๐ฒ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฒ๐๐ข๐๐๐ ๐ช
67.3K posts

๐ฒ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฒ๐๐ข๐๐๐ ๐ช
@ColinTCrypto
https://t.co/fD42bQkVf1 @cbbi_daily โAll paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value โ ZEROโ (Voltaire 1729) Fiat is the scam that enables all other scams.


Not what you want to see ๐ณ CPI and PPI pumping Market expects Fed to stay tight or hike Bond yields rise Keep an eye on high risk assets Good luck, Kevin Warsh.





$BTC 4H would be ideal to continue holding this level







@SalsaTekila Very typical for Bitcoin to sell off during bear markets while SPX continues to pump. Purple = Bitcoin top Green - Stock market "top" before a large correction







The reason for setting my posts to "only verified members can reply" was actually to eliminate bots/scammers in the replies section, which became overwhelming and I just couldn't stop them all. It was consuming a lot of my time to block them. This one setting did a great job at almost entirely eliminating them. However, a secondary unexpected benefit was that, on average, it increased the quality of responders and reduced toxic, low energy peeps. It seems those who are verified, on an average basis, are higher quality responders and less degraded people. Now, as I said, that is an *average*. As with all averages, there are exceptions and plenty of good people, such as yourself, who engage in constructive and helpful discussion who get excluded and it's a shame. Maybe some day when the bots get under control I will consider setting it back to "everyone can reply". But, I also appreciate the higher quality of responders, so I would even be hesitational about that. Did you know, it's only $3/month to become verified on X? :) It's worth it, imo.





Timeline is saying "everyone is saying crypto is dead" Not quite there just yet One more capitulation this year to scare the hoes should really do it #Bitcoin













