Rahul | Aerius Labs

4.3K posts

Rahul | Aerius Labs banner
Rahul | Aerius Labs

Rahul | Aerius Labs

@Rahul__Ghangas

Utility maxxing 🔧, Stressed Dictator - @AeriusLabs, prev - @CelestiaOrg, @renprotocol | Building @Trade_VEX @FluxePay

Katılım Ekim 2020
912 Takip Edilen2.4K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Rahul | Aerius Labs
Rahul | Aerius Labs@Rahul__Ghangas·
This is something we have been working very very hard on for some time, and glad that it will be finally out soon. Call it the appchain thesis, fractal scaling, the evolution of the rollup centric roadmap, "It's all just Bridges" or just FAST ORDERBOOKS GO BRRRRRRR...to each their own From the very start of VEX, we wanted a differentiator that set us aside from other CLOBs. Something that is unique to us and would eventually become our architectural moat. There are many more components to being a successful product, still have to figure those out. This is just validation that the original vision was in the right direction. An experience that rivals centralized operators A system that cannot cheat the user Faster, cheaper, more secure than the competition All on crypto native rails Still here, still building, still hungry.
VEX@Trade_VEX

22k real time provable TPS has been achieved internally 22k signatures 22k orders 1 second Now let’s double it

English
1
1
10
3.9K
Rahul | Aerius Labs retweetledi
Fluxe
Fluxe@FluxePay·
GM Fluxe Fam✳️ We have some exciting new teasers dropping later 🤫 Stayed tuned and remember, study Fluxe
English
1
1
4
178
Rahul | Aerius Labs retweetledi
Fluxe
Fluxe@FluxePay·
Imagine just sending funds anywhere No blockscans, no one looking over your shoulder. Just sending funds confirmed privately between the sender and recipient Now stop imagining and look at Fluxe
English
0
2
5
184
Rahul | Aerius Labs retweetledi
Fluxe
Fluxe@FluxePay·
Secure your future Study Fluxe
Fluxe tweet media
English
0
3
5
131
Rahul | Aerius Labs retweetledi
Fluxe
Fluxe@FluxePay·
Privacy meta
0
1
4
118
Rahul | Aerius Labs retweetledi
Rahul | Aerius Labs retweetledi
Fluxe
Fluxe@FluxePay·
We may have been silent for a bit, but we were never gone True builders buidl no matter the market conditions. Fluxe is SO back
Fluxe tweet media
English
2
3
8
261
Rahul | Aerius Labs
Rahul | Aerius Labs@Rahul__Ghangas·
I’ve tried this argument a lot of times to only come to the conclusion time and again that this could never work. The marginalised portion would keep getting pushed to worse since the elected representatives (by the others) can’t be guaranteed to have their best interests at heart and then the cycle repeats indefinitely.
English
0
0
0
42
Rahul | Aerius Labs retweetledi
Mitchell Hashimoto
Mitchell Hashimoto@mitchellh·
Fork your dependencies, trim them to only your use case, never update unless it breaks for your users. I’ve been vocal about this for 10+ years. I’ve always said that updating is way riskier than latent bugs (which can be tracked and CVEs monitored). If you are updating a dependency, it’s on you to analyze every single commit in the full transitive set of dependencies. If you dont see anything compelling, dont update! I remember at HashiCorp once in awhile an engineer would try to update a dep or replace a DIY lib with an external one and id always ask “show me the commit we need.” Dont update for the sake of it. Feeling pretty swell about this mentality with all the supply chain attacks happening.
English
291
780
8.9K
1.2M
勾
@colludingnode·
When you're in a making excuses for mediocrity competition and your opponent is a Stage 1 rollup or Solana DeFi protocol
English
5
1
25
1.3K
Rahul | Aerius Labs retweetledi
alin.apt
alin.apt@alinush·
ECDSA signatures (and why you should avoid them)
Charles Guillemet@P3b7_

This morning, THORChain was drained of roughly $10.8m Node operators have freezed the network for nearly 13 hours. The full analysis isn't out yet, but according to @jpthor, this could be a MPC exploit. ECDSA and TSS is hard. THORChain's vaults rely on TSS, a flavor of MPC where a quorum of nodes jointly produces a signature without ever reconstructing the private key. Clean for Schnorr or EdDSA; painful for ECDSA, which Bitcoin and Ethereum require. That's why we saw plenty of protocol attempts (Lindell17, GG18, GG20, CMP, CGGMP21, DKLS, KU23...), each patching flaws in the previous one. GG20 has a track record. THORChain's TSS uses GG20, on a fork of Binance's tss-lib. GG20 has shipped two well-publicized critical bugs: CVE-2023-33241 and TSSHOCK. CGGMP21, now cggmp24, are the latest protocols, but GG20 is still widely deployed. I often hear a misconception when I hear about MPC setup: "The key is split across many nodes, so any single co-signer doesn't really matter". In every published GG18/GG20 attack, one malicious or compromised co-signer is enough to extract everyone else's shard and reconstruct the full key. AI changes the threat model. Compromising a full software node, complex Go stack, exposed P2P, custom signing daemons, a churn protocol that admits new participants on a schedule, has always been difficult and acted as a barrier. With LLM-driven vulnerability discovery and exploit synthesis, the bar to compromise one of N validators is dropping fast. Here, it's a plausible TSSHOCK-style playbook: - compromise one operator - wait for it to churn into an active Asgard vault - send malformed proofs during keygen or signing - reconstruct the key offline - sweep in a single transaction It's unclear yet if the attacker used a known-unpatched GG20 weakness, or a fresh cryptographic flaw. But, in all cases, MPC and TSS are not a substitute for hardening every co-signer. They sit on top of co-signers that must each be treated as critical infrastructure, hardware-isolated enclaves, minimally exposed, continuously audited, and running protocol with security proofs. While the investigation progresses, be careful in your interactions onchain. These TSS setup are used in various protocols.

English
4
6
27
5.4K
Rahul | Aerius Labs retweetledi
Mitchell Hashimoto
Mitchell Hashimoto@mitchellh·
I strongly believe there are entire companies right now under heavy AI psychosis and its impossible to have rational conversations about it with them. I can't name any specific people because they include personal friends I deeply respect, but I worry about how this plays out. I lived through the great MTBF vs MTTR (mean-time-between-failure vs. mean-time-to-recovery) reckoning of infrastructure during the transition to cloud and cloud automation. All those arguments are rearing their ugly heads again but now its... the whole software development industry (maybe the whole world, really). It's frightening, because the psychosis folks operate under an almost absolute "MTTR is all you need" mentality: "its fine to ship bugs because the agents will fix them so quickly and at a scale humans can't do!" We learned in infrastructure that MTTR is great but you can't yeet resilient systems entirely. The main issue is I don't even know how to bring this up to people I know personally, because bringing this topic up leads to immediately dismissals like "no no, it has full test coverage" or "bug reports are going down" or something, which just don't paint the whole picture. We already learned this lesson once in infrastructure: you can automate yourself into a very resilient catastrophe machine. Systems can appear healthy by local metrics while globally becoming incomprehensible. Bug reports can go down while latent risk explodes. Test coverage can rise while semantic understanding falls. Changes happens so fast that nobody notices the underlying architecture decaying. I worry.
English
513
1.9K
15.3K
1.6M
Rahul | Aerius Labs retweetledi
Andrew Lewis-Pye
Andrew Lewis-Pye@AndrewLewisPye·
Want a gentle intro to distributed computing for blockchain? I've been turning my notes "Consensus in 50 pages" into a short book called “A Quick Consensus”. Most of the way through, and what's there should already serve as a rigorous but accessible intro to the essentials. Covered: Tendermint, PBFT, HotStuff, Simplex, accountability, player reconfiguration, asynchronous SMR (and a bunch more). Still to add: erasure coding, DAG protocols, 2-round finality, recovery, and the Pipes model. Current draft (updated frequently): Lewis-Pye.com
English
6
21
102
18K
Rahul | Aerius Labs retweetledi
Mitchell Hashimoto
Mitchell Hashimoto@mitchellh·
It isn't unexpected that the focus of the Bun Rust rewrite is on the anti-Zig side more than anything, since the internet loves to hate. What is unexpected and unfortunate is that leadership within Bun hasn't tried to steer the conversation away from that at all. There are so many positive and interesting takeaways from this and I'm not really seeing any of them pushed as the primary message. A positive thing that hasn't been talked about at all is how far Bun came thanks to Zig. And even if you dump it now, its meaningful for how good Zig was to even build a product to this point and impact by any metric. I would've loved to see anyone in leadership say this. On the interesting side is how fungible programming languages are nowadays. Programming languages used to be LOCK IN, and they're increasingly not so. You think the Bun rewrite in Rust is good for Rust? Bun has shown they can be in probably any language they want in roughly a week or two. Rust is expendable. Its useful until its not then it can be thrown out. That's interesting! There's been a lot of talk about memory safety and no doubt Rust provides more guarantees than Zig. But I'd love to see a better analysis of why Bun in particular suffered so much rather than take the language-blame path. How could engineering as a practice been more rigorous to prevent this? What were the largest sources of crashes other programs should watch out for? How does Rust prevent them? How could Zig theoretically prevent them? That's interesting. I know the official blog post hasn't come out yet from Bun. But they're smart enough to know that that PR would stir up controversy the moment it opened, or they should've been. And plenty in the company have been tweeting and writing about it. Its somewhat telling to me in various dimensions what they chose to talk about first. I tend to think I'm pretty good at corporate PR/comms (especially when it comes to developer audiences) and I think appealing to the negative is never the right long term strategy; it does work to get short term eyes though.
English
111
246
3.6K
382K
Rahul | Aerius Labs
Rahul | Aerius Labs@Rahul__Ghangas·
"An FTX penthouse high-riser, yeah / Samuel Bankman, free all my guys up, yeah / I'm in a sold-out show with your girl on a riser" - Drake
English
0
0
2
97
Rahul | Aerius Labs retweetledi
aramadana
aramadana@rmzcrypt·
Massive news: Türkiye is the first state to anchor its official archives to @ethereum! @iletisim moved 130+ publications to IPFS with cryptographic proofs settled on Ethereum mainnet. 🇹🇷⛓️ From "trust us" to "verify us" via public, permissionless infrastructure. Huge!
ZuKaş 2026 | September@zuzalukas

A sovereign state just anchored its official archives to @ethereum . Türkiye's Presidential Communications Directorate has moved 130 institutional publications onto IPFS, with cryptographic proofs settled on Ethereum mainnet — making Türkiye the first state to transition official institutional records to verifiable proof on a public, permissionless L1. The authenticity and integrity of these records can now be independently verified by anyone. This is what state-level endorsement of decentralized infrastructure actually looks like.

English
0
7
40
3.9K
Rahul | Aerius Labs retweetledi
James Prestwich
James Prestwich@_prestwich·
you set out to build a trustless bridge and then you end up with some frankenstein altair oracle zk proof mess and you STILL need upgrade keys to it because Ethereum plans to deprecate it's entire consensus system (again)
English
4
8
43
5.5K