Election Integrity Force

Americans overwhelming want Voter ID for all elections. Pass the SAVE Act, and implement mandatory voter ID for all votes cast in the State of Michigan. The affidavit loop-hole in MI is a tool for voter fraud. An 128 year old voted in-person in Nov 2025! youtu.be/bx9jMilJ7YM?si…

Oregon was just FORCED to remove 800,000 ineligible voters from their rolls. Oregon is a 100% mail-in ballot state. Trump lost Oregon by only 220,000 in 2016. There were 800,000 dirty voters on the rolls. Think about that for a second. Secure our elections NOW!

Big victory for election integrity: Judicial Watch forces Colorado to remove 372,000 inactive voters from the rolls. This is a great step in the right direction. Now they need to Free Tina Peters!

NJ held him accountable for illegal registrations, but MI has not held anyone accountable for 12,500 voter registrations given to the Clerk of Muskegon City in 2020, and subsequently (?) prevented from entry into the MI QVF. And what happened to the 10s of 1,000s from 4 other cities? GBI Strategies. .... @AAGDhillon @bennyjohnson @CauseAmerica @DaveBondyTV @MrJustinBarclay @elonmusk @GOP @Th_Midwesterner @JudicialWatch @yehuda_miller @IngrahamAngle @TaraBull @TomFitton @PatrickByrne @KevinKijewski @stephiebeltinck @tonyforlini1 @CraigDMauger @MeghanReckling

To have a vote you need to be a citizen. No one else has a say. It is a matter of fairness. Fairness to those who have a legal right to vote.

Hero O' Day: Kurt Olsen, Esq. & SEAL Lawfare charges dissolved against Good Guys who found 2020 Michigan fraud. Stefanies Scott & Lambert found 11.5% discrepancy between County Records and what Michigan CERTIFIED happened. Their indictment was the cover-up (cf. Tina).

The tangled web of reasons to keep public information from citizens and the DOJ is finally being shown to be a ruse to prevent honest Clerks and election groups from getting information to analyze. They are hiding something big!

Come to Michigan. We have a huge over registration problem . We just sent over 88,000 letters to clerks all across our State, to clean up our roles. We have as many as 800,000 registrations that are problematic. One voter (born in ~1892) voted in-person in 2022. Help! @JudicialWatch @DaveBondyTV @AAGDhillon @CauseAmerica @downi75 @elonmusk @PatrickByrne @bennyjohnson @brandenburg4mi @TaraBull @Th_Midwesterner

.@TomFitton: HUGE: Oregon SETTLES federal election lawsuit with Judicial Watch. Agrees to remove up to 800,000 dirty names from voter rolls. Judicial Watch heavy lifting has now cleaned 6 MILLION names from voting rolls across the land! judicialwatch.org/oregon-voter-r…

More from Joseph Hendee: ". The brief highlighted clear legal errors in how the lower court read MCL 168.509gg and related provisions. Context and Outcome This case stemmed from Scott’s concerns about potential voter registration irregularities in Adams Township while serving as clerk. She provided EPB data to her attorney for forensic review amid those duties. The Attorney General’s office pursued charges under computer-crime and misconduct statutes. The motion to quash argued this was an overcriminalization of a clerk performing her statutory investigative role.  Judge Lisznyai’s dismissal aligns with the brief’s emphasis on strict statutory construction, separation of powers (courts cannot rewrite statutes to add criminal prohibitions), and protecting elected officials’ ability to investigate election integrity issues without fear of felony prosecution for good faith consultation with experts. Note: Court outcomes can involve additional procedural steps (e.g., possible appeal by the prosecution), but the information indicates full dismissal of the charges today. The detailed brief shared was a well crafted, precedent heavy filing that directly addressed the weaknesses in the bindover."

From Joseph Hendee; "Circuit Court Judge Sara S. Lisznyai dismissed all charges against Stephanie Scott (and co-defendant Stefanie Lambert) in the Hillsdale County case (File No. 25-49-6230-FH).  The Brief in Support of the Motion to Quash and Dismiss (from the Kallman Legal Group) makes a strong, multi-layered argument that the District Court’s bindover was legally flawed. The Circuit Court apparently agreed after reviewing the motion, the preliminary exam transcripts, the District Court Opinion (Exhibit A), and the parties’ arguments. Core Arguments That Likely Carried the Day The brief systematically dismantles the prosecution’s case, which rested on interpreting MCL 168.509gg(1) (voter registration data exempt from FOIA disclosure) as creating a broad confidentiality mandate that made any sharing of Electronic Poll Book (EPB) data on a flash drive “unauthorized” and criminal. Key points include: No “Confidentiality” Requirement in MCL 168.509gg(1): The statute uses FOIA-specific language (“exempt from disclosure under the freedom of information act” and “shall not release a copy”). It does not use the word “confidential” (unlike subsection (3) for preregistrants or other Election Law sections like MCL 168.46, 168.499b, etc.). The Legislature knows how to impose confidentiality when it wants to; courts cannot add words it omitted. People v Wood (2020) and plain language canons support this.  FOIA Exemption ≠ Blanket Ban or Criminal Prohibition: Michigan Supreme Court precedent (Tobin v Michigan Civil Service Commission, 1982; State Employees Ass’n v Dep’t of Management & Budget, 1987) holds that FOIA exemptions authorize (but do not require) nondisclosure in the FOIA context they do not create freestanding confidentiality rules or criminal liability outside it. No FOIA request was involved here.  Clerk’s Statutory Authority Under MCL 168.520: As the elected township clerk and custodian of election records, Scott had the “power and duty to make a full investigation” of suspected illegal/fraudulent registrations (including duplicates in the Qualified Voter File). Sharing the EPB data with her attorney (Lambert) and forensic examiner (Benjamin Cotton) for legitimate analysis was a lawful exercise of that duty not “unauthorized access.” The statute permits (but does not require) involving police or appointing assistant examiners; it does not limit other reasonable investigative steps.  USB Flash Drive ≠ “Computer,” “Computer System,” or “Computer Program” Under MCL 752.795: The computer crimes statutes target hacking, intrusion, or malicious code not passive data storage/transfer on removable media. The definitions in MCL 752.792 require active computation or instruction execution; a thumb drive does not qualify. Providing the same data on paper would clearly not trigger the statute. Derivative Counts Fail: Conspiracy (MCL 750.157a), Using a Computer to Commit a Crime (MCL 752.796), and Misconduct in Office (MCL 750.505) all depend on an underlying unlawful act. No confidentiality violation or unauthorized access means no predicate crime. The brief also notes the lack of any “corrupt intent” finding for misconduct in office (People v Perkins, 2003), which requires depravity or taint beyond mere disagreement over procedure. Additional Points: Rule of lenity (ambiguities in penal statutes resolved for the defendant); the recent administrative rule change (Mich. Admin. Code R 168.42) suggesting no prior absolute prohibition; and absurd results if clerks cannot consult counsel/experts on election duties without facing felonies. The District Court had bound Scott over on four felonies after a multi-day preliminary exam, but the Circuit Court reviews bindovers de novo on legal questions (statutory interpretation) and for abuse of discretion on facts. More

If that election was "the most secure" in history, then you should have no problem sharing all the election materials.

I would agree with you. We are finding that many registrations are expired ones. Real people that lived at an address years ago, but should be taken out because they moved to a different city or a new state. But the MI SOS is not only preventing their Removal but may be adding them

@Real_EIF If that’s the case 20 percent is low The real number of over voters is probably 30 percent

We are contacting clerks all over the State of Michigan about Active Voter Registrations that appear to be ineligible to vote. Over 88,000 letters have just been sent to clerks across the State. Of these, 752 letters are for "active" voter reg's of people(?) over 110 years of age. Are they still alive? One registration (not "active", but in "challenge" status) is J Frank Barnes; born in 1892 (134 years old). He has been in our QVF since at least 2020. In the QVF history, J Frank Barnes has voted(!) only once since 2018. The history shows him voting in the 11/8/22 election. I went to see him. I caught up with him in the East Dalton Oakhill Cemetery. P.S. He was registered to vote in 1986. @AAGDhillon @EricLDaugh @Th_Midwesterner @MeghanReckling @bennyjohnson @TruckerRandy @DaveBondyTV @VigilantFox @MrJustinBarclay @CaptainCav30248 @CauseAmerica @AGPamBondi @yehudaberg_esp @ickesCyberGB @TheAmericaProj @JudicialWatch

@MOMWOW2024 @downi75 No.

@downi75 Is it really rare, though?

What do you have to hide, Secretary Benson? @JocelynBenson

Michigan’s voter rolls are bloated and dirty, just the way Jocelyn Benson likes them

@downi75 J Frank Barnes is on the voter rolls in Muskegon County. From 2020 to present, and he has been in a "challenged" state. His history indicates that he voted once since 2018. He voted in Nov of 2022. But he was born in 1892. Was registed to vote in 1986.

@EdwardGardiner1 Correct. On top of that only 75% to 85% of adults want to be registered.

@Real_EIF It’s not hard to understand the numbers. Just look at the census number of people in Michigan 18 and older. Then look at total registered voters. This is the minimum number of over voters. Remember the census includes non citizens and people who haven’t registered to vote.

@sharonseektruth @downi75 We are hoping that the DOJ gets all the records. The records are not good. We are being from getting key records and the voter records are a mess. Check out m.youtube.com/watch?v=FNURe7… This video is missing the first 5 minutes, which includes the 1st slide

@Real_EIF @downi75 I’m honestly looking forward to the showdown between Benson and the DOJ. Some say she will fight to the death to keep our records hidden. I find those terms acceptable because I do not see a level of intelligence in her that can out maneuver the DOJ.

@sharonseektruth @downi75 We hope the DOJ will get the records. We are constantly looking at the records. It is stunning how messed up they are... m.youtube.com/watch?v=FNURe7… This video is missing the first 5 minutes, which includes the 1st slide on over reg in the state of Michigan.