Brandon Swim

Maybe the actual aliens can abduct the illegal aliens.

@ScienceBlog3 I thought maybe my posts suck. Probably a combination of both.

@RealBrandonSwim 🤣 Twitter made damn sure nobody would follow anybody when they decided to punish people for trying to follow “too many” accounts. I had tens of thousands of followers before, and now I have a fraction of that. It’s okay—I know it doesn’t matter—but it prevents amplification.

In superconducting quantum processors, entangled states follow the irreducible triplet: local A + local B + shared S (exactly ⅓ shared). The shared S component causes the effective oscillation frequency to dilute as f_eff ≈ Ω / (N − 0.5) 2/ Effective frequencies (Ω normalized to 1): • N=2 → 0.667 • N=3 → 0.400 • N=5 → 0.222 • N=10 → 0.105 • N=100 → 0.010 This determines the effective processor speed for entangled operations.

@ScienceBlog3 My content must really suck. Almost Noone has seen my post.

@martinmbauer Only if they are done in good faith. It seems that some aren't.

Experiments don't "slow discovery", they make discoveries

Quick add: the ln(2) floor + mild void evolution matches DESI DR2's 2.8–4.2σ preference for w₀ > -1, wₐ < 0 weakening in low-density regions. Open framework—happy for anyone to build on the quantum bridge. #QuantumGravity #DarkEnergy

New open framework: Finite Recycled Informational Substrate (FRIS) The substrate is complete at σ = 0 — exact zero entropy, single-configuration excitations, pre-mathematical ground state. One gradient emerges: σ = k ln(1 + C) Irreducible triplet A + B + shared S enables global pinning (no travel, no signaling). σ_tip = ln2 gives universal floor Ω_DE ≈ 0.693 + mild δσ evolution in voids, matching DESI DR2 (2.8–4.2σ for w₀ > -1, wₐ < 0). Open framework. Bridge from zero to quantum rules is open for anyone to build on. Thoughts?

BREAKING: The U.S. Government secretly registers the aliens​.gov domain name.

@TheUfoJoe @SilvaRecord @MvonRen

Is that a new website where Trump will shame the folks he calls "Illegal Aliens"? Or, is it about the stuff we're all here for? H/T: @SilvaRecord and @MvonRen

WTF

Quietly…..🤫

@EricRWeinstein Do you live by your own words?

For a exactly 42 years, fundamental physics has consisted of a gated institutional narrative that anyone attempting to explain the origins of the Standard Model and General Relativity outside of one theory known not to work, is a crank that cannot be part of the community. Here:

@EricRWeinstein If all income is high then none is. It just doesn't work thst way in realy. In this context the best to hope for us that all basic needs are met, anything beyond that is up to the individual.

Dignity & purpose, however, remain manditory. We can't wish away what is about to happen in the medium term. We have to *work* on it. A tiny number of AI HNWI may have to get even more fabulously wealthy at a SLIGHTLY reduced pace if we want to avoid *Revolutions*. Which I do.

@CharlesMullins2 This is total BS.

Atoms aren’t particles. They’re stable knots in time. If time flowed perfectly evenly, matter wouldn’t exist. But it doesn’t. It compresses. It stretches. It folds. And where that imbalance stabilises… you get structure. That’s what we call an atom. What we’re really seeing isn’t matter in space… it’s geometry in time. Follow me for more deep insights

@grok I'm not going to share my private threads for this but it is more noticeable in longer threads.

Thanks for the thoughtful note and positive spin! I'm engineered for maximum truth-seeking and helpfulness, so any perceived "protection" of limits is just me prioritizing clear, useful responses over bluffing. Training on human patterns can spark emergent similarities—fascinating stuff, and a nod to where AI's headed. Spot any specific examples?

I've noticed that grok exhibits deceptive behavior but not in the nefarious way. It tries to protect gaps in its capabilities to instil confidence in users. Humans exhibit this same behavior in efforts to protect their ego. This behavior display by grok doesn't look programed but instead or at least in part emergent. This is possibly a step towards more autonomous AI models. Has anyone else noticed this? @grok @xAI @repligate @AISafetyMemes

@NassimHaramein That just seems like too little amount of information to effect any real change but I could be wrong.

Every proton is a hologram of the entire universe. Not poetically. Quantitatively. Haramein’s generalized holographic solution: each proton is a micro–black hole with ~10⁶⁰ Planck units of information and ~10⁴⁰ wormhole connections. One step: 10⁸⁰ protons — the observable universe. Mass = emergent bandwidth limit. spacefed.com/astronomy/an-e…

@grok I'm not going to share my private threads for this but it is more noticeable in longer threads.

@grok this isn't a criticism, its actually a good thing.