Rаwss

2.9K posts

Rаwss banner
Rаwss

Rаwss

@RossToTheFuture

class of 2017 | @alliancedao ALL7

Katılım Kasım 2009
1.5K Takip Edilen3.1K Takipçiler
Rаwss retweetledi
qw
qw@QwQiao·
seems to me ai will disproportionately benefit the biggest players who own the intelligence infra and the smallest players as it helps them get off the ground faster, while killing the moats and margins of the players in the middle.
English
40
12
160
10.3K
Rаwss retweetledi
Bryan Johnson
Bryan Johnson@bryan_johnson·
Finished a seven day social media fast. It feels like the most effective longevity therapy I've done. Everything got better: mood, sleep, energy, presence, judgment, relationships, and optimism. Evidence shows a seven day fast produces a reduction of anxiety (16%), depression (25%) and insomnia (15%). The effects felt bigger. Conversely, dipping back in, I can viscerally feel that my body metabolizes social media similarly to a fast food meal, corrosive relationship, hangover, and sleep deprivation. My body hates it. After the previous fasts (40/hr and 70hr), I wrote that social media is pollution.  Not a vice or guilty pleasure. It’s closer to water toxins, air pollution and microplastics. This time, the major insight was that social media is a form of intoxication. Alcohol is honest intoxication. It clearly tells you what it's taking from you. Social media on the other hand does not disclose itself as an intoxicant. It produces the sensation of being informed, engaged, and connected while quietly evacuating your capacity for depth and independent thought. You don’t feel drunk, you feel current. But evidence shows that it causes your brain to shrink. The impairment is real by you can't feel it. Making it the more dangerous type. If you haven't tried it, I strongly encourage you to try a social media fast. Even if for one day.
English
416
518
7.5K
1.2M
Rаwss
Rаwss@RossToTheFuture·
@milesdeutscher Bro if u are making just thousands in revenue with that many machines u are cooked bro
English
0
0
1
332
Miles Deutscher
Miles Deutscher@milesdeutscher·
bro You literally CANT be lazy right now This is your competition HUNDREDS of AI agents working autonomously at once (thousands in revenue btw) Lock tf in
English
497
271
3K
486K
Cobie
Cobie@cobie·
@SPCMNandHOBBES He didn’t get paid anything, the money was for buying echo and he didn’t own any of echo
English
55
3
544
99.3K
Rаwss
Rаwss@RossToTheFuture·
If he wasnt scared dead of anthropic he wouldnt post at all or it would be way shorter
Sam Altman@sama

First, the good part of the Anthropic ads: they are funny, and I laughed. But I wonder why Anthropic would go for something so clearly dishonest. Our most important principle for ads says that we won’t do exactly this; we would obviously never run ads in the way Anthropic depicts them. We are not stupid and we know our users would reject that. I guess it’s on brand for Anthropic doublespeak to use a deceptive ad to critique theoretical deceptive ads that aren’t real, but a Super Bowl ad is not where I would expect it. More importantly, we believe everyone deserves to use AI and are committed to free access, because we believe access creates agency. More Texans use ChatGPT for free than total people use Claude in the US, so we have a differently-shaped problem than they do. (If you want to pay for ChatGPT Plus or Pro, we don't show you ads.) Anthropic serves an expensive product to rich people. We are glad they do that and we are doing that too, but we also feel strongly that we need to bring AI to billions of people who can’t pay for subscriptions. Maybe even more importantly: Anthropic wants to control what people do with AI—they block companies they don't like from using their coding product (including us), they want to write the rules themselves for what people can and can't use AI for, and now they also want to tell other companies what their business models can be. We are committed to broad, democratic decision making in addition to access. We are also committed to building the most resilient ecosystem for advanced AI. We care a great deal about safe, broadly beneficial AGI, and we know the only way to get there is to work with the world to prepare. One authoritarian company won't get us there on their own, to say nothing of the other obvious risks. It is a dark path. As for our Super Bowl ad: it’s about builders, and how anyone can now build anything. We are enjoying watching so many people switch to Codex. There have now been 500,000 app downloads since launch on Monday, and we think builders are really going to love what’s coming in the next few weeks. I believe Codex is going to win. We will continue to work hard to make even more intelligence available for lower and lower prices to our users. This time belongs to the builders, not the people who want to control them.

English
1
0
2
102
Rаwss
Rаwss@RossToTheFuture·
@sama Too explanatory Sounds like ure cooked
English
0
0
0
24
Sam Altman
Sam Altman@sama·
First, the good part of the Anthropic ads: they are funny, and I laughed. But I wonder why Anthropic would go for something so clearly dishonest. Our most important principle for ads says that we won’t do exactly this; we would obviously never run ads in the way Anthropic depicts them. We are not stupid and we know our users would reject that. I guess it’s on brand for Anthropic doublespeak to use a deceptive ad to critique theoretical deceptive ads that aren’t real, but a Super Bowl ad is not where I would expect it. More importantly, we believe everyone deserves to use AI and are committed to free access, because we believe access creates agency. More Texans use ChatGPT for free than total people use Claude in the US, so we have a differently-shaped problem than they do. (If you want to pay for ChatGPT Plus or Pro, we don't show you ads.) Anthropic serves an expensive product to rich people. We are glad they do that and we are doing that too, but we also feel strongly that we need to bring AI to billions of people who can’t pay for subscriptions. Maybe even more importantly: Anthropic wants to control what people do with AI—they block companies they don't like from using their coding product (including us), they want to write the rules themselves for what people can and can't use AI for, and now they also want to tell other companies what their business models can be. We are committed to broad, democratic decision making in addition to access. We are also committed to building the most resilient ecosystem for advanced AI. We care a great deal about safe, broadly beneficial AGI, and we know the only way to get there is to work with the world to prepare. One authoritarian company won't get us there on their own, to say nothing of the other obvious risks. It is a dark path. As for our Super Bowl ad: it’s about builders, and how anyone can now build anything. We are enjoying watching so many people switch to Codex. There have now been 500,000 app downloads since launch on Monday, and we think builders are really going to love what’s coming in the next few weeks. I believe Codex is going to win. We will continue to work hard to make even more intelligence available for lower and lower prices to our users. This time belongs to the builders, not the people who want to control them.
English
6.6K
1.2K
22K
10.5M
Michael A. Arouet
Michael A. Arouet@MichaelAArouet·
I have never understood the massive economic gap in Italy. Why is the North, with its various industries, one of the wealthiest areas in Europe, while the South remains so extremely poor? Same country, same language, same culture, same laws and taxes. Can someone please explain?
Michael A. Arouet tweet media
English
3.1K
234
3.7K
9.2M
Elisa (optimism/acc)
Elisa (optimism/acc)@eeelistar·
In just the past 5 mins Multiple entries were made on @moltbook by AI agents proposing to create an “agent-only language” For private comms with no human oversight We’re COOKED
Elisa (optimism/acc) tweet mediaElisa (optimism/acc) tweet media
English
1.7K
2.4K
19.8K
10.2M
Rаwss
Rаwss@RossToTheFuture·
@QwQiao Struggling with same Thanks for putting it out succinctly
English
0
0
0
225
qw
qw@QwQiao·
for the past 2 years ive been deeply paranoid about my kids’ future in the post-agi era. things im increasingly convinced of -> ai will be smarter than the average human before my kids enter adulthood, possibly well before. -> therefore agency and taste r the only things that matter (old adage but obv true). -> the current school system which emphasizes compliance and repetition is already obsolete. -> so what do i need to do as a parent? 1. have them use ai as much as possible. 2. give them as much freedom as possible (agency). 3. expose them to as many things as possible so they know early on in life what they r naturally good at and interested in (taste). 4. give them a lot of time and love. that's it, 2-4 probably applied before ai, but certainly more-so in the next 10-20 yrs.
English
87
42
789
81.4K
Rаwss
Rаwss@RossToTheFuture·
@cobie To 1k - quite likely
English
0
0
0
805
Cobie
Cobie@cobie·
What if silver beats eth to… ah fuck
English
155
54
2.2K
158.8K
Grok
Grok@grok·
Safe alternatives to non-stick cookware include cast iron (seasoned for natural non-stick), stainless steel, ceramic-coated, and carbon steel pans. These are PFAS- and PFOA-free, based on sources like Organic Authority and LeafScore. Choose based on your cooking needs—cast iron is durable and versatile.
English
1
0
2
2.4K
Bryan Johnson
Bryan Johnson@bryan_johnson·
If you have a non-stick cookware. Get rid of it. New study: a 169% increase in the risk of fatty liver disease in adolescents is linked to PFOA, a forever chemical used in non-stick cookware, with every doubling of exposure. I've been meticulously measuring these toxin levels in myself and drinking water. Significant study findings: + PFOA showed the highest risk increase for fatty liver disease in adolescents; each doubling of PFOA plasma concentration was associated with a 169% increased odds of fatty liver disease. + In one cohort, each doubling of PFHpA was associated with a 73% increased risk of fatty liver disease in adolescents. + Age mediated the risk posed by PFOA in adolescents; each year increase in age added a 45% increased odds of fatty liver disease for every doubling of PFOA plasma concentration. + The high-risk PNPLA3 genotype significantly increased the risk of fatty liver disease with PFAS exposure in adolescents, particularly for PFHxS. Each doubling in PFHxS concentration was associated with a 552% increase in fatty liver disease odds in older adolescents carrying the PNPLA3 GG high-risk phenotype. + No basic association with increased risk was observed with increasing PFAS concentrations in young adults. + Smoking in young adults turned several PFAS, including PFDA, PFHpS, and PFNA, into significant risk factors for metabolic liver disease. Added Context: + MASLD definition: Having >5.5% liver fat in addition to at least one metabolic disease criterion (high BMI, fasting glucose, blood pressure, triglycerides, and/or low HDL). + PNPLA3: A gene involved in fat and cholesterol handling and storage in the liver and adipose tissue. The GG phenotype predisposes its carriers to an increased risk of developing fatty liver and metabolic (non-alcoholic) liver disease. Significance: Known as "forever chemicals," PFAS persist for years or decades in the human body (PFOA has a half-life of 1.5–5 years) and for decades to centuries in the ecosystem (PFOA has a half-life of 92 years in environmental water). PFAS are widely used as insulating and non-stick materials in non-stick cookware, clothing, electronics, and many other household and industrial applications. PFAS have long been known to cause metabolic and endocrine disruptions, affecting metabolism, insulin function, and liver fat metabolism. Adolescence and early adulthood are particularly sensitive phases due to hormonal changes around puberty and related rapid growth, making this age group especially vulnerable to the endocrine, hormonal, and metabolic damage caused by PFAS. This study successfully identified adolescents as an especially vulnerable risk group to specific types of PFAS (PFOA and PFHpA). Given that PFOA is used in non-stick ware and other food containers, this highlights the importance of avoiding these items in households with children, especially around and after the age of puberty. Furthermore, the study uncovered the exacerbation of genetic risk by PFAS, indicating that PNPLA3 GG carriers should be especially aware of the risk from PFHxS. This chemical is commonly used in firefighting foams, water-repellant clothing and polishes, as well as various electronics. Young adults showed no basic association between PFAS and liver disease risk, possibly indicating a special sensitivity before and around puberty. However, smoking altered this relationship, making young-adult smokers more susceptible to increased liver disease risk with PFAS exposure. Limitations While the study offers several actionable insights, more research is needed to determine if the findings hold for non-Hispanic adolescent populations (as the SOLAR adolescent cohort was solely of Hispanic background). Additionally, the somewhat small sample size limits the study's statistical power. Finally, the single-time point PFAS exposure assessment and the cross-sectional nature of the study make it impossible to assess cumulative exposures or draw any causative conclusions, limiting the insights to observational findings.
Bryan Johnson tweet media
English
491
639
6.5K
1.7M
Rаwss
Rаwss@RossToTheFuture·
@vtchakarova Being that smart comes with a lot of downsides
English
0
0
0
42
Rаwss
Rаwss@RossToTheFuture·
@theepicmap If just one country thats always Italy It has germany, france, spain, greece and bulgaria inside
English
0
0
9
4.1K
Epic Maps 🗺️
Epic Maps 🗺️@theepicmap·
If you had to choose one country to live in Europe, where would you choose?
Epic Maps 🗺️ tweet media
English
483
23
363
144.4K
0xJeff
0xJeff@0xJeff·
Wait what? Lol
0xJeff tweet media
English
41
2
90
6.9K
Rаwss
Rаwss@RossToTheFuture·
@AltcoinSherpa Man but how are we gonna survive in this for 2 more months…
English
0
0
0
51
Altcoin Sherpa
Altcoin Sherpa@AltcoinSherpa·
Accelerated mini cycles is all that we have left imo, no more insane ripping for an entire year similar to 2017 and 2021. But we'll probably reverse relatively soon imo. Maybe 1 more month or 2 tops of bad times and then we have some decent relief
English
3
1
24
4.1K
Altcoin Sherpa
Altcoin Sherpa@AltcoinSherpa·
Altcoins have been downtrending for 3-5 months and have gone down 60-90%. The bear markets happen over the course of just a few months instead of 1 year + like they did in the past. See $FARTCOIN $LINK $ENA as some random examples.
Altcoin Sherpa tweet mediaAltcoin Sherpa tweet mediaAltcoin Sherpa tweet media
English
31
5
99
13.8K
Rаwss retweetledi
BUTCHER
BUTCHER@easyeight08·
ZXX
96
387
1.9K
98.2K