@mcuban guess Elon would have been wise to take your advice
English
Ron Lussier 59
429 posts
@TheStalwart @DavidSacks Judging by the market today David fell off his high horse . 😂
English
@DavidSacks David please stop tweeting about the market!
English
How you like them apples now?
Joe Weisenthal@TheStalwart
David didn't tweet for a week, and then he returned to jinx the rally. SPX down 3.7% since 9:57
English
@SaraEisen Very interesting Sara! Probably should look at his buddies purchases prior to his comment.
English
My current best view:
Trump lets tariff reactions play out for a few weeks. Sees the trend of capitulations and is emboldened to keep going. He fields offers from everyone. Negotiates with no one.
Then brings everyone to MaL in a month or two and puts an offer on the table: Bretton Woods 2.0. It’s simpler and more effective to have one Grand Bargain than negotiate piecemeal with 80 countries+.
I am focused on figuring out what terms matter most for the MaL Accords. I have a few in mind which are obvious and would kingmake the US.
I don’t buy this whole “end of US hegemony”. This is the moment to go for the jugular and establish world order around America.
English
English
@WhiteHouse
All you needed to do was offer a genuine thank you! You visit our President’s house, once again asking for help, only to insult your adversary as a “negotiation” tactic. Then, when our President points out that the U.S. has funded you for years, you act offended. Let’s not forget your actions during his campaign—showing up with the opposing side (which should’ve been flagged as foreign interference) and signing missiles! It’s clear you want to be seen as the war-torn hero, but you’re prolonging this conflict with kickbacks to your so-called “supporters.” Now you’re off to Europe to renegotiate with them? Good luck! We in the U.S. wish you well, but we’re done with “no strings attached” funding—Europe likely won’t offer you a better deal either. And now Europe’s turning back to us for help? You, sir, are a joke. We want to help Ukraine find peace, but you’re standing in the way.
English
We are very grateful to the United States for all the support. I’m thankful to President Trump, Congress for their bipartisan support, and American people. Ukrainians have always appreciated this support, especially during these three years of full-scale invasion.
English
@elonmusk Elon stick to what makes you successful my friend.
English
Google & Microsoft very disproportionately donate to the Democratic Party.
Between them, they control close to 100% of web browsers and search. Even with the best of intentions, they can’t help but introduce bias.
The Rabbit Hole@TheRabbitHole
Top Donor Contributions to Donald Trump & Kamala Harris as of September 2024.
English
I can’t believe how the crowd strike upgrade has caused so much pain for a lot of Delta travelers.
English
Joe Biden didn’t pass the torch, he was knifed in the back.
English
@HalftimeReport @TheDomino Did Weiss borrow Dan Ives jacket? Lol
English
Would you support Alex Jones being able to keep his businesses so his family can SURVIVE ?
YES or NO ?
English
Today’s verdict represents the culmination of a legal process that has been bent to the political will of the actors involved: a leftist prosecutor, a partisan judge and a jury reflective of one of the most liberal enclaves in America—all in an effort to “get” Donald Trump.
That this case—involving alleged misdemeanor business records violations from nearly a decade ago—was even brought is a testament to the political debasement of the justice system in places like New York City. This is especially true considering this same district attorney routinely excuses criminal conduct in a way that has endangered law-abiding citizens in his jurisdiction.
It is often said that no one is above the law, but it is also true that no one is below the law. If the defendant were not Donald Trump, this case would never have been brought, the judge would have never issued similar rulings, and the jury would have never returned a guilty verdict.
In America, the rule of law should be applied in a dispassionate, even-handed manner, not become captive to the political agenda of some kangaroo court.
English
@SpeakerJohnson Your statement is meaningless. Trump’s lawyers pleaded their case and was found guilty by a selected jury. So you don’t believe the need to follow the law?
English
My statement on President Trump trial verdict:
Today is a shameful day in American history. Democrats cheered as they convicted the leader of the opposing party on ridiculous charges, predicated on the testimony of a disbarred, convicted felon. This was a purely political exercise, not a legal one.
The weaponization of our justice system has been a hallmark of the Biden Administration, and the decision today is further evidence that Democrats will stop at nothing to silence dissent and crush their political opponents.
The American people see this as lawfare, and they know it is wrong—and dangerous. President Trump will rightfully appeal this absurd verdict—and he WILL WIN!
English
Darwin would be delighted to see how right he was.
Marc Zell - מארק צל@GOPIsrael
Princeton University students announce a hunger strike in solidarity with Hamas. As a Princeton alumnus and former president of Princeton Hillel I am shocked and embarrassed.
English
🚨BREAKING: Joe Rogan just said that the FBI and Nancy Pelosi are responsible for the January 6th Capitol attack.
What's your reaction?
English
If you're unfamiliar with a divisive issue, unwilling or unable to study history, struggle to distinguish right from wrong, or good from evil, and curry favor by parroting a handful of talking points cribbed from other plagiarists, here's a cliff notes version.
Those who wear masks, or hoods, use terror, torture, kidnapping, and murder to advance their objectives - which generally involve a dystopian world completely at odds with liberty, reason, human rights, scientific and economic progress - or support and promote those who do are probably the bad guys.
English
The “Experts” are finally admitting that Russia is winning the war in Ukraine, but they are still lying about why. The reason is not congressional inaction over further funding. The reason is that Russia has more manpower than Ukraine; it produces more artillery than the West; and it has air superiority. Russia has been using its air power to devastate Ukrainian infrastructure and military positions with enormous FAB bombs. The US doesn’t produce enough air defense to change that reality, especially in light of all the competing demands for that limited supply. In any event, what will happen now is that the Ukraine funding bill will pass, but it won’t change the outcome of the war. What it will do is line a lot of pockets, perhaps for the final time, which is the real objective here.
English