King Clip-on Tie

82.1K posts

King Clip-on Tie banner
King Clip-on Tie

King Clip-on Tie

@RichardClip

'Guess you think you're an authority figure there, huh buddy, rulin' over your little booth. You know these are the limits of YOUR life, man, you pathetic POS'

Florida, USA Katılım Mayıs 2019
6K Takip Edilen5.4K Takipçiler
King Clip-on Tie
King Clip-on Tie@RichardClip·
'So you didn't actually see my client bite off the victim's ear; right?' 'I did not' 'Then how can you say he did bite it off?' 'I saw him spit it out'
English
0
0
1
41
King Clip-on Tie
King Clip-on Tie@RichardClip·
agree Regardless of the legality of our taking VZ oil (questionable at best), NO ONE in VZ can possibly be anything but really PO'd by our doing it. They will not get any happier as this goes on. I suspect a big part of Trump's real motive here is his belief that Maduro can (& will, thru plea bargain) provide the evidence he needs to prove the 20 election fraud he keeps claiming is true (remember, Chavez-designed voting machines). But Maduro cannot & will not do that (even if he wanted to lie, he'd have to go thru his own lawyers' ethical obligations & trial court scrutiny to do so). Once Trump realizes this, he'll lose whatever interest he has here (except taking that free oil). VZ people will continue to suffer under same corrupt regime, which will just keep paying off Trump so he won't interfere in what it does.
English
0
0
0
17
King Clip-on Tie
King Clip-on Tie@RichardClip·
@BraddrofliT exactly 'Those who understand these matters have no need to discuss them. They know it; they recognize it in each other; & they confer immortality on each other.' E. Hemingway
English
0
0
1
54
Brad
Brad@BraddrofliT·
Ladies & Gents - a member of the Trump cult 🤦🤦🤦 If you have to actually type this bs, you're a weak little boy....not a man.
Brad tweet media
English
2.3K
871
6.4K
120.1K
Ken Gardner
Ken Gardner@KenGardner11·
I hate to be that guy, but under what actual legal authority can Trump allocate money to the TSA that has not been specifically appropriated by Congress? Is it not the same problem as Biden's attempt to cancel student loans?
English
134
17
176
13.2K
Terry Jepson
Terry Jepson@terry_jepson·
@highbrow_nobrow If she is too dumb to answer a simple question "Who won the 2020 presidential election?", then we have to question if she has the smarts to work for the federal government.
English
1
0
1
109
The Intellectualist
The Intellectualist@highbrow_nobrow·
U.S. Senator: Who won the 2020 election? Trump nominee: *(doesn’t answer)* U.S. Senator: That’s not my question. Who won? Trump nominee: *(doesn’t answer)*. (2026)
English
18
103
524
29.8K
Warren Kinsella
Warren Kinsella@kinsellawarren·
Lots of conservatives, lots of otherwise-sane people, are hurting themselves, long-term, for their silence on Trump's madness. They will wear it, long after he is gone.
English
293
106
688
16.3K
Mark Slapinski
Mark Slapinski@mark_slapinski·
I might lose followers for this, but it needs to be said: Trump is BY FAR the worst president in American history. He's a pedophile, a con artist, and a war criminal. May he burn in hell.
English
2.6K
7.3K
54.3K
514.4K
King Clip-on Tie
King Clip-on Tie@RichardClip·
@Martina Ah yes, ye ole 'we're on TV' defense to a service-of-process issue, 1st recognized in the common law in the famous 1619 decision of Lord Coke in Flack v. Partyhack ...
English
0
0
0
18
King Clip-on Tie
King Clip-on Tie@RichardClip·
@SundaeDivine Ah yes, ye ole 'we're on TV' defense to a service-of-process issue, 1st recognized in the common law in the famous 1619 decision of Lord Coke in Flack v. Partyhack ...
English
0
0
0
29
King Clip-on Tie
King Clip-on Tie@RichardClip·
@WalterAppling @JonahDispatch Ah yes, ye ole 'we're on TV' defense to a service-of-process issue, 1st recognized in the common law in the famous 1619 decision of Lord Coke in Flack v. Partyhack ...
English
1
1
2
17
Sheldon Whitehouse
Sheldon Whitehouse@SenWhitehouse·
Joe Biden won the election in 2020. If a future judge can’t admit that, what’s left?
English
2.5K
3.6K
12.1K
192.8K
King Clip-on Tie
King Clip-on Tie@RichardClip·
@DerekCressman Ah yes, ye ole 'we're on TV' defense to a service-of-process issue, 1st recognized in the common law in the famous 1619 decision of Lord Coke in Flack v. Partyhack ...
English
0
0
0
13
King Clip-on Tie
King Clip-on Tie@RichardClip·
@herotimeszero Ah yes, ye ole 'we're on TV' defense to a service-of-process issue, 1st recognized in the common law in the famous 1619 decision of Lord Coke in Flack v. Partyhack ...
English
0
1
9
355
King Clip-on Tie
King Clip-on Tie@RichardClip·
@Kanew Ah yes, ye ole 'we're on TV' defense to a service-of-process issue, 1st recognized in the common law in the famous 1619 decision of Lord Coke in Flack v. Partyhack ...
English
0
0
0
50
King Clip-on Tie
King Clip-on Tie@RichardClip·
@bluegeorgia @RonFilipkowski Ah yes, ye ole 'we're on TV' defense to a service-of-process issue, 1st recognized in the common law in the famous 1619 decision of Lord Coke in Flack v. Partyhack ...
English
0
0
0
36
Ron Filipkowski
Ron Filipkowski@RonFilipkowski·
Mike Lindell was served with a lawsuit today while doing an interview at CPAC.
English
1.5K
6.5K
44K
2.6M
King Clip-on Tie
King Clip-on Tie@RichardClip·
@micyoung75 x.com/RichardClip/st…
King Clip-on Tie@RichardClip

22A only bars being 'elected' 3d time. Doesn't bar running, being on ticket, or people voting for him. 'Election' presumably occurs on J6, when election results are formalized. That may be 1st day on which ct challenge can be filed. If Rs nominate him again, they're taking a big chance that SCOTUS won't declare him ineligible on J6. VP would then become POTUS, presumably. x.com/RichardClip/st…

QME
1
0
0
528
Mike Young
Mike Young@micyoung75·
The 22nd Amendment was ratified in 1951 as a direct response to FDR’s four terms. It was passed by a Republican-controlled Congress. It was not designed to be optional. Graham’s spokesperson said he misspoke. That is the right call — Trump is constitutionally barred from a third term and the courts would enforce that. But the ambient vocabulary of this movement — “irreplaceable,” “do everything we can,” “we’ll never get another” — creates a frame that serves the Third Term Project whether or not anyone uses the words directly. What actually changes behavior in November isn’t whether Trump can legally run in 2028. It’s whether the people who cheered Graham today treat the midterms as a vote for Trump’s continued hold on power — which is exactly what the Republican leadership at CPAC is asking them to do. Graham misspoke on the constitutional mechanics. He described the political psychology precisely.
Headquarters@HQNewsNow

Franklin Graham at CPAC: I love Donald Trump. We'll never get another president like Donald Trump. That is why it's important we do everything we can to try to get him re-elected.

English
3
8
100
13.7K
King Clip-on Tie
King Clip-on Tie@RichardClip·
@dilanesper It took decades to learn the cost of the 'victory' of the overthrow of Mossadegh ...
English
0
0
1
24
Dilan Esper
Dilan Esper@dilanesper·
the newest talking point is that the undefined "victory" over Iran will pay off for decades to come. this is where they shift when they know that based on any current metric this is a massive screw up
English
3
2
37
980
King Clip-on Tie
King Clip-on Tie@RichardClip·
I tend to agree. But if we have to appeal to the 'spirit' of the applicable law, it's because the plain language leads to the opposite conclusion. It seems authors of 22A didn't think this thru too well. Hopefully, SCOTUS won't have to address the issue; Rs will be taking a big chance if they try to pull off something like this ...
English
0
0
0
4
Larry Sabato
Larry Sabato@LarrySabato·
@RichardClip Not frivolous but I have to believe that a Supreme Court would hold this back door method of ‘election’ to be in violation of the spirit of the Constitution as amended. Even THIS Trumpy Supreme Court.
English
1
0
2
33

Keşfet

@BraddrofliT @KenGardner11 @terry_jepson @highbrow_nobrow @kevinbaum013 @kinsellawarren @mark_slapinski @Martina