Richard Hearne

8K posts

Richard Hearne banner
Richard Hearne

Richard Hearne

@RedCardinal

Richard Hearne, https://t.co/Snrr3a1mO1: these days mainly interested in Technical SEO and Machine Learning.

Phuket Katılım Aralık 2007
449 Takip Edilen1.1K Takipçiler
Richard Hearne
Richard Hearne@RedCardinal·
@CyrusShepard I think the big publishers are having some buyer's remorse on the deals they struck. The realization that AI is far more dependent on web search and fresh content has changed the calculus. Publishers are now realizing the greater intrinsic value of their content.
English
0
0
4
115
Cyrus SEO
Cyrus SEO@CyrusShepard·
Reddit has discussed shutting off Google's access to its content for AI use Other giant publishers might shut out Google completely Here's the entire text of the original Wall Street Journal article. The whole thing is worth reading 🧵1/2
Cyrus SEO tweet mediaCyrus SEO tweet mediaCyrus SEO tweet mediaCyrus SEO tweet media
English
9
15
85
5.4K
Ed Emery
Ed Emery@branddrip·
List your favorite moon shot domain name, with the price! I will start: GameAdventure.com $250,000
Ed Emery tweet media
English
40
2
28
2K
Richard Hearne
Richard Hearne@RedCardinal·
@rustybrick Might actually work better than Top Stories carousel. Certainly an improvement over showing regular AIO for newsy topics instead of Top Stories.
English
0
0
0
22
Richard Hearne
Richard Hearne@RedCardinal·
@AbdulBasitcom @TonyNames The last point is the real problem. It's totally solvable. Yet Afternic/GoDaddy has failed to address this problem. It's particularly a pain point when you are legitimately adding a large number of domains regularly - noticing the bad requests is hard.
English
1
0
1
24
AbdulBasit Makrani
AbdulBasit Makrani@AbdulBasitcom·
@TonyNames Absolutely! Such emails are coming in every week and I've to reject those submissions at Dynadot. The problem still exists with Afternic as their system is somehow allowing the domains to be added without them having the domain ownership.
English
1
0
2
356
Tony
Tony@TonyNames·
The afternic FT confirmation email from registrars is a great way to track when lowlifes add names that don't belong to them to their account You just need to stay alert and not confirm without checking if they are on your afternic account
Tony tweet media
English
4
2
51
3.2K
Richard Hearne
Richard Hearne@RedCardinal·
@cyberandy It's noteworthy that alongside this they claim to have the highest search figures ever. Yet they choose to provide no relative distinction for "all" these clicks they are sending from AI. It's such a shame they can't just be honest with publishers. It's all politics now.
English
1
0
1
36
DomainNameWire.com
DomainNameWire.com@DomainNameWire·
Help me understand why anyone would have registered these domains this week. 09sq9a. top 09tjau. top 0ac886. top 0am221aj. top 0bcd. top 0gfy9q. top 0h1wxt. top 0hjq45. top 0hrlmd. top 0hsz5im. top 0hylie. top 0imqq4p8. top
English
8
0
0
1.7K
Richard Hearne
Richard Hearne@RedCardinal·
@gfiorelli1 @glenngabe I got one yesterday where the query populated was [bill] with an AIO telling me it looks like I cut off my query. They've clearly been using this to inflate their Search numbers. It also pollutes GSC reporting :(
English
0
0
1
48
Gianluca Fiorelli
Gianluca Fiorelli@gfiorelli1·
@glenngabe The worst is when the Google app notifies you with something newsly that may interest you, you click and the “search result” is the AI mode answer about a breaking news
English
1
0
1
145
Glenn Gabe
Glenn Gabe@glenngabe·
Once again, AIOs don't trigger for newsy queries. Nope, not at all. Right... :)
Glenn Gabe tweet media
English
7
0
20
2.4K
Richard Hearne
Richard Hearne@RedCardinal·
This is super interesting, and well worth a read if you are interested in KG+AI. If I was a younger version of me I'd be begging to go over and work with these guys on this. For free.
Andrea Volpini@cyberandy

👉🏼 wordlift.io/blog/en/sangue… Frontier LLMs fall for the story; a small model reads the graph. How ontology-guided GRPO taught Gemma 4B knowledge graph reasoning, field notes included.

English
1
1
4
281
Richard Hearne
Richard Hearne@RedCardinal·
@neokiddomains Nobody points out that at an average sales price of $295 USD you need a 3.5% STR to break even (assumes handreg .COM $10). If your YR1 STR is <3.5%, your YR2 break even point requires an even higher STR. Industry average STRs likely 1-2%.
English
0
0
0
15
Richard Hearne
Richard Hearne@RedCardinal·
@gaganghotra_ I'd say the legal guardrails in most major AI's would be quite an interesting read.
English
0
0
1
39
Gagan Ghotra
Gagan Ghotra@gaganghotra_·
oh my Fable 5 🤧🤧 "Legal note: you're proxying and re-rendering third-party HTML transiently for analysis the user requested on (presumably) their own page. Add a line to the footer: "Only analyze pages you own or have permission to audit." .....
Gagan Ghotra tweet media
English
1
0
1
316
Richard Hearne
Richard Hearne@RedCardinal·
@DInvesting @spaceship Well done on the sales. Curious where the leads might have come me from if no lander? Do end users search on spaceship? Or does spaceship distribute inventory on a network?
English
1
0
0
51
Elliot Silver
Elliot Silver@DInvesting·
On the flip side of the commission discussion, I sold one domain name via @Spaceship last night and another this morning. Spaceship commission is 10%, so that's an extra $500 in my pocket. Neither domain name used a Spaceship lander. One was a BIN and the other negotiated.
English
3
2
38
1.7K
Richard Hearne
Richard Hearne@RedCardinal·
@dejanseo I wish more people would appreciate this. There's a whole bunch of systems behind those responses they get served.
English
0
0
1
22
DEJAN
DEJAN@dejanseo·
ZXX
1
3
14
879
Richard Hearne
Richard Hearne@RedCardinal·
@dejanseo Do you have this snippet in the validation set? Curious what the actual anchors looked like in that text. I think this is really interesting since there's going to be diffs in how you link across langs due to different linguistic structure.
English
0
0
0
11
DEJAN
DEJAN@dejanseo·
I have some sad news for my Dutch friends. LinkjeBERT has failed mid-training. The model went bad at step 3607 and stop generalizing. I do have a valid checkpoint saved but I don't believe this will be as good as LinkBERT. Will try again with more training data and different hyperparameters.
DEJAN tweet media
English
2
0
7
1.1K
Shane
Shane@shanejones·
@danbarker Spotted a pattern in some recent sales. Asked GPT for some suggestions and got a win from that.
English
1
0
8
334
Shane
Shane@shanejones·
Had an excellent win on Monday. Great start to the week. Held this for 9 months in total. Prior to this, my biggest domain sale was £150 🤣 Stocked up on a few more domains after this to see if I can replicate this.
Shane tweet media
English
109
56
481
16.4K
Richard Hearne
Richard Hearne@RedCardinal·
This is really fascinating. Great study. Well worth the read.
DEJAN@dejanseo

This research presents a methodology for quantifying brand authority in large language model memory using Personalized PageRank and directed association graphs: dejan.ai/blog/brands/ If you ask an artificial intelligence model to name one hundred brands at random, it will not actually be random. Instead, the AI reveals which brands occupy the most real estate in its memory. To study this, we prompted Google’s Gemini model two hundred thousand times to name random brands. Giants like Google, Microsoft, and Nike topped the list. After filtering out a significant amount of gibberish and machine errors, we used these primary brands as seeds to build a massive association network. We asked the AI to name brands associated with the seeds, and then brands associated with those, eventually mapping a web of nearly three million names. By applying a customized version of the famous PageRank algorithm, we calculated a brand authority score. This algorithm simulates a journey through the network, prioritizing the brands the AI recalls most frequently. The final scores do not just measure simple popularity. We measure how deeply embedded a brand is within the AI's neural connections. For instance, the luxury fashion label Maison Margiela was never recalled unprompted, but it ranked incredibly high because it sits at the dense intersection of so many other high-profile fashion brands. In the age of AI, this methodology offers a brand-new way to map digital influence.

English
0
0
1
70
David McSweeney
David McSweeney@top5seo·
Comparing entities on two competing pages with QueryBurst
English
1
1
12
734
Richard Hearne
Richard Hearne@RedCardinal·
@gaganghotra_ Most likely a very small number of those 1-3 rankings were responsible for most/all of the AI citations. That chart is hiding a lot of info IMO. Extrapolating from it could lead to some very wonky theories.
English
1
0
0
48
Gagan Ghotra
Gagan Ghotra@gaganghotra_·
i guess these correlations are significant enough to say if want presence in AI Overviews then ranking in Top 3 usual search results is the way right?? #SEO😀
Gagan Ghotra tweet media
Gagan Ghotra@gaganghotra_

doing some #SEO research for a client project this Monday morning ☕️ again and again noticing the same pattern as Top 3 visibility in usual search results change so does the AI Overviews visibility more presence in Top 3 -> more presence in AI Overviews

English
1
1
2
510