Ricky Thondapu

156 posts

Ricky Thondapu banner
Ricky Thondapu

Ricky Thondapu

@RitvikThon

Product Manager & Head of Growth @ICAMP | Working at the intersection of AI & Blockchain

Katılım Eylül 2024
119 Takip Edilen50 Takipçiler
Ricky Thondapu retweetledi
ICAMP 🛠️ terminal.i.camp
Edtech isn’t a bubble. It boils down to what people gain: skills + community held together by the story. Where do you fit? What are you becoming? That’s why brands like Harvard or Apple work. Where people see themselves in the narrative. Most computer science programs give you content. Some give you community. @icamp is built on a different story: You don’t just become an engineer. You learn to think in systems. Personalized across the globe, regardless of your background.
English
5
7
44
186
Ricky Thondapu
Ricky Thondapu@RitvikThon·
Here is an interesting use case: What if every AI output was audited, and stored on-chain? Blockchain records. AI verifies. No edits. No black boxes. From healthcare to finance, every decision becomes traceable. Not only logging systems. Rather, auditing intelligence itself.
English
0
0
2
48
Ricky Thondapu
Ricky Thondapu@RitvikThon·
AI is consolidating the market right now. Everything else, including blockchain, AR/VR, quantum, and mechatronics, is being pushed to the future. linkedin.com/posts/ritvik-t…
English
0
0
2
50
Ricky Thondapu retweetledi
ICAMP 🛠️ terminal.i.camp
AI writing code doesn’t mean developers disappear. AI can generate code. That doesn’t mean developers disappear. Software isn’t just code. It’s requirements that change. Systems that break in weird ways. Tradeoffs nobody documented. Decisions that affect thousands of users. This is the kind of reality @icamp tries to prepare developers for. AI will change how developers work. Not whether they exist.
ICAMP 🛠️ terminal.i.camp tweet media
English
2
4
42
178
Ricky Thondapu retweetledi
ICAMP 🛠️ terminal.i.camp
Who remembers Devin? Weren’t all the software engineers supposed to be gone by now? At @icamp, there’s discussions about what AI actually changes in computer science, and what it doesn’t.
ICAMP 🛠️ terminal.i.camp tweet media
English
0
2
13
97
Ricky Thondapu retweetledi
Prash ↕️ cenfu.eth
Prash ↕️ cenfu.eth@0xPrash·
This post is the best unintentional marketing lesson in ages, Peak positioning fr 😂 Positioning 101: It's not what it *is*, it's what you *call* it + how you frame the glow-up. > Call cron "autonomous agent" = AGI arrived > Call cache "AI memory" = it's alive!! > Same old tools, new sexy names. Marketing doing marketing.
Prash ↕️ cenfu.eth tweet media
English
1
1
17
151
Ricky Thondapu retweetledi
Legion Hoops
Legion Hoops@LegionHoops·
Hornets VP of Basketball Insights says an AI system provided them with a strategy to draft Kon Knueppel, per @djdotmp4. (h/t @TheHoopsAlerts)
Legion Hoops tweet mediaLegion Hoops tweet media
English
178
182
10.8K
1.4M
Ricky Thondapu retweetledi
TAU Profile
TAU Profile@TAUProfile·
Introducing Tau Profile™ Own your engineering identity. A decentralized profile built for computer science engineers. On-Chain Profile • Proof-of-Skill • Future Tech Talent #Announcement #Web3AI #ComputerScience
TAU Profile tweet media
English
0
2
2
87
Ricky Thondapu retweetledi
ICAMP 🛠️ terminal.i.camp
Why do we accept one-size-fits-all education in a world that no longer runs on one-size-fits-all systems? We live in a world where every interface adapts, feeds personalise in real time, commerce predicts intent, tools configure to our workflow. Yet learning, the most critical layer of human development, remains stuck in rigid, linear, one-size-fits-all structures. Application systems engineering is not static. It evolves with new paradigms, abstractions, and infrastructure. The surface changes constantly. What endures are the fundamentals: systems thinking, architecture tradeoffs, performance reasoning, failure modes, first-principle clarity. Historically, access to that depth depended on proximity: the right institution, mentors, and problems at the right time. Personal pace, context, and cognitive differences came second. AI removes that constraint. Personalization at scale is now technically feasible: adaptive sequencing, real-time feedback loops, dynamic difficulty adjustment, context-aware guidance. There is no longer a structural reason for uniform progression. Yet most learning systems still function like batch processors: same syllabus, same cadence, same evaluation path. That gap is the opportunity. At @icamp, we are building learning as an adaptive system. Anchored in fundamentals, responsive to individual capability, designed for long-term clarity in a fluid engineering landscape. Education should not be the outlier in personalisation. It should be the most advanced system we build.
ICAMP 🛠️ terminal.i.camp tweet media
English
2
4
35
171
Ricky Thondapu retweetledi
Balaji
Balaji@balajis·
This is the first AI cut. And it will send shockwaves. Remember: Jack is one of the greatest founders of all time. He created this platform that we’re all on, and has been early to many technological shifts. And Block was doing very well as a business. So, for him to cut 40% of headcount in this way is a signal to everyone in tech: get good now. Become indispensable. Work nights and weekends. Learn the AI tools and raise your game. Or you might not make the cut, as an employee or as a company. I know. That sucks. But capitalism is natural selection. The market is unforgiving, because you are the market. After all, it’s not like you’re buying some random gallon of milk from the store; you’re always buying the best product at the best price. So too for apps: your customers are always installing the best piece of code they can get. And because AI is going to create new winners, if you aren’t the best in your market, someone may become better with AI. Particularly with the new agentic workflows. To be clear: Block’s severance is generous by any measure. 20 weeks of pay, six months of health insurance and vested equity, all of that goes far beyond any typical package. Jack did his level best to cushion the disruption. The laid off are a temporarily unfortunate class, as opposed to a permanent underclass. But had he not leaned into the AI transition, he might have had to lay off more people, slowly, and over time, as faster competitors went after his market share. How would they do that? Sure, AI isn’t a panacea by any means, but the closer you are to software engineering the more aggressively you need to embrace agentic workflows. The AI companies are already doing that, and places like Stripe, Shopify, Coinbase, and now Block are pushing hard on this area. There will be overcorrection. But the fundamental technical innovation is real. And you need to either disrupt yourself or get disrupted.
jack@jack

we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company. #### today we're making one of the hardest decisions in the history of our company: we're reducing our organization by nearly half, from over 10,000 people to just under 6,000. that means over 4,000 of you are being asked to leave or entering into consultation. i'll be straight about what's happening, why, and what it means for everyone. first off, if you're one of the people affected, you'll receive your salary for 20 weeks + 1 week per year of tenure, equity vested through the end of may, 6 months of health care, your corporate devices, and $5,000 to put toward whatever you need to help you in this transition (if you’re outside the U.S. you’ll receive similar support but exact details are going to vary based on local requirements). i want you to know that before anything else. everyone will be notified today, whether you're being asked to leave, entering consultation, or asked to stay. we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. but something has changed. we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly. i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter. repeated rounds of cuts are destructive to morale, to focus, and to the trust that customers and shareholders place in our ability to lead. i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. a smaller company also gives us the space to grow our business the right way, on our own terms, instead of constantly reacting to market pressures. a decision at this scale carries risk. but so does standing still. we've done a full review to determine the roles and people we require to reliably grow the business from here, and we've pressure-tested those decisions from multiple angles. i accept that we may have gotten some of them wrong, and we've built in flexibility to account for that, and do the right thing for our customers. we're not going to just disappear people from slack and email and pretend they were never here. communication channels will stay open through thursday evening (pacific) so everyone can say goodbye properly, and share whatever you wish. i'll also be hosting a live video session to thank everyone at 3:35pm pacific. i know doing it this way might feel awkward. i'd rather it feel awkward and human than efficient and cold. to those of you leaving…i’m grateful for you, and i’m sorry to put you through this. you built what this company is today. that's a fact that i'll honor forever. this decision is not a reflection of what you contributed. you will be a great contributor to any organization going forward. to those staying…i made this decision, and i'll own it. what i'm asking of you is to build with me. we're going to build this company with intelligence at the core of everything we do. how we work, how we create, how we serve our customers. our customers will feel this shift too, and we're going to help them navigate it: towards a future where they can build their own features directly, composed of our capabilities and served through our interfaces. that's what i'm focused on now. expect a note from me tomorrow. jack

English
681
1K
9.5K
2M
Ricky Thondapu
Ricky Thondapu@RitvikThon·
Single character domains have a pretty great recall value
Ricky Thondapu tweet media
English
1
4
17
222
Ricky Thondapu retweetledi
Garry Tan
Garry Tan@garrytan·
High love and high structure. I grew up in a home that was high structure but low love. My father's rules were absolute, enforced by the threat of conflict, but there wasn't warmth underneath. When I started building teams, I instinctively swung the other way: high love, low structure. I wanted everyone to feel supported. I avoided setting hard expectations because I didn't want to be my dad. It didn't work. People didn't know where they stood. Standards were fuzzy. The team drifted. What I eventually learned is that the optimal isn't one or the other — it's both. Genuine care for people combined with clear expectations and real accountability. Most people need structure to thrive. They want to know what's expected, how they're doing, and where the boundaries are. That's not mean. That's respectful. High love without high structure is actually a form of neglect.
English
102
141
2.2K
103.1K
Umair Shaikh
Umair Shaikh@1Umairshaikh·
What immediately tells you a startup won’t last?
English
233
5
225
33.1K
Ricky Thondapu retweetledi
ICAMP 🛠️ terminal.i.camp
Two people can sit in the same classroom, follow the same syllabus, and put in similar efforts, whilst achieve very different outcomes. This highlights a fundamental limitation in how learning systems are designed. At ICAMP, the adaptive learning is what allows systems to adjust the differences in outcomes.
English
12
37
49
442