Red

@nungusstock @HotmailfromSH It is impossible to get sued or punished for giving medical help in China since 2017 when they passed good-samaritan laws to protect people that help.

@HotmailfromSH 日本でこれやったら、男は痴漢で逮捕される。 中国は逮捕されないのか？？？ 人助けして逮捕される日本、やばいだろ！

4月26日，海南万宁。下午六点左右，一名女性不慎落水，被救上岸时已口吐白沫、面色青紫、心脏骤停…… 危机时刻，正在此度假的浙大一院90后护士夫妇姜智文＆袁苑立即跪地抢救，经过心肺复苏急救，溺水女子最终恢复自主呼吸和心跳。

@Nevermind09171 @HotmailfromSH No, China passed good Samaritan laws in 2017 so you can't get sued for providing medical help.

@HotmailfromSH 男的會被告嗎?

@howie_hua 56+20=76

It's Mental Math Monday! What's the first method you think of when you have to mentally calculate 28+48?

@RealestMemes_ Balls Trigger

@jimiuorio slate.com/technology/201…

One more and I’ll let it die…the general consensus is that 80% of the people who say they’ll press blue are lying or are unaware of how they will perform under acute danger(not a guess..based on historical precedent)…everyone who claims they’d press red are telling the truth.

@TheRajGiri I believe Terry Bolea caused great damage to the entire industry. Had Barry Orton been given the All-American Hero treatment and the massive push Terry got, the wrestling industry would be in a much better place.

Is wrestling today on a global scale a different animal if any of those guys didn't exist? Maybe, I'm curious what you think. But I really believe that without Hulk Hogan, wrestling today would be completely different.

海外ニキに質問🙋 あなたの思う、日本アニメの「最も魅力的な悪役（ヴィラン）」は？ 面白い回答は引用します！！

What is your favourite giant roadside statue in Canada?

@lady_valor_07 If you exist, why haven't you visited the Tanami Desert?

If aliens exist, why haven’t they visited Earth?

@stillreal2us Repo Man

Pick one wrestler to end Roman Reigns’ World Heavyweight Championship reign

@uscfan981 HBK MJF DDP Eddie Guerrero Sting

Who’s your top 5?

@HeckelTravis Hulk Hogan was a household name. Because of that, Terry Bolea caused more harm to wrestling than anyone else.

Hogan was a household name. Literally a household name. The Rock? Probably is. Austin? Possible. Undertaker? I don’t think a household name, but people know him Bret? No Michaels? No, come on Hogan is a name people in your household knows

@MerriamWebster Separate. Every time.

What word is your spelling nemesis? This is a safe space.

@ai_saboru_tech Cruel Angel's Thesis and it isn't even close. Wait, Tank is somewhat close.

海外ニキに質問🙋 あなたの思う、日本アニメの「最高のオープニング（OP）またはエンディング（ED）曲」は？ 良い回答は引用します！

@Bratt_world Can we stop playing pretend and accepting Trump's ridiculous definition of a tariff? Canadian producers do not pay American tariffs, American importers do. If Americans can't afford to import our resources because they are dumb, let's USE them ourselves and BUILD.

These people brains are so cooked.

@davemeltzerWON If Barry Orton had been given the gimmick and push that went to Hogan, the entire wrestling industry would be so infinitely better in every single way.

From what?

@James_IV_4753 @Review_bra Ain't nobody spending an entire dollar on Yamcha, so Light has access to Goku's true name.

@Review_bra Jokes on you. Goku was raised in the woods, so he was never legally given his name, therefore his real name is Kakarot, and Light would have no way of knowing that

>by far the most powerful is in 2 dollars

@yuzu_4ever If the vote comes in and blue wins with 60% of the vote, do you think we should track down everyone who voted red and execute them?

i would rather die than live in a world only composed of red button pressers.

@CraftingVegeto What if you only need 10% of the world to press blue? 5%?

Okay, so after thinking about this red blue button dilemma for hours, here is where I landed lol At first glance, the correct pragmatic answer is obviously red. You survive no matter what. That part is still 100 percent true. Red is the logical self preservation move. You do not die no matter what the others do. But once you think deeper, you realize that blue actually has a strong moral and collective argument. Blue only needs "just" over 50 percent to save literally everyone, while red basically needs 100 percent for no one to die. So blue is the gamble that gives humanity the best shot at universal survival with the lowest bar. At the same time, tons of people are emotional as hell, not logical or pragmatic, and sadly a lot are straight up virtue signaling kings. That means there is a real chance we end up in that dangerous 40 to 49 percent blue zone where billions die and society collapses anyway. Even the survivors probably would not survive long after that. Good job everyone. So yeah, red is the logical self preservation move, and blue is the more morally correct gamble to try and save everyone. Both sides have a solid point. Having that said... Everyone on Twitter furiously shitting on the other side is an idiot. Blues calling reds selfish monsters are idiots. Reds who cannot even see the collective blue argument are idiots too. But here is the most important part imho. All of this is bullshit. This is just a Twitter thought experiment where everything is easy and fake. If this was real life, an actual button in front of you, and pressing the wrong one means you actually die, everything changes. Heart rate at 180, adrenaline spiking, shitting your pants. I firmly believe there is near 0 percent chance blue gets over 50 percent in a real scenario, which I am not saying is a good thing. All the virtue signaling idiots on the internet would secretly press red in a heartbeat. Sure, some actual idealists who care about the collective more than pure survival would still press blue, and sadly they would die. In a real terrifying dystopian situation like that, red is the only solution, and it sucks.

@mrmikeMTL Super C. The C stands for Contra

without telling me your age, what was the very 1ST video game you ever played?