Bennett R. Boyle

5.3K posts

Bennett R. Boyle banner
Bennett R. Boyle

Bennett R. Boyle

@RealBennRBoyle

✟ Romans 3:23-24🙏 - @SBTS M.Div student, @ColumbiaChi Filmmaking graduate 🎓- 𝒮𝒾𝓂𝓊𝓁 𝒿𝓊𝓈𝓉𝓊𝓈 ℯ𝓉 𝓅ℯ𝒸𝒸𝒶𝓉ℴ𝓇 -

Chicago, IL Katılım Haziran 2013
455 Takip Edilen243 Takipçiler
Bennett R. Boyle
Bennett R. Boyle@RealBennRBoyle·
Or we could not be cynics and simply praise God for a testimony of his saving grace? Seems like a much more charitable option than assuming ill heart motivations. The line between "he told me that he's proud of her past" and "he's proud of her past" is so minuscule that either functions under the simple moral definition of slander as making a false statement about someone. Maybe not technically the legal definition but if I was talking about strict legal definitions this would technically be libel lol. Doing this towards a brother and sister in Christ sharing their testimony of God's grace just adds to the inappropriate nature of your comments. Perhaps "even if he didn't intend it this way, it could be read that he is proud of her past" would have been more appropriate? Or perhaps just not trying to dig for fault and simply holding your tongue would have been even better? Making a statement that is either false or inappropriately accusatory about a brother in Christ's heart is never the charitable move James 4:11 is very appropriate here. We should not treat testimonies of saving grace with cynicism and judgement by default, especially if we have to judge hearts when finding a reason to
English
0
0
0
7
Ian Franklin
Ian Franklin@ianfranklin·
No, if I said "he told me that he's proud of her past," that's slander. If I look at his situation and interpret his behavior as prideful, that's not slander. He's a virgin with no sexual experience, yet he marries a woman who describes her sexual partner tally as "countless." She converts to his faith, marries him, an even though she's been with countless men, is pleased with him. That's why I believe he's so cavalier about it. He's a marketing agent who works with churches to use stories as a vehicle to market. That's kind of filthy in itself, which adds substance to the notion that he seems proud.
English
1
0
0
9
.Dean Abbott
.Dean Abbott@DeanAbbott·
Most people think evangelicalism is conservative but, in fact, large swathes of it are radically anti-traditionalist and, in their way, liberal. Many evangelicals see traditional social virtues like modesty, propriety and prudence as hindrances to the practice and proclamation of the gospel and therefore congratulate themselves on violating these norms if, in their minds, doing so "brings glory to God". That's exactly what's happening here. A man and his wife throw sensitive personal information into the social media gutter without thinking for a moment about dignity or social appropriateness and then, when people object, claim that people who value the social virtues they've discarded care less about God.
Trevor Sheatz@TrevorSheatz

My wife was formerly promiscuous. I was a virgin. She was then radically born-again. Committed to church, evangelized constantly, Puritan books in her bedroom, prayer journals, grief over past sexual sin, etc. We got to know each other well for over a year, dated for four months, engaged for two and a half, and didn't sin sexually with one another. Our first kiss with each other was at the altar on our wedding day (reaction pic attached!). We've been married for over five years now, and she's been the most wonderful and godly wife, mother to our three children, and homemaker you could imagine. She's more pure than most virgins, as biblical purity has less to with past sins (though they certainly matter) and more to do with one's current posture of the heart and daily decisions to honor the Lord (Matt. 5:8). We're far too quick to forget the story of the woman labeled as a known "sinner" (likely a prostitute) in Luke 7:36-50 who was washing Jesus' feet with her tears while kissing them too. The Pharisees were shocked that Jesus let a public sinner do this. Jesus responded with a parable about debts being forgiven and ended with this powerful conclusion: "Her many sins have been forgiven; that’s why she loved much. But the one who is forgiven little, loves little" (Luke 7:47). Everyone seems to highlight the benefits of virginity, and it certainly is a blessing. But we forget to highlight the benefits of being forgiven much as well. My wife knows the depths of Jesus' forgiveness more than most people, enabling her to more easily live out a life of passionate love for her Savior. A woman or man's past sexual sin matters. But what matters far more when it comes to deciding who to marry is if the person is truly born again, if their repentance is real, if they truly have a heart for Christ, if they truly follow Jesus and obey his commands. "God has chosen what is foolish in the world to shame the wise, and God has chosen what is weak in the world to shame the strong. God has chosen what is insignificant and despised in the world ​— ​what is viewed as nothing ​— ​to bring to nothing what is viewed as something, so that no one may boast in his presence. It is from him that you are in Christ Jesus, who became wisdom from God for us ​— ​our righteousness, sanctification, and redemption, — in order that, as it is written: 'Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord.'" (1 Cor. 1:27-31) "Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has passed away, and see, the new has come!" (2 Cor. 5:17)

English
16
28
247
8.5K
Bennett R. Boyle retweetledi
John Mason
John Mason@LivingGodsTruth·
The hide your testimony crowd is out in full force. These are essentially victoryless Christians, if such a thing exist. Christians overcome Satan through the blood of Jesus, His sacrifice, and the word of their testimony based on Revelation 12:11. What are you ashamed of?
Michael Knowles@michaeljknowles

"Dad, what should I do if I want to have a good marriage?" "Well, son, my first piece of advice is to avoid calling your wife a whore, reformed or otherwise, to strangers on the Internet."

English
2
1
38
1.2K
Bennett R. Boyle retweetledi
Samuel James
Samuel James@Digitalliturgy·
Unpleasant reality: Currently there is a contingent of Very Online men trying to reconcile their sexual addictions with their attraction to "based" Christianity by selling a weird Islam-meets-Reddit patriarchialism. These men are best ignored, but they are benefiting enormously from the reactionary, anti-"Big Eva" rhetoric that men who know better have been using the last 5 years in the service of their own evangelical turf war. Now, some smart, sincere, genuinely Christian men are in the position of having to care for their own brand by taking seriously the voices of those other addicted, resentful, deeply deceived men.
English
2
4
20
934
Bennett R. Boyle
Bennett R. Boyle@RealBennRBoyle·
Everything you said here may be true and there is an argument to be made that it isn’t appropriate to share details. Be that as it may, accusing them of doing so because they are actually proud of her past (despite them expressly saying it is because they are giving glory to God for changing her) is slander.
English
0
0
0
13
May Winter
May Winter@MSugma71483·
@RealBennRBoyle @ianfranklin @DeanAbbott If you can’t see why sharing intimate details about your sexual history with a large group is inappropriate then you can’t be helped. Remember that prior to the sexual revolution,this kind of openness about sex would have been widely regarded by Christians as improper & immoral
May Winter@MSugma71483

@DeanAbbott Evangelicals should revisit 1 Corinthians 10:23 & think about it. Publicly speaking about one’s spouse’s sexual history before a wide audience is clearly not something “edifying.” It is not supportive of moral or spiritual development; rather, it degrades everyone involved.

English
2
0
0
29
Bennett R. Boyle
Bennett R. Boyle@RealBennRBoyle·
@ianfranklin @DeanAbbott You accused them of being proud of her past. That is a direct accusation not an opinion. Unless you have anything to back that up, it is slander
English
1
0
0
22
Ian Franklin
Ian Franklin@ianfranklin·
@RealBennRBoyle @DeanAbbott No, it NOT slander. It's a different opinion based on witnessing an event from an outside perspective. The man is a marketing agent for a living. Don't be so naive as to blaspheme God's name among the Gentiles.
English
1
0
1
33
Bennett R. Boyle retweetledi
Ryan Duff
Ryan Duff@ryancduff·
“So if this makes you uncomfortable, that discomfort is not a problem with the post. It is a problem with your gospel.” Bingo
Faithfulness Okom@AttorneyF_

God married a whore. In Hosea 1:2, God instructs a prophet to marry a prostitute as a living parable of His own relationship with Israel. I’ll admit my first instinct seeing this post was to recoil. Then I did my quiet time. In Hosea, Gomer is not background detail. She is the crux of the whole story. Hosea takes her back after she leaves him. He buys her back out of slavery as God tells him to. Because that is what God does. Rahab was a prostitute in Jericho. She is in the lineage of Christ. Matthew 1 puts her there without apology or asterisk. The woman who washed Jesus’ feet with her tears in Luke 7 was a known public sinner, likely a prostitute. The Pharisee hosting the dinner was disgusted that Jesus let her touch him. Jesus told the Pharisee that the person forgiven most loves most. He did not say she was tolerated. He said she understood grace better than the religious man throwing the dinner party. The pattern is clear, this is not one story. This is every generation being confronted with the same scandalous imagery and recoiling the same way. Because the scandal does not stop in the Old Testament. Paul tells husbands in Ephesians 5 to love their wives the way Christ loves the Church. And who is the Church? She is the bride of Christ. She is not a worthy or befitting bride. She is a people steeped in idolatry, rebellion, and spiritual adultery, bought back at the cost of His life. In the Old Testament, God tells Hosea to marry Gomer. In the New Testament, Christ marries us. The parable is the same only that the stage is larger. This post or this man’s union is not more scandalous than the gospel. The gospel tells us that a sinless God dies in the place of a guilty people who neither deserved it nor asked for it is the whole gospel. The scandal is not incidental to the story. It is the story. None of us gets to be comfortable. All of us recoiling at this testimony are doing exactly what the Pharisees did. They saw sinners near Jesus and called it contamination. Jesus said that was the entire point. So if this makes you uncomfortable, that discomfort is not a problem with the post. It is a problem with your gospel.

English
0
4
50
1.3K
Bennett R. Boyle retweetledi
Bennett R. Boyle
Bennett R. Boyle@RealBennRBoyle·
@ianfranklin @DeanAbbott This is just slander. They are not proud of her past. They are literally giving God glory for changing her and praising him that where sin abounds grace is more
English
2
0
3
44
Ian Franklin
Ian Franklin@ianfranklin·
@DeanAbbott Exactly. They don't necessarily need to feel ashamed in an appropriate setting, but what people are missing is that they're both actually proud of her past. Apparently she talks about her past exploits regularly online.
English
2
0
7
269
Bennett R. Boyle retweetledi
Jennifer Buck
Jennifer Buck@JenniferBuck65·
The enemy doesn’t want testimonies of God’s grace seen/heard. All of this noise is generated to overshadow the heart of the matter—Christ redeems and Christ changes lives. Many may not even realize they are being used as tools of the enemy to steal God’s deserved glory.
Protestia@Protestia

The Daily Wire hosts mock and make fun of @TrevorSheatz for his viral "My wife was formerly promiscuous. I was a virgin" tweet. All the while, they show they don't know anything about the situation, or the fact that his wife @AshleySheatz has been sharing her testimony for years- it's been pinned to her profile since 2019- as a testament to God's mercy and lovingkindness.

English
3
3
51
1.5K
Bennett R. Boyle retweetledi
Chris Hohnholz
Chris Hohnholz@Chris_Hohnholz·
🎯👇🏻
Squirrel@ShinarSquirrel

@Chris_Hohnholz It shows that there are a whole lot of vocal-but-immature males who claim the name of Christ with ZERO understanding of the Gospel. They don't grasp the depths of their own depravity at all.

ART
1
1
6
345
Bennett R. Boyle retweetledi
Bennett R. Boyle retweetledi
Chris Hohnholz
Chris Hohnholz@Chris_Hohnholz·
For all those trying to claim there’s no hypocrisy here or that it was never about treating women differently, stop your lying.
Chris Hohnholz tweet media
English
12
4
93
2.8K
Bennett R. Boyle
Bennett R. Boyle@RealBennRBoyle·
@CodyLibolt What is the main problem then, as you see it? The man-centeredness rather than truth-centeredness sure seems to be one of the main problems
English
1
0
0
12
Bennett R. Boyle
Bennett R. Boyle@RealBennRBoyle·
I mean, he did caveat it with the fact that the serial killer should be in prison or on death row so this scenario, from the Christian perspective, isn't even one that exists but if you grant your illogical premise I have one question: is the Gospel unable to transform a serial killer and sexual predator and through sanctification forge them into a marriageable spouse? (now it wouldn't still always be prudential to marry this person and it should be treated on a case by case basis but you are the one who proposed this scenario). If it is impossible, at what point does sin become so great that the Gospel loses its efficacy? And if your argument is instead "it hasn't lost efficacy, the consequences of sins simply remain" then tell me where Scripture implies that pre-conversion sin can permanently disqualify us from marriage? You are either downplaying the efficacy of the Gospel or (more likely) downplaying the grievousness of your own sin.
English
0
0
0
11
Kangmin Lee | 이강민
This is insane. No wonder young men are leaving Protestant churches in droves.
Kangmin Lee | 이강민 tweet media
English
99
63
1.2K
21.5K
Bennett R. Boyle retweetledi
Υουκε 🌿
Υουκε 🌿@lagracelaverite·
William is, once again, showing his true colours. He says that Stephen—who, in direct reply to my post exposing Michael Spangler’s racist and white supremacist views, defended and praised him—is “a better man than all his critics combined.” Think about that.. A man defending evil is “better” than all his critics combined. Do you see it now?
Υουκε 🌿 tweet media
Υουκε 🌿@lagracelaverite

Stephen Wolfe wrote a long defence explaining why he finally cut ties with his racist, white supremacist, neo-Nazi friend Michael Spangler. I see many issues with his statement, but the main takeaway is he didn’t cut ties over evil; he did it over reputational harm and personal cost. This is pure damage control. Don’t be fooled.

English
3
6
33
2.9K
Bennett R. Boyle
Bennett R. Boyle@RealBennRBoyle·
The doctrine of justification definitely changes the equation, Alex, because someone who was in deep sexual sin prior to conversion is now justified and sanctified. True conversion will likely make this person among the most virtuous spouses possible because if they are truly converted they will now be following after the Lord and daily being sanctified. If this "natural principle of wisdom" tells us that someone with a promiscuous past (all else being equal) is still not among the most virtuous spouses possible regardless of conversion/justification/sanctification (which is honestly what your post and many others from the CN crowd seem to be implying) it does most definitely negate and undermine the glory of the gospel of grace and forgiveness. On top of that, it also has a low view of your own depravity if a former sexual sinner still looks unclean to you after her being washed in the blood of Christ. "Such were some of you"
English
1
0
1
30
Alex Kocman
Alex Kocman@AJKocman·
The doctrine of justification doesn’t negate the fact that, all things being equal, one should strive to marry the most virtuous spouse possible. Also, this natural principle of wisdom does not negate or undermine the glory of the gospel of grace and forgiveness.
English
8
9
90
1.9K
Bennett R. Boyle retweetledi
Ken
Ken@Ken_FiveSolas·
Every redeemed person in Christ was “damaged goods,” dead in trespasses and sins. But by God's grace, we were made alive, saved through faith, and because of His precious gift, we have been transformed into a new creation, and our former life is gone. If this is problematic for anyone to boast about, then you need to examine your heart and stop criticizing fellow believers.
Trevor Sheatz@TrevorSheatz

My wife was formerly promiscuous. I was a virgin. She was then radically born-again. Committed to church, evangelized constantly, Puritan books in her bedroom, prayer journals, grief over past sexual sin, etc. We got to know each other well for over a year, dated for four months, engaged for two and a half, and didn't sin sexually with one another. Our first kiss with each other was at the altar on our wedding day (reaction pic attached!). We've been married for over five years now, and she's been the most wonderful and godly wife, mother to our three children, and homemaker you could imagine. She's more pure than most virgins, as biblical purity has less to with past sins (though they certainly matter) and more to do with one's current posture of the heart and daily decisions to honor the Lord (Matt. 5:8). We're far too quick to forget the story of the woman labeled as a known "sinner" (likely a prostitute) in Luke 7:36-50 who was washing Jesus' feet with her tears while kissing them too. The Pharisees were shocked that Jesus let a public sinner do this. Jesus responded with a parable about debts being forgiven and ended with this powerful conclusion: "Her many sins have been forgiven; that’s why she loved much. But the one who is forgiven little, loves little" (Luke 7:47). Everyone seems to highlight the benefits of virginity, and it certainly is a blessing. But we forget to highlight the benefits of being forgiven much as well. My wife knows the depths of Jesus' forgiveness more than most people, enabling her to more easily live out a life of passionate love for her Savior. A woman or man's past sexual sin matters. But what matters far more when it comes to deciding who to marry is if the person is truly born again, if their repentance is real, if they truly have a heart for Christ, if they truly follow Jesus and obey his commands. "God has chosen what is foolish in the world to shame the wise, and God has chosen what is weak in the world to shame the strong. God has chosen what is insignificant and despised in the world ​— ​what is viewed as nothing ​— ​to bring to nothing what is viewed as something, so that no one may boast in his presence. It is from him that you are in Christ Jesus, who became wisdom from God for us ​— ​our righteousness, sanctification, and redemption, — in order that, as it is written: 'Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord.'" (1 Cor. 1:27-31) "Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has passed away, and see, the new has come!" (2 Cor. 5:17)

English
18
15
136
3.2K