Linzi 🖤🤍

@BarryStill2 Fantastic news!! 🔥🔥🔥🔥

Happy Friday evening pet. @RightNUFC

@KelKamikaze1 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@RightNUFC 😅🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Hasn’t even bothered to read the judgement. 🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭 When all else fails, act belligerent and name call like a 3 year old. 😜

@Hellar_eal253 @HoltFelix37777

@HoltFelix37777 @RightNUFC Sue literally cannot cite anything in it. Her lawyers must be so embarrassed.

Oops. Look a bit silly now….. don’t you. 🤭 hilldickinson.com/our-view/artic…

@HoltFelix37777 @Hellar_eal253 I’ve just realised you’re that other weirdo’s alt account. You’ve come to back yourself up. That’s hilarious 🤣🤣

@RightNUFC @Hellar_eal253 No you have nothing to prove. You have already proved you don't understand the limitations of "your" High Court Judgement.

@Hellar_eal253 No, read what the judge says in the ruling. If you’re not willing to read the ruling, then you’re just making yourself look a fool. Now, I’ve finished work and I’m going to meet my friends for a drink. I’m done with you now. Have a lovely evening and weekend 😊

@RightNUFC 🤣 so you admit it isn't in there?

@Hellar_eal253 Read it for yourself, if you’re so adamant of what it says, then you should be able to show me where I am wrong. But you can’t, because you haven’t read it. ❤️

@RightNUFC Show me where in the judgement it says the police are banned from wearing pride flags and/or lanyards. It's your judgement. Show me. You can't can you? Because it's NOT IN THERE. Stay mad.

@Hellar_eal253 @HoltFelix37777 You haven’t even read it. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@RightNUFC @HoltFelix37777 And yet, you don't even know what it means. Makes you looks so, so sad.

@RightNUFC Aww, you're REALLY thick aren't you? You've misunderstood your own source. The court didn't ban Pride flags it said on-duty police marching in uniform in that specific context breached impartiality. That's a long way from "institutions aren't allowed to display the flag".

@DeanaHoggat Ha! 🤣🤣

@RightNUFC Adeya’s argument failed so badly, she’s changing her name to Fail Mcfale.

🚨 Eddie Howe says stories that Bruno Guimarães is in talks with Man United are disrespectful: 🗣️ “I don’t know how to respond, I don’t even think I should. It’s a waste of my energy. Bruno is our captain and he’s injured. His only focus is coming back to fitness. 🗣️ “(The story) is not necessarily a problem for us, but it’s unwanted news. You don’t want your players distracted … I don’t know how much they’ll absorb that. 🗣️ “But for me it’s not the time. In the summer you can sort of understand those stories a little bit more because the transfer window is open, but to say our captain is in discussions with another club is totally disrespectful to Bruno more than anybody else. He’s totally committed here.” #NUFC

@HoltFelix37777 @Hellar_eal253 Read the judgement anonymous person with no profile picture. I have nothing to prove, that was done when I won my court case ❤️

@RightNUFC @Hellar_eal253 Your High Court Judgement does not say unequivocally that police can never display Pride flags in any situation, it’s a case‑specific judicial review decision, not a general statutory prohibition.

@Hellar_eal253 @HertsPolice Says the person who hasn’t even bothered to read it. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Take care ❤️

@RightNUFC @HertsPolice It must really hurt to have such little understanding of what it actually means for the only exciting thing to ever happen in your life.

Well, @HertsPolice clearly did not get the memo when I won my high court case. Just like you’re not allowed to display the flag on your Police vehicles, just like you’re not allowed to display it at public events like pride, public engagement is also not an excuse to display politically charged messaging when you are supposed to be an impartial public service. Infuriating.

@Hellar_eal253 @HertsPolice Sorry you’re incapable of having a grown up conversation. ❤️

@RightNUFC @HertsPolice Sorry you're so thick. And that this was the most exciting thing to ever happen to you.

@Hellar_eal253 @HertsPolice It is your job to read the ruling, if you’re not going to bother then I’m giving you no more of my time. Take care ❤️

@RightNUFC @HertsPolice Even if we limit it to the police the judgment still doesn't say they are prohibited from displaying Pride flags or symbols. You've posted it multiple times but still can't point to a single line that says what you're claiming. You're an idiot

@Hellar_eal253 @mc_simmy @HertsPolice

@RightNUFC @mc_simmy @HertsPolice And yet you remain so wrong.

Understand it perfectly, now stop embarrassing yourself. If you haven’t taken the time to read and understand the full judgement, then you’re pissing into the wind with me. You have no idea what you’re talking about without reading it. You’re just showing yourself to be rather lazy and ignorant to true facts….but that isn’t surprising 🤣 Have a nice day ❤️

@RightNUFC @HertsPolice No. It doesn't. You clearly don't understand WHAT it says. And you can't show me where you think it does. HOW embarrassing for you.

It was never about public bodies, the original post was aimed at the police, it was the police I brought the case against. You TRA’s love to try and obfuscate from the truth and pretend not to understand words, it’s really quite sad. You can’t even have a conversation without name calling. Read the ruling or don’t read it, makes no difference to me because there is many documented articles and an official judgement proving I’m right. Cry more. 😘

@RightNUFC @mc_simmy @HertsPolice And now you've just shifted the argument to something else because you know you are wrong. You must be humiliated.

@Hellar_eal253 @HertsPolice Yes it does, you clearly haven’t read the ruling. Absolutely tragic 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@RightNUFC @HertsPolice Again idiot, nowhere in that judgment does it say that police are prohibited from displaying Pride flags or symbols. It deals with a specific instance of participation in a Pride event, not a general ban. If you think it does, quote the exact paragraph - because it isn't there.