Nickydo

@UAPDr Why is it that actual proof is JUST out of reach.. like your fingers grazing the holy grail, as everything around you crumbles. This phenomenon has rules baked into it, that kicks in whenever we lift our cameras. it’s not going to let us see it until it wants us to.

@dantecro2 @SolarHeavy It's an ad. Can't block it unless I pay for the blue tick.

@Revolvix @SolarHeavy There are ways to stop seeing these types of posts. If you have to block them, you won't take the post anymore.If you have to whatever there are directions to not see the posts anymore

@FiredUpCoug 2022's "The Engagement Plot."

It's show time at my grandparent's house. This is one of their movie drawers. What should we watch?

@redheadranting Watched it in the cinema back in the day. Very funny movie, but not for everyone.

I am GenX and have never seen this movie. I grew up watching the original show every day after school, I couldn't understand why a remake would be worth my time. Is it?

@Grummz Oh cool they must have fixed 5. That must mean that my £60 copy of silent hill 2 remake runs buttery smooth now, £50 Oblivion remaster? All those games I've put back on the shelf, waiting to be fit for purpose are fixed now? I'm going to be a busy man!

Oh great, Unreal Engine 6 is doomed now.

@dantecro2 @SolarHeavy I'm all for them promoting their music. This ain't it. Timelines are filled with crap like this. They should fire their marketing department, ads like these just annoy the hell out of people.

@Revolvix @SolarHeavy Yo they should promote there music its not engagement farming like the people who do full on wild claims just to rile people up

@TheStingisBack She thinks it's slipped from her wrist. Her character wasn't the most intelligent in this one!

Priscilla Presley (81 today) had such a nice... The Naked Gun will always be a classic, nobody did it like Leslie Nielsen. I'm missing something here though… what’s the ankle bracelet joke supposed to mean?

@wow36932525 @InterstellarUAP It's a regurgitation channel. For the clicksssss....

@InterstellarUAP Funny guy -I do this for free show some courtesy.

Ross Coulthart: "Catastrophic UFO disclosure is a real risk" 👽🛸 He predicts catastrophic disclosure will happen as a reaction to intelligence communities covering up reverse engineering programs. "If the government continues down this path of soft disclosure and hides the truth from the public then whistleblowers will come forward and we could have catastrophic disclosure" The journalist warns an uncontrolled release of highly sensitive information could do more damage than public good.

@ARCRaidersGame There is currently no end-game. Projects done, decks finished. I play around 20 hours a week and it always ends up with me just wandering around aimlessly. You are currently bleeding players through the nose. No real, tangible rewards for trials.

⭐️ Trials Season 4 - May 25 - 31 Loot. Burn. Explode. Repeat. Hope you’re well stocked on Blaze Grenades, Raiders - sometimes the best solution to a problem is to set all your enemies on fire 🔥 Next week in Trials you’ll be looting Weapon Crates, dealing damage to Shredders and Bombardiers, and bring the fight to the ARC lurking in the Red Lakes.

@JeremyCorbell @g_knapp @WeaponizedPod @MichaelLazovsk3 Theres no way for anybody to see who you have blocked Jeremy, you need to list them otherwise it makes your block day completely null and void.

INTERNATIONAL BLOCK THE BULLOCKS DAY - MAY 23 Since dropping the movie SLEEPING DOG, I’ve been watching. Watching how certain government factions and their IC-adjacent operatives respond when truth reaches the public. What I’ve confirmed is no longer theory. It’s documented. And honestly? It’s weaksauce. Here’s what I now have hard confirmation on… Certain government initiatives have been LEGALLY deploying coordinated bot networks and paid sockpuppet accounts to flood UAP news stories with disinformation. This isn’t speculation. Just 10 days ago 13 MAY, CIA Senior Operations Officer James E. Erdman III (@Jerdman2005) testified before the Senate Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee about exactly this kind of internal corruption. Look it up. I’ve kept my comments open for years - deliberately. It was an investigative choice. To observe how they operate. Let them reveal their playbook. Let them think they’re winning 😉 They did. They weren’t 🥋 And I’ll say this plainly. I expected more. The tactics are unsophisticated. The bots are clumsy. The narratives are recycled and lazy. The people running these operations either fundamentally underestimate the American public - or they’ve simply never had a real conversation with one. Either way, they miscalculated - on a monumental level. And that’s fascinating! Patience has a season. That’s over. Today I’m doing something simple and clarifying. I’m blocking approximately 50 accounts - bots, paid shills, and regime-serving noise rustlers - who’ve been weaponizing my platform, your platform, our platform… to muddy the waters on UAP disclosure. When I’m done, see who I blocked. That’s what a state-adjacent influence operation looks like up close. Unimpressive. Outmatched. Exposed. Let me be direct about who is getting blocked. These are not skeptics. These are not critical thinkers. These are not even worthy adversaries. These are people who sold their intellectual credibility - if they ever had any - to run interference on the single most important truth-seeking conversation in human history. They are less perceptive than the average American asking honest questions at their kitchen table. They got paid to be blind. To the IC professionals doing the right thing - you already know what I’m referencing. Check your own systems. The JWICS. You know the operation. You know the memo - the one where @CIA outlined how to “shape the emerging UAP narrative.” I’ve read it. I’ve reported it. @G_Knapp knows too. The people with integrity inside these institutions know EXACTLY what I’m talking about. Don’t capitulate. To everyone else, my WEAPONIZED family… you were never as fooled as they needed you to be. You were never as passive as they counted on. And you are not going to stop now. ONE battlefield is social media - and we can use that against them. But the REAL battlefield? It’s simpler and older and more powerful than any algorithm they’ve ever built. It’s your voice. In your kitchen. At your job. With your family. On your street. Unfiltered, unmanaged, and pointed directly at the truth. They can manipulate a feed. They cannot manipulate a conversation between two people who have decided to stop being quiet. So here’s the move… BE LOUD. TAG PEOPLE. SAY WHAT YOU MEAN. MEAN WHAT YOU SAY. FOLLOW THROUGH. Nothing disrupts a perception management operation faster than millions of clear-eyed people talking to each other without permission. Today, 23 MAY is International Block The Bullocks Day. Clean your house. Block the noise. Make room for the real fight. Because serious, rigorous, legitimate debate on UAP is not only welcome here - it is necessary for what comes next. The public deserves that debate. The truth demands it. The Gremlins getting starved now - no more feeding them 🐺👾 “Let’s light this candle.” - Alan Shepard (First American in space / 5 MAY, 1961) Your brother in this fight, always, Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell (aka 5Name) GO GO UFO!!! 🛸🥷

@ArcRaidersInfo I don't understand. Map conditions are cool but I literally have NOTHING to work towards. Projects done, decks done. I play around 20 hours a week and I end up just wandering about. Their endgame simply doesn't exist, and that's a big problem.

All 3 upcoming ARC Raiders map conditions! 🧪 Toxic Swamp: “Geothermal fissures have erupted beneath the swamp, releasing both toxic gases and rare natural resources." ☔️ Acid Rain: “An especially sour rain corrodes everything on the surface, harming any Raider caught outdoors." 🔥 Heatwave: "A scorching sun has been beating down on everything and everyone, making it exhausting just to get around. Stay in the shadows if you can." These may come before the big update in October.

@drew4worldruler I saw that one too and thought it was interesting the way it veered pretty sharp. Shame it gets blocked by the top bar just as it's doing something interesting. I think they are in our mountains as well as the ocean.

Ok, so here’s the one that has caught my attention and I haven’t seen anyone talking about it. DOW-UAP-PR061, "SPHERICAL UAP [CALLSIGN] 2021/04/12 VID 0" I’ve clipped this video and slowed it to half speed to highlight what I find most interesting. At around the 0:33 mark (3:50 in the original linked in the comments), you can see the object dives down along the cliff face, then circles towards a structure that may or may not be natural in the shadow of the cliff. You can clearly see the shadow created by the object projected on the ground, so this isn’t a sensor artifact. Lacking a frame of reference, it’s difficult to estimate the speed or size of the object. The video was captured by a “U.S. military platform,” so most likely a recon drone. The MQ-9 typically cruises at 30,000 feet which is pretty much the only information we have unless someone can identify the topography. The intelligent maneuvering in the descent appears to rule out a balloon being the explanation. And while it seems based on the topological features that this is too large and moving too fast too consistently to be a bird, that can’t be ruled out until someone is able to geolocate the video. And yes, I know what pareidolia is as far as the circled feature on the cliff face, but I thought the straight lines and 90° angles were worth noting. Anyone have thoughts on this one? Stay curious.

The DOW, and AARO, has far better footage than this. They are giving us pixelated birds and balloons, and launching them as a PERFECT springboard for Mick West to wax lyrical and say they are birds and balloons. It's done on purpose. They ain't EVER going to show the good stuff.

@openshutter21 That's one hell of a mountain view you have there too. Stunning.

I'm probably going to lose my "man card" for this one 🤦 This bee has been hanging around for the past two days. My first instinct was to whack it with my hat and stomp on it as he came in hot looking like he wanted to sting me. As the day went on he kept coming back and just hovering right beside us. He literally hung out with Ryder and I all day yesterday. This morning a better spot opened up at the campground about 500ft away so I figured that was the last that I saw of him. About 15min ago he's back just hovering in a non threatening way (vid in comments). I think I'm starting to like this bee, or I might be losing my mind, or a little of both.

@ARIEBARHEN1 @Thekingofufos Cool, an AI "podcaster" quoting scripture. That's not creepy at all ...

🚨 BOMBSHELL INTERVIEW: Harvard Prof. Avi Loeb Drops Major ET Revelations! 🚨 In my explosive new interview, renowned Harvard astrophysicist and Galileo Project leader Professor Avi Loeb reveals he has found evidence of extraterrestrial (extrasolar) materials recovered from the deep ocean floor during the Galileo Project’s historic expedition to Papua New Guinea. The results? To be published soon! 🔥 He also breaks down the latest Trump UFO disclosure files, analyzes what’s been released so far, and explains why he believes life on Earth originated from Mars through panspermia. This is one of the most important conversations on the search for extraterrestrial intelligence happening right now. Don’t miss it! 👉 Watch the full interview here: youtu.be/7Uy4SteJHCg What do you think — are we looking at the first confirmed interstellar artifacts on Earth? 👽🔭 #AviLoeb #GalileoProject #UFO #UAP #Extraterrestrial #TrumpUFO #Panspermia #Interstellar

@un1versalist It doesn't look quite so simple in his new film. I'm seeing at least three different shapes of UAP in trailers and TV spots. I'm certainly intrigued, but got stung after watching a lackluster second half of his war of the worlds. Cautiously optimistic let's say!

One thing I love about Spielberg is how simple he keeps it with NHI No cryptoterrestial, alternate reality fancy pants BS He's old school ETH crew like myself We're still out here in cyberspace and on Colbert

@DocStrangelove2 Despised this game. Questioning system made absolutely zero sense. Follow ups were completely unrelated and I failed every time. The setting and face animations were ok.

L.A. Noire had the unique ability of going from 0 to 60 at any time.

@InfinityDisclsd I don't like the highly produced "SCIF" sets, and the AI renditions of cases that have already been covered by hard working, boots on the ground researchers spanning decades. I won't be fooled by it, it's a bro circle created to make money, dressed up as "infotainment."

Ufology Does Not Owe You a Living: The Personal Grievance at the Center of the Disclosure Economy This piece circulating argues there should be more money in ufology, that researchers and creators in the field are systematically undercompensated, and that the audience's reluctance to pay constitutes a moral failure. The original article is right about one thing: there is a pattern in this community of using ‘grift’ to police almost any attempt at monetization, and creators will burn out if all serious work is expected to be free - but the argument is built on a personal memoir of poverty followed by a transposition of that experience onto the field as a whole. It's the wrong diagnosis. The framing presents a personal career problem as a structural problem of an entire field, and the rhetorical move at the center of the piece is what produces most of the disclosure economy's actual pathologies. Compensation for serious work is legitimate. Books, papers, documented archives, original investigations, sustained research. Nobody serious disputes that researchers should be paid for the work they produce. But the argument under examination is different. It says: I chose to build a career in this field, the career is not paying me what I want, and the audience that will not fund it at the level I require is failing the cause. That is a personal grievance with the market for a niche. It is the same grievance that opera professionals could make, that indie documentary filmmakers could make, that working poets could make, that academic philosophers could make. None of them make it, because the niche reality of those fields is treated as a fact about the world rather than a moral demand on the audience. The piece sidesteps that comparison by elevating the topic. The entire load-bearing premise is one phrase. "The most important topic in human history." If you accept that elevation, audience indifference becomes a moral failure and the rest of the argument follows. If you reject the elevation, the argument collapses to: I picked a niche, please pay more. That elevation is not the audience's responsibility to accept. It is the writer's responsibility to demonstrate. The way you demonstrate the importance of work in a research field is by producing work that survives scrutiny. Writing essays asserting the importance and asking why the money has not followed does not accomplish it. But there is a deeper issue underneath all of this. A field has to decide what it is. A research field is organized around verifiable output. The economic structures that grow up around it, books, conferences, institutional positions, are delivery formats for the underlying work. The optimization function is truth-tracking. A content category is organized around audience attention. The economic structures that grow up around it, subscriptions, engagement metrics, agency representation, are extraction mechanisms. The optimization function is reach. You cannot run the first as if it were the second without the second consuming the first. That is the actual structural problem of the disclosure economy, and it is not solved by demanding the audience pay more. It is produced, in significant part, by exactly the agency model the Pursuing X reply positions as the answer. An agency is not a champion of the field. An agency is a service vendor whose product is client revenue growth. Its incentives optimize for whatever performs in the feed. Cliffhangers perform. Indefinitely deferred revelation performs. Confirmable claims that turn out wrong do not perform, because they close the loop. The monetized drip is what the agency model produces when you point it at a research topic. It is also a model with a structural interest in the question never resolving, because resolution collapses engagement. That is not a conspiracy claim. It is the math of the business model. Agencies amplify whoever pays them. They do not select based on rigor, originality, or contribution. The figures who get the agency treatment are the figures who already monetize well enough to afford the fees. That is the opposite of supporting the people doing the most important work. Adjacent serious fields do not have this layer for a reason. Science journalism has editors and outlets. Academic research has institutions and peer review. None of them have a sector of agencies whose product is to build a business around a figure in the field. When that sector forms inside a field, it is a sign the field has begun to organize around personality and brand rather than around work product. The question for ufology is what it wants to be. If it is a research field, the model is books, papers, archives, documented investigations, free distribution of the underlying evidence with paid premium formats around it. If ufology is a content category organized around audience revenue, then the agency model is the natural endpoint, and the field will produce exactly what every other content category organized around audience revenue produces. Optimized cliffhangers. Permanent unresolution. A class of intermediaries whose financial outcomes depend on the question never closing. That is what the disclosure economy is. The argument that there should be more money in it is an argument for accelerating exactly the dynamic that has hollowed the field out. The personal grievance is not the audience's problem. The framing that converts personal grievance into moral demand on the audience is the field's actual problem. The agency layer that monetizes the framing is the most refined expression of it. The structural point holds in every case. Choosing a niche means accepting the economics of the niche. Producing important work in that niche may or may not be rewarded by the market. The audience that does not pay enough to sustain the career one wanted is doing nothing wrong. It is making the ordinary decisions audiences make. If anything, the Strieber case strengthens the argument rather than weakening it. He has done the work. He has the credentials. He has built the monetization layer. He has the demonstrable output. And he is still struggling. That is what the niche economically supports. The field is doing what fields do. The writer who chose it is responsible for that choice.

@AronOzmeir @realannapaulina I bet you're a hoot at parties.

Only if you're stupid and downloaded executables without scanning them. The only reason it destroyed your computer is because of YOU. Guess how long I've used anti-virus? NEVER Guess how old my password is: Since before you were born. I've never changed it. Why? Because I'm not an idiot user.

Literally destroyed any computer it touched. 🤣

@realannapaulina I thought I was being edgy back in the day and downloaded Scissor Sisters Debut album. It took a day and when I finally clicked play, all the songs were 10 seconds loops of the beginning of track one. Never forget it!