BobbyNewmark

@GoldenAgeTimes2 @s_mosby41080 @Texas_jeep__guy He already looks stupid, yapping on x about everyone / everything he doesn’t like being a Jewish conspiracy.

@s_mosby41080 @Texas_jeep__guy You're about to look really stupid.

⚜️ The Thomas Massie Files Have Been Released, & They're Quite Disturbing ⚜️ Cynthia West, a Florida School Board candidate for Okaloosa County District 5 has been carrying a secret, & she didn't know who to turn to for advice about how to handle it. So, she met up with @marcuscarey, a prominent Kentucky attorney, to seek advice & he interviewed her where she agreed to go on the record with what has been unfolding in her life, involving Thomas Massie, another Congresswoman, attempts to bribe with cash & silence with an NDA. Two months after Massie's wife, Rhonda, passed away, she entered into a romantic relationship with him, which was in August, 2024. Totally normal behavior from a new Widower. The pair went on trips & she'd visit him in Kentucky, in Rhonda's home. Things heated up pretty between them, & he gave her a promise ring. Things were going great between them. In fact, Thomas helped West get a job working for Indiana Rep. Victoria Spartz. This way, she could travel to DC to spend more time with him while she was there. Then, the relationship took a weird turn. He began requesting she do s*x acts for him that made her uncomfortable. When she refused & objected to it, she expressed that he became angry & emotionally abusive towards her. West ended the relationship, but continued working for Rep. Spartz. Shortly after the breakup, she said she got a text saying she was fired. Cynthia stated she never got written up, or did anything to warrant this other than expressing concern for Spartz' well-being, so she went to Ethics to put in a complaint. Then, she notified Thomas that he would be named in this report. She said he got very angry, & said to her: "you're just one person, you can't make a difference, & you need to just walk away." Cynthia said he then did what any other principled conservative would do: he tried to bribe her with $5,000 in cash & wanted her to sign an NDA. Cynthia refused the cash & the NDA. Cynthia said Massie has cash that he calls "cow money", which is untraceable & that he doesn't report it. Who knew, the guy who demands transparency in DC, did all he could to be the least transparent in this situation. Same goes for the guy who acted disgusted about Epstein survivors being silenced, yet he tried to bribe off a woman he mistreated in order to prevent this from seeing the light of day. I think the DOJ should investigate this "cow money." It's safe to say Massie is done, & this explains A LOT!

@PaulusGreatus @CharlesSchwab $MMTLP I’ll take $15, call me, you know the number.

I had a thought... When the NBH S-1 is in effect, I'm wondering if each of the 105 broker-dealers will attempt to contact us in the hopes of buying our MMTLP shares at the same share offering price of $15.00. I can confidently tell you this - if my broker contacts me and offers me $15.00 for each of my shares, I will NOT hesitate with my answer...a resounding NO! We all know our shares are worth far more than the S-1 Share Offering price of $15.00!

@MmtlpD2627 Don’t do it, I didn’t.

People forcing us to transfer our mmtlp shares but haven't transferred their own. I am suspicious of these people. It's a sick joke espesh knowing there are novice investors in the community.

@austral2508310 @johnbrda Any HF’s who wanna buy directly from me, HMU via PM. We can get on the horn with Schwab and make it happen.

@austral2508310 @johnbrda Why can’t we fucking shareholders sell.. so McCabe gets to make more money while we stay stuck, cool.

sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archiv… It looks like it is effective. Let’s see what happens.

For years this community has been overrun by people with really big hopes for their small number of shares. The typical GME era squeeze chasers. Just wanted to remind everyone that some of us are sitting on a lot of MMTLP, 9,000 in my case, and just want a fair resolution.

@JunkSavvy @SqueezeTeam6 @slocumfortexas @SECGov Good grief 😮‍💨

NBH has the opportunity to amend their complaint and add DEFENDANTS. Surely, they have a list. A lot of PRESERVATION LETTERS appear to have been delivered judging from XTD reactions. Time will tell. If I was @SECGov and University Lands UL, I would be VERY concerned right now. I believe @EnergyCredit1 has opened the door for DISCOVERY of their internal and external communications. Surely, they DO NOT want them exposed! Gettin' Spicy!!! 🌶️🌶️🌶️ I wonder if University Lands UL received a PRESERVATION LETTER after they attempted to terminate the Orogrande Leases which "the Company has not agreed to do." Hmmm... MMTLP MMAT TRCH

Ohh! Do @slocumfortexas next #MMTLP

@johnbrda I want my fucking money

@SceneinCinema Besson also briefly married Milla Jovovich after T5E, not sure if everyone remembers that..

Natalie Portman says she faced "se×ual terrorism" as a 13-year-old after the release of the film Léon: The Professional. The Fifth Element (1997) is ruined for many knowing the director Luc Besson was (32) started a romantic relationship with the blue alien lady, who was only 15. Natalie Portman was 12 years old when she starred in Luc Besson's Léon: The Professional. At that time, Besson was in a relationship with Maïwenn Le Besco. Maïwenn has claimed that the relationship between Portman’s character (Mathilda) and Jean Reno’s character (Léon) in Léon was partially inspired by her own real-life relationship with Besson, which began when she was 12 and he was 29. A few years later, Besson cast Maïwenn as the blue alien Diva Plavalaguna in The Fifth Element. They married in 1992 when Maïwenn was 16 years old. She gave birth to their daughter, Shanna, in early 1993, also at the age of 16. Portman described her pride and excitement in releasing the film, only to encounter se×ually explicit messages both directed toward her and made about her. “I excitedly opened my first fan mail to read a r@pe fantasy that a man had written me,” she recalled. "A countdown was started on my local radio show to my 18th birthday, euphemistically the date that I would be legal to sleep with. Movie reviewers talked about my budding bre@sts in reviews." The experience, she said, changed the way she expressed herself publicly, in order to limit the ways she could be objectified by others. "I understood very quickly, even as a 13-year-old, that if I were to express myself se×ually, I would feel unsafe," she said. "And that men would feel entitled to discuss and objectify my body to my great discomfort. So I quickly adjusted my behavior. I rejected any role that even had a kissing scene and talked about that choice deliberately in interviews.”

@kimkep4796 Wen settlement

MMAT / TRCH / MMTLP — In re Meta Materials, Inc., Case No. 24-50792-gs New filings: 5/4/2026 by DANIELLE SPEARS & SCOTT TRAUDT ⚠️Not Legal Advice ⸻ SPEARS — Doc 2757 Filing Title: Emergency Motion to Cure Notice and Shorten Time to Permit Movant’s Matters to Be Heard on May 7, 2026 Layman’s Breakdown SPEARS is basically asking the judge to fix a procedural mistake (missing objection deadline in her notice) and still let her motions be heard on May 7. Her argument: Everyone already knew about the hearing The Trustee already responded No one was harmed by the technical error She’s saying: don’t delay this over a paperwork issue. Standout Lines “This motion addresses a technical defect…” “All parties had actual notice… and sufficient opportunity to respond.” “No party is prejudiced…” What It Means This is procedural, not substantive. She’s trying to stay on the May 7 calendar despite not strictly following rules. ⸻ TRAUDT — Doc 2758 Filing Title: TRAUDT’s Reply to Jane Street’s Opposition to Rule 2004 Discovery Layman’s Breakdown TRAUDT is fighting for broad discovery against Jane Street under Rule 2004. His core argument: You don’t need to prove wrongdoing first to get discovery Rule 2004 is meant for investigation (“fishing expedition”) Public data already shows red flags in MMAT/MMTLP trading Only internal trading records will explain what actually happened He’s pushing hard that: We need the books before we can prove anything. Standout Lines Paraphrased “Rule 2004 is the bankruptcy equivalent of discovery… It does not require… proof before obtaining records.” “Often ‘in the nature of a fishing expedition.’” “Public filings cannot answer that question.” “Jane Street asks for a blackout. Rule 2004 permits a flashlight.” Key Points He’s Making MMTLP is relevant to estate claims (ties directly to MMAT trading) Jane Street’s changing positions = possible hidden activity Discovery could reveal: Shorting Derivatives Fails-to-deliver Settlement mechanics What It Means TRAUDT is trying to: Expand discovery beyond the Trustee Gain access to market structure data But here’s the reality: 👉 The court has already emphasized this is the Trustee’s lane So even IF TRAUDT is right on Rule 2004 law: The judge may limit or redirect discovery to the Trustee Or allow discovery with guardrails (protective order, staged production) ⸻ Big Picture (Both Filings Together) SPEARS → procedural push to be heard TRAUDT → substantive push for discovery Neither controls the case direction. 👉 The Trustee still owns the investigation 👉 The judge is focused on efficient, controlled discovery before August 2026 ⸻ ⚠️ Not Legal Advice dropbox.com/scl/fi/t9uwcx9… dropbox.com/scl/fi/bjvfted…

@Greenhills303 @smokentoken4750 @johnnaarintl I refused to transfer, still 8,975 with Schwab, including in IRA accounts.

@smokentoken4750 @johnnaarintl Yep. Trap everyone. It zeroes out the share.

#MMTLP #MMTLParmy #MMTLPfraud #MMTLPfiasco If anyone can do a little research here it may have a bearing on the May 7th hearings as well as the 2nd Circuit appeal to get MMTLP trading again for 2 days PCO. 1. Who or what entity on X, Reddit, and Disgracebook pushed hardest to get MMTLP shares pumped into AST (now Equiniti)? I could use links. 2. Who pushed for filing FOIAs en masse? DM or email me.

@kimkep4796 Stupid question, but, how does progress on the MMAT bankruptcy translate to a settlement for people stuck in MMTLP? I’m sitting on thousands of shares in my Schwab account, clock still ticking, still frozen in time.

MMAT MMTLP TRCH MMAT Bankruptcy — Case 24-50792-gs ⚖️ Litigation Funding Showdown 📅 May 7, 2026 • 1:30 PM PT ————————————————- 🎯 Why Citadel LLC wants to see the litigation funding agreement 👀👀👀 1. 🧠 Peek at the Trustee’s strategy Litigation funding agreements often reveal: •What claims the trustee thinks are strongest •How much the case might be worth •What evidence they already believe exists •Settlement expectations 👉 That’s basically a roadmap of the case ⸻ 2. 💰 Leverage in settlement If they see: •Funding is limited → they may try to outlast the trustee •High return terms → they argue the case is speculative or weak 👉 It helps them price the risk ⸻ 3. ⚖️ Attack the funding legally They can argue: •It’s really debt (364), not a 363 transaction •The funder has too much control •It’s not in the best interest of the estate 👉 Access = ammunition to try to kill or restrict the funding ⸻ 4. 🧩 Identify pressure points The agreement may show: •Triggers for funding withdrawal •Budget limits •Case milestones required 👉 That tells them where the trustee is vulnerable ⸻ 🔒 Why the Trustee wants it UNDER SEAL 1. 🛡️ Protect litigation strategy •Prevents defendants from seeing: •Legal theories •Target priorities •Case valuation ⸻ 2. ⚔️ Avoid tipping off discovery targets •If targets (like Citadel, others) know: •What’s coming 👉 They can prepare defenses early or shape narratives ⸻ 3. 💼 Standard practice Courts often allow: •Redactions or sealing of: •Financial terms •Strategy-sensitive provisions 👉 Especially in litigation funding deals ⸻ 💬 Plain English Bottom Line 👉 Citadel wants the agreement because it’s: a blueprint of the trustee’s case 👉 The trustee wants it sealed because: it gives the other side a strategic advantage 👉 The judge will likely: balance transparency with protection—not fully open, not fully hidden

@BiffPalmer @DanGambleAI This might be the only parlay I win today 😭🙏🏻

@DanGambleAI BAAANGGGGG

💥BAAANGGGG💥 +528 Super Bowl SGP cashed! Let’s goo!! Show some love if you tailed! ❤️

@LibTearCreator1 It’s obvious that the original pic is Clinton, but the cope level of Trump supporters in here is mind boggling. Your boys is, was, and always will be a pedo and rapist.

OPEN LETTER TO @SECGov INSPECTOR GENERAL Subject: Request for Review, FOIA Processing Integrity, MMTLP-Related Requests, Outcome and Delay Disparities Dear Inspector General, I am writing to request that the Office of Inspector General review FOIA processing practices affecting requests related to MMTLP and the December 9, 2022 U3 trading halt. Based on FOIA log analysis and request tracking compiled by the public and community requesters, a large proportion of MMTLP-related FOIAs experience extended delays and procedural parking states, including “Referral Request” and “On Hold,” with some requests remaining pending for more than a year and, in certain categories, with median pending times exceeding two years. Separately, the updated SEC-wide vs MMTLP roll-up indicates a large outcome disparity, where MMTLP-tagged requests receive full or partial disclosure at a substantially lower rate than SEC-wide FOIAs, while B7 exemption outcomes are substantially more prevalent in MMTLP-tagged requests. These patterns, taken together, raise process-integrity concerns that delay can become functional denial, particularly when information is time-sensitive for oversight, bankruptcy proceedings, or public accountability. I respectfully request an OIG review focused on: 1.Time-in-status controls: Median and maximum duration in “Referral Request,” “On Hold,” and “Perfected” statuses, and whether escalation triggers exist. 2.Bundling practices: Criteria for bundling, notice to requesters, opt-out availability, and measurable impact of bundling on timeliness and outcomes. 3.Outcome disparity: Comparison of disclosure outcomes and exemption usage between MMTLP-tagged and baseline SEC FOIAs, controlling for request scope and subject matter. 4.Transparency of extensions: Whether the SEC logs and reports extension counts and delay events per request ID, and whether the current system understates delay frequency. For convenience, I can provide the supporting spreadsheets and PDFs, including top longest-pending and most-delayed request IDs and category-level pending-day statistics. Thank you for your consideration. I am available to provide the supporting materials, methodology, and any additional context your office may require, you have all my contact information on file. Sincerely, George Palikaras

@mmtlp6769 @GardnerWade3 @FINRA Different Houston Wade, and pathetic of you to take that pot shot

MMTLP What is the RESL share count @FINRA?

@kimkep4796 Wen resolution, my 8,950 shares are lounging in my Schwab retail and Roth accounts

**$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH $NBH Case 2:25-cv-01195-APG-DJA — Kelly v. FINRA (Layman’s Terms)** Below is what Kelly just filed — his Opposition to FINRA’s Motion to Dismiss — broken down for regular investors 👇 (thread below) dropbox.com/scl/fi/8jyncjl…

@RareDealsHere @HTS_Financial @PeteSessions @FINRA What’s it gonna take for us to get anywhere? Is the goal for them to wait everyone out? Like, until we’re dead? My 8,950 shares ain’t going nowhere.

Wait, are you saying @HTS_Financial notified @PeteSessions of a problem concerning $MMTLP before the halt? Forgive me if I'm jumping to conclusions but this kinda fits the timeline and explains why he contacted @FINRA about an issue BEFORE the first Corporate Action... He even had his own slides explaining his involvement during his Townhall events shortly after the U3 halt! (See Image 👇🏾) Note: The slide has some errors. Whoa, I always wondered why he was in contact with FINRA before anyone else knew there was a problem! Step in anytime guys! @SECGov @SECEnfDirector @FBI @FBIWFO @FBILosAngeles @DOJCrimDiv @TheJusticeDept @SecretService @RepRalphNorman @mikecrapo #MMTLPsetaDATE

@WarClandestine @johnbrda One of the dumbest diatribes I’ve ever read.

Many of you fail to see the big picture. The Dems are currently engaged in a nationwide insurrection. It’s a continuation of the treasonous plot to remove Trump. It’s one giant 10+ year regime-change operation. They cannot be negotiated with. We are at war. There is no asking nicely anymore. All the lines have been crossed. They are not concerned with the interests of the American People. They are only concerned with maintaining their power, which means protecting their illegal voters and ensuring there are no voter-ID laws. There will not be any coexistence. The Democrat Party will cease to exist when all is said and done. The crimes they have committed cannot and will not be forgiven. The path to ensuring they never hold power again: -Secure the border (Trump already did) -Deport the illegals (process underway) -Pass voter-ID/no mail-in ballots If we do these things, the Democrats will no longer be able to cheat in elections, they will never win a federal election again, and they will eventually cease to exist. If we go nuclear and terminate the filibuster, we can accomplish all of this, and effectively end the Democrat Party. If we fail to secure elections before the 2026 midterms, we likely will never get the opportunity to secure elections, and then when the Democrats win again, we will become a one-party communist state, and the Republic will be lost forever. The time for Republicans to act, is right now.

@Greenhills303 Maybe I’m stupid, but, why would we want our MMTLP shares converted into bankrupt MMAT shares? What could an MMAT bankruptcy share ever be worth?

#MMTLP #MMTLParmy #MMTLPfdiasco #MMTLPfraud Scott Traudt - yours truly - defeated Wes Christian and his attorney Robyn O'Neil on 28 October 2025 when the 1st Court of Appeals in Texas said no to Christian attempting to keep his SLAPP lawsuit against me bottled up in the 129th Judicial District in Houston - the same court he has all arbitration or conflict resolutions set for contractually in the MMAT bankruptcy retainer agreements he has in Las Vegas (yes, that's a big "hmmmmmmm..."). Christian attempted to convince the court that I had access to legal resources while at sea squid fishing aboard a Point Judith, RI trawler, and a few other ridiculous assertions legally (including attempting to sell the 1COA on rules and standards for my appeal that simply didn't exist.) Yes, these days are getting darker for Mr. Naked Shorts, but none darker than what happened when he let it slip that he had seen the MMTLP share count with DTCC and from MMAT's paid trade data outfit (Broadridge). He said it was all the "motherlode of naked shorts" when he has seen numbers that said otherwise. I'll post the document later. It gets uglier too for him in Houston. During the hearing on the SLAPP case, his attorney attempted to tell the judge that he lost income from McCabe's wallet at Next Bridge Hydrogrifters because he was terminated because of my alleged defamatory statements...there's just a few problems with this, and in no particular order: 1. Wes stated my alleged defamations happened on X in November and December (maybe even January of this year.) But he was hired by McCabe on Feb 18, 2025. he sued me on February 6, 2025. See the date issue? 2. McCabe hates me and has said in print I am a liar, compromised, a "dark force." Why would Mccabe listen to anything I said and give it any credence as an evaluation of his fellow Texan, Wesley Christian? 3. Wes has already gone on the record in US Bankruptcy Court in April 2025 stating he quit NBH as counsel to "avoid the appearance of conflict" or some other close self-serving madness. Nothing about Scotty Traudt. Or @spldbrat351964 either for that matter. So pull up a chair and let's see how the Judge rules on my disqualification motion in Las Vegas, because the one thing that is certain is that those of you holding MMTLP will see it converted to MMAT if we prove that the TRCH/NBH spin off was done fraudulently, and Wes Christian is removed. And there may be more an enormous potential recovery in MMAT if the popcorn trail continues to explode as it has in the last couple weeks.