ShawnT82
3.8K posts
The schizophrenic black guy on the subway when he’s told to put his dick back in his pants:
English
@MAGAVoice Sad to use your own daughter as a lying excuse to restart the war with Iran.
English
@SMDURAES @hayes_nata3 Your little Twinkie would get you embarrassed.
English
🚨 BREAKING: President Joe Biden just called Donald Trump “a threat to the nation and democracy.”
That’s one of the strongest attacks we’ve heard yet ahead of the election season. 🇺🇸
Do YOU agree with Biden?
YES — Trump is a threat
NO — This is political fearmongering
Drop your answer below and explain why
English
We’ve now reached the “confront random Jews and berate them about how disgusting they are, and blame them for all our problems” stage of Jew derangement syndrome.
I cannot believe this is a real video.
English
@HockleyTyson A little taste of the medicine is not too bad. You know 🥺.
English
I’m not defending ChudTheBuilder, but this seems like more anti white racism.
How is it even legal to not allow him to use his give send go funds for bail??
English
Chud The Builder was denied a bond reduction. His bond remains at $1.25 million.
English
@therobbieharvey Give it to charity. They need it the most. This will help his supporter become a better person.
English
NEW: Chud The Builder’s GiveSendGo funds will be blocked.
So… if you’re still giving… 🤷🏼♂️
English
@War_Radar2 So fucking dumb. not true. Russia is winning on the battlefield, taking more territory every day. We all know this, and Ukraine is desperate, carrying out terrorist attacks using drones against civilians. Use your fucking brain, you fucking retard.
English
‼️🇷🇺🇺🇦🇪🇺 Putin escalates as Ukraine strikes back, Kremlin responds with nuclear drills in show of desperation
After Ukraine’s successful deep strikes inside Russian territory exposed Moscow's critical vulnerabilities, Vladimir Putin has ordered large scale nuclear readiness exercises involving missile forces, nuclear submarines, and strategic bomber units.
Critics say the move reflects pressure and escalation rather than confidence, as Moscow leans heavily on nuclear signaling while struggling to contain Ukraine’s sustained battlefield and strategic pressure.
Ukraine’s resistance continues to reshape the dynamics of the war, while Russia increasingly relies on fear based deterrence and high risk signaling.
English
@War_Radar2 Putin could have chosen to flatten Ukraine a long time ago, but he chose not to, unlike in all the other wars we have seen. The nuclear drilling is not a threat to Ukraine. It’s a threat to the NATO countries that are supporting Ukraine by building drones and giving them to Ukrai
English
@MyronGainesX Shut the fuck up, you dumb piece of shit. You're a disgrace, a fucking monkey brain. I don’t know why people follow your ass because you act like you’re important. A monkey calling people monkeys. he will get the maximum sentence and there’s nothing you can do about it.
English
Chud is has a valid self defense claim. The usual suspects are about to chimp out now 😂🫵🏽🐒
Andrew Branca Show@TheBrancaShow
WHAT A GREAT DAY FOR DALTON EATHERLY! TLDR: The State's case against Eatherly appears to be utterly lacking in ANY LEGAL MERIT WHATEVER, based upon what appears to be the official Affidavit of Complaint just made public (attached). This in a case in which the State's BURDEN is proof of guilt, and disproof of self-defense, beyond ANY REASONABLE DOUBT. All of it: So, it appears the affidavit of complaint against Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly has been made public, and the contents will ABSOLUTELY SHOCK many of you. FIRST SHOCKER: THERE IS NOT A SINGLE WORD ABOUT DALTON HAVING UTTERED ANY RACIAL SLUR TOWARDS JOSHUA FOX WHATEVER, SO AS TO HAVE PROVOKED THE FIGHT AND THUS TO HAVE LOST THE LEGAL JUSTIFICATION OF SELF-DEFENSE. NOT. ONE. WORD. That was Dalton's biggest potential vulnerability on self-defense, and we can now be confident that we can put that concern to rest. But it gets even BETTER for Dalton. SECOND SHOCKER: Even if self-defense IS NOT EVEN CONSIDERED, the Affidavit of Complaint fails to present ANY evidence-based narrative that Dalton has committed ANY CRIME WHATEVER. (But, of course, self-defense WILL be raised, only further buttressing Dalton's legal position.) Specifically, there's literally not a SINGLE WORD in this Affidavit of Complaint that describes ANY criminal conduct whatever. I've embedded the Affidavit in my possession, but for purposes of succinctness, the relevant portions reads: "... Dalton Eatherly and Joshua Fox engaged in a verbal altercation in front of the Montgomery County Courthouse." This is not a crime, unless it's merely the misdemeanor of disorderly conduct, which would apply equally to both Eatherly AND Foxx. And in any case Eatherly has not been charged with disorderly conduct (nor Fox, of course). "During this verbal altercation, Mr. Eatherly turned his body in a bladed stance towards Mr. Fox ..." There's nothing unlawful about taking a defensive stance when dealing with an angry antagonist. Certainly Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "taking a bladed stance." "... and reached for his firearm located in his right jacket pocket." Again, there's nothing unlawful about reaching for a firearm in one's pocket in preparation for possible necessary self-defense. Note that Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "reaching for a firearm in located in his right jacket pocket." "Thereafter, a physical altercation ensued." Note the passive voice. The "altercation ensued." There's no claim that EATHERLY initiated the "altercation." Indeed, if anything, to the extent the affidavit has detailed Eatherly's conduct, the absence of any representation of his conduct to indicate that it was EATHERLY who initiated the altercation, we can only infer that it was instead FOX who initiated the altercation. This would, of course, make Eatherly the VICTIM of Fox's unlawful attack upon him. The next paragraph: "Mr. Eatherly discharged his firearm, striking Mr. Fox multiple times." There's nothing inherently unlawful about discharging a firearm and shooting someone multiple times. Thousands of shootings that fit this description occur every year, and qualify as perfectly lawful self-defense. Of course, now self-defense need actually be put on the table. Then there's a discussion of Fox being flown to a hospital, followed by: "In addition, at the time shots were fired, there were several innocent bystanders in the area. Surveillance video fo the incident shows a ricocheting projectile hitting nearby walls." Again, there is nothing inherently unlawful about firing shots that miss the intended target. Police involved in lawful shootings of suspects routinely miss about 70% of the shots fired. Those shots ALSO go flying about the neighborhood until they hit something. None of that is a crime, absent evidence of recklessness--and the affidavit provides no statement of recklessness. Indeed, not a word of recklessness. Note that if the shots were fired in lawful self-defense, as a matter of law they were not fired recklessly. I would also note that there's not a word in this affidavit that even contests, much less contradicts, even a single legal element of Dalton's anticipated claim of self-defense. Not Innocence, not Imminence, not Proportionality, not Avoidance, and Not Reasonableness. Not a single element. Not a word of it. If this were a civil case, I would argue that this complaint fails to state a cause of action. Indeed, it's hard to recall the last time I saw an Affidavit of Complaint so utterly lacking in legal substance whatever. At this point I have to say that I've never felt more positive about Dalton Eatherly's claim of self-defense, at least based upon the representations of this apparently official "Affidavit of Complaint." If these facts provided in this Affidavit of Complaint are all the State of Tennessee has on which to prosecute Dalton on the attempted murder, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, and malicious firearms possession charges brought against him, I simply don't see any prospect to any reasonable degree of legal certainty of prosecutors securing a conviction on any of those charges beyond a reasonable doubt on the legal merits. HEY! IF YOU LIKE THIS KIND OF USE-OF-FORCE LEGAL ANALYSIS, and would like to know more about how to be HARD TO CONVICT if YOU are ever compelled to defend yourself, your family, or your property against criminal predation, consider picking up a FREE copy of my best-selling plain-English book, "The Law of Self-Defense: Principles" (we only ask that you cover the S&H). lawofselfdefense.com/FREEBOOK @AmiriKing @ArchetypeTheory @JackPosobiec @DLoesch @Timcast @TheOfficerTatum @MyronGainesX @TateTheTalisman
English
@LegacyProgramVP I hope he gets the maximum sentence so he learns, and his followers learn to have some human dignity. But I guess he doesn't know how because he was too quick to chimp out.
English
Dalton Eatherly aka ChudtheBuilder is looking at anywhere between 15-42 years if convicted of all charges and they run consecutively.
The breakdown:
- Attempted Murder: 5-15 years
- Firearm Enhancement: 6 years (mandatory)
- Aggravated Assault: 3-15 years
- Reckless Endangerment w/ deadly weapon: 1-6 years
The last charge would most likely be maximum penalty considering video evidence shows (according to reports) that bullets struck nearby buildings in an inhabited dwelling, with people walking around outside as well. If anything, he will most likely be found guilty of this charge at a bare minimum.
Also, it appears that a “Laylani Campbell” has been subpoenaed to potentially testify. It is my understanding after being sent information from a Facebook post that she currently works for the Montgomery County Sheriff’s office.
Let’s not forget, Joshua Fox still hasn’t been charged at all. If he was seen as the aggressor or instigated, then he would have been charged as well, especially given his criminal background.
My early prediction:
- (most likely) Bond will stay at $1.25 million with stipulations that Dalton cannot use his donation account as it was setup with the intention to help his family, not his legal fees. **I wouldn’t be surprised if the judge decides that he won’t have a bond after hearing the evidence tomorrow**
- Dalton will be found guilty and be sentenced to 15-20 years in prison, likely able to be released earlier on good behavior…if he doesn’t continue practicing his first amendment rights schtick in prison.
English
@TheBrancaShow You’re the dumbest attorney I have ever seen. Hope no one hires you.
English
@TheBrancaShow Shut the fuck up. You're a racist piece of shit. You defend a racist. That's what you are. This country will never be in a better place where people like you exist in it. You've seen all the videos with this guy provoking people. he simply provoked the guy and he pulled his gun.
English
WHAT A GREAT DAY FOR DALTON EATHERLY!
TLDR: The State's case against Eatherly appears to be utterly lacking in ANY LEGAL MERIT WHATEVER, based upon what appears to be the official Affidavit of Complaint just made public (attached).
This in a case in which the State's BURDEN is proof of guilt, and disproof of self-defense, beyond ANY REASONABLE DOUBT.
All of it: So, it appears the affidavit of complaint against Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly has been made public, and the contents will ABSOLUTELY SHOCK many of you.
FIRST SHOCKER: THERE IS NOT A SINGLE WORD ABOUT DALTON HAVING UTTERED ANY RACIAL SLUR TOWARDS JOSHUA FOX WHATEVER, SO AS TO HAVE PROVOKED THE FIGHT AND THUS TO HAVE LOST THE LEGAL JUSTIFICATION OF SELF-DEFENSE.
NOT. ONE. WORD.
That was Dalton's biggest potential vulnerability on self-defense, and we can now be confident that we can put that concern to rest.
But it gets even BETTER for Dalton.
SECOND SHOCKER: Even if self-defense IS NOT EVEN CONSIDERED, the Affidavit of Complaint fails to present ANY evidence-based narrative that Dalton has committed ANY CRIME WHATEVER. (But, of course, self-defense WILL be raised, only further buttressing Dalton's legal position.)
Specifically, there's literally not a SINGLE WORD in this Affidavit of Complaint that describes ANY criminal conduct whatever.
I've embedded the Affidavit in my possession, but for purposes of succinctness, the relevant portions reads:
"... Dalton Eatherly and Joshua Fox engaged in a verbal altercation in front of the Montgomery County Courthouse."
This is not a crime, unless it's merely the misdemeanor of disorderly conduct, which would apply equally to both Eatherly AND Foxx. And in any case Eatherly has not been charged with disorderly conduct (nor Fox, of course).
"During this verbal altercation, Mr. Eatherly turned his body in a bladed stance towards Mr. Fox ..."
There's nothing unlawful about taking a defensive stance when dealing with an angry antagonist. Certainly Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "taking a bladed stance."
"... and reached for his firearm located in his right jacket pocket."
Again, there's nothing unlawful about reaching for a firearm in one's pocket in preparation for possible necessary self-defense. Note that Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "reaching for a firearm in located in his right jacket pocket."
"Thereafter, a physical altercation ensued."
Note the passive voice. The "altercation ensued." There's no claim that EATHERLY initiated the "altercation."
Indeed, if anything, to the extent the affidavit has detailed Eatherly's conduct, the absence of any representation of his conduct to indicate that it was EATHERLY who initiated the altercation, we can only infer that it was instead FOX who initiated the altercation.
This would, of course, make Eatherly the VICTIM of Fox's unlawful attack upon him.
The next paragraph: "Mr. Eatherly discharged his firearm, striking Mr. Fox multiple times."
There's nothing inherently unlawful about discharging a firearm and shooting someone multiple times. Thousands of shootings that fit this description occur every year, and qualify as perfectly lawful self-defense. Of course, now self-defense need actually be put on the table.
Then there's a discussion of Fox being flown to a hospital, followed by: "In addition, at the time shots were fired, there were several innocent bystanders in the area. Surveillance video fo the incident shows a ricocheting projectile hitting nearby walls."
Again, there is nothing inherently unlawful about firing shots that miss the intended target. Police involved in lawful shootings of suspects routinely miss about 70% of the shots fired. Those shots ALSO go flying about the neighborhood until they hit something. None of that is a crime, absent evidence of recklessness--and the affidavit provides no statement of recklessness. Indeed, not a word of recklessness.
Note that if the shots were fired in lawful self-defense, as a matter of law they were not fired recklessly.
I would also note that there's not a word in this affidavit that even contests, much less contradicts, even a single legal element of Dalton's anticipated claim of self-defense. Not Innocence, not Imminence, not Proportionality, not Avoidance, and Not Reasonableness.
Not a single element. Not a word of it.
If this were a civil case, I would argue that this complaint fails to state a cause of action.
Indeed, it's hard to recall the last time I saw an Affidavit of Complaint so utterly lacking in legal substance whatever.
At this point I have to say that I've never felt more positive about Dalton Eatherly's claim of self-defense, at least based upon the representations of this apparently official "Affidavit of Complaint."
If these facts provided in this Affidavit of Complaint are all the State of Tennessee has on which to prosecute Dalton on the attempted murder, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, and malicious firearms possession charges brought against him, I simply don't see any prospect to any reasonable degree of legal certainty of prosecutors securing a conviction on any of those charges beyond a reasonable doubt on the legal merits.
HEY! IF YOU LIKE THIS KIND OF USE-OF-FORCE LEGAL ANALYSIS, and would like to know more about how to be HARD TO CONVICT if YOU are ever compelled to defend yourself, your family, or your property against criminal predation, consider picking up a FREE copy of my best-selling plain-English book, "The Law of Self-Defense: Principles" (we only ask that you cover the S&H).
lawofselfdefense.com/FREEBOOK
@AmiriKing @ArchetypeTheory @JackPosobiec @DLoesch @Timcast @TheOfficerTatum @MyronGainesX @TateTheTalisman
English
@TheBrancaShow Did you miss the one he posted a couple of days ago predicting his outcome? This guy is gonna die in jail. You're free to join me.
English
@jay2c8qe @Luther3792 Yeah, because they’re politicians and police officers, law enforcement.
English
@Luther3792 These fucking faggots don’t even show their face. How are you a man but scared to show who you are fucking clowns
English
Divisiveness is good. There ought to be a divide between our people and those who want us dead. #PatriotFront #LLV #IrynaZarutska #NEAC
English
DO NOT TELL TRUMP OR MAGA!!!!!
Jesus Was Not White. Not European. And Not Christian.
open.substack.com/pub/mjfree/p/j…
English