Rohan Pahwa

@swarajk_ GK-2?

udupi is so far so went to benne instead

@Balancing_Actor Worth reading, Boss?

Read his book land of seven rivers as soon as it came out. I had no idea who he was then and no idea why I picked it out.

Human garbages like you have provided the intellectual cover sitting in Delhi for years of industrial scale rape, murder, loot, goondagardi. You yourself are a goonda no different from the TMC goons. Your weapon is the pen. Today, just two words for you: F*** off.

@YearOfTheKraken Nahi bhai..👍

Am I posting too much, guys? Should I reduce the frequency of my tweets?

Thank you Rashbehari’s voters.

@on_drive2306 belt treatment needed...

Karma finally catches up with TMC jihadis

A state that was partitioned on religious lines and birthed with some of the worst communal violence just before independence, then saw a destruction of Bengali Hindus in a genocide that they aren't allowed to acknowledge. That state was always polarised. It was just suppressed.

Yes!❤️ Guess the likes of you won’t even know his name.

Pakistan must pay a high cost for waging a decades-long campaign of terrorism against India.

Balancing means: “To be or to put somebody/something in a steady position so that the weight is not heavier on one side than on the other”. Any Munir- Modi, meaning India- Pakistan, balancing act is therefore meaningless in practice. Where is the equivalence between Munir and Modi or India and Pakistan? An elephant on one side and a tail- wagging poodle on the other. How do you balance them? Make the poodle elephantine? There is no balancing act. It is not within US power to re-hyphenate India and Pakistan. It is weak-mindedness on the part of some of our commentators to even entertain this hollow concept. The writer of the article is actually denying any return to hyphenation. India has moved on. It has risen. Pakistan is in survival mode. Just ignore Trump’s verbal love fest with his favourite Field Marshal.

“Indian journalism developed no reporting tradition; it often reported on India as on a foreign country.” ~ VS Naipaul, India: A Wounded Civilization.

Unless India’s interests were at stake, which we have already secured, it is Not our monkey, Not our circus! If Pakistan can secure a ceasefire/ offramp, good for them. India should engage with US for its own interests, not for a regional quagmire not of our choosing.

If you think hawks in DC and Tel Aviv will allow Iran to control Hormuz, keep its uranium, no limits to ballistic missiles, and security guarantees to not attack Iran again, I have a beachfront property in Bikaner to sell you.

Goes to show that the final criticism leveled at Modi that he craves leli validation and global recognition like Nehru craved is also wrong. He did the right thing for Indians, stayed out of two idiots fighting.

💯 💯 💯 Bigger surrender and strategic defeat than Vietnam and Afghanistan combined.

That is the fraud. American power on screen is “craft.” British power on screen is “heritage.” Indian power on screen is suddenly evidence of political conditioning. Same cinema. Same nationalism. Different skin colour. The Economist has a wonderfully colonial rulebook for cinema. When America straps a camera to Pentagon hardware and sells state power with a soundtrack, it is “spectacle.” When a film is made with CIA-adjacent mythology around national revenge, it is “serious storytelling.” But when India puts its own enemies and terrorist attack scars on screen, suddenly the magazine reaches for the psychiatrist’s couch. That is the real joke here. Fighter jets, spies, commandos and national vengeance are perfectly acceptable as long as the flag fluttering in the background is American or British. Then it is culture. It is craft. It is cinema doing what cinema does. The Economist has invented a very elegant little rule for cinema: Top Gun: Maverick can fly on Pentagon muscle, RAMBO & Zero Dark Thirty can ride CIA mythology, James Bond can sell six decades of British spy glamour, Dunkirk can turn wartime memory into national legend, and all of that is called storytelling. But the moment India puts terror, retaliation and national memory on screen with Dhurandhar, the magazine starts diagnosing the audience instead of reviewing the film. What @TheEconomist cannot digest is not one film. It is the fact that Indians are no longer outsourcing their memory to London’s approval. A country that has lived through decades of Pakistan-sponsored terror is apparently expected to process all that pain in whispers, with tasteful disclaimers, and preferably under the supervision of foreign editors who still think they are qualified to explain India to Indians. And that is why the review reeks. Not of sophistication, but of the old imperial tic: Western nationalism on screen is a nation telling its story; Indian nationalism on screen is a pathology requiring diagnosis. The costume has changed. The sneer has not. The funniest part is that The Economist probably thinks this is fearless criticism. It is not. It is just another imported lecture from people who never mind propaganda when it wears aviators, a tuxedo, or a CIA badge, but develop exquisite moral sensitivity the moment India stops being apologetic on its own screen. Just FYI: Decades of Pakistan-sponsored terror are apparently meant to be processed quietly, apologetically, and preferably without ever producing a mass-market cultural response. That is the old script. India is no longer following it.

I am trying to stay professional in language. This is not a serious proposal. It does not address a single issue of Iran's threats to the U.S., Israel, entire region - missiles, nuclear, navy, behaviors of proxy terror armies/against international shipping in the strait of hormuz (outside of saying let commercial shipping go through). China (the source of Islamic Regime weapons development, sanctions evasion, 90% sanctioned oil sales), Russia (Iran's arms dealer to attack civilians daily in Ukraine, providing intelligence to attack U.S./Israel/Ally sites), and Pakistan (state backer of terrorism, sancturary provider for terrorists) all should have no invlovment. Sure if the terrorist in Tehran want to pass messages thru Islamabad...fine... but this is not serious, counterproductive IMO.

@lizardwizka_alt Tere bina zindagi se @Papaji200

@clary_co India cannot be used as a staging area for such purposes. These intruders must be punished as per Indian law.