Smau5

soundcloud.com/chibana_san/on… enjoy

@jumice_93 @NightLoaf Not sure about imu but i'm sure vs ace is is still favorable with the new build maybe even better than before

@NightLoaf The point is that Pink/Franky/Law are better in the mirror, so you can’t afford to lose both the mirror and Nami since they’re two of the most common matchups...is better winning the mirror and Green matchups, and just accept your fate vs Nami Ace and Imu are worse matchups now

I feel like Enel players are starting to overcook making some matchups worse in favor of bettering their worse matchups. If you played a deck in the past that lost to the aggressive enel, but was good against the field it might be worth retesting vs the new version.

@kyleDeBrosse @vegycslol @DistantCoder Imo caring what the order of the unknown cards is like saying i should have shuffled better my deck, random is random and that extra unknown card could have been one from anywhere on the deck, so feel like returning it would be fine

@vegycslol @DistantCoder @Smau555 That is not a great way of thinking imo unknown order or not you have completely changed what the card order is and can have easily changed who the eventual winner was because every decision made past that point by both players will change

So I read through the entire thread and have many thoughts. 1. The player in question here should have paid attention to their match and should be held accountable for creating a damaged gamestate. If people are willing to give him the leniency saying that it was an honest mistake that he didn't catch, I don't see how they can say that their opponent couldn't have just as easily missed the mistake. To suggest that the opponent realized the mistake and waited is genuinely unreasonable and isn't a good argument unless you can undeniably prove that they did so maliciously. If you cannot prove it beyond "it feels scummy" then your argument is invalid. 2. A lot of people are saying that the first judge's ruling of just randomly putting the extra card back was a reasonable one. This is legitimately crazy. In this situation the draws for turn would have been different and putting the card back randomly somewhere on top of the deck would alter the way the game would have gone, thus is not a correct way to fix the gamestate. In this situation the gamestate was 100% irreparable because there was no way to rewind the gamestate to a point where the game would have played out identically to how it would have had the mistake not happened. Any situation in which we create a new gamestate that is legal but isn't identical to what the gamestate WOULD have been is an unreasonable way to fix the issue in a tournament setting. 3. People are calling the opponent a shark for appealing the initial judge's decision. Let me make this very clear: You are NEVER a shark for appealing a ruling, EVER. Appealing doesn't make you an asshole, doesn't make you a shark nor does it make you "that guy". The appeal system in any TCG exists specifically so that you have the right to get a 2nd opinion when you disagree with a judge's initial ruling. This can go both ways, you can appeal and have the head judge confirm the floor judge's ruling which gives you confirmation that the initial ruling was correct, which is a good outcome OR it confirms that the floor judge made a mistake (this can happen often) and you appealing has caused you to instead get a correct ruling. The appeal system is there to protect players and make sure that they are ruled for fairly in a majority of situations. In their position I would have also appealed as the floor judge's initial ruling was not reasonable and I think that the head judge's call here was 100% correct. An irreparable gamestate caused by the player most at fault (the one who made the mistake) resulting in a game loss is the most reasonable course of action. 4. I think the only real mistake the head judge made in this situation is that they didn't also issue a warning to the opponent who didn't notice OP's mistake. They also had a reasonable amount of opportunity to catch the mistake and should be given a warning for not having caught it when it happened. However, I think it is not reasonable to assume the player maliciously waited before calling a judge as there is no way to prove it. 5. Another big thing that needs to be talked about, is that OP's thread here does not own up to their own mistake AT ALL and instead directs full blame to their opponent and accuses them of maliciously trying to force them into an illegal gamestate in order to "earn a free win off the judge call". I think it's unfair that this player is starting a witch hunt against his opponent when the opponent genuinely did everything right. If they caught a mistake and called the judge when they noticed the mistake happened, then appealed when they disagreed with the floor judge, then they did everything exactly the way they were supposed to. In Yu-Gi-Oh, this behavior of calling someone out for "maliciously trying to gain an unfair advantage due to a judge call" would result in that player making the accusation being suspended for a certain duration of time. Overall, I think it's unfortunate that this player got a game loss, but the reality is that they got a loss for their own mistake and here they are clearly attempting to deflect the blame when in reality they are the player most at fault for causing their own game loss.

@Rubyene200330 @DistantCoder i understand what you are trying to say but the thing is that you wouldn't know if it beneficial to you or the opponent so it should be neutral right, you don't even know what card it was.

@Smau555 @DistantCoder its more that it would changed how the game played at all, but you wouldnt know how, lets number the cards on the deck from 1 to 39, we know the first 3 or 5 cards since he told us he searched, if as a judge, you put a card in the middle of the deck you will alter the draws and

@SpadeLoK For me is not about being lame i think sharking should be punished by the rules, intentionally trying to take advantage of mistakes it's going to make the game worse for honest players.

I “get” judge sharking at big events but that doesn’t make you any less of a bum imo Yes you are absolutely in the right (rule speaking) if you shark every little thing, you are still a loser. No amount of “lock in better!” makes the sharking any less lame

@OrangeSamuraiD @ClydeTCG The goat

Jackson Hoang @ClydeTCG moves on to the Finals of the One Piece Card Game North American Finals held at Bandai Card Games Fest in Dallas, Texas!

@FrioVFX calla lamaop

Some rushed animation for the Arknights Contest (1/2) URL: youtube.com/watch?v=ncSW2n… #Arknights #アークナイツ

@Ploy_osu Xd

@FrioVFX Yo

@FrioVFX Yo

pokemon go con disturbios en santiago de chile

owo

@Ploy_osu 😍

Have you ever? Horny Edition 1- yes 2- no 3- no 4- no 5- no 6- no 7- no 8- no 9- no 10- no 11- hell no 12- yes 13- yes 14- yes 15- yes 16- no 17- yes XD 18- no 19- uhh prolly yes drop an emoji and i’ll send you the questions

@Ploy_osu would bang

I don’t remember taking this picture but look at this cute eboy

youtu.be/feg3BZeYP4A shitty video

soundcloud.com/chibana_san yo some hardcore

@cametek @YouTube best remix of the song 🔥

Holy shoot it's already 80k views... How much determination did you spend to listen to this? It's massive, I can hardly believe this, thank you! MEGALOVANIA (Camellia Remix) youtu.be/9X7I3bW49S8 @YouTubeさんから