Harry Clap

None of the information posted or repeated on this account is known by its author to be false, nor intended to stir racial or any hatred of, nor cause psychological or physical harm to, any person or group of people (howsoever identified).

@Rat_1960 @JAHeale Mate ur the one comparing apples with oranges. dropping 70% of ur seats in an election is quintessential ‘meltdown’

@HarryClap52652 @JAHeale Well yes that would be if it happened. That is for three election cycles on the trot Labour dropped 70% of seats. Takes until 2030 assuming no council re-organisation.

Lord Hayward, pollster and Tory peer, has done his forecasts for next week’s council elections: 🩵Reform - gain 1550 🔶Lib Dems - gain 150 🌴Tories - lose 600 🌹Labour - lose 1850

@brivael @zoeharcombe “Not a single ministry has invented anything that's changed your daily life” WRONG! The EU has VASTLY improved my life in Spain, by ensuring plastic bottle caps stay attached when unscrewed! SpaceX? Rural Internet? Self-driving cars? All useless in comparison🤣🤣🤣

Elon Musk avait dit un truc qui m'avait marqué sur l'allocation de ressources. En substance : passé un certain niveau de richesse, l'argent n'est plus de la consommation, c'est de l'allocation de capital. Cette phrase change tout. L'économie, dans le fond, c'est juste un problème d'allocation. Tu as des ressources finies et des usages infinis. Qui décide où va quoi ? Imagine une cour de récré. 100 enfants, des paquets de cartes Pokémon distribués au hasard. Tu laisses faire. Très vite, un ordre émerge. Les bons joueurs accumulent les cartes rares, les collectionneurs trient, les négociateurs trouvent des deals. Personne n'a planifié. Et pourtant chaque carte finit dans les mains de celui qui en tire le plus de valeur. Le système maximise le bonheur total de la cour. C'est ça, la main invisible. Maintenant fais entrer la maîtresse. Elle trouve ça injuste. Léo a 50 cartes, Tom en a 3. Elle confisque, redistribue, impose l'égalité. Trois effets immédiats. Les bons joueurs arrêtent de jouer, à quoi bon. Les mauvais n'ont plus de raison de progresser, ils auront leur part. Les échanges s'effondrent. La cour est égale, et morte. Elle a maximisé l'égalité, elle a détruit le bonheur. Le problème de la maîtresse, c'est qu'elle ne peut pas avoir l'information que la cour avait collectivement. C'est le problème du calcul économique de Mises, formulé en 1920. L'URSS a essayé de le résoudre pendant 70 ans avec le Gosplan. Résultat : pénuries, queues, effondrement. Pas parce que les Soviétiques étaient bêtes, parce que le problème est mathématiquement insoluble en mode centralisé. Quand Musk a 200 milliards, il ne les consomme pas, il les alloue. SpaceX, Starlink, Neuralink, xAI. Chaque dollar est un pari sur le futur. Et lui a un track record. PayPal, Tesla, SpaceX. Il a démontré qu'il sait identifier des problèmes immenses et y allouer des ressources avec un rendement spectaculaire. L'État aussi a un track record. Hôpitaux qui s'effondrent, éducation qui décline, dette qui explose, services publics qui se dégradent malgré des budgets en hausse constante. Le marché identifie les bons allocateurs, la politique identifie les bons communicants. Le profit n'est pas une finalité, c'est un signal. Il dit : tu as alloué des ressources rares vers un usage que les gens valorisent suffisamment pour payer. Plus le profit est gros, plus la création de valeur est grande. Quand Starlink est rentable, ça veut dire que des millions de gens dans des zones rurales ont enfin internet. Quand un ministère est en déficit, ça veut dire qu'il consomme plus qu'il ne produit. L'un crée, l'autre détruit, et on appelle ça redistribution. Dans nos sociétés il y a deux catégories d'acteurs. Les entrepreneurs et les bureaucrates. L'entrepreneur prend un risque personnel pour identifier un problème, mobiliser des ressources, créer une solution. S'il se trompe il perd. S'il a raison, ses clients gagnent, ses employés gagnent, ses fournisseurs gagnent, l'État collecte des impôts. Il est la cellule de base du progrès humain. Le bureaucrate ne prend aucun risque personnel. Son salaire est garanti. Au mieux il maintient une rente existante. Au pire il la détruit par excès de réglementation, mauvaise allocation forcée, incitations perverses qui découragent ceux qui produisent. Mais dans aucun cas il ne crée. Regarde les 50 dernières années. iPhone, internet civil, SpaceX, Tesla, Google, Amazon, Stripe, mRNA, ChatGPT. Toutes des inventions privées, portées par des entrepreneurs, financées par du capital risque. Pas un seul ministère n'a inventé quoi que ce soit qui ait changé ta vie au quotidien. La France est devenue le laboratoire mondial de la dérive bureaucratique. 57% du PIB en dépenses publiques, record absolu. Une administration tentaculaire, une fiscalité qui pénalise la création de richesse. Résultat : décrochage face aux États-Unis, à l'Allemagne, à la Suisse. Fuite des cerveaux. Désindustrialisation. Dette qui explose. Et le pire c'est que la mauvaise allocation s'auto-renforce. Plus l'État prélève, moins les entrepreneurs créent. Moins ils créent, moins il y a de base fiscale. Plus l'État s'endette et taxe. Boucle de rétroaction négative parfaite. La maîtresse pense qu'elle aide, et chaque année la cour produit moins. Dans nos sociétés, ce sont les entrepreneurs, toujours, qui font avancer la civilisation. Les bureaucrates au mieux maintiennent une rente, au pire la détruisent. Aucune société n'a jamais progressé en taxant ses créateurs pour subventionner ses gestionnaires. La question n'est jamais qui a combien. C'est qui alloue le mieux la prochaine unité de ressource pour maximiser le futur de l'humanité. La réponse depuis 200 ans n'a jamais changé. Ce ne sont pas les fonctionnaires.

@Rat_1960 @JAHeale Extrapolating the figures for this election to ‘total’ councillors, would mean a drop from 5850 to just 1580! What exactly do I consider a ‘meltdown’? 😂

@JAHeale Well 5,850 total Labour councillors 2,550 up for an election. Losing 1,850 of those while painful for Labour is not a meltdown.

@GriftReport She looks sexier now. But I’ve always liked older women.

Davinia Taylor, 47, claims she's biohacked her biological age down by 28 years to just 20, the former Hollyoaks actress and ex-Primrose Hill party girl has been sober for 17 years after ditching the wild lifestyle, she now swears by ancestral nutrition like bone broth packed with minerals and vitamins plus good fats to kill snack attacks, Taylor promotes the hacks in her book Kitchen Rehab and uses infrared saunas for 20-minute detoxes and cold exposure for dopamine hits, Does she really look 20 years younger or is she talking out of her backside? Davina now (left) Younger davina (right)

@vaboosh @MichelleDewbs @GBNEWS Absolutely pathetic! Why was she letting that stupid woman prattle on?…

What useless coverage of the Parliamentary vote @MichelleDewbs You missed the announcement completely after all that build-up! 🙄 @GBNEWS

@Rob209412382879 Yup, he’s, literally, looking v shifty indeed, shifting back & forth in his seat, crossing & uncrossing his arms…

Morgan McSweeney is starting to crumble.. Lying wee rat...

@Oftheforest2 @PolitlcsUK And touching his nose…

@PolitlcsUK Don't believe him. He's blinking too much.

🚨 WATCH: Morgan McSweeney says it felt like "a knife through my soul" when he discovered the extent of Peter Mandelson’s links to Jeffrey Epstein "How I understood it at the time was a passing acquaintance that he regretted having"

@timothy_stanley I’m pretty sure it had summat to do with Global Warming too…🙄

Morgan McSweeney, having accepted personal responsibility, also blames Trump and Brexit for the Mandelson appointment.

@cymbal_martin @PippaCrerar Were u this apoplectic when they were voting about a piece of cake Boris allegedly eat?

@PippaCrerar FFS, haven't you professional journalists got anything better to do than whip up a frenzy about shite like this?

EXCL: Keir Starmer will face a vote on whether to launch investigation into claims he misled the Commons over his decision to appoint Peter Mandelson as ambassador to Washington. Sources tell us that Commons speaker, Sir Lindsay Hoyle, is expected to allow a debate on Tuesday on whether to refer PM to the privileges committee.

@CorkyMrC @JamesMelville “Everything is her fault” Nah not having it. It’s Trump. Or Brexit. Or Global Warming. No, no, it’s definitely Trump. One of them 3 anyway…

@JamesMelville Thatcher. Everything is her fault. The societal decline in our country started with her. Setting people against each other, devastating public services, siding with an equally deranged US President. Saved by the Falklands War. It’s all her fault.

Who is the worst Prime Minister in your lifetime?

@Matt_Pinner @Suffragent_ @elonmusk @nikitabier @cb_doge @allegrajacchia “I left my job to do X full time” Get a proper job then…

Been up all night having panic attacks! I left my job to do X full time, iv got kids to feed, iv never broken X rules or posted anything violent or against terms/conditions verified since 2017-last night my monetisation was paused @elonmusk @nikitabier @cb_doge @allegrajacchia

@katiespitfire @getfreestuff01 @mrdanwalker “Nazi scum” 😂😂😂

@getfreestuff01 @mrdanwalker Cry harder Nazi scum

Some news… all allegations withdrawn. I did NOT agree to settle.

@VladimirPanick @DPJHodges Yup It’s called ‘getting a taste of ur own medicine’. Is it a bit sour? It sounds like it…

@DPJHodges Scum Right Wing press trying to unseat a democratically elected PM. We won’t forget Hodges.

The herd is moving.

@EdKrassen Siri, show me evidence of why cousins shouldn’t marry…

MAGA doesn’t care if America breaks its promises to Ukraine because they don’t care about promises or lies. They’ve shown that over and over again by continuing to support Trump.

@Rothmus Spain ‘safe’? Try being a female walking through the ‘Ramblas’ area of Barcelona after midnight…

And it almost perfectly overlaps with another map.

@BjCruickshank He was a fucking embarrassment. How the fuck do these cunts get ejected? Thick as whale spunk.

This is toe curling from this young Labour MP: x.com/BBCNewsnight/s… Starmer is a goner.

@LindaDuberley @threadreaderapp unroll please

Sir Olly Robbins is clearly stricken by this deplorable episode. What kind of Prime Minister hands over the most prestigious role in our diplomatic service to the friend of the world’s most famous sex predator while treating a clearly talented and committed senior civil servant like trash. @JChimirie66677 @Minerva39987475 @MarkLaity

Exactly. Powell receiving access to sensitive Chagos material before his appointment was confirmed tells you everything about how this network operates. The access comes first. The formal appointment follows. By the time the role is announced, the decisions have already been shaped. Lord Alli is the name that has been conspicuously absent from most of this coverage. A Labour donor given extensive access to Downing Street from day one, his presence never satisfactorily explained, his influence never properly accounted for. He bought Starmer clothes. He attended meetings he had no obvious official reason to attend. And when questions were asked, the answers were evasive in the same way answers about Mandelson, Powell and Doyle have been evasive. The Syria dimension adds another layer. Alli boasted in a House of Lords debate that he had visited Syria on multiple occasions and held personal talks with President Assad on several occasions, at the height of the civil war, while simultaneously urging the West against military action after Assad had used chemical weapons on his own people. Assad's Syria was a client state of Russia and Iran. A man with those connections was given the run of Downing Street from day one. Starmer said he got nothing in return. The access itself is the return. Lord Alli's name also appeared in the Epstein files released in February 2026. The precise nature of that reference hasn't been fully established, but its existence, alongside his Assad connections, his undeclared interests in a British Virgin Islands company, and his unaccounted access to Downing Street, adds yet another thread to a picture that becomes harder to dismiss as coincidence the more closely it is examined. The pattern is not one of occasional lapses. It is a consistent operating method. People who belong to the network get access, appointments and protection. People who follow the rules get sacked. The formal machinery of government exists to ratify decisions already made in rooms that are never minuted. You are right that we do not know the half of it. The half we do know is already extraordinary.

Possibly the most bizarre intervention from anyone over madcap period of last 48 hours was Margaret Hodge on Newsnight depicting the attempt by Keir Starmer’s office to secure an ambassadorship for Matthew Doyle as some sort of redeployment scheme for unemployed No 10 staff.

@10to15percent @afneil “well respected” Fuck off was he

@afneil He’s a very experienced, well respected civil servant and leader, who acts like an 18year old intern on his first day. Pathetic.

The Starmer-Robbins testimony in full: Starmer: I want Mandelson come hell or high water — and PDQ. Robbins: I’m the new kid on the block, the appointment process is almost complete. So, OK, I’ll oblige.