Rillian Grant

312 posts

Rillian Grant

Rillian Grant

@RillianGrant

Katılım Ocak 2025
44 Takip Edilen1 Takipçiler
DesRon5
DesRon5@patrickbec·
We want European nations to do what’s in their best interests. We just didn’t expect that would mean kicking the US in the teeth while fighting a war, after all the bleating about needing the US to defend against the Russian hordes and fund/arm Ukraine. But at least we now know 1. what Europe considers to be in its best interest, 2. that we are not aligned in our respective interests or values and 3. that the alliance needs to be re-fashioned if not abolished. The Europe that JD Vance and Rubio spoke about that the US has historical and hereditary links to is gone. The new arrangements will reflect that, at least in the areas of security. The hostility is just an emotional response to the above realizations. It will pass and the US and Europe will have normal relationships of sovereign nations.
English
9
0
1
398
fleur inverse
fleur inverse@fleur_inverse·
I can understand Americans criticizing Europeans for some reasons, but these days it is sheer hostility over not understanding that Europe also has its own interests, and that I wouldn't have expected.
English
86
35
822
24.4K
85logic
85logic@85logic25461·
@r_ric000 @PeterWrangel If you force Europe to start paying for their own defense they won’t be able to pay for free healthcare, talk about a simpleton.
English
1
0
0
25
Peter Wrangel
Peter Wrangel@PeterWrangel·
Europe is impotent no matter how large its population is. It's more likely that Germany and France go to war against each other after the US leaves NATO, than Europe ever becoming this badass super continent Europe had 60+ years of US military protection and they still couldn't get their collective shit together. They have no industrial base, no massive electrical sources and no spine to stand up to anyone.
Anthony LaMesa@ajlamesa

The United States can absolutely do what MAGA wants and leave NATO, pulling all our troops out of Europe. But I don’t think the people demanding that right now will like the deals a future European Union will make with China, Russia, and Iran. Once Ukraine, the UK, and the Balkan countries join, the EU would have a population almost twice that of the United States — and Brussels wouldn’t give a shit about Lindsey Graham’s threats.

English
118
43
556
22.4K
Robert Jumper
Robert Jumper@jumrobe·
@PeterWrangel If ever there was a time for the French and Germans to find their balls and look at the watch, now is the time
English
1
0
0
36
Michael Huff
Michael Huff@ClassicFord52·
@PeterWrangel Europe is not as wealthy as they think they are. It will be interesting to see how they handle the challenge of continuing their massive social programs and now suddenly having to defend themselves with their own assets as well.
English
2
0
0
27
Kurt Schlichter
Kurt Schlichter@KurtSchlichter·
The Europeans are not dealing with “a man.” They are dealing with the United States of America. The United States needed the most innocuous kind of cooperation from them. They denied the United States that cooperation. The implied argument is that their obligations within our alliance depend on whether they like the guy we chose as our president. “Sure, we’re allies…if we approve of who you elected.” Nope. We are not going to forget, and we’re not going to forgive. I’m indifferent to their excuses or their rationalizations. The United States of America needed their help and not very much help. They turned us down. That changes everything. And they aren’t going to like how it changes everything.
Gerard Baker@gerardtbaker

The casuistry here is remarkable. This is the simple reality: Like most Americans, most Europeans think this war is a bad idea.Their governments are being asked to take a huge risk by a man who has proved unreliable, volatile and intemperate over and over. Who would do that?

English
769
1.2K
5.3K
178.1K
Hadrio
Hadrio@Hadrio_Official·
@ArtemisConsort Or is it possible this is a muskian sci-fi gimmick that nobody is actually taking seriously?
English
1
0
1
77
Hunter Ash
Hunter Ash@ArtemisConsort·
It’s hilarious how proud of themselves people are for noticing the very first thing anyone would notice about space data centers. I too had the thought “what about cooling” the first time I saw the idea, then I saw huge companies betting on it and assumed I was missing something rather than that no one at SpaceX etc had the BRILLIANCE I had to notice this obvious phys 101 objection, because I’m not a moron. And yeah, turns out you can make radiators work.
David Bombal@davidbombal

Why space servers FAIL Execs want to put data centers in space, but there's a massive physics problem: vacuums have no convection cooling. Discover why cooling servers in space relies purely on infrared radiation! Big thanks to @ThreatLocker for sponsoring my trip to ZTW26 and also for sponsoring this video. To start your free trial with ThreatLocker please use the following link: threatlocker.com/davidbombal

English
91
28
960
96.2K
Rillian Grant
Rillian Grant@RillianGrant·
@nycthinker @constans Those are definitely areas where LLMs fall short, which is why there are many benchmarks targeting the application of general concepts and causal reasoning (aka. world modelling). I'm not currently seeing anything that LLMs fundamentally can't do.
English
1
0
0
11
Chris W
Chris W@nycthinker·
@RillianGrant @constans Underlying general principles such as logic, mill’s methods, physical laws, etc which are causal representations. One might also say inherent tendency towards the least Kolmogorow-complex solution (overcast.fm/+ABNwV_LN6b4/2…) LLMs still useful ofc
English
1
0
1
13
constans
constans@constans·
People who hate AI know JUST ENOUGH to be dangerous. It IS a stochastic parrot. It DOES just “predict the next token”. It IS dependent on training data What’s interesting is that this these are all true AND it displays useful problem solving intelligence and information
Dean W. Ball@deanwball

My theory about why so many on the left remain in denial about AI is that their worldview rests on a load-bearing notion of “the tech industry” as being composed of vapid morons whose accomplishments will always be superficial, never “real,” always based on some grand theft. With social media and search, the theft was manipulation of people’s minds. With Amazon it was worker exploitation. With Apple, it was a mix of these. In the left retelling of the story, no value whatsoever was created from these technologies. All a trick. With AI the “grand theft” in the telling of the left is the use of copyright-protected data in pre-training. This one is a particularly dangerous mindworm for them, since they identify with the “artists and writers” from whom they imagine this training data was “stolen.” This is why things like “mode collapse” from synthetic data, stochastic parrotry, “it can only mimic things it has seen on the web” and similar are so core to the argument for the left: it supports the notion of “tech bro” thieves—who lest we forget, and they never will let us, have no “liberal arts” training!—continuing their unbroken string of robberies. Of course the “grand theft” notion is an old motif on the left, relating as it does to a zero-sum mindset about economics, business, and growth that is. more traditionally associated with the left, though the lines have always been blurry, since the zero-sum mindset is above all else a *human* fallacy and thus a useful tactic in mass politics of all valences. The lines have become especially blurry lately, as has been widely observed. Anyway, the notion that AI *is* a genuinely world-changing technology, that it can “go beyond” its “stolen” training data, breaks this load-bearing conception of the tech industry as vapid and superficial and, more importantly, of the people within it as blood-sucking thieves.

English
48
34
800
43.3K
∿spencer.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
The lack of any fundamental curiosity at all about AI from the left has been one of the most discouraging things of my life, but that’s okay because I will simply become the epicenter of a new and cooler left that likes technology
Taylor Lorenz@TaylorLorenz

Leftists cancelling me for using Claude code and cooking based off the Google AI recipe suggestions… I see why that political movement has absolutely zero power. 🫠

English
173
76
1.4K
242.2K
von_ragnar
von_ragnar@ragnar_von·
@_ontologic @dontfallforem @elaifresh And? None of this potential is gonna be realized, as long as we have tech bros at the helm Imagine telling someone about all the amazing uses a stick could have, when they're currently being hit by it
English
1
0
1
126
Dunkurtin
Dunkurtin@dunkurtin·
@_ontologic @dontfallforem @elaifresh Have you considered most of us actually understand the potential better than you? Because LLMs have pretty much plateaued and have no real potential. If youre interested in real AI you would also not be happy with the current trajectory.
English
2
0
4
158
Deus Hoc Vult
Deus Hoc Vult@ThugNaught·
Lots of kickbacks and bribes from European countries to our congress people. They are crooks. All this recent bullshit from Europe along with the obvious lack of capabilities Europe offers may move that needle. We have been asking NATO countries for more than 20yrs to spend more on their own military’s and on their own defense infrastructure. Until Trump was a dick about it yall wouldn’t do it. These European countries are going to need to spend at least 10% of is GDP, for at a minimum of 10 years. Doing so may give you the capability to defend yourself from Russia. The one time cost of moving our troops and equipment back home would be easily recovered by not having to defend an ungrateful continent.
English
1
0
0
18
Rillian Grant
Rillian Grant@RillianGrant·
@ThugNaught @astraiaintel America is free to do that if they feel it's in their best interests. It would be a challenge for Europe but not an insurmountable one. And it would really help domestic industry. I assume there's some reason why they haven't already?
English
2
0
0
23
Deus Hoc Vult
Deus Hoc Vult@ThugNaught·
@astraiaintel I want to see more of this kind of attitude from Europe. More and more Americans who support NATO are changing their position. 🇺🇸 needs to leave NATO bring home our troops and equipment. Let the smug and entitled Europeans fend for themselves. We are tired of paying for it.
English
1
0
2
421
Rillian Grant
Rillian Grant@RillianGrant·
@nycthinker @constans What would you consider underlying principles? I find LLMs useful because they are able to combine approximations of how things work with problem solving methods. Is there a fundamental different between those low level approximations and actual underlying principles?
English
1
0
0
14
Chris W
Chris W@nycthinker·
@RillianGrant @constans This is why a model can do well on one fixed math benchmark, but fail on a basic everyday logic problem. Why it can do well on GDPval yet fail at remotelabor index.
English
1
0
1
21
laulukaskas
laulukaskas@clockstiqqun·
@nightfallgemini as with all enclosure under the DotB it's ultimately preparatory for the DotP
English
1
0
8
190
laulukaskas
laulukaskas@clockstiqqun·
a major trend in internet politics is that liberal constitutional and legal frameworks have been de facto privatized by gating mandatory economic infrastructure behind opaque corporate bureaucracies. this one's not even a puritan issue, it's regular liability
Lain on the Blockchain@CryptoCyberia

This is hilarious ngl

English
10
141
1.7K
54.5K
Rillian Grant
Rillian Grant@RillianGrant·
@nycthinker @constans They can. For example, an LLM can add together two large numbers not found in it's training data by applying a learned pattern. The same applies to reasoning about many different abstract concepts. In my case for example how to transform data between two forms reliably.
English
1
0
0
27
Chris W
Chris W@nycthinker·
@RillianGrant @constans You are describing a human being, not an LLM. LLMs don’t encode wide generalizations that are robust to novelty (vs training data.)
English
1
0
1
22
Rillian Grant
Rillian Grant@RillianGrant·
@nycthinker @constans An LLM lets you go from a unique problem to a unique solution. Both problem and solution are explained in terms of common concepts that the LLM is trained to understand.
English
1
0
0
26
Rillian Grant
Rillian Grant@RillianGrant·
@nycthinker @constans They are novel conclusions if no one has thought of them before. A lot of the problems I use it to solve are somewhat unique (otherwise we'd buy the existing solution).
English
1
0
0
23
Zac
Zac@Zacbunchanumbrs·
@Madame_Ennui No, it's a war crime because they are chasing a fleeing, unarmed person that represents no threat to anyone. That's an actual war crime, whether you do it personally or with a drone.
English
6
0
2
231
yana
yana@Madame_Ennui·
Really interesting to observe how ppl react to drone warfare in Ukraine. The majority of the world has not encountered drone warfare, they still see war as something closer to WWII, so they don’t understand that this is how war is fought now. Bc of its novelty, it’s a “war crime”
Melian Refugee@escapefrommelos

two things that “radicalized” me about this useless stupid war: 1) these videos are often posted with masturbatory glee 2) the victims are always uniformed but very often unarmed and without helmets… almost like they’re PoWs who have been released and hunted on video for sport

English
33
44
827
28.4K
Rillian Grant
Rillian Grant@RillianGrant·
@inkoalawetrust @gfodor LLMs can do things they're not explicitly trained on by combining or adapting other learned processes. Part of why it's unrealistic is the idea that a more advanced system would struggle with emotions worse than what we have today.
English
0
0
0
15
inkoalawetrust
inkoalawetrust@inkoalawetrust·
@RillianGrant @gfodor Lol no, they can usually do things beyond what they were explicitly made for, even the ones that are described as being coded like symbolic AI. A T-800s NPU is sure as shit a much more competent and "true" AI than what we have today even if they struggle with emotions at first.
English
1
0
0
9
gfodor.id
gfodor.id@gfodor·
Saw Project Hail Mary and it’s kind of sad that all sci-fi is now clearly dated when the AI systems are dumber than Claude
English
86
51
3.9K
298.3K