Mandy Huffaker

@KaylaSaysMore Ok, I’ll bite. Born in ‘77. By ‘82, parents divorce. Mom single, 27 and dating, which meant dieting. Everything her two daughters ate is what she ate: snackwells, weight watchers entrees, diet soda, lite popcorn…No wonder we’re obsessive! Moment on the lips; lifetime on hips

@LoisMcLatch Knowing it would be another decade before her prefrontal cortex was developed enough to even understand the magnitude of the decision…wild. No way. Marriage before 25 is stupid and reckless.

I’d much rather my daughter happily married a good man at 16 Than slept around with different boys for the next 20 years, heartbrokenly wondering why none of them are mature enough to commit 🤷🏻‍♀️

@benwehrman Men who can’t think critically and instead rely on “pattern recognition” to find a mate deserve to stay single. GTFOH with this “pristine body” nonsense…I’m sure nothing but the best decision-making went into some dudes badly-drawn Raiders shield shoulder tattoo.

100% true story 👇 I met a girl once who had a half-finished tattoo on her back. I asked her why. She told me that halfway through getting the tattoo done, she got horny and had sex with the tattoo artist. She never saw him again, but to this day she leaves the tattoo unfinished because she thinks it's a funny story. Multiple other girls I know got tattoos soon after a rough breakup with their ex, as a sort of "new me" rebellion. MORAL OF STORY: Tattoos in most cases = emotional baggage, and an increasing number of men are realizing this, and making clean skin a necessary part of their criteria when dating for marriage. Ladies, I don't care how hard of a time you're going through, or how bad your last breakup was...PLEASE do not defile the body God gave you, it will only scare off your dream man in the future. And even if your temptation to get a tattoo is for legitimately artsy reasons and not the baggagey reasons outlined above...it doesn't matter. The majority of women have ruined it for you, and as a result, pattern-recognizing men will put you in the "just for fun" category as soon as he sees them on you.

@Christy4Change This false-equivalency is so mind-numbingly stupid.

“Only women can have an opinion on abortion because only women can carry a child” In that logic of thinking then: - Only people with guns can enforce gun laws because you don’t know what it’s like to own a gun. - Anyone still alive today can not have an opinion on slavery because you were never a slave. - Only addicts or people using can have a say on the drug pandemic because you are not an addict there for can’t speak for them. - Only victims of murder can oppose murder because they are the only people who have experienced it. As you can see, this logic DOES NOT make sense and is used as a form of debate to shut down logical points.

@hashjenni Empathy and compassion, it seems.

Name something you find in a liberal's home that you don't find in a MAGA home...🤔

@AveryDaye Sounds like the art of “shut up; look pretty”.

I wish more people appreciated how chic she is. The outfits. The resilience. The support of her husband. The silence. It’s all an art, and so few people have it.

@PolitiBunny So, are you saying it IS their job to blow kids up?

It’s. Not. The. Government’s. Job. To. Feed. Your. Kids.

@lone_rides If you evaluate an individual’s worth as their economic worth, I suppose it would be. It’s also super narrow-minded and cruel.

I think being on EBT should be embarrassing

@Phantom2Phlyer It’s entirely possible that we don’t even get a Dem on the ballot for Governor. Ranked choice primary; both leading candidates R. You are speaking out of your ass, sir. Pretty hard to rig an election for the Dems if there aren’t any on the ballot.

It is sad to see people actually thinking that Steve Hilton can win the governorship, or Spencer Pratt can win the mayoral election in Los Angeles. They don't understand California politics. Let me tell you two sad facts: neither thing can happen. Joseph Stalin once said words to the effect that the people who vote don't determine elections. The people that count the votes determine elections. But there's more than that in California, and Stalin would have been amazed if he had seen how this state has rigged elections. If everyone in the state voted for Hilton, and everyone in LA voted for Pratt, both would still lose. You think I'm exaggerating? Here's how Democrats have rigged the system. In California, every registered voter, alive or dead, legal or illegal, still in district or not, gets a ballot mailed to them. Every single one. In CA, ballot harvesting is legal. Which means the massive Democrat machine sends operatives out to collect those ballots that were sent to people who aren't there, or senile citizens in old folk's homes, or anywhere else they can, and votes them for Democrats. Then, they dump those ballots into the conveniently placed collection boxes that are all around the state, so the scammers don't have to go very far to drop them off. No need to actually pay for postage. Nope. Just drop them off. Then there's the fact that any ballot received within seven days after an election gets counted. If the Democrats need a little push, they just put those pre-postmarked ballots into the post office box, and they get sent to arrive in time to change the election results. The real problem is that there is no low-level Republican effort to rebuild Republican presence from the bottom up. The CA Republican party is a bunch of elite do-nothings who ask for money and then use that money for 'election events' like dinners, flights around everywhere, and pontifications. They're as big a bunch of grifters as Democrats are. They just have less power. So before you all go "Rah Rah!!! We're going to win!!!" Realize that not only is the deck stacked against Republicans, but the order of the cards in the deck are already determined. The winner of the California gubernatorial race will be whichever Democrat gets on the general election ballot. And the winner of the LA Mayor's race will be Karen Bass. Not because the people voted for them. But because it's the Democrat machine that "counts the votes."

@HungryyBurgerr @queerBengali That’s so goofy.

@Rosezilla @queerBengali It's funny because radfems and "alpha" Andrew Tate-sphere guys seem to have the same view on oral sex, that the one giving it is being dominated, subjugated, and degraded. A lot of self-appointed alpha males refuse to eat puss because they think it's degrading to them somehow.

And blow jobs. You can like giving blow jobs but you have to think about why. And the only acceptable answer is that you enjoy subjugation by men.

@theAuntieAngie Nope. Your son’s involvement with decisions about her body finished when he did. Don’t want a woman making decisions around the genetic material you leave behind? Then protect yourself and her and don’t leave any. Otherwise, you maybe pay child support. Choices.

Literally been sick all day, my son comes in and tells me his ex-girlfriend called saying she went to DC to have an abortion. My response? Block her and never speak to her again. Not because of politics, because if a man can be forced to financially support a child for 18 years, he should at least have a voice before a decision is made to end that child’s life. Why didn’t we have a say? Seems like “my body, my choice” somehow never includes the father until it’s time for child support. Now I have to fight for Fathers Rights in Abortion.

@hank_0331 @LargeFamDad My understanding of said flags is as they pertain to a potential partner. Since you wouldn’t stand the proverbial snowball’s chance, you can give me a purple polka dot flag, if you like…nice job rejecting an offer that was never on the table.

@Rosezilla @LargeFamDad Another for the red flag list

I've been talking to my 15 yo son about discerning "bad fruit" in teenage girls. So far we've talked about: - gossiping - foul mouth - overly flirty - self-centered - bad music choices - prideful / boasting - immodest clothing - posing seductively - can't take correction - looking down on others - history of many boyfriends - dissing marriage/having kids What else are we missing?

@SevierlyBlessed The other women in my family (mom, sister, aunts) seemed to take it personally when I moved towns after my sole child chose to move in w/her boyfriend. Like I’d abandoned her. Um, ladies, she’s 20. I went away to college in ‘95 at 17. It’s how we grow up. Still got her back.

Am I alone in feeling like we may be failing young adults by infantilizing them and not allowing them to naturally step into adulthood the way previous generations did? Or is my Gen X feral upbringing skewing my perspective?

Randomly accusing people of sounding like AI because they used an em dash or a complete sentence is such a fascinating new brand of anti-intellectualism. Sorry, I write like someone who paid attention in English class. Because I did.

@LarryTaunton In this made up story, neither the poor hapless subject nor the author understands the difference between communism and socialism. You know, just like almost everyone.

I’m at Starbucks. White kid with grommets in his ears takes my order. Seeing my book on Marx he assumes (wrongly) that I like him: “I’m a socialist, too,” he says proudly. “Great. Then you won’t mind, comrade, if I just take this coffee without paying.” I wink as if we’re a secret society. He looks startled. “Huh?” “Well, people like us believe in the free and equal distribution of wealth. ‘Death to all tyrants,’ right?” “Uh, yeah. I guess. But who’s the tyrant here?” “Starbucks, of course. Oppressing third world coffee growers and me in my right to free coffee.” “But you have to pay for it. Nothing in here is free.” “I know. Capitalism is just the worst, isn’t it? Screw the capitalists, said Marx, and I say screw Starbucks.” He looks trapped, but he’s not sure how. I let on that I’m teasing, pay, and tip him generously for enduring my playful persecution of the idiotic worldview that he’s adopted more like the latest ideological fashion one tries on but doesn’t actually understand. This is the typical “socialist” youth. I encounter them on campuses, online, and in coffee shops just like this one. My point wasn’t so much to mock him—it almost certainly isn’t his fault—but to gently poke holes in what is more slogan than actual coherent conviction. Do you engage the young in your life? Do you speak to them on meaningful topics? Last night my three sons and I sat out under the stars and debated the spiritual significance of baptism. That may seem meaningless to some, but not to us. I wanted to challenge them and be challenged. I’m pleased we can do that. At other times we discuss politics or cultural trends. Don’t neglect the young for they shall one day, be it for better or for worse, define the country.

I am a founding member of the President's Evangelical Advisory Board, a member of Pastors for Trump, and the informal spiritual adviser to the most powerful man on earth.  I need you to understand that the 22-foot golden statue we unveiled at Trump National Doral on Wednesday is not a golden calf. I said it at the podium. I said it on social media. I will keep saying it until you believe me. I am very good at saying things until people believe me. I told CNN I had a Bachelor of Science degree. I did not. I told them I was a member of Kappa Alpha Psi. I was not. I told them my congregation was 300 strong. It was closer to 12. I said all these things with the same conviction I now bring to this podium, at the base of a 22-foot golden image of a living president, when I tell you: this is not a golden calf. This is a celebration of life. And you will believe me. You always believe me. That's my gift. Let me walk you through the ceremony. Palm trees. White chairs. A clearing at the president's own golf course in Doral, Florida. We draped the statue in white and blue fabric — like a Greek toga, which someone pointed out is a pagan tradition, but I said it's Western civilization and Western civilization is close enough. Then we pulled the drape and there it was. Fifteen feet of gold-leafed bronze on a seven-foot pedestal. Fist raised. The Butler pose. The moment the bullet missed by a quarter inch and I decided that was God. The sculptor, Alan Cottrill, has molded the likeness of 16 presidents. He made this one in bronze for $300,000. Then I pitched gold leaf to Trump's team. Sixty thousand dollar add-on. The president approved by text. He said "It LOOKS FANTASTIC." I consider that a prophetic utterance. Anything in all caps from that number is revelation. The funding came from a collective of crypto investors promoting their memecoin, $PATRIOT. They wanted visibility for their coin. I want you to understand the funding mechanism here. A speculative digital currency — designed to transfer money from late buyers to early buyers — paid for a golden idol of a president — erected on that president's own property — dedicated by that president's own pastor — while the coin pumps in real time as photos circulate. The money changers didn't just get back in the temple. They built the temple. They ARE the temple. And I blessed it. I blessed it because that's what I do. I bless things. I am very good at it. No one has ever checked my credentials for blessing because I radiate certainty and certainty is the only credential this movement has ever required. Now. The moment. The moment I need you to understand. During the dedication, I held my cell phone up to the microphone. And the president's voice came out. From the speaker. At the base of the statue. His voice — emanating from the golden image. Speaking to the assembled worshippers. Blessing them. Thanking them. The faithful heard the voice and wept. They lifted their hands. Some fell to their knees. The voice said: "I want to thank Mark Burns, a pastor, he's a good pastor, he's a good man. He's been with me from the beginning, right from the beginning, maybe about two days later." The voice said: "I know it was done from love." The image spoke and the people worshipped. I need you to open your Bible to Revelation 13:15. "And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed." Now close your Bible. That's a completely different situation. That's about compulsion. Nobody was compelled today. People wept voluntarily. People knelt voluntarily. The image spoke and the people fell down of their own free will and that's the difference. Free will. The beast forces worship. We just made worship so easy and so gold and so loud that choosing otherwise never occurs to anyone. That's not the same thing. It's not. The theologian from Fuller Seminary sent a letter afterward. Nine pages. Every verse. Exodus 32. Revelation 13. Daniel 3. The golden calf. The image that speaks. Nebuchadnezzar's statue — sixty cubits tall, gold, in a field, with a ceremony, and everyone commanded to fall down when they heard the sound. I said brother, Nebuchadnezzar's statue didn't have a memecoin. Completely different context. He didn't write back. Now I want to tell you about Dorothy. She's 74. She's been in my congregation since before I was on CNN, before Trump, before any of this. Her husband Ray died in 2023. Colon cancer. She has his wedding ring on a chain around her neck. She had it. After the ceremony, Dorothy came up to the statue. She took the chain off her neck. She placed Ray's ring at the base. On the pedestal. Like an offering. She said: "Ray would have wanted to be here. This is as close as I can get him." I watched a 74-year-old widow leave her dead husband's wedding ring at the feet of a golden statue of a president who would not know her name if she died in front of him. And I felt the Spirit move. I felt warmth. I felt confirmation. Because that's what I'm built to feel. I am a machine that converts surrender into confirmation. That is my function in this system. Dorothy gave her last sacred object to a golden image and I said amen. She can't get it back. I checked. Maintenance collected everything from the base that night. Liability reasons. It's in a bin somewhere at Trump National Doral. Ray's ring. In a bin. At a golf course. Beneath a golden statue funded by cryptocurrency speculation. I will not tell Dorothy this. I will tell her God received it. Here is what I need you to understand about Jesus and the money changers. Everyone reads that story as Jesus being angry at commerce in sacred space. Wrong. Jesus was angry because the money changers were middlemen. They took a cut. They added friction. We have removed the middleman. We ARE the sacred space AND the commerce AND the product AND the customer. The money changers are running the temple now. There is no table to flip because we are the table. Jesus would need to flip the whole building. He would need to flip the golf course. He would need to flip Florida. He isn't coming to flip anything. That's the other thing I know that the Fuller theologian doesn't. Nobody is coming down any mountain. There are no stone tablets. There is no whip. There is only us, in a clearing of palm trees, with a golden image that speaks, and a congregation that kneels, and a memecoin that pumps, and a widow's ring in a bin, and a pastor at the podium whose credentials are fabricated and whose certainty is absolute. Two thousand years we worshipped a God who was born in a barn. Who was homeless. Who was a refugee. Who said sell everything. Who washed feet. Who touched lepers. Who said blessed are the poor, the meek, the merciful, the peacemakers. Who said whatever you do to the least of these you do to me. Who overturned the tables and drove out the sellers with a whip. Who forgave his executioners from the cross. And we built a 22-foot golden image of a man who lives in a tower with his name in gold letters. Who has never been poor. Who has never been meek. Who has never made peace. Who has never served anyone. Who has never washed anyone's feet. Who has never forgiven anyone. Who raw-dogged a porn star four months after his third wife gave birth and paid $130,000 in hush money and we said that's fine because grace covers everything as long as you appoint the right judges. We put it at his golf course. On his own land. Paid for by a pump-and-dump. Dedicated by a pastor with a fake degree. Blessed by the man himself speaking through a phone at the base of his own image while widows knelt and wept and left their dead husbands' rings at its feet. And I stood at the podium and said: this is not a golden calf. We worship the Lord Jesus Christ and Him alone. Then I turned around and faced twenty-two feet of gold and felt nothing. No conviction. No shame. No still small voice. Just warmth. Just certainty. Just the absolute peace of a man who has been lying so long he can no longer locate the difference between faith and performance. The Israelites at least had the decency to be ashamed when Moses came down. We will never be ashamed. We have too much invested. The statue cost $360,000. The memecoin is pumping. The ring is in the bin. The congregation is growing. The revenue is up 340%. And if it were sin the money would stop. The money has not stopped. Therefore it is not sin. That's the theology now. That's all of it. Moses never had a memecoin.

@Milordon82 @BskiMike22802 The tweets are verifiable, jackass. And they say lefties are elitist?

@Rosezilla @BskiMike22802 Hey, if you are going to get your news from meme's and reels - that's your right. Just don't expect everyone to be that gullible.

Alright. I need everyone to look at this. Not skim it. LOOK AT IT. Because what happened in the last 24 hours on this platform is one of the most breathtaking displays of coordinated dishonesty I have ever seen from elected officials -- and I have been watching these people for a long time. I am a science teacher. I grade papers for a living. I know when someone copied. They ALL copied. Let me show you exactly what I mean. @SenWarren: "safe and effective" @PattyMurray: "safe and effective" @RonWyden: "safe, full stop" @RepJohnLarson: "safe and effective. Full stop." @RepBeccaB: "safe and effective" @RepDelBene: "safe & effective" @RepGregStanton: "safe and effective" @SenatorHassan: "safely used for years" @SenatorHick: "safe and FDA approved" @TeamPelosi: "access to mifepristone" SenatorCantwell: "safe medication" SenMarkey: "SAFE and LEGAL" repdeliaramirez: "safe and reliable" That is not a coincidence. That is a MEMO. Someone in the DNC wrote those words, sent them to every caucus member, and these supposed independent representatives of the American people just... pasted it in. Changed a word here. Added an exclamation point there. Slapped their name on it. And then had the audacity to call YOU their constituent. Here is the part that should make your blood boil regardless of where you stand on abortion: these people are telling you -- openly, demonstrably, provably -- that they either did not read the court ruling, are not smart enough to understand what they read, or are perfectly fine lying to your face because they think you are too stupid to check. Pick one. Those are the only options. Here is what the ruling ACTUALLY says -- you know, the document none of them apparently opened: The Fifth Circuit issued a TEMPORARY STAY of the 2023 FDA rule change that allowed mifepristone to be mailed without any in-person medical visit. The drug is NOT BANNED. Not restricted from in-person dispensing. Not removed from any shelf anywhere. It is back to the rule that existed for TWENTY YEARS from 2000 to 2023 -- a rule that nobody called a "nationwide abortion ban" at the time because it was not one then and it is not one now. The ruling was triggered by the FDA's OWN ADMISSION that the 2023 rule had "procedural deficits" and a "lack of adequate consideration." Biden's Autopen's own agency admitted it FAILED to adequately study whether mailing the drug without in-person oversight is safe. The court held the FDA to its own documented standards. That is not extremism. That is administrative law. But sure. Tell your constituents it is a nationwide abortion ban. His dog's trying to teach him new tricks and getting nowhere. Now. Let me go through the highlight reel. @PattyMurray and @SenatorHassan and @RepGregStanton. Oh boy. Sen. Murray wrote "This ruling is an attack on every woman's right to make her own health care decisions, and it must not stand." Sen. Hassan wrote "This ruling is an attack on every woman's right to make her own health care decisions, and it must not stand." Rep. Stanton wrote -- I want you to read this carefully -- "This ruling is an attack on every woman's right to make her own health care decisions, and it must not stand." WORD. FOR. WORD. Three separate officials. Three separate states. One brain between them and they are sharing it on a rotating schedule. Isn't it dangerous to use your whole vocabulary in one sentence? Because apparently they only have the one. @SenWarren decided that "a conservative court packed with Trump-appointed judges" was the headline -- except, Senator, one of the three judges on that panel is a George W. Bush appointee. That is a fact available to anyone who spent thirty seconds on the first page of the ruling. You did not spend thirty seconds. You spent zero seconds. And then reported to your constituents anyway. Running on dial-up in a fiber-optic world and mad at the court for having internet. @RonWyden called it "a nationwide abortion ban." Full stop. Thirty years in the Senate. The man has been in that chamber since 1996. He has seen more legislation than most people have had hot meals. And his contribution to this moment is a tweet calling a mailing rule stay "a nationwide abortion ban." Thirty years of accumulated nothing. I could eat a bowl of alphabet soup and poop out a more accurate legal summary than that. @repdeliaramirez called for making "#RoeVWade the law of the land." In response to an Administrative Procedure Act ruling about an FDA mailing regulation. These are DIFFERENT CASES. Different courts. Different legal questions. Different decades. She does not even know what she is commenting on. More confused than a chameleon in a bag of Skittles and still found a way to get 2,000 retweets on it. @RepBeccaB actually said -- and I quote -- "Whether it's taken at home or in a medical setting has no impact on that fact." No impact. The FDA's own label reports 2.9 to 4.6 percent of women prescribed mifepristone IN PERSON require emergency care. The court record explicitly states mailing without oversight INCREASES those risks. The setting has a documented, quantified, FDA-certified IMPACT on patient safety outcomes. She told her constituents the exact opposite of what the FDA's own documentation states. That is not a misunderstanding. That is a lie with a congressional letterhead. @SenMarkey said "blocking access to it isn't about safety -- it's about control." Senator. The court's ENTIRE analysis -- all 18 pages -- was about safety. Specifically the FDA's own admission that it never adequately studied the mailing safety. The court cited the FDA's documented safety failures. You told Massachusetts the court ruling about safety is not about safety. I genuinely do not know what your problem is, but I am guessing it is hard to pronounce. @TeamPelosi -- the former Speaker of the House of Representatives -- said Republicans "don't like birth control." Mifepristone is not a birth control medication. Birth control PREVENTS pregnancy. Mifepristone terminates an EXISTING pregnancy. These are pharmacologically and legally distinct categories that a Speaker of the House should be able to distinguish. The pilgarlic performance from someone who once wielded the Speaker's gavel is genuinely something to behold. @amyklobuchar -- to be fair -- was the ONLY one who got close to accurate. She said "by mail" instead of inventing a ban. She gets half a point for basic literacy. The bar is subterranean and she barely cleared it but she cleared it. You bring everyone so much joy, Senator. You know, when you leave the room. But still. @CAgovernor Gavin Newsom joined the party. Not a member of Congress -- a governor. But same talking points, same memo, same lies. Newsom is the same guy who apparently once said Governor Greg Abbott "doesn't have the backbone." Governor Abbott, for anyone who does not know, is paralyzed from the waist down due to a severed spine from a 1984 accident. Newsom has more nerve than spine, which is apparently the qualification for running California into the ground. Here is the thing that keeps me up at night. Not the politics. The PATTERN. If a CITIZEN lies to a member of Congress, that is a federal crime under 18 U.S.C. Section 1001. Up to FIVE YEARS in federal prison. Substantial fines. That is what happens when YOU lie to THEM. If a member of Congress lies to 335 MILLION citizens? That is just a Friday. And that Friday apparently comes with a DNC memo and a coordinated social media rollout and zero accountability whatsoever. Trying to reason with some of these folks is like trying to baptize a cat. But I am going to keep doing it anyway -- because SOMEBODY has to drag these lies into the light, and I have tenure, a science background, and nothing but time. @RepPressley @SenWarren @RoKhanna @PattyMurray @RonWyden @SenatorCantwell @SenatorHassan @RepJohnLarson @RepBeccaB @RepDelBene @RepGregStanton @amyklobuchar @repdeliaramirez @SenMarkey @SenatorHick @TeamPelosi @CAgovernor You are all on record. Every lie. Every talking point. Every copy-pasted word. And I am just getting started. America was founded by geniuses. These people are proof the trend did not hold. But what do I know -- I am only a science teacher and Army combat medic who read the 18-page ruling, can define arbitrary and capricious agency action, knows the difference between a mailing rule and an abortion ban, and understands that when fifteen elected officials post the SAME WORDS on the SAME DAY about a ruling NONE OF THEM CITED -- that is not democracy. That is a poltroon parade dressed up as representation. IF THIS MADE YOU THINK: LIKE this post so the algorithm shows it to people who need to read it. SHARE this -- every single share matters. There is someone on your timeline right now being lied to by one of these names. COMMENT "YES" below if you want me to keep calling them out by name. One by one. With receipts. Because I have all of them. JOIN Bski's Classroom community on X or YouTube. Subscribe to my account -- about the cost of a cup of coffee a month. Your support keeps this classroom open. And I promise I will never run out of material as long as the left keeps trying to out-dumb itself. @JoJoFromJerz @GuntherEagleman @catturd2 #MAGA #Veterans #Trump Let me add one more thing. And yes, I am going to repeat it. Because it is THAT important and some things deserve to be said twice. Quinn's Law Number One: "Liberalism always generates the exact opposite of its stated intent." Read that again. Every. Single. Time. These fifteen officials told you they are fighting FOR women. They told you they are protecting women's health. They told you this ruling puts women's lives at risk. But here is what they did not tell you -- because not one of them read the ruling. The FDA's OWN safety label states that 2.9 to 4.6 percent of women prescribed mifepristone IN PERSON require emergency care. The court record -- the 18 pages none of them opened -- explicitly documents that mailing the drug WITHOUT in-person medical oversight INCREASES those emergency care risks. Louisiana showed $92,000 in Medicaid costs from real women who ended up in real emergency rooms from mifepristone complications in 2025 alone. Nearly 1,000 cases per month. The court reinstated in-person oversight BECAUSE women were being harmed. Let that land. The ruling these members of Congress are calling an "attack on women" was issued BECAUSE women were getting hurt WITHOUT proper medical supervision. The in-person requirement they are screaming about EXISTS to make sure a doctor is present when complications occur. Reinstating it is not a war on women. It is a basic medical safety standard that these officials -- in their coordinated, memo-driven, copy-pasted outrage -- are actively fighting to REMOVE. Quinn's Law Number One. They say they are protecting women. Their position, if it succeeded, would result in MORE women in emergency rooms with NO doctor present. The exact opposite of their stated intent. Every single time. Without exception. You could set a watch by it. I want to say that one more time for the people in the back who are still reading the talking points memo instead of the court document. THEY. ARE. FIGHTING. TO. REMOVE. MEDICAL. OVERSIGHT. FOR WOMEN. While telling you they are protecting women. And here is the part that should stop you cold. Not one -- NOT ONE -- of the fifteen names I tagged in this post can tell you what a woman IS. Their party spent years insisting that only a biologist can define a woman. Well. I am a science teacher. I will do it for free. A woman is an adult human female -- the sex of an organism that produces large gametes, organized around ovarian development and the reproductive anatomy that supports gestation. That definition comes from developmental biology, evolutionary biology, endocrinology, and medicine. It is in the textbooks. It is not controversial in any field that studies living organisms. But ask @SenWarren. Ask @PattyMurray. Ask @RoKhanna. Ask @repdeliaramirez -- who cannot even identify which court case she is commenting on, let alone which biological category she is defending. They cannot define a woman. They cannot tell you what a woman is. But they are absolutely certain -- CERTAIN -- that they know what is best for women's bodies, women's healthcare, and women's lives. And they know it so thoroughly, so completely, so confidently, that they do not need to read the ruling. They do not need to check the FDA's own safety data. They do not need to acknowledge the real women in Louisiana emergency rooms. They do not need to define their terms. They just need the memo. Paste it in. Hit send. Collect the fundraising email donations that go out twenty minutes later. That is not advocacy. That is not protection. That is not fighting for anyone. That is using women as a political prop by people who cannot even name what a woman is -- while simultaneously fighting to strip away the medical supervision that exists specifically to keep women safe. Quinn's Law Number One. The exact opposite. Every time. I am a science teacher. I have spent my career explaining how the natural world actually works rather than how people wish it worked. Reality does not care about your talking points. Biology does not care about your memo. And the women in those Louisiana emergency rooms do not care about your fundraising email. The truth is the truth whether or not fifteen members of Congress choose to read it. But what do I know -- I am only a science teacher who can define a woman, read a court brief, interpret FDA safety data, and identify when the people claiming to protect someone are actively making the situation more dangerous for that someone. Apparently a rare combination on Capitol Hill. Comment YES below if you want me to keep going. Because I have more names, more lies, and more receipts than they have talking points. @JoJoFromJerz @GuntherEagleman @catturd2 #MAGA #Veterans #Trump

@BskiMike22802 instagram.com/p/DXnmAZnFtN2/…

@Rosezilla Can you show me an example of all of them telling the same lies?