Jodoc Kirouac

@SeddSezz mmm graphics with no actual source or date of creation. It is almost as if someone recently created such a graphic to make a point. Forgetting of course that the 1976 graphic covers the whole of the year, while the 2026 graphic doesn't cover the Summer. Max Temp London 28 May76

There is no such thing as global warming. It is merely a fearmongering con to get us to reduce our emissions. All while globalists travel around constantly in their private jets…

@Rod__Mason @MNew834 But since 1850, there has been a global rise in average temperature, yes or no? Is this rise, over such a short timescale, an outlier. If so, why?

@MNew834 Yes; climate doesn’t stay the same. It’s always changed, and it always will.

About 100 million more people are in colder than usual conditions at the moment than are in warmer than usual conditions. But of course that’s not news (or it’s yet more ‘evidence of global warming.’)

@SamaHoole Pointing out the environmental consequences of 1 product is not a promotion of another. Polyester is not the only alternative either. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/share/H7VSYCGT…

British sheep produce around 22,000 tonnes of wool a year. A renewable fibre, sheared from a living animal that regrows it for the next season, used for carpets, insulation, textiles, jumpers, and traditional products that outlast the sofa. The environmental alternative is polyester. Spun from crude oil. Manufactured in a refinery. Non-biodegradable. Sheds microplastics with every spin of the washing machine. Ends up in every river, every ocean, every fish, every lung. A single polyester fleece can shed up to 250,000 microfibres in one wash. But the sheep grazing a Welsh hillside on rainwater is the problem, and we should all be wearing more crude oil instead. The mental gymnastics required to call wool environmentally harmful while promoting polyester is Olympic-level. Wool: renewable, biodegradable, grown on grass, naturally flame-resistant, insulates wet or dry, lasts decades, returns to soil at the end of its life. Polyester: fossil fuel, never biodegrades, sheds microplastics for centuries, needs chemical flame retardants, manufactured in conditions that poison the air for the workers handling them. Yet environmental groups campaign against wool while wearing fleece jackets pumped out of oil rigs in Texas. The sheep is not the problem. The activist in the polyester gilet is.

@Ferdinand641 @john4brexit They are not responsible for what to teach through the national curriculum, that is a Government policy. They are not responsible for the delivery of non-academic training programmes, the Government. Also oversaw a 32% reduction in apprentices.

@RespondUnable @john4brexit The NEU are responsible for teaching idiocy

The culprit for the lack of opportunity for young people is the Labour government. Minimum wage, the employment act , NI, red tape, nanny state/HR , university over apprenticeships and tech training have made it impossible for businesses to employ the young. We have abandoned white working class young people in particular

@PeterWi22007998 @paulafr68963440 1. There are no statistics that validate any of this. Immigration is falling under Labour 2. The idea that this Labour Government is in any way Communist exposes the idiocy of people that do not understand communist economic theory and buy a tick to demonstrate their stupidity

How can you possess a brain and still vote Labour ?

@DonaldClark @john4brexit That would be the Blair government, checks records, delivered the longest run of continuous economic growth in the UK since the Second World War.

@john4brexit Largely cause by Blair, her brother in arms.

@Ferdinand641 @john4brexit Foreign workers are paid the same (there is a legal minimum wage), and pay NI for them. So thats a poor excuse. This Government - I think you will find that todays entrant to the workforce were schooled under 14 years of the Tory Government. But its Labour's fault.

Exactly. Young people have been priced out of the job market by moronic minimum wage rules and high NI. Words cannot express my contempt for this disgusting government and its union owners who will be behind this. Most young people are lovely but utterly useless when they start work. They are often late, lazy, have a silly attitude and don’t realise that they annoy hard-working colleagues. I used to be quite brutal with them and soon they learn; some really shine. Others sadly go off the rails. Girls are easier, to be fair. I don’t know what teachers are thinking, but it’s definitely not about how their bloody foolish ideas will suit a work environment. Part of teachers’ training should be work experience with likely employers of their students.

@john4brexit The figures show there is no lack of opportunity for young people, but employers prefer foreign workers. 14 years of Tory education and training policies and British business owners more interested in their dividends than training British workers.

@robinmonotti You are struggling with climate science aren't you. I suggest you cease making yourself look uniformed. The key point is that global warming is an average, and regional climates respond differently because of geography, oceans, winds, and natural variability.

Some areas of Europe have been warmer than average, while other areas of Europe have been colder than average. Yet CO2 levels are largely the same. It is does not take a "climate scientist" to determine that the same CO2 levels can't be causing both warming & cooling at the same time!

@DavidC_in_UK @SunilSharmaUK @DianaHarding7 You do know why the ozone layer didn't disappear. Because the science was taken seriously and international community significantly cut ozone depleting gases. 1987 – Montreal Protocol - read about it. Same with Acid rain. No one calls it global warming.

@SunilSharmaUK @DianaHarding7 The story each decade, told us "in 10 yrs" 60s - Oil will run out 70s - A new Ice Age is coming 80s - Acid rain will destroy all crops 90s - The ozone layer will disappear 2000s - The Arctic ice caps will be gone 2010s - Global warming will be irreversible We just got more Taxes

In the past 100 years, climate-related deaths are down 97%. Polar bears have more than doubled since the 1970s. The Great Barrier Reef is healthier than ever. Greenland ice is growing / Antarctica has gained ice. Now all of that is absolutely astonishing…

@peterrhague @JimmyFinnIsOut and the US. In fact the UK and France are the only 2 P5 members that have not used the veto in the last 2 years.

@JimmyFinnIsOut Is it though? We can do foreign aid and diplomacy without funding a talking shop for dictators that gives Russia and China veto power

I’ll throw down the gauntlet to internationalists - what is the case for the UN existing at all? Why shouldn’t we just get rid of it?

@mikeosmond @AllisonPearson @heidiEC5 @lukerobertblack @nadhimzahawi Neither you nor the Senator understand the risk/benefit calculations. This is why the people like you in the US has decided that children getting measles is such a good thing - because you don't understand basic science and statistics.

@AllisonPearson @heidiEC5 @lukerobertblack @nadhimzahawi x.com/senronjohnson/…

Covid vaccines were not necessary for younger, healthy people. All risk and no benefit. Forcing people to get jabs they don’t need was grossly unethical.

@AllisonPearson @lukerobertblack @nadhimzahawi For younger, very healthy people, the benefit–risk margin is narrower, but most independent analyses still find net benefit, particularly during waves with high transmission and before widespread immunity. Nothing like your oversimplification and this was not known at the time.

@lukerobertblack @nadhimzahawi Covid vaccines were unnecessary for healthy people. In fact, some healthy people died or were injured as a result. Not to be confused with actual essential vaccines which provide full immunity!

@CPhilpOfficial Tell me why can't they compete. Explain why employers are choosing not to employ them? Who was in charge of education and training for 14 out of the last 16 years that has delivered this outcome? Why did you allow poor preparation of UK youths and mass immigration?

97% of new jobs here for under 25s going to non-Europeans Only 3% going to UK under 25s, many of whom are now economically inactive (including a quarter of young people in London) Mass low skill migration, especially from the third world, must end completely This is not helping the economy - it’s creating mass unemployment among UK young people

@robinmonotti Tell me you don't know the difference between "weather" and "climate" by tweeting crap. I mean did you really pay for a tick so that you could demonstrate of stupid you are?

How do the climate alarmists explain that December 2022 had the COLDEST day since 2010 if supposedly there is a "global warming" phenomenon caused by the Industrial Revolution & the burning of hydrocarbons?

@RebelHQ Perhaps you should ask your self why the Government spends 40% of its universal credit on workers who are paid so badly by their employers the tax payer has to subsidise that employer.

They raised the minimum wage for young people to tht of experienced workers. 1) Why would a business employ a teen with no experience that needs to have an experienced worker show them the ropes and slow up existing workers? 2) If a business is willing to take on a teen, the experienced worker now thinks, I'm training someone but I'm earning the same as the guy I'm training. I'd want a pay rise or I'd be off. Labour hadn't the nous to sit down and see this coming. Rachel Reeves - former Bank of England Governor - nearly!😂 Now their scratching their head! - CLUELESS

@mrs_alyse Except they don't. I suggest you as yourself why you live in a country where 70% of the grid is more than 25 years old, much of it built in the 1960s–70s, not designed for today’s loads or for long‑distance renewable transmission.

The Brits actually have laws keeping people from fully opening their windows. A new level of ridiculous. They aren't allowed to open their own windows.

@TomG07581187 @KathyConWom So the highest temperature was recorded at Kew Gardens - must be all those rose bushes. Why do you take a tweet from someone who hasn't done their research at face value. Why are you so easily led? Why didn't you check?

@KathyConWom Yes it's such a surprise that there are high heat levels at Heathrow, all that concrete, glass and jets revving engines.

The UK’s ‘hottest ever May day’ was recorded at Heathrow Airport. 👉 Next to a runway. Does anyone still take this scaremongering seriously? #climate conservativewoman.co.uk/must-every-sun…

@KathyConWom FFS it wasn't. But you still say it is. Are you just stupid. It was at Kew Gardens.

@adamtoo__ @ClaireCoutinho Coming from a country where 70% of the grid is more than 25 years old, much of it built in the 1960s–70s, and not designed for today’s loads or for long‑distance renewable transmission I suggest you keep quiet. You didn't need to pay an immigrant for a tick to look stupid.

@ClaireCoutinho Call me crazy but if "air con" uses too much energy that only means you need more power plants. There's no shortage of power plants, only the decision to not to build them when they're needed...build a few more, heck build 50 more or 100 more...skies the limit!

Britain’s miserabilist view of energy policy is never as clear as during a heatwave. That’s because, unlike virtually every other civilised country, British housebuilders are de facto banned from installing air conditioning. Our building regulations say that housebuilders must exhaust every other “passive” option for cooling buildings – from airflow to shutters to awnings – before local council pen pushers will let them install air con. The result is that most of our homes are built without it. That’s why 3% of British homes have air con, compared to 90% in the US, Japan and Korea. Why do we have this mad ban in place? Because our political class, including erstwhile Conservatives such as Robert Jenrick, said it ‘used too much energy’. This is an anti-growth mindset that must be rejected. Cheap, abundant energy is the foundation of prosperity, but the problem with the net zero ideology is that it turned this fundamental truth on its head. Energy use became a bad thing to be demonised, and the result is that we made electricity scarce and expensive by focusing on decarbonisation over cost and security of supply. Prices went through the roof and fewer and fewer people now use it. But as energy demand has collapsed in the UK, so have growth and living standards. That’s why two years ago I made a speech saying we would need to prepare for more energy demand to fuel AI and air con, or risk becoming poorer and less prosperous. The fact that we are one of the only major economies that has decided the solution to hot days is to “sweat it out” tells you everything you need to know about our warped energy ideology. All the evidence shows that in heatwaves people sleep far fewer hours, productivity plummets and children struggle in school. Why would we limit access to a technology that is proven to save lives, boost productivity and make people more comfortable? It is even more absurd when you consider that Ed Miliband is carving up the countryside for masses of solar farms – solar farms that we are going to be paying millions of pounds to switch off when it’s too sunny in the summer. Yet air conditioning demand peaks in the summer at exactly the same time as those solar farms are generating more electricity than the grid can use. That’s how mad our energy policy is – we are now building energy generation that we want to stop the public from using. We really are through the looking glass now. This is all part of the mind rot that has infected all echelons of government, which sees UK energy usage as uniquely bad and will do everything it can to drive it down – even when that means transferring our industries’ emissions to coal-powered China, or blocking our households from enjoying the growth, prosperity and consumer benefits that other countries allow. That’s why rather than embrace AI, Labour are currently agonising about whether it’s compatible with net zero - and why they would rather use Putin’s oil than back our British industry in Aberdeen. Under Kemi Badenoch and my leadership, we Conservatives are taking a new approach. We need to get back to energy realism by repealing the Climate Change Act. We need to prioritise cheap, abundant energy by backing the North Sea, doubling down on nuclear and adopting our Cheap Power Plan to make electricity cheap. Energy policy should serve the needs of the British public, not the other way around. That’s why we would axe the outdated building regulations that are blocking air con and build an energy system which puts consumers first.