Ruby

@LetsSeeCapri_ WAIT CERES IS FINALLY HERE???

FINALLY CERESMON IS HERE I'M SO HAPPY

I might need help to upgrade this combo, i play tropical venom, pass 2 memory, EoT play ceresmon for free, ceresmon kills something, we recover turn, then we a second ceresmon since sirenmon isnt a OTP and its may Any ideas how to better recover turn? #DigimonCardGame #DigimonTCG

@kamisiro7791 I dont get it

음탕한 녀석이 돌아왔다

@digimon_tcg_EN Please release ceresmon tomorrow, its very important to me

[REVEALS] Hello Digimon Tamers! Today’s cards are [BT25-002 Wanyamon] and [BT25-021 Gaomon]! BOOSTER DUAL REVOLUTION [BT-25] In stores May, 2026! world.digimoncard.com/products/pack/… #DigimonCardGame #DigimonTCG #Digimon

@digimon_tcg_EN please reveal ceresmon tomorrow, i bet my life to a friend it and im really scared

@sevencrim @SkarlonYGO After a normal resolvement, but in reality, is just giving an game advatange to the RG luffy player because he himself made the mistake

@SkarlonYGO Ye that's why he appealed to the head judge after completely normal resolvement. Ts is screaming "rule sharking"

This makes a lot more sense to me at least than the initial version of events from this drama, and I am once again disappointed with how many people in the replies seem to think that you're a bad person if you call a judge instead of letting every opponent go 'whoops my bad'

@Smau555 @DistantCoder I would feel bad, if my opponent made an important mistake, and he end up getting benefits from it cause it was the way to fix the game(during the match i might not notice, but by the end it will be obvious)

@Smau555 @DistantCoder What are you saying its true, since we as player dont know the changes, it end up being neutral, but 2 importants things to be noticed 1. As a judge, you creating a new game with new outcome 2.if you the other party, you might lose(or be in disvantage) for something you didnt do

So I read through the entire thread and have many thoughts. 1. The player in question here should have paid attention to their match and should be held accountable for creating a damaged gamestate. If people are willing to give him the leniency saying that it was an honest mistake that he didn't catch, I don't see how they can say that their opponent couldn't have just as easily missed the mistake. To suggest that the opponent realized the mistake and waited is genuinely unreasonable and isn't a good argument unless you can undeniably prove that they did so maliciously. If you cannot prove it beyond "it feels scummy" then your argument is invalid. 2. A lot of people are saying that the first judge's ruling of just randomly putting the extra card back was a reasonable one. This is legitimately crazy. In this situation the draws for turn would have been different and putting the card back randomly somewhere on top of the deck would alter the way the game would have gone, thus is not a correct way to fix the gamestate. In this situation the gamestate was 100% irreparable because there was no way to rewind the gamestate to a point where the game would have played out identically to how it would have had the mistake not happened. Any situation in which we create a new gamestate that is legal but isn't identical to what the gamestate WOULD have been is an unreasonable way to fix the issue in a tournament setting. 3. People are calling the opponent a shark for appealing the initial judge's decision. Let me make this very clear: You are NEVER a shark for appealing a ruling, EVER. Appealing doesn't make you an asshole, doesn't make you a shark nor does it make you "that guy". The appeal system in any TCG exists specifically so that you have the right to get a 2nd opinion when you disagree with a judge's initial ruling. This can go both ways, you can appeal and have the head judge confirm the floor judge's ruling which gives you confirmation that the initial ruling was correct, which is a good outcome OR it confirms that the floor judge made a mistake (this can happen often) and you appealing has caused you to instead get a correct ruling. The appeal system is there to protect players and make sure that they are ruled for fairly in a majority of situations. In their position I would have also appealed as the floor judge's initial ruling was not reasonable and I think that the head judge's call here was 100% correct. An irreparable gamestate caused by the player most at fault (the one who made the mistake) resulting in a game loss is the most reasonable course of action. 4. I think the only real mistake the head judge made in this situation is that they didn't also issue a warning to the opponent who didn't notice OP's mistake. They also had a reasonable amount of opportunity to catch the mistake and should be given a warning for not having caught it when it happened. However, I think it is not reasonable to assume the player maliciously waited before calling a judge as there is no way to prove it. 5. Another big thing that needs to be talked about, is that OP's thread here does not own up to their own mistake AT ALL and instead directs full blame to their opponent and accuses them of maliciously trying to force them into an illegal gamestate in order to "earn a free win off the judge call". I think it's unfair that this player is starting a witch hunt against his opponent when the opponent genuinely did everything right. If they caught a mistake and called the judge when they noticed the mistake happened, then appealed when they disagreed with the floor judge, then they did everything exactly the way they were supposed to. In Yu-Gi-Oh, this behavior of calling someone out for "maliciously trying to gain an unfair advantage due to a judge call" would result in that player making the accusation being suspended for a certain duration of time. Overall, I think it's unfortunate that this player got a game loss, but the reality is that they got a loss for their own mistake and here they are clearly attempting to deflect the blame when in reality they are the player most at fault for causing their own game loss.

@Smau555 @DistantCoder so yeah, the fix wasnt that big, but the problem lies that there are scenarios, where it can change the trajectory of the game by putting the card in the deck or not, and as a judge, you shouldnt give advantage that could either win a game or lose, even if its a crazy scenario

@Smau555 @DistantCoder to you, in this fake scenario, that random card that was put into your deck could have given your win if its in the lower end, in the other scenario where you didnt draw it, it could been becuase you draw the card that was put into your deck instead

@LudwigAhgren @cjyaTV they spelled ur name wrong

THE LIST HAS BEEN RELEASED

@friend_of_takos デッキリストすごくいいですね！デジタマは何を使っていますか？

どっち組もうかなぁ

@Da_G4me アレスタードラモンを試したことありますか？彼とメデューサモンの組み合わせはかなり強いですよ！レストせずにセキュリティを攻撃できて、デジタマでメデューサモンに進化、それからBT21のオーウェンを使ってもう一度攻撃。4回チェックできて、最後のセキュリティで石化トークンを消せます！

予選も終わったししばらくはメデューサモンで遊んでいきたい気持ちがあります。 試行錯誤の末に素直な構築で今日は臨んだんですが、変な山も色々組めそうなので試してみたい…

@765Nanami Amazing art!!

Hello! Petrified tokens are out for grabs! They are available for free on my Vgen! Hope you like it! vgen.co/765Nanami/shop

@zawasho Love the design!

ダブルピース

@TastynDylicious @RANK10YGO Its a good emu with automation(not sure i said it right, english isnt the first language) there are some problems but most of them are fixables and most decks are 100% playable, i would say main problem it isnt having a chat(can be a bonus for some)

@RANK10YGO Wait is the app actually functional?? I quit around the time armor digivolution came out and I don't think it was ready yet at the time...

satanic zipbomb vs poop monkey final battle