
Roadhouse
149 posts

Roadhouse
@Roadhouse_eth
Peeking 10 yes ahead of crypto 🔮 | Formal verification proponent 🔍 | Anti-Proof of Work crusader⚔️ | NFTs: for utility 🌌


You cannit be a practicing Jew and proudly gay How have we gotten to a point where something that is halachically punishable by death is seen as ok for Jews to promote Yes, it seems bleak, but though we have fallen, we will rise, though we sit in darkness, Hashem is our light


The State of Israel calls for an end to the Spanish occupation of Ceuta. #FreeCeuta















This is extraordinary. For the many of you who wonder how the EU could agree to such a humiliating "deal" with Trump, wonder no more. We have an unusually straightforward answer directly from the horse's mouth: Sabine Weyand, who's the Directorate-General for Trade at the EU commission. As she puts its: - "If you didn't hear me say the word 'negotiation' – that's because there wasn't one." => the U.S. dictated the terms - "From the Commission's perspective, this was a strategic compromise, not an ideal economic solution" => they're aware this completely f*cks the EU economically - "The European side was under massive pressure to find a quick solution to stabilize transatlantic relations – especially with regard to security guarantees" => the EU agreed to the "deal" under a protection racket - "We have a land war on the European continent. And we are completely dependent on the United States. The member states were not prepared to take the risk of further escalation – that would have been the consequence of European countermeasures." => Europe acted out of fear, choosing economic submission because of its total dependence on the U.S. (which ironically will only worsen the dependence) There you have it, she said the quiet part out loud: the EU is in such a terrible strategic situation and EU leaders have so little courage that they're unable and unwilling to say 'no' to even the most humiliating demands. Src: sz-dossier.de/tiefgaenge/das…



We're in ancapistan. All the roads are private. Would a private road owner require an identity system for road users? It seems pretty obvious that they would.






Foreigners are still buying a ton of US debt.













