ObsessedinGA

12K posts

ObsessedinGA banner
ObsessedinGA

ObsessedinGA

@RazedRight

Here for the ride! figuring out what I want to be when I grow up on X. oh…Likes/RT probably means I agree. I block all bots

Katılım Kasım 2022
743 Takip Edilen447 Takipçiler
ObsessedinGA retweetledi
Katy Faust
Katy Faust@Katy_Faust·
What did you think was going to happen after we legalized #GayMarriage? That same-sex couples would finally be able to visit one another in the hospital? Inherit property? Make medical decisions? Many of those legal protections were already available through powers of attorney, contracts, and other legal arrangements. What #Obergefell enabled was something else. It accelerated the legal replacement of biological parenthood with intent-based parenthood. It made it easier to detach children from their mother or father and reattach them to biological strangers so same-sex couples could be "equal" to husband-wife couples. It conditioned an entire culture to repeat, “Love makes a family,” by threatening them with social isolation if they refused. It permitted scrubbing “mother” and “father” from parentage laws and replacing them with "gestating" and "non-gestating" parent in the name of non-discrimination. It made politicians afraid to defend the importance of mothers and fathers because genderless families had been upheld by the country's highest court. The lasting legacy of #Obergefell has not simply been the redefinition of marriage. It has been the unmaking of the American family by erasing mother and father, both in law and culture. Children deserve better. @MakeKidsGreater
New York Post@nypost

Fox News star Guy Benson welcomes baby girl trib.al/9KekLur

English
62
327
1.8K
43.7K
ObsessedinGA retweetledi
James Lindsay, anti-Communist
James Lindsay, anti-Communist@ConceptualJames·
The dumbest thing I think I've heard about Hasan Piker is that he's part of the class he claims to be representing. Mfer is a bougie-ass millionaire nepo baby who hates all of you and wants you to be his slaves so he can be rich in a system where he's a little kinglet.
English
76
417
3.7K
109.1K
Libs of TikTok
Libs of TikTok@libsoftiktok·
Lyft has an option for women to exclusively match with only "women and nonbinary drivers." So women wanting only women drivers can still be paired with a MAN, as long as the man says he's "nonbinary” 😂
Libs of TikTok tweet media
English
362
680
5.2K
152.9K
🏳️
🏳️@Gini_220·
Simple but tricky. Your eyes might be lying… 🤔 99% already failed. Prove you’re in the smart 1%!!
🏳️ tweet media
English
559
62
263
11.9K
Beauty
Beauty@beautyandjs9·
Answer is not 15.. Can you solve this in 20 seconds?
Beauty tweet media
English
2.1K
57
246
32.2K
Mila
Mila@miladreaamy·
Bunu çözersen, sen bir dahisin. Garfield'in kilosu nedir?
Mila tweet media
Türkçe
36.1K
427
10.8K
4.7M
ObsessedinGA retweetledi
Margot Cleveland
Margot Cleveland@ProfMJCleveland·
Said otherwise: Even if you aren’t fooled by hawking of snake-oil salesman, you can acknowledge he's very good at it! And what a snake-oil salesman (including Mamdani) does is bamboozle people into buying a product that, at best, doesn’t work and, at worst, is pure poison.
Meghan McCain@MeghanMcCain

I am going to say something that is going to anger my fellow republicans about Mamdani: I listened to his interview with @LuluGNavarro - for a low information voter who has no time to pay attention to the substance of his message, what he is saying is absolutely brilliant in his attacks against the right. The tone of what he is saying is brilliant. It is part folksy everyman, republicans have abandoned the working class and are a bunch of elites without being harsh or conspiratorial. He has gotten very strong, very fast and is evolving in his national messaging to the rest of the country. Despite my abject fear and repulsion of socialism, it is really impactful. If democrats are smart they will nominate someone with his tenor and tone on economics and national policy (leaving out Israel and international politics which is a whole other ball of wax). If democrats do this in '28, we have a huge fucking problem. A huge fucking problem we will not be able to podcast bro our way out of.

English
5
18
171
14.3K
ObsessedinGA retweetledi
Spencer Pratt
Spencer Pratt@spencerpratt·
Is knowing literally NOTHING a prerequisite for being a communist? OPM inflates costs. Every time. Healthcare: $2 TRILLION/year - Medicare/Medicaid. Housing: >$400 Bn/year - section 8, MID Food: >$200 Bn/year - Food stamps, farm subsidies Cars: $90 Bn automaker bailouts, cash4clunkers Utilities: >$50 Bn subsidies for "green" energy, $26 Bn for SoCo Tuition: >$1.8 TRILLION federal student loan & grant portfolio, non-payment covered by taxpayers And it's not just that these commies are bafflingly economically ignorant, but the smugness with which they level their impotent retorts is wild. They are just bitter, self-loathing people who know nothing, and because they don't understand basic economics, they call everything "exploitation". No, lady, your ignorance is being exploited...by filthy communists running a shell game on taxpayers. Let me explain basic economics for you: If the average student defaults cuz they can only afford to repay $20K for tuition, colleges will charge $20K for tuition. If the federal government will backstop a $200K loan after the student defaults at $20K...colleges will charge $200K...that's why tuitions have risen at 2-3x CPI immediately after they started heavily subsidizing tuition. 20-30% of hospital costs go to medicaid/medicare compliance. Plus, that 3rd-party-payer creates a moral hazard, just like with tuition...they rack up the charges cuz it's OPM. Again, this is why hospital prices have skyrocketed way higher than inflation, and cash patients pay 80% less than insured patients. Ever since Obamacare made taxpayers subsidize private insurance companies, too...it's gotten out of control. When government picks up the tab, neither cost nor quality matters. OPM til it's over. Again, this is basic economics that even Dom Kennedy understands better than these people.
Melanie D'Arrigo@DarrigoMelanie

“healthcare, housing, food, tuition, cars, utilities,” are all owned privately with their sale prices designed to exploit consumers to maximize profits. Hope this helps.

English
111
924
5.4K
102.3K
Melanie D'Arrigo
Melanie D'Arrigo@DarrigoMelanie·
“healthcare, housing, food, tuition, cars, utilities,” are all owned privately with their sale prices designed to exploit consumers to maximize profits. Hope this helps.
Spencer Pratt@spencerpratt

Isn’t it weird how unsubsidized consumer goods like TVs, appliances, clothes, all get cheaper and cheaper…while anything government puts its hands on, healthcare, housing, food, tuition, cars, utilities…just gets more and more unaffordable? Oh well. Probably nothing.

English
166
46
206
134.2K
Sehrish 🧢
Sehrish 🧢@SqSehrish·
Only sharp minds will notice the hidden rule Can you crack it..?🤔
Sehrish 🧢 tweet media
English
9.8K
141
1.3K
446.6K
Sean
Sean@scs_real·
Still trying to find neutrinos Enjoy Ode To Joy
English
15
13
63
2.7K
Ferarri
Ferarri@ferarri001·
This challenge has embarrassed math experts 🤯 Can you crack it?
Ferarri tweet media
English
13K
108
1.2K
665.6K
ObsessedinGA retweetledi
mike bski
mike bski@BskiMike22802·
Bernie. Bernie, Bernie, Bernie. Let me get this straight, because I want to make sure I am reading your economics homework correctly, and I did not eat a bowl of alphabet soup this morning so bear with me. You just listed UnitedHealth's $5.48 billion quarterly profit as proof of corporate greed. Cute. Except that profit happened WHILE the Affordable Care Act — the law that guarantees these insurers a captive, subsidized, taxpayer-fed customer base — has been the law of the land for fifteen years. You are not exposing corporate greed, Senator. You are reading me the receipt for your own bill. The ACA did not shrink the insurance industry. It turned it into a government-guaranteed cash cow, and now you are shocked, SHOCKED, that the cow got fat. Eats soup with a fork, this one. And here is the part that should really sting. Your own party just finished a 43-day shutdown demanding MORE money be poured into that exact system, because the temporary COVID subsidies YOUR PARTY wrote into the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 and the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 — zero Republican votes on either bill, by the way — expired right on schedule, exactly as YOU designed them to. Not a single Republican voted to end those subsidies. You did. Then you shut down the government to admit, out loud, on the record, that a law literally named the AFFORDABLE Care Act cannot survive without emergency pandemic cash. That is not an insult from me. That is a confession from you. So now the solution is Medicare for All. Naturally. Because when a fifteen-year-old government program made the insurance companies richer, the answer is obviously MORE government program, just bigger. If ignorance is bliss you must be the happiest man in the Senate. Independent estimates put full single-payer implementation at somewhere between forty and sixty percent of the ENTIRE federal budget. Forty to sixty percent, Senator. Larger than Social Security. Larger than defense. You want me to hand over half the country's checkbook to the same apparatus that just admitted its last healthcare experiment doesn't work without a subsidy IV drip. Let's talk about who's asking. You have served in the United States government for something like forty years between the House and Senate, and by my count the bills you personally got across the finish line as lead sponsor could be counted on one hand, mostly involving the naming of federal buildings. Somewhere out there is a tree tirelessly producing oxygen for you, Senator, and it owes itself an apology for the return on investment. This is also the same man who, as a young idealist, tried out communal living on a hippie commune and did not exactly stick around long enough to collect a pension from it. Now you want the reins to fifty percent of the national budget. I keep hearing "tax the rich" out of a man worth several million dollars who charters private jets on his "Fighting Oligarchy" tour because, in his own words, he isn't waiting in line at United with the rest of us peasants. Bless your heart. That is rich even by Congressional standards. Couldn't pour water out of a boot with instructions on the heel, but sure, hand him the checkbook. And before you tell me capitalism failed and it's finally socialism's turn — how's that working out for your ideological younger brother in New York? Zohran Mamdani just announced a THIRTY MILLION DOLLAR government grocery store in a city his own comptroller says is worse than broke. Kansas City tried this. Erie, Kansas tried this. That is not a hunch, Senator, that is a lab result, and I am a science teacher, so let me walk you through the peer review. An experiment only counts as science if it has been REPLICATED. Not run once. Run again. And again. Under different conditions, different continents, different decades, different "well THIS time we'll do it right" true believers standing at the podium. So let's replicate it together, shall we, because apparently nobody handed you the lab notes. Trial one: the USSR, 1920s and 1930s. Stalin seized the farms, collectivized the kulaks, and centrally planned the harvest. Result: the Holodomor, a man-made famine in Ukraine that starved somewhere between five and ten million people to death while grain was actively being EXPORTED past their starving bodies. That is not a rounding error. That is a control group that died. Trial two: Cuba, 1959 onward. Castro nationalized every business, every farm, every bank on the island. Sugar production, once the envy of the hemisphere, collapsed. The economy shrank thirty-five percent in a single decade when the Soviet training wheels came off. Extreme poverty today sits near eighty-eight percent. Same experiment. Same result. Trial three: Venezuela, sitting on some of the largest oil reserves on the PLANET, nationalized its oil industry and ran the socialist playbook to the letter. Production collapsed from three and a half million barrels a day to under one million. Hyperinflation peaked past sixty-three THOUSAND percent. Nine million people fled. You cannot bribe your way out of the results with oil money. We tried. It's in the data. Trial four, and this one should make every teacher in America wince: China's Great Leap Forward, 1958 to 1962. Mao abolished private farming, herded peasants into communes, melted down their pots and pans for backyard steel that was too low-grade to use for anything. Somewhere between fifteen and forty-five million people starved. Some regions saw cannibalism. That is not a typo. That is what happens when central planners replace the price system with a five-year plan and a slogan. Trial five: North Korea, present day, running the same command economy with the Juche twist. Famine in the 1990s killed hundreds of thousands to over a million. Markets are technically illegal and thrive anyway in the shadows, because human beings will trade even when their government threatens to shoot them for it. Trial six is my personal favorite because it is the cleanest natural experiment in the history of economics: East versus West Germany. Same people. Same language. Same culture. Same starting point in 1945. One half got markets, one half got the Stasi and collectivized industry. East German productivity settled at roughly thirty to seventy-five percent of the West's, and the population had to build a WALL to stop its own citizens from swimming, tunneling, and hot-air-ballooning their way out. Nobody builds a wall to keep people from fleeing prosperity, Senator. Trial seven: Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge, 1975 to 1979. They abolished money entirely. No markets. No private property. Total state control, straight out of the textbook you apparently keep on your nightstand. One point seven to three million people, roughly a quarter of the country, died of starvation, overwork, and execution in FOUR YEARS. And for the extra credit column: Ethiopia's Derg collectivization, Tanzania's Ujamaa villages, Yugoslavia's market-socialism ceiling, Vietnam before it finally abandoned the model, India's decades of License Raj stagnation, and Poland and the rest of the Eastern Bloc running factories that burned three times the steel per unit of output compared to the free market next door. Every single trial, same hypothesis, same result. I have seen middle schoolers design better controlled experiments during a volcano science fair. That is not one anecdote, Bernie. That is a stack of peer-reviewed, historically documented, independently verified trials spanning four continents and a full century, and the conclusion section reads the same every time: shortages, queues, corruption, and a body count north of a hundred million people once you tally every collectivized farm, every purged kulak, and every commune that ran out of rice. If an experiment fails this many times in this many labs, a real scientist stops blaming the equipment and starts questioning the hypothesis. You, apparently, would rather run trial number eight on 340 million Americans and call it "finally getting it right." Trying to reason with some folks really is like trying to baptize a cat. Quinn's First Law of Liberalism: liberalism always generates the exact opposite of its stated intent. You want cheaper healthcare, you get record insurer profits. You want affordable food, you get a thirty-million-dollar failed grocery store. You want to fight the oligarchy, you fly private. Every single time. Set your watch by it. I keep asking Democrats this question and I never get an answer: what have YOU actually done to help people, versus just handing out someone else's money? Because handouts without a ladder out is not compassion. It is a leash. And I think deep down you know that, Senator, or you wouldn't need the private jet to get away from the people you claim to be fighting for. You're about as useful as a screen door on a submarine when it comes to actually running anything, but boy can you point fingers. You are the human version of period cramps on this topic, Bernie, and I mean that with the utmost respect for a man who has spent forty years discovering new ways to spend money he didn't earn. Has a leak in the think tank if he genuinely believes THIS is the moment socialism finally works. Unless your name is Google, Senator, you need to stop acting like you know everything about running an economy you have personally never had to run. But what do I know. I am only a medically retired Army combat medic and a science teacher who actually reads the Congressional Budget Office numbers before I open my mouth about a trillion-dollar healthcare takeover. @JoJoFromJerz @atrupar @TheYoungTurks #MAGA #Veterans #Trump
English
895
4.8K
13.7K
1.1M
ObsessedinGA retweetledi
Dr Jordan B Peterson
Dr Jordan B Peterson@jordanbpeterson·
We think of this evil as Marxism. In reality, Marxism is nothing more or less than the current instantiation of a much more ancient evil: possession by the envious and hateful spirit that drove Cain to murder his brother Abel. The great book of Genesis thus portrays mankind as riven by an eternal fratricidal conflict. Those who reject genuine sacrifice become embittered by their subsequent failure ("rejection by God"). Instead of repenting and changing, they turn to revenge. And who do they target? Those who strive to do well and offer what is best. I can't believe how much wisdom the author of Genesis 4 compressed into that story's few sentences. You might even come to believe that God Himself had a hand in it. Truly: it's uncanny. The first two human beings born into history are, respectively, a good, honest productive man and his brother, who allows himself to be consumed by resentment and the desire to destroy. Communism, in a nutshell.
English
1.2K
6.7K
30.6K
1.4M
ObsessedinGA retweetledi
Bonchie
Bonchie@bonchieredstate·
Can we follow the law and ban TikTok now?
English
38
160
1.7K
34.3K
ObsessedinGA retweetledi
Shahriq Khan
Shahriq Khan@RealShahriqKhan·
You know what wrecked me when I was converting to Christianity? Jihad is literally the gospel in reverse. Once I saw it, I couldn't unsee it. The gospel says Christ shed His blood for YOU. Jihad says you shed your blood for ALLAH. Jesus lays down His life to save His enemies. Jihad calls you to take the lives of enemies in pursuit of God's favor. Christianity says the Shepherd dies so the sheep can live. Jihad says the sheep die hoping the Shepherd accepts them. They are mirrors. One is grace, the other is striving. One says, "It is finished." The other says, "Do more." Jesus never asked me to earn God's love with my blood, he proved God's love by shedding His own. That's why the cross changed everything for me. Jesus didn't come to tell us how to die for God. He came to die for us so we could truly live. PRAISE GOD! I AM FREE! Now, we need to make all the Muslims Christian.
English
657
6.8K
30K
522K