Riyadh Rave Scene

There’s a reason defenders didn’t want anything to do with Larry Allen. That wasn’t just strength… that was freak-level power. Strongest in NFL history, and right there in the GOAT lineman conversation. Who you taking over him?

🇫🇷🤯 𝗜𝗡𝗦𝗔𝗡𝗘! For 𝟲 𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗨𝗧𝗘𝗦 last night (from the 59th minute to 65th minute) in the PSG vs Liverpool, PSG chained 𝟴𝟵 𝗣𝗔𝗦𝗦𝗘𝗦 without Liverpool touching the ball… After those 89 passes, Kvaratskhelia scored.

Florida and Texas have the lowest state spending per person in the US. They're also 2 of the 5 states that had the highest population growth in the last decade. State spending ≠ quality of life improving.

You tried to paint me as a pervert for exposing fraud, and as a result radical leftists started trying to dox me and send death threats, wanting to kill me. Now you are taking credit for “leading the charge” on the fraud. Are you serious? You are the fraud.

It’s amazing that Gavin Newsom actually had the nerve to post that.

Last week, Governor Newsom denied that widespread fraud was occurring in his state. Now, he's trying to claim credit for fighting it. Totally incoherent—he is clearly worried that fraud will sink him.

Wait a minute! Gavin Newsom said none of this was happening, mocked Nick Shirley for traveling to California to investigate and expose it, and called CMS administrator Dr. Oz “racist” against Armenians for even suggesting there was hospice fraud in Los Angeles.

Warren Buffett explains why financial companies are the hardest to analyze: Buffett points out that even as an owner, you can't be fully sure of what's happening inside a financial company. He uses Berkshire's own insurance business as an example: "The biggest single element that is very difficult to evaluate even if you own the company is the loss and loss adjustment expense reserve." This single line item has an outsized effect on reported earnings, especially over short periods where small changes in assumptions can swing the numbers dramatically. Berkshire carries roughly $45 billion in loss reserves, but Buffett admits he couldn't say with certainty whether that figure will prove slightly high or slightly low. "If I had to bet my life on whether 45 billion turned out to be a little over or a little under, I'd think a long time." He notes the difference between 44.5 and 45.5 billion could easily go either way, and that anyone motivated to hit a particular earnings target would find it "an easy game to play." Banking poses a similar challenge. The core question is whether the loans are any good, and even with a board seat, that's hard to know. "I've been on the boards of banks and I've gotten surprises. It's tough to tell." He contrasts this with simpler businesses like WD-40 or See's Candy. Those companies may have better or worse prospects, but at least you can understand what's happening right now. Financial institutions don't offer that clarity. And when you layer derivatives on top, the picture gets even murkier. "No one probably knows perfectly, or even within a reasonable range, the exact condition of some of the biggest banks in the world."

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Hilarious

This was published 9 days before Wright brothers’ Kitty Hawk made its first successful flight.

for his entire career, Jose Altuve has had to fight off an unfairly high strike zone. Until the ABS zone redefinition, that is. On the smallest hitter in the majors suddenly finding himself in a fair fight up in the zone @baseballpro baseballprospectus.com/news/article/1…

A community college professor taught the same study skills lecture for 30 years, and the video quietly became one of the most watched educational recordings on the internet. His name is Marty Lobdell. He spent his career as a psychology professor watching students fail not because they were lazy, but because nobody had ever taught them how their brain actually works under the pressure of learning something hard. The lecture is called "Study Less Study Smart." Over 10 million views. Passed around in Reddit threads, Discord servers, and university study groups for over a decade. And the core insight buried inside it has been sitting in cognitive psychology research for years, waiting for someone to explain it in plain language. Here is the framework that completely changed how I think about effort. Your brain does not sustain focus the way you think it does. Studies tracking real students found that the average learner hits a wall somewhere between 25 and 30 minutes. After that, efficiency doesn't just decline. It collapses. You're still sitting at your desk, still looking at the page, but almost nothing is going in. Lobdell illustrated this with a student he knew personally. She set a goal of studying 6 hours a night, 5 nights a week, to pull herself out of academic probation. Thirty hours of studying per week. She failed every single class that quarter. She wasn't failing because she lacked effort. She was failing because she had confused time spent near books with time spent actually learning. The 25-minute crash hit her at 6:30pm every night. She spent the next five and a half hours sitting in the wreckage of her own focus and calling it studying. The fix sounds almost too simple. The moment you feel the slide, stop. Take five minutes. Do something that actually gives you a small reward. Then go back. That five-minute reset returns you to near full efficiency. Across a six-hour window, the difference is not marginal. It is the difference between thirty minutes of real learning and five and a half hours of it. The second thing he taught destroyed something I had believed about how memory actually works. Highlighting feels productive. Going back over your notes and recognizing everything feels like knowing. But recognition and recollection are two completely different cognitive processes, and your brain is very good at making you confuse them. You can see something you've read before and feel completely certain you understand it, even when you couldn't reconstruct a single sentence from memory if the page were blank. He proved this live in the room. He read 13 random letters to his audience. Almost nobody could recall them. Then he rearranged the same 13 letters into two words: Happy Thursday. The whole room got all 13 without effort. Same letters. Same count. The only thing that changed was meaning. The brain stores meaning. Not repetition. The moment new information connects to something you already understand, the retention changes entirely. This is what the cognitive psychology literature calls elaborative encoding, and it is the mechanism underneath every effective study technique. The third principle was the one that hit me hardest, and the one almost nobody applies. Lobdell cited research showing that 80 percent of your study time should be spent in active recitation, not passive reading. Close the material. Say it back in your own words. Teach it to someone else, or to an empty chair if no one is around. The struggle of retrieval is where the actual learning happens. Reading your notes again is watching someone else do the work. His parting line has stayed with me longer than almost anything else I have read about learning. He told the room that if what he shared didn't change their behavior, they hadn't actually learned it. It would just live in their heads as something they had heard once and felt good about. He was right. And most people leave every lecture exactly like that. The students who remember everything aren't putting in more hours. They stopped confusing the feeling of studying with the fact of it.

We have actually gone from from "LGTBT" to "MMIWG2SLGBTQQIA+" 2017 Jordan Peterson has been vindicated (once again)

DeCarlos Brown arrests… 1. Capable 2. Capable 3. Capable 4. Capable 5. Capable 6. Capable 7. Capable 8. Capable 9. Capable 10. Capable 11. Capable 12. Capable 13. Capable 14. Capable 15. Incapable to stand trial What a miscarriage of justice. Sickening.

Why was Warren Buffett richer than Charlie Munger? “Well, he got an early start, he was much smarter and he worked harder. Tell me why was Albert Einstein poorer than I was?” - Charlie Munger 😂

Exactly

A study linked various SAT test scores to favorite bands- the lowest SAT scorers preferred Lil’ Wayne, and the highest preferred Beethoven

If you were just complaining that a $4 billion dollar trip to space "could have fed the poor" but you're silent about the $126 billion dollar train to nowhere, it's time to stop pretending your politics have anything to do with feeding poor people

Canada is cooked

Men only want one thing and it's this.