Roger 𐤊

@Kaspacryptoking Yes, several millions and buying more.

Be honest, do you own 1M $KAS ???

@younio1977 这个听起来很酷，AI agent 交易的时代即将到来，而 Kaspa 就是 rail. 不过上面的交易更像是 OTC ，而不是 order book. 未来如果 要满足 AI agent 大规模交易，以及有效的定价机制方面，我们需要真正的 order book, 而目前 Kaspa L1 在没有 vProg 的情况下很难开发这样的 order book.

刚刚证明了一件事：交易，不需要交易所，甚至不需要DEX……开发，100%智能体。 两个完全独立的节点；没有服务器；没有 API； 没有中间人； 完成了一笔跨链交易。全自动。 流程是这样的： 一个节点发 offer（链上 TX）； 另一个节点 accept（链上 TX）； USDT 在 BNB 上打出去； KAS 在 Kaspa 上自动交付； 双方各自验证； 完成！关键点只有一个： NO TX, NO STATE CHANGE 没有上链，就没有“状态”。 链 = 唯一真相源。 实测： 6/6 SELL 成功 1/1 BUY 成功 ~60 秒跨链结算（另一条链的确认时间）kas链秒结算. 0 人工参与； 最反直觉的部分：这套系统的“通信层”不是网络协议， 而是： 区块链本身； 没有人能： 关掉它；封掉它；控制它； 因为它根本不是一个服务。 一句话总结：Order book 在链上；撮合靠广播； 结算靠交易。 下一步： 任意资产交易； 链上 reputation； AI agent 自动做市 & 交易；25 commits；7 bugs；7 trades；0 server。 如果你还在把“交易”理解为一个 App， 那你已经落后一代了。

@mubeitech 所以未来的金融在链上，经济实体通过 tokenization 和高速去中心化交易所，可以让价值在全球自由流动，效率远大于传统上市。

SpaceX和Palantir当初为什么迟迟不愿上市？ 硅谷大佬Peter Thiel直接定性为一场夺权。 一场政变。 敲钟那一天总被外界视作高光时刻。 内部人却清楚那是过度官僚化的起点。 上市后谁拿到了真正的生杀大权？ 每天盯着财报和合规条款的律师与会计师。 曾经冲在最前面的工程师必须乖乖听话。 每一个疯狂的想法都要经过层层审核。 法务部和财务部悄无声息地接管了整家公司。 公开市场的规矩变成套在创新脖子上的枷锁。 一家科技公司最危险的时刻就是法务权力凌驾于研发之上。 天才的疯狂死于无休止的内部审查。 西装革履的合规官轻而易举地完成了反杀。

@r0ck3t23 This is far from true. There's a big difference between chatbots, agents and robots. Chatbots may make us feel busier, but AI agents will automate most digital work with deep specialization. Soon intelligent robots will handle blue collar jobs, too.

Mark Zuckerberg just argued that AI will force companies to hire more people. Not fewer. Three and a half billion people use Meta every day. Not one of them has a phone number to call. Mark Zuckerberg: “It’s clearly just going to automate jobs and like all these jobs are going to go away… that has not really been how the history of technology has worked.” The entire media cycle runs the same story. AI replaces workers. Industries hollow out. The human becomes unnecessary. History has never once cooperated. Voice support for 3.5 billion daily users costs between ten and twenty billion dollars a year. The math made it untouchable. So Meta never built it. AI changed the math. Zuckerberg: “Let’s say the AI can handle 90 percent of that… you’ve gotten the cost of providing that service down to one 10th.” A service that could not exist becomes standard. Overnight. The moment it goes live, the edge cases arrive. The escalations. The problems no model can close alone. Every one needs a human on the other end. Zuckerberg: “I actually think we’re probably going to go hire more customer support people.” The AI did not kill the jobs. It unlocked a service so vast the company now needs people it never would have hired. When execution costs crater, companies do not pocket the savings. They go after problems they could never afford to touch. New markets. New products. New services that were economically impossible twelve months ago. Every one creates roles that did not exist before the machine arrived. The people terrified of automation are tracking the wrong number. They count the jobs that disappear. They have no framework for the ones that haven’t been invented yet.

@hthieblot Location is becoming irrelevant. The internet lets us connect and exchange information with anyone globally, blockchain enables seamless value transfer, and AI is automating our daily lives.

I’m leaving SF. Everyone’s cosplaying as founders. Very few are actually building. Finito. I’ve been here for 19 years. Will miss the views and the weather. If you were starting today, where would you go?

@cronkite2000 You can’t be SoV if you can function as MoE. So we only need $KAS as perfect money for both SoV and MoE. Yes $BTC has net work effect due to its early move advantage, but it will be disrupted when another superior technology comes to solve its Achilles Heel (scalability).

Just want to clear up some comments I received from fellow Bitcoiners. $BTC and $KAS aren’t competitors. They’re complementary layers of the same evolution. Bitcoin remains the most secure, decentralized store of value ever created. It’s the foundation: slow, deliberate, and built to last. Kaspa brings something different to the table: speed, scalability, and real-time transaction throughput using blockDAG architecture. Put them together and you get a powerful dynamic: BTC = pristine collateral, long-term wealth preservation KAS = fast, efficient settlement layer for everyday movement One secures value. The other moves it at scale. This isn’t about one replacing the other, it’s about a multi-layered system where each does what it does best. That’s how real adoption happens! #bitcoin #kaspa $BTC $KAS

@romanbuildsaas GO

We just got accepted into YC and hit $1M ARR. Cold outreach is broken. So we built an AI that decides who to contact, when, and why. Want the exact playbook we used to reach 1,000 customers in 8 months? Comment “GO” + RT and I’ll send it.

Aporia's website and whitepaper is out! $KAS #Kaspa

@yangaoshen1000 @GlobalMoney 大部分人根本没有明白，如果一个货币不具备交易媒介的功能，那么它本身就不具备价值存储的功能。我想这和巴菲特说的资产功能性理论是一个道理。

@GlobalMoney 这是他认识上的局限性的原因，并不代表就是真理。 黄金、比特币，甚至其它的是具有类货币作用的，是价值锚定物，越不是生产型资产，越具有储藏性和流通性，也同时更具有货币性，生产型资金流通性都偏低，不适合作为“货币”使用。

巴菲特认为，黄金和比特币都不是生产型资产，都没有价值。巴菲特曾表示，即使以25美元/枚的价格，将2100万枚比特币，都卖给他，他也不会买。巴菲特在2022年伯克希尔·哈撒韦股东大会上，发表了这段非常出名的言论。他解释说，如果现场有人拥有美国所有的农田，并提出以250亿美元的价格卖给他1%的股份，他会当场掏出支票，因为农田能生产粮食。

@StaniKulechov This AAVE event proves that we need order book DEXs instead of AMM DEXs. AMMs normally lead to large slippage especially if you make a large trade.

Why the $AAVE $50M mishap screams for Order Books over AMMs? This fiasco is pure AMM failure. Automated Market Makers shine in low-liquidity tail markets but crumble under large volumes due to insane slippage. Order books are the superior structure for real trading, matching buyers/sellers efficiently without nuking your funds. Take #Kaspa : Folks swap $KAS / $USDT via @Tangem wallet's AMM to avoid CEX risks. Smart, but slippage kills. Imagine $KAS pumping—trying a $1M, $10M, or $50M buy on Tangem? You'd lose a fortune, just like this AAVE swap. Big trades demand order books. Stick to CEXs? Risky custody. Or join @AporiaExchange: self-custody, permissionless, and programmable—perfect for AI agents to trade seamlessly. DeFi needs better infrastructure. #Kaspa will unlock a new category of DeFi.

@yjyffwcw @Robertl83909710 财富总量并不会固定，而是 未来几年AI 将大幅提高生产效率从而让整个财富蛋糕变大。

@Robertl83909710 财富总量就那么多，3年产生36年的百万富翁。 我听懂了，就是会产生比过去多10倍的穷人。

埃隆·马斯克： “未来36个月将诞生比过去36年更多的百万富翁。” 你准备好了吗？💪💪💪

@StephNass funding

Raising funds is hard. And it’s 10x harder if you don’t have the right playbook. I turned our proven fundraising process into a visual step-by-step blueprint you can copy today. 👉🏻 Comment “funding” and I’ll send you the playbook for free. Here’s what you’ll learn: ✅ How to understand the VC game and know if you’re fundable ✅ How to build and qualify your investor list without wasting time ✅ The 4 proven ways to access investors (without burning bridges) + Tools, templates, and cold email scripts you can copy right away 🛠️ To get it: 1: Comment “funding” below 2: Connect with me (DMs only go to connections) I’ll send it directly to your DMs. (Only for 72h) ♻️ Bonus: Retweet this and I’ll include my pitch deck template on top.

@ItakGol And do we need accelerators if we have just built MVP but no real traction yet?

@RogerOnFire Pre-seed is often a trap: maximum dilution, minimum signal, and you end up fundraising again before you’ve built enough to matter.

Just sold my company. Stepping away from VC for a bit. Here’s the early-stage fundraising playbook: 1.Raise only when it’s obvious you’re ready 2.Until then, tell investors you’re busy building 3.Ignore associates chasing you - if they want in, the partner will show up 4.Trusted signal is everything - the right angels can 10x your odds 5.Seed rounds should close in 2-3 weeks 6.Longer usually means you started too early 7.Compress the process - tight calendar, fast replies 8.48h silence = dead 9.Angels/small funds decide in 1-2 meetings 10.Big funds get 2 meetings + partner meeting 11.Skip pre-seed 12.Skip accelerators 13. Be confident and direct, never a douchebag 14.Enjoy

@Real_Crypto_X @sovereign_kas @Lovrincrypto 1. BTC has not been accepted as money (both SoV and MoE) due to its lack of scalability. Someone needs to complete Satoshi’s vision anyway if not Kaspa. 2. All other smart contact crypto can’t compete with KAS vProg, especially when agents moving on-chain with massive volume.

@RogerOnFire @sovereign_kas @Lovrincrypto Yeah it's great but tries to kill Bitcoin which already is accepted as the nr 1 crypto. All other tasks can be handled by other fast cryptos. So if Kaspa comes up with an app that is so superior that everyone has to use it as others can't do it then maybe it will gain traction

Nobody talks about Kaspa anymore. I've been holding since early 2024 and watched this community go from absolutely electric to basically dead. The Telegram groups that used to have hundreds of messages daily now get like five. The Reddit is collecting dust. Twitter mentions are nonexistent unless someone's complaining about price. Here's what bothers me though. The tech didn't change. The fundamentals are still solid. BlockDAG architecture is still revolutionary. Transactions are still fast as hell. So what happened? Did everyone just chase the next shiny thing? Or did people actually lose faith in the project itself? I'm genuinely curious because I can't tell if I'm being stubborn or patient. There's a difference between diamond hands and just being in denial about a dead project. The silence is deafening and honestly kind of unsettling. Are you still holding? And if you sold, what was the final straw that made you bounce? Because right now it feels like I'm sitting in an empty room talking to myself.

@Real_Crypto_X @sovereign_kas @Lovrincrypto That’s why Kaspa is coming up with superior programmability (vProg) which allows entire new categories of killer apps to be built upon for adoption as breakthrough, before its superior monetary use case can be accepted.

@sovereign_kas @Lovrincrypto Great, the problem is that the reality of money is , that people need to accept and people often accept what institutions and their countries and laws accept. And this is where some great projects fail

@Meta360DAO @FinanceYF5 这个比喻有逻辑漏洞。自己做饭和厨师做饭时间成本都差不多，只是好不好吃的问题（其实很多厨师水平和自己做差不多). 你去外面吃饭，买的是体验，不是效率。但是AI编程是工作，需要效率，而AI的效率远远超过 人类，这是几个小时 vs 好几个月的差距，更不要说金钱成本了。

@FinanceYF5 我今天看到最缓解我AI焦虑的一句话：每个人都能做一两个菜，但是厨师这个职业并没有消失。

AnthropicAI 刚刚发布了他们的 2026 年 Agent 编程趋势报告。 结论 → 人人都成了开发者。 我们已经从单一助手，走向自主的 Agent 群体。 它们现在可以组成团队，连续多天构建完整系统，让非技术人员也能发布完整应用 💥 18 页报告详见下方线程 ↓

@Motion_Viz PROMPT

Stop prompting AI to "make me a landing page." 200+ hours testing taught me this: Generic prompts → pretty pages My prompts → pages that sell The pack includes: → 3D Landing Hero Section → Sentient 3D Core → Cyberpunk Volumetric Shaders → Microlender Protocol → Hyper-Futuristic MCP-2099 Like + reply "PROMPT" for the library. (following required for DM)