Rema (Rao) Chaari

580 posts

Rema (Rao) Chaari

Rema (Rao) Chaari

@Raodyisms

An extroverted pathologist, podcaster, yoga enthusiast, BollyX instructor..and a classic ENFP!!! #cytopath #pathology

Cleveland, OH Katılım Eylül 2009
554 Takip Edilen635 Takipçiler
Rema (Rao) Chaari retweetledi
Scott Kilpatrick, MD
Scott Kilpatrick, MD@ScottBikeethan·
majority of tumors in our classification system were described and well documented prior to being also confirmed as having molecular drivers. For sure, molecular testing has helped clarify boundaries, but the classification system has expanded not contracted, with only a
English
2
3
8
913
FAN TRUMP ARMY
FAN TRUMP ARMY@TRUMP_ARMY_·
🚨 BREAKING: The new Florida law that allows for the DEATH PENALTY for adults who rape children under the age of 12 is now in effect. DO YOU SUPPORT THIS? A. YES B. NO
FAN TRUMP ARMY tweet media
English
34.7K
15.1K
197.1K
5M
Pepe Jiménez Heffernan
Pepe Jiménez Heffernan@pepeheffernan·
CC367. EBUS-TBNA of mediastinal nodes in an old woman with an extra pulmonary known tumor. Rhabdoid cells: abundant, dense cytoplasm occupied by filaments that pushes the nucleus. Discohesive; usually big nucleoli. This is not a melanoma, so think of other "usual rhabdoids"
Pepe Jiménez Heffernan tweet mediaPepe Jiménez Heffernan tweet mediaPepe Jiménez Heffernan tweet mediaPepe Jiménez Heffernan tweet media
English
15
19
47
4.3K
Rema (Rao) Chaari retweetledi
JClinPath_BMJ
JClinPath_BMJ@JClinPath_BMJ·
📊 The Area Under the Curve (AUC) is a single number that shows how well a model can tell categories apart. It combines sensitivity (finding true positives) and specificity (avoiding false positives) into one overall score. A perfect model has an AUC of 1.0—no missed diagnoses, no false alarms. The higher the AUC, the more accurate and reliable the model is across all threshold settings. Think of it as the model’s “diagnostic precision” score!
JClinPath_BMJ tweet media
English
0
4
9
956
Pepe Jiménez Heffernan
Pepe Jiménez Heffernan@pepeheffernan·
CC361. FNA of a nodule in the cheek in a woman with previous history of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. More images below. I will give you a hint: not its typical location @kriyer68 @DrBMcGinn @goziemnweke
Pepe Jiménez Heffernan tweet mediaPepe Jiménez Heffernan tweet media
English
11
29
66
4.9K
Rema (Rao) Chaari retweetledi
Scott Kilpatrick, MD
Scott Kilpatrick, MD@ScottBikeethan·
If you decide to seek a second opinion for a life altering diagnosis, I highly recommend that you have your original pathology diagnosis, when applicable, also reviewed. At many institutions this is (and should be) standard practice.
English
7
12
111
8.4K
Rema (Rao) Chaari
Rema (Rao) Chaari@Raodyisms·
@JosephMisdraji What a great moment this is for you! I am so excited for your new ventures and I can’t wait for my turn 😉 enjoy the time!!
English
0
0
1
95
Joseph Misdraji
Joseph Misdraji@JosephMisdraji·
Happy Easter. I thought I would take this opportunity to announce that I am retiring from pathology at the end of this academic year. I have had a great career but it’s time to find joy pursuing other interests. I wish you all the best in your careers. Joe
English
10
2
43
2.9K
Rema (Rao) Chaari retweetledi
Scott Robertson
Scott Robertson@ScotRobertsonMD·
We built a fast web-based application for searching pathology reports. Works especially well with Epic data. Contact me if you want to learn more. #Pathology Manuscript Link: doi.org/10.1016/j.jpi.…
Scott Robertson tweet mediaScott Robertson tweet media
English
1
25
50
6.8K
Rema (Rao) Chaari retweetledi
Sanjay Mukhopadhyay
Sanjay Mukhopadhyay@smlungpathguy·
@Vik_deshpandeMD Crucial to this approach is vastly overstating the value of NGS and targeted therapy. How many low grade neoplasms with a fusion do we need and how does it help the patient when they are all treated exactly the same?
English
1
3
44
4.7K
Rema (Rao) Chaari retweetledi
Vikram Deshpande
Vikram Deshpande@Vik_deshpandeMD·
Very true—but patients are aspirational, and so are their clinicians. People want the best, and the WHO has positioned itself as the gold standard in tumor classification. I’ve seen families willing to spend a lifetime’s savings on a single genetic test, just to give their child a shot at the best treatment. That’s how much weight the WHO carries. Which is why it’s deeply troubling that so much of its current framework is based on low-quality evidence and personal opinion. That’s not just poor science—it’s unfair.
English
1
3
26
2K
Rema (Rao) Chaari retweetledi
Dr. Shalini Radhakrishnan, MD
Dr. Shalini Radhakrishnan, MD@shalinirkr21·
@Vik_deshpandeMD I couldn't agree more! The WHO blue books, over the years, have become more glossy, hyper-specialized, and genetically obsessive; they now read like love letters to billion-dollar biotech firms. Problem is, the rest of the world isn’t reading along. Because we can't.
English
4
5
37
3.3K
Rema (Rao) Chaari retweetledi
Vikram Deshpande
Vikram Deshpande@Vik_deshpandeMD·
Controversial but crucial: The new WHO Blue Books heavily rely on molecular diagnostics, tools inaccessible to up to 80% of the world’s population. Instead of addressing global inequality, they risk deepening it. Radical, inclusive change is urgently needed.
English
34
92
410
47.8K