Jericho 🇷🇺

@slave_2_liberty Why didn’t they film the rocket leaving Earth from that ISS station? All fakery

These pictures are absolutely stunning and compelling.

@MagaGrunt1 Zionist

🇺🇸Nothing Iran can do. When the Marines take the shore you’re out of luck. These men are truly weapons of war. The title Marine was never given but earned.🇺🇸

@AmericaSpoof Stop terror attacks on Iran.

🚨 BREAKING Iran has been given just 24 hours After that, the world could witness one of the most devastating airstrikes ever. No more warnings. No more delays. The countdown has begun.

@NASA Why didn’t they film the rocket leaving Earth from that ISS station? All fakery

The Moon is special in so many ways. Scientifically, it provides opportunities we simply don't have on Earth. It's near enough to reach with robotic explorers and humans. And for all of us on Earth, it's special because it's ours. 🩶

These moon landing deniers shouldn’t be allowed to breath. Now that this confirmed picture has been sent down to us from artimis, they have NOTHING left to do except hate themselves. If the moon landing is fake, how do you explain THIS?!

@WarMonitors Why didn’t they film the rocket leaving Earth from that ISS station? All fakery

Your iq is automatically capped at double digits if you think the moon landings were fake.

@Vulcan_hobo Why didn’t they film the rocket leaving Earth from that ISS station? All fakery

Idiots don't understand how reflections work. 🤣🤦

@MelonieMac A Jew is someone that rejects Christ.

Jesus was a Jew

@MelonieMac Melonie is a Zionist skank.

@kimmie_c_ Why didn’t they film the rocket leaving Earth from that ISS station? All fakery

I will not argue with flat earthers. I will not argue with flat earthers. I will not argue with flat earthers. I will not argue with flat earthers.

@gustav0cardenas Why didn’t they film the rocket leaving Earth from that ISS station? All fakery

¿Cómo sé que el ser humano pisó la Luna? Porque aprendí a distinguir evidencia real de sospecha automática. El pensamiento crítico no es andar diciendo “yo dudo de todo” como si fuera una postura intelectual. Es evaluar pruebas con calma. Y acá sobran: rocas lunares estudiadas por laboratorios de distintos países, retroreflectores que siguen funcionando y que cualquier observatorio puede apuntar con un láser, imágenes de misiones chinas, indias y japonesas mostrando los sitios de alunizaje, y un ecosistema entero de ingenieros y científicos que trabajaron en esto sin que nadie haya salido a “confesar” nada en más de medio siglo. Dudar sin criterio no te vuelve crítico, te vuelve caprichoso. Si tu estándar es “no creo nada”, terminás negando la gravedad, Australia y hasta tu propio certificado de nacimiento. Pensar críticamente no es repetir “no me convence”. Es preguntarte con honestidad: ¿qué evidencia existe y qué tan sólida es? Y en este caso, la evidencia no solo es sólida: es abrumadora.

@pbeisel Why didn’t they film the rocket leaving Earth from that ISS station? All fakery

For all you highly moronic moon conspiracy theorists... The moon landings happened. Here are four bulletproof reasons why the hoax theory collapses under its own weight. 1. We brought back 842 pounds of moon rocks and geologists worldwide have been slicing them open for 55 years Apollo 11–17 crews hauled back samples that scream "lunar origin" in every isotope, crystal structure, and chemical signature. These rocks have zero water content (Earth rocks almost always have some), solar wind particles embedded from billions of years of unfiltered space exposure, and microscopic glass beads formed by ancient meteorite impacts— stuff impossible to replicate with 1960s tech. Independent labs in the Soviet Union, Europe, Japan, and China analyzed them and confirmed: same age (3.7–4.5 billion years), same exotic minerals like armalcolite, same lack of oxidation. If NASA faked it, they'd have needed a secret lunar rock factory decades ahead of its time. Conspiracy theorists never explain how we pulled that off while simultaneously "faking" the tech to get there. These samples are still studied today in museums and universities— you can touch (protected) pieces yourself. 2. Laser reflectors are still on the Moon, and anyone with the right equipment can ping them right now Apollo 11, 14, and 15 crews placed corner-cube retroreflectors on the lunar surface. These are passive mirrors (no batteries, no moving parts) that bounce laser beams straight back to Earth. Observatories like McDonald in Texas, Apache Point in New Mexico, and facilities in France, Italy, and Australia have been firing lasers at them daily since 1969 and measuring the round-trip time to millimeter precision. The data proves the distance to the Moon (about 384,400 km) and how it's slowly receding (3.8 cm/year). China’s Chang’e missions and India’s Chandrayaan have imaged the exact landing sites, including the hardware and tracks. If it was faked, the hoaxers would have needed to secretly land mirrors on the Moon— or convince every laser-ranging scientist on Earth to lie for half a century. Spoiler: they didn’t. 3. Modern orbiters from multiple countries have photographed the landing sites in high resolution—footprints and all NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) has snapped razor-sharp images of every Apollo site since 2009. You can see the descent stages, rover tracks, astronaut footprints, and even the exact paths they walked. Japan’s SELENE, India’s Chandrayaan-2, and China’s Chang’e-2 and Chang’e-3 orbiters independently confirmed the same shadows, hardware, and disturbance patterns. These aren’t blurry NASA photos from 1969, they’re crisp, multi-spectral images taken decades later by rival space agencies. The geometry matches perfectly: the flag is still there (Apollo 11’s fell over during liftoff), the rover is parked where they left it, and the blast craters under the landers are exactly as predicted. A studio set on Earth couldn’t survive that level of global scrutiny from space. 4. The conspiracy would have been bigger, dumber, and leakier than the actual mission Over 400,000 people worked on Apollo. That’s engineers, technicians, contractors, secretaries, and janitors across dozens of companies and universities. Not one deathbed confession, not one leaked memo, not one whistleblower with hard proof in 55+ years? That’s statistically insane. The Soviets were tracking every second of the missions in real time with their own radar and radio telescopes— they hated America’s guts and would have screamed "fake" at the first glitch if they could. Instead, they congratulated the U.S. and kept quiet. Faking it would have required inventing better special effects, vacuum chambers, and propulsion tech than what actually existed while hiding it from the very people who built the real rockets. Occam’s razor doesn’t just cut here; it eviscerates the hoax. The footage, the rocks, the reflectors, the photos, the tracking data— they all line up perfectly because the landings were real. The moon is still up there, waiting for the next crew. The evidence isn’t "believable", it’s undeniable. If you’re still on the fence, go look at an LRO image of Tranquility Base or bounce a laser off those reflectors yourself. Remember: conspiracy theory is the sophistication of the ignorant.

@LeftwaffenWatch Why didn’t they film the rocket leaving Earth from that ISS station? All fakery

I keep seeing the same absolutely retarded moon landing denier arguments ‘wHeRe aRe tHe stArs’? ‘hOw diD thEY gET tHE cAR up there’? ‘lANdLInE cALl fRoM tHe mOOn’? ‘It’S mADE oF tInFOiL’ All that nonsense can be debunked with five minutes of research, and I don’t mean TikTok videos How did people get so moronic?

@ThoughtPillow Boomers still believe in sci fi space crap. 😂

“We can’t leave earth” - We have “Space exploration is fake. NASA is using CGI” - But you actively use GPS everyday (Bolt, Yango, Uber). “There are no satellites in space” - But when they tell you it will rain, you ran inside - You watch TV - You use heart monitors “Okay if NASA is real, explain this (attaches an edited video of Buzz Aldrin 🤣) ” - Your videos are altered or taken out of context, full videos are available to watch. Go and search On top of it all, whether you believe or not, they’ll keep funding NASA with your money and there’s nothing you can do about it.

@alexboge How do you have air pressure without a container? End of debate.

“Do you believe in the firmament?” A reminder to anyone thinking about engaging in a debate - ask that question first. Before you spend time explaining, sourcing, or breaking things down, start there. If the answer is yes, you’re done. There’s no discussion to be had. You’re not dealing with someone evaluating evidence - you’re dealing with someone committed to a literal, unfalsifiable structure placed over reality, sourced from authority they consider beyond question. That belief isn’t being tested. It’s being protected. And once you recognize that, everything else becomes obvious: Nothing you show them will matter. Nothing you explain will land. Nothing you say will move the needle. At that point, the most rational response isn’t to keep going. It’s to stop. Or, if you feel like acknowledging it: “Ah, got it.”

@ChrisMartzWX Outer space? Where does Outer space begin my friend? These rockets all land in the Bermuda triangle. You need to grow up. Quit playing with the Easter bunny and Santa Claus and wake up. Be an adult.

Every flat Earth retard should be strapped onto a rocket ship and blasted into outer space.

@invis4yo Free will. And we know that slavery was greatly exaggerated in America. We know who the real slavers are. Come on, man.

Were they watching during slavery?

@thescottbarber Most of science is fake. You weren’t around during the fake Covid virus? Are you serious?

Curiously, every moon landing denier also failed high school science.

@mjfree No, Jesus was blonde hair with blue eyes just like me. Stop trying to steal my culture.

Trump would have deported Jesus Christ Skin tone: Olive to medium-brown Hair: Dark brown to black, likely short and curly/wavy Eyes: Brown Facial hair: Beard (typical for Jewish men of the time) Forensic reconstruction by Richard Neave

@ManaByte You can’t have air pressure without a container.

Earth isn’t flat, the Moon landing wasn’t faked, and space isn’t some CGI dome. These claims fall apart the moment you look at the technology we use every day. None of it works unless Earth is a sphere in a real cosmos. Start with GPS. Your phone calculates your position by comparing timing signals from satellites orbiting Earth. Those satellites move at precise speeds and altitudes that only make sense in a real vacuum. If Earth were flat or if space were fake, GPS would fail instantly. No navigation, no rideshare apps, no airline routing, no global timing systems. The entire system depends on orbital mechanics that match what physics predicts for a spherical planet. Satellite internet, satellite TV, and weather forecasting all rely on the same reality. We watch storms form from orbit. We track hurricanes across oceans using data from satellites operated by different countries and private companies. These systems agree with each other because they are observing the same real planet from space. If space were fake, every meteorologist, every aerospace engineer, every telecom company, every airline, and every military on Earth would have to coordinate a perfect lie for decades. That is not possible. Now to the claim that NASA fakes photos of Earth. This is one of the easiest conspiracy theories to debunk because NASA is not the only source of Earth images. Not even close. Dozens of countries and private companies have their own satellites that photograph Earth constantly. Weather satellites from Europe, Japan, India, and South Korea all produce their own full‑disk images. Private companies like Maxar and Planet Labs take high resolution photos of Earth every day for commercial clients. Amateur radio operators receive live images directly from NOAA satellites using equipment you can buy online. None of these systems rely on NASA. None of them match a single centralized source. Yet they all show the same spherical Earth from different angles at different times. If NASA were faking Earth photos, every other space agency and every private satellite operator would have to fake them too. They would also have to coordinate the lighting, cloud patterns, storm movements, and surface features in perfect sync. That is not happening. The simplest explanation is the correct one. Multiple independent systems are photographing the same real planet. The Moon landing is even harder to deny once you look at the tech. We still interact with the equipment the astronauts left behind. Observatories fire lasers at the retroreflectors sitting on the lunar surface and receive the return signal at the exact predicted intervals. This is not a theory. It is a measurement that universities and independent facilities repeat all the time. You cannot fake a laser return from nearly 240,000 miles away. Even the internet used to spread these conspiracies relies on space infrastructure. Undersea cables carry most traffic, but satellites handle the rest. The timing, routing, and handoff between systems only work because the satellites are actually in orbit. If space did not exist, the global communications network would collapse. The irony is simple. The technology that flat Earth believers and Moon landing deniers use to post their claims is the same technology that proves them wrong. The evidence is not hidden. It is built into the functioning of the modern world. You can reject the conclusions, but you cannot reject the infrastructure that makes your phone, your internet, your weather alerts, your maps, your flights, and your entire digital life possible. These conspiracies do not just fail scientifically. They fail technologically, mathematically, and logistically. They only survive when people stop paying attention to the systems they rely on every day.