RaresatsGhost

568 posts

RaresatsGhost banner
RaresatsGhost

RaresatsGhost

@RaresatsGhost

Katılım Kasım 2023
1.2K Takip Edilen602 Takipçiler
RaresatsGhost
RaresatsGhost@RaresatsGhost·
This is really interesting, though Satoshi’s answer is neither important nor decisive.
Vincent (Cryptolution) 👑@Cryptolution

December 9, 2010. A user asks Satoshi Nakamoto why Bitcoin shouldn't just allow 64 or 128 bytes of "arbitrary data" in a transaction. His answer, verbatim: "I also support a third transaction type for timestamp hash sized arbitrary data. There's no point not having one since you can already do it anyway. It would tell nodes they don't need to bother to index it." Read the design spec inside that answer. Small. Standardized. Not indexed by nodes. Bitcoin Core shipped that exact spec in March 2014. It's called OP_RETURN. #Runes lives entirely inside OP_RETURN. One runestone per transaction, prunable, zero UTXO bloat, full market fees. #Ordinals pays the same toll through witness space. The only gatekeeper Satoshi ever wrote into the system was the fee. Both pay it. Now read BIP110. It proposes to reject the exact transaction class Satoshi said he supports, from the channel built to his own spec. That is not enforcing Satoshi's design. That is reversing it. And we already ran this experiment. In this same December 2010 thread, miners holding double digit hashrate publicly refused to filter non-standard transactions. Satoshi's response was not a crackdown. It was the quote above. Fees settled this in 2010. Fees are settling it again in 2026. Source: satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcoint…

English
0
0
1
156
RaresatsGhost
RaresatsGhost@RaresatsGhost·
Bitcoin’s deepest moat has never been technological superiority. It is the result of more than a decade of accumulated historical path dependence, institutional inertia, consensus cost, and ownerlessness. This is what elevates Bitcoin from a mere “technological asset” into an “institutional asset” — and even a “civilizational protocol.” Rare sats are born from Bitcoin itself. The higher Bitcoin’s value classification and historical significance become, the higher the ultimate value of rare sats as its native artifact layer will be.
BullCryptozor@BullCryptozor

x.com/i/article/2074…

English
1
2
8
837
TKtokyo
TKtokyo@tktokyoBTC·
Bitcoin/Ordinals Newsフィード (6/28 08:01 JST) IBIT 平均投資家が約40%の含み損を抱え、スポット BTC ETF は週間17.9億ドルの純流出と開始以来2番目の規模に達した。 前日の新規保有者の含み損に続き、ETF からの資金引き上げが7週連続と過去最長を更新するなか、機関マネーの後退が数字で可視化された節目である。 今朝はそのほか、ワルシュ元 FRB 議長による「40歳未満の新たな金」発言、過去13年データが示す赤月の偏りなど3件を取り上げる。 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ▸ IBIT平均投資家が約40%の損失、ETF流出が過去2番目の規模に ブラックロックのIBIT平均投資家が約40%の損失を抱えており、スポットビットコインETFは6月26日終了週に17.9億ドルの純流出を記録した。これは2024年1月開始以来2番目に大きい規模で、7週連続の流出ランニングは過去最長となった。金曜日の単日流出は4.445億ドルに達し、IBITからのみ発生した。イーサリアムETFも7週連続の流出を続け、ハイパーリキッドなどの新興ファンドは一部で流入を記録した。 theblock.co/post/406451/av… ▸ 連邦準備制度理事会元議長ワルシュ氏「40歳未満にとってビットコインは新たな金」 連邦準備制度理事会元議長のケビン・ワルシュ氏が、40歳未満の世代にとってビットコインは新たな金であると指摘した。若い世代は金ではなくビットコインを購入しており、次世代の価値貯蔵手段として位置づけられるという見方が示された。 x.com/i/status/20708… ▸ 過去13年のデータでビットコインの赤月は10月・2月・7月のみ 過去13年のビットコイン価格データ分析により、10月・2月・7月のみが一貫して赤字月となり、他の月はノイズであることが明らかになった。投資家に対し、来る相場への備えを促す内容の投稿が注目を集めている。 x.com/i/status/20708… ▸ Rare Satsの希少性はOrdinalsプロトコルとRodarmorレアリティ指数で定義 ビットコイン上のRare Satsは通常のサトシとは異なり、Ordinalsプロトコルと@rodarmor氏が作成したRodarmorレアリティ指数により希少性が定義される。このシステムはビットコインネットワークでの作成時期に基づいてサトシをランク付けする仕組みである。 x.com/i/status/20708… - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 過去アーカイブは: ordbase.jp/news/ #ビットコイン #Ordinals
EDK@EDKbtc_

did you know that rare sats on bitcoin are not your average satoshis they stand out because of their rarity defined by the ordinals protocol and the rodarmor rarity index created by @rodarmor this system ranks satoshis based on when they were created in the bitcoin network uncommon sats are the first one in every mined block rare sats are the first after each difficulty adjustment period which occurs roughly every two weeks epic sats mark the beginning of new eras after each halving which happens every four years legendary sats are even rarer marking cycle changes and the mythic sat is the one and only sat zero from bitcoins genesis block these rare sats have become popular collectibles because they can be inscribed with unique data such as art or messages turning them into digital assets on the bitcoin blockchain their limited supply and historical significance make higher tier ones extremely valuable with some epic sats fetching prices in the millions of dollars beyond the main index collectors also seek out pizza sats connected to the iconic bitcoin pizza day and palindrome sats that have numbers reading the same forwards and backwards whether you are a bitcoin maximalist or a digital collector rare sats offer a fascinating way to engage with bitcoins past and future get started by learning about ordinals wallets and marketplaces to hunt these treasures (image powered by @xverse)

日本語
1
1
3
614
RaresatsGhost
RaresatsGhost@RaresatsGhost·
@ord_net If this feature were applied to Rare Sats, it would be both practical and fun.
English
1
0
4
91
◉RD
◉RD@ord_net·
P2P trading is live on ◉RD ↔️ Trading is a fun part of collecting, & now you can swap Ordinals with confidence, publicly or privately 🤝 Make asks by collections, traits, or specific inscriptions, with the option to add/request BTC. Review your trade before final acceptance 🪄
English
24
34
130
6.9K
Avii
Avii@AviiWeb3·
@tktokyoBTC rare sats are digital artifacts with real scarcity, love seeing the culture evolve
English
1
0
2
73
RaresatsGhost
RaresatsGhost@RaresatsGhost·
@NakaSompo @midwit Rare Sats exist independently by their very nature. They rely on no platform, and not even on Ordinals itself. They are an inevitable emergence from the structure and history of the Bitcoin protocol.
English
0
0
2
38
Midwit
Midwit@midwit·
I was just kicked from the Magic Eden server for discussing the lawsuit. I am one of the biggest $ME holders and stakers. AMA
English
79
26
493
41.4K
RaresatsGhost
RaresatsGhost@RaresatsGhost·
@furbi59360 Honestly, I’m a Rare Sats collector, but your Rare Sats feature is not very user-friendly.
English
1
0
2
30
thepiratebay.btc
thepiratebay.btc@thepiratebaybtc·
@BitcoinBombadil Filters up! We want to make sure our inputs aren't including rare sats. They would have us absentmindedly include rare sats in CEX deposits, which are then sequester. Unverified sats in, common sats out will be looked back on as the greatest digital fleecing of our time.
English
1
0
1
42
₿itcoin ₿ombadil
₿itcoin ₿ombadil@BitcoinBombadil·
If Bitcoin can stay decentralized, then it can fulfill its objective monetary purpose. Knots + BIP-110 + DATUM + Ocean + Datacarrier = 0 helps Bitcoin stay decentralized better than Core v.30+ Filters up!🛡️
English
3
7
37
473
bitoshi blockamoto 🧱 BITMAP 🟧
@six0Bitmap I think about this a lot. Ultimately, a district represents a block, and there isn't any other way through sats that comes close to owning a block. It's the difference between a top down approach, versus a bottom up approach. Lots to explore here.
English
3
1
5
297
bitoshi blockamoto 🧱 BITMAP 🟧
Today's codex prompt. Something I've been thinking about a lot. Satmap is bitmap, without the bitmap. It's simply a map of sats. I have to do this for my own sanity, and to figure out how much of bitmap is narrative over functionality. Does bitmap survive if sats do it better?
bitoshi blockamoto 🧱 BITMAP 🟧 tweet media
English
11
6
51
2.6K
Ncrypt.Unc ~🌱 ツ
Ncrypt.Unc ~🌱 ツ@NcryptUnc·
I live in constant fear of listing and selling an uncommon only for Casey to come out later and say it had over 5 types of super interesting rarities. That’s why I just accumulate and hodl until there are more rarity filters 😂
Casey@rodarmor

🍀 LUCKY SATS 🍀 Each uncommon or rarer sat now has a luck score, equal to the luck of the block it was mined in. Lucky blocks have more leading binary zeros in the block hash than required by the difficulty target. 🧵

English
1
2
5
262
RaresatsGhost
RaresatsGhost@RaresatsGhost·
Your Ordinals Theory Handbook is what made me fall in love with Rare Sats. As you said, Rare Sats are Bitcoin’s native numismatic layer. Naturally, some people will feel called to collect them. And you were right: throughout human history, every civilization’s money has eventually formed its own layer of collectible monetary artifacts. Truly hope to see more of your thinking and building around Rare Sats. Much love and deep respect!
English
0
1
20
574
Casey
Casey@rodarmor·
🍀 LUCKY SATS 🍀 Each uncommon or rarer sat now has a luck score, equal to the luck of the block it was mined in. Lucky blocks have more leading binary zeros in the block hash than required by the difficulty target. 🧵
English
48
53
311
45.4K
KPM◉◉N
KPM◉◉N@KPMoon·
Every collector eventually learns: Rarity matters. Provenance matters. Historical significance matters. Ordinals combine all three. 🟠🌊
English
3
3
32
1.4K
lifofifo ◉
lifofifo ◉@lifofifo·
@hodlonaut Thank you for hosting all my jpegs. On your node and in your head. Rent free.
English
3
1
42
670
hodlonaut #BIP-110
hodlonaut #BIP-110@hodlonaut·
To be smeared by people who wants to facilitate JPEGs on Bitcoin is a badge of honor. Bitcoin is money. That’s the contract with the node runners. Not free spam storage.
English
33
96
535
11.3K
RaresatsGhost
RaresatsGhost@RaresatsGhost·
@CreatorBitcoin well said. Well said. Those who were meant to leave have left, and those who were meant to stay remain.
English
0
0
5
71
Creator
Creator@CreatorBitcoin·
I spent quite a bit thinking about this. I was there from almost the beginning and just barely experienced the spreadsheet trading. What am I missing? For that, I have to compare to now: - Ordinals are onchain, so we all still have that and don't have to miss it. The best collections made back then are still there. - The founders, artists, collectors who truly believe in Ordinals are still there. - The paid influencers, tourists, extractors have left, because there is nothing left to extract. - The biggest marketplace that ultimately turned out not to care about Ordinals has left and been replaced by marketplaces built by real Ordinals believers and many times better than what was there. - There was a lot more liquidity, a lot more trading and a lot more pumps, but if that was all so real, why did everyone leave... And where have the gains gone. I think this is a great time, a real beginning, with people who understand Ordinals, believe in it and want to make it successful together. But in a way that is sustainable. So what am I missing from the early Ordinals era? Nothing.
7 (Barbra)@thatwagmigirl

What do you miss the most about early Ordinals era ?

English
6
6
31
1.9K
KPM◉◉N
KPM◉◉N@KPMoon·
Most markets start with speculation. Then they develop culture. Then institutions arrive. The same cycle has repeated many times in technology. Study history. Study Ordinals. 🟠🌊
English
2
5
20
429
RaresatsGhost
RaresatsGhost@RaresatsGhost·
@coaster89 @lifofifo @Satflow @ord_net @Ordinal_io All we need to do is wait patiently. @lifofifo is the strongest independent developer I’ve ever seen, and he is deeply focused on Bitcoin NFT collectibles. So you can trust that he won’t let Rare Sats down — and he won’t let us down either.
English
0
0
2
53
RaresatsGhost
RaresatsGhost@RaresatsGhost·
After Magic Eden's exit, we find ourselves—fortunately—with three excellent Ordinals marketplaces: @Satflow , @ord_net and the just-launched @Ordinal_io . Amid the relief, I feel a small regret: none of the three has yet launched rare sats trading. In the opening introduction of the Ordinal Theory Handbook, Casey wrote: "Ordinal theory imbues satoshis with numismatic value, allowing them to be collected and traded as curios." He also wrote: "Humans are collectors, and since satoshis can now be tracked and transferred, people will naturally want to collect them." Casey is right. Across all of human history, every civilization's money has eventually crystallized a collectible-artifact layer of its own. If you believe, as I do, that Bitcoin will become money at the scale of human civilization itself, then rare sats becoming the collectibles of a new digital numismatics is simply civilization's inevitability. Rare sats are Bitcoin's native NFT collectible—yet with no issuer, no whitelist, no team allocation. That is why they had no centralized marketing force in their early days, and why, compared to issued NFT projects, they must go through a far longer process of value discovery. So rare sats are not for the short-term speculator; only the long-term, value-minded collector is where they truly belong. Listing rare sats won't send trading volume soaring. But an Ordinals marketplace without rare sats—an Ordinals NFT marketplace, especially—is destined to be incomplete. I believe @rodarmor would agree. I believe the founders of these three platforms can see this too. And I'm genuinely curious: which one will be the first to list rare sats? Because I know this isn't merely a choice about platform features. It's a choice about the founder's values. I love Bitcoin. I love Ordinals. I love rare sats. I love you guys! @robertjfclarke @lifofifo @CreatorBitcoin
English
15
16
80
5.3K