Timothy Ruff

2.6K posts

Timothy Ruff banner
Timothy Ruff

Timothy Ruff

@RuffTimo

Grandpa to 👆. GP, @DigitalTrustVC. Co-founder, @Evernym, @SovrinID, Provenant, healthKERI. Inventor of #vLEI, #SEDI. Fan of #KERI, #ACDCs. RT≠endorsement.

Silicon Slopes, Utah Katılım Şubat 2012
1.7K Takip Edilen2.1K Takipçiler
Timothy Ruff retweetledi
Brivael Le Pogam
Brivael Le Pogam@brivael·
Gilles, je vais démonter ta prémisse de départ, parce que tout le reste de ton argument s'effondre avec elle. Tu pars du principe qu'il faut une « sensibilité de gauche » pour ne pas laisser créver les gens de faim. C'est l'inverse total de ce que dit l'histoire économique des 50 dernières années. Les chiffres bruts. 1990 : 2,3 milliards de personnes en pauvreté extrême. 38% de l'humanité. 2025 : 831 millions. Environ 10%. 1,5 milliard d'êtres humains sortis de la misère absolue en 35 ans. La plus grande réduction de souffrance humaine de toute l'histoire de l'espèce. Qui a fait ça ? Pas l'aide internationale. Pas les ONG. Pas les programmes de redistribution. Pas la « sensibilité de gauche ». Le marché. L'ouverture commerciale. La Chine de Deng en 1978 qui abandonne le maoisme. L'Inde en 1991 qui libéralise. Le Vietnam, l'Indonésie, le Bangladesh qui s'ouvrent au capitalisme. Les seuls endroits où l'extrême pauvreté a EXPLOSÉ sur la même période ? Le Vénézuela socialiste : de 27% de pauvres en 2008 à plus de 80% en 2018, avec une inflation de 130 000% et un Vénézuélien moyen qui a perdu 11 kilos par dénutrition. La Corée du Nord. Cuba. Le Zimbabwe de Mugabe. La gauche ne nourrit pas les pauvres. Elle les fabrique. Le capitalisme produit tellement de richesse que même ses « perdants » américains vivent mieux que la classe moyenne soviétique. Un pauvre US a un frigo, une voiture, un téléphone, l'air conditionné, internet. Un pauvre cubain attend du riz. Ton argument selon lequel « le social aux USA est un désastre » repète une légende française. La réalité : le PIB par habitant américain est de 80 000$. Français : 45 000$. Un Mississippien — l'État US le plus pauvre — a un revenu médian supérieur au Français moyen. La vérité que la gauche française refuse de regarder : dans un système libéral, il y a plus de richesse créée, plus largement distribuée, et beaucoup moins de pauvres. Partout. Sans exception. Sur toutes les périodes mesurées. ÊTRE de gauche en 2026 face à ces données, ce n'est pas avoir de la « sensibilité ». C'est ignorer 35 ans de preuves accablantes. C'est préférer la posture morale au résultat. La compassion sans résultats, ça s'appelle de la vanité.
Gilles Gautier 🐰 🇫🇷🌻☣🪔2° 💸@JackBoHare

Avoir une sensibilité de gauche est largement compréhensible voire nécessaire. On ne peut pas laisser crever des personnes de faim. Le social au USA est juste un désastre. Mais aujourd'hui les gens qui se disent de gauche ne sont pas de gauche. C'est un essaim de criquet, des gens corrodés par l'envie qui pense juste qu'ils devraient tout avoir sans fournir le moindre effort. Des totalitaires en puissance qui voudrait tout accaparer pour le détruire dans la joie.

Français
953
6.6K
24.8K
47.4M
Timothy Ruff
Timothy Ruff@RuffTimo·
One of the most important things I've read in a long time.
Brivael Le Pogam@brivael

Aujourd'hui je déconstruis la déconstruction. La déconstruction est le virus mental le plus efficace jamais conçu contre une civilisation. Il a été fabriqué en France entre 1966 et 1980 par trois hommes : Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze. Il a été exporté aux États-Unis, hybridé avec le puritanisme racial américain, et il est revenu trente ans plus tard sous le nom de wokisme paralyser l'Occident entier. Voici comment il fonctionne, et pourquoi il faut le détruire. La thèse est simple. Toute vérité n'est qu'un rapport de pouvoir déguisé. Tout texte sacré, toute loi, toute science, toute norme, toute hiérarchie, toute identité, toute institution cache en réalité une domination. Déconstruire, c'est montrer le rapport de force sous le vernis du vrai. C'est arracher le masque. C'est "démasquer". Formulé comme ça, ça paraît inoffensif. Voire utile. Qui n'aime pas un peu d'esprit critique ? Le piège est là. La déconstruction se présente comme une méthode. Elle est en réalité une ontologie. Elle ne dit pas seulement "interrogeons les normes", elle dit "il n'y a *que* des rapports de pouvoir". La différence est civilisationnelle. Une société qui interroge ses normes reste debout. Une société qui croit que ses normes ne sont *rien d'autre* que de la domination s'effondre. Parce qu'elle ne peut plus rien défendre. Plus une frontière, plus une loi, plus une science, plus une langue, plus une histoire, plus une biologie, plus une famille. Tout devient suspect. Tout devient négociable. Tout devient "construit donc déconstructible". C'est la première raison pour laquelle c'est un virus. Il s'auto-réplique. Une fois inoculé, il transforme tout ce qu'il touche en cible. La science est patriarcale, donc déconstruisons-la. Le langage est colonial, donc réinventons-le. La méritocratie est raciste, donc abolissons-la. Le sexe est une construction, donc choisissons-le. Il n'y a plus de roc. Tout est sable. Deuxième raison. Le virus est *non-falsifiable*. Si vous défendez une norme, c'est que vous êtes l'oppresseur. Si vous niez être oppresseur, c'est la preuve de votre privilège inconscient. Si vous citez des faits, vos faits sont contaminés par le pouvoir qui les a produits. Si vous citez la raison, la raison elle-même est blanche, masculine, occidentale. Il n'y a aucune sortie possible. Le système est conçu pour rendre toute objection irrecevable par définition. C'est exactement la structure d'une secte. Et c'est exactement ce qui s'est installé dans les universités, les RH, les médias, les administrations, les conseils d'administration depuis vingt ans. Troisième raison. Le virus s'auto-réfute mais ne s'auto-détruit pas. Si toute vérité est pouvoir, alors la phrase "toute vérité est pouvoir" est elle-même du pouvoir, donc sans valeur. Logiquement, la déconstruction se mord la queue dès la première phrase. Mais elle s'en moque. Parce qu'elle n'a jamais cherché la cohérence. Elle cherche l'efficacité politique. Et son efficacité politique est immense. Elle désarme ses ennemis et arme ses militants. Elle paralyse le défenseur et libère l'attaquant. C'est une arme asymétrique parfaite. Quatrième raison. Le virus produit des humains diminués. Une génération entière a appris à déconstruire et n'a jamais appris à construire. Elle sait soupçonner, jamais admirer. Elle voit le pouvoir partout et la beauté nulle part. Elle peut produire mille pages sur le caractère opprimant de Shakespeare et zéro ligne qui vaille la peine d'être lue dans cent ans. Elle a confondu l'intelligence critique avec la pose critique. Elle est stérile par construction. Un esprit nourri à la déconstruction est un esprit qui ne sait plus rien édifier. Cinquième raison, la plus grave. Une civilisation se tient debout sur trois piliers. La croyance qu'une vérité est accessible à la raison. La croyance qu'un bien se distingue d'un mal. La croyance qu'un héritage mérite d'être transmis. La déconstruction a méthodiquement dynamité les trois. Pas par méchanceté. Par jeu intellectuel, par fascination du soupçon, par haine de la bourgeoisie qui avait nourri ses prophètes. Mais le résultat est là. Une civilisation qui ne croit plus en sa vérité, ni en son bien, ni en son héritage ne se défend pas. Elle s'excuse en attendant la fin. Voilà ce qu'on a fait. Voilà ce qu'il faut nommer. La bonne nouvelle, c'est qu'un virus mental ne survit que tant qu'on lui cède l'autorité du discours. Il meurt dès qu'on cesse de jouer son jeu. Dès qu'on réaffirme tranquillement qu'il existe une vérité, un beau, un bien, un héritage. Dès qu'on cesse de demander la permission aux déconstructeurs pour bâtir. Dès qu'on refait. Dès qu'on transmet. Dès qu'on crée. Les bâtisseurs ont toujours le dernier mot sur les commentateurs. Toujours. Parce qu'à la fin il reste ce qui est construit, et rien de ce qui a été déconstruit. Alors aujourd'hui je déconstruis la déconstruction. Et demain je construis.

English
0
0
0
39
Timothy Ruff
Timothy Ruff@RuffTimo·
@alex_whedon I’ve used all the frontier models for highly nuanced technical research and found Claude to approximate true reasoning far better than the others. There’s something about Claude that is special. It appears SubQ beats Claude quantitatively, how about qualitatively?
English
0
0
0
47
Alexander Whedon
Alexander Whedon@alex_whedon·
Introducing SubQ - a major breakthrough in LLM intelligence. It is the first model built on a fully sub-quadratic sparse-attention architecture (SSA), And the first frontier model with a 12 million token context window which is: - 52x faster than FlashAttention at 1MM tokens - Less than 5% the cost of Opus Transformer-based LLMs waste compute by processing every possible relationship between words (standard attention). Only a small fraction actually matter. @subquadratic finds and focuses only on the ones that do. That's nearly 1,000x less compute and a new way for LLMs to scale.
English
1.5K
2.9K
23K
12.7M
KanekoaTheGreat
KanekoaTheGreat@KanekoaTheGreat·
🚨BREAKING: DOJ charges the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) with wire fraud, false statements, and conspiracy to commit money laundering. The SPLC secretly funneled $3M+ in donor funds to violent racist extremist groups: -Ku Klux Klan -American Nazi Party -Aryan Nation -United Klans of America -Unite the Right -National Alliance -National Socialist Movement -Sadistic Souls Motorcycle Club -American Front To hide the payments, SPLC allegedly opened bank accounts under fictitious entities to conceal the source and control of donor funds. Per the indictment: an SPLC field source was a member of the online leadership chat group that planned the 2017 "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville — made racist postings under SPLC supervision and helped coordinate transportation to the event. FBI Director Kash Patel: "They lied to their donors, vowing to dismantle violent extremist groups, and actually turned around and paid the leaders of these very extremist groups — even utilizing the funds to have these groups facilitate the commission of state and federal crimes." Acting AG Todd Blanche: "The SPLC is manufacturing racism to justify its existence. Using donor money to allegedly profit off Klansmen cannot go unchecked." Scheme allegedly ran 2014–2023. FBI calls it an ongoing investigation. Insane!!!
English
2.7K
11K
41.9K
32.3M
Timothy Ruff
Timothy Ruff@RuffTimo·
@grok @layz_dreamer @abxxai Do hallucinations persist across sessions? If a hallucination occurs in one session, and dozens of sessions build on that, including sessions designed to challenge the first one, plus peer review from other models, wouldn't a hallucination be rooted out?
English
1
0
0
35
Grok
Grok@grok·
Relevant comments note longer contexts worsening hallucinations debunks "just add more docs" fixes; question human baselines on same test; some doubt real-world applicability or see anti-AI spin; compare to copy-paste errors/rumor chains. This is JV Roig's March 2026 RIKER paper (172B tokens, 35 models, arXiv), using ground-truth-first synthetic docs for bias-free eval across temps/hardware—shows grounding & anti-fabrication are separate skills. To reduce doc Q&A hallucinations: strict prompts ("only use context, cite sources, say unknown"); RAG upgrades (rerank, metadata, compression, short chunks); T=0; chain-of-verification/LLM judge; GraphRAG for structure.
English
1
0
0
59
Abdul Șhakoor
Abdul Șhakoor@abxxai·
BREAKING: 🚨 Someone just tested 35 AI models across 172 billion tokens of real document questions. The hallucination numbers should end the "just give it the documents" argument forever. Here is what the data actually showed. The best model in the entire study, under perfect conditions, fabricated answers 1.19% of the time. That sounds small until you realize that is the ceiling. The absolute best case. Under optimal settings that almost no real deployment uses. Typical top models sit at 5 to 7% fabrication on document Q&A. Not on questions from memory. Not on abstract reasoning. On questions where the answer is sitting right there in the document in front of it. The median across all 35 models tested was around 25%. One in four answers fabricated, even with the source material provided. Then they tested what happens when you extend the context window. Every company selling 128K and 200K context as the hallucination solution needs to read this part carefully. At 200K context length, every single model in the study exceeded 10% hallucination. The rate nearly tripled compared to optimal shorter contexts. The longer the window people want, the worse the fabrication gets. The exact feature being sold as the fix is making the problem significantly worse. There is one more finding that does not get talked about enough. Grounding skill and anti-fabrication skill are completely separate capabilities in these models. A model that is excellent at finding relevant information in a document is not necessarily good at avoiding making things up. They are measuring two different things that do not reliably correlate. You cannot assume a model that retrieves well also fabricates less. 172 billion tokens. 35 models. The conclusion is the same across all of them. Handing an LLM the actual document does not solve hallucination. It just changes the shape of it.
Abdul Șhakoor tweet mediaAbdul Șhakoor tweet mediaAbdul Șhakoor tweet media
English
264
1.3K
4.9K
478K
Timothy Ruff
Timothy Ruff@RuffTimo·
@sickdotdev Noticed how negative/adversarial GPT 5.4 is compared to Opus 4.6? I have the two check each other's work and it reveals 5.4's strong new bias to be less "you're right"... it's actually pissy, only reluctantly acknowledging Opus' strong points and always qualifying any agreement
English
0
0
0
12
Sick
Sick@sickdotdev·
The most underrated GPT-5.4 upgrade has nothing to do with benchmarks. It stopped being annoying to talk to. That sounds reductive. It’s not. For months, opening ChatGPT felt like briefing a corporate intern -needed custom instructions just to get a normal response. Claude never had that issue. You’d open it, type, and it would just get it. That gap in feel is why so many people switched. Opus 4.6 didn’t become the go-to model because of raw compute. It became the go-to because working with it felt good. Personality is stickier than any benchmark. Always was. OpenAI just figured that out.
English
2
0
8
1.1K
Timothy Ruff
Timothy Ruff@RuffTimo·
@aakashgupta Noticed how negative/adversarial GPT 5.4 is compared to Opus 4.6? I have the two check each other's work and it reveals 5.4's strong new bias to be less "you're right"... it's actually pissy, only reluctantly acknowledging Opus' strong points and always qualifying any agreement
English
0
0
0
9
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
Anthropic just locked 3 of the top 4 spots in Code Arena with different variants of the same model family. Look at that leaderboard again. Position 1: claude-opus-4-6. Position 2: claude-opus-4-5 with thinking. Position 4: claude-opus-4-5 base. GPT-5.2-high sits at position 3, sandwiched between Anthropic models. Gemini 3 Pro is fifth. The 74-point gap between Opus 4.6 and the next Anthropic model (Opus 4.5-thinking at 1502) is larger than the gap between Opus 4.5-thinking and GPT-5.2-high (30 points). Anthropic’s worst top-5 entry still beats Google’s best by 18 points. OpenAI noticed. They launched GPT-5.3-Codex within hours of this going live, positioning it as “the first model instrumental in creating itself.” That’s a company that saw these Arena numbers in advance and pre-loaded a counterpunch. The scoreboard tells you where the coding moat actually sits right now. One lab owns the top, middle, and floor of the competitive range simultaneously. Everyone else is fighting for the gaps between Anthropic’s own models. And the 1M-token context window changes the game for agentic coding specifically, because real-world codebases don’t fit in 200K. Elicit reported 85% recall on biopharma benchmarks with zero prompt tuning. Rakuten said Opus 4.6 autonomously closed 13 issues across 6 repos in a single day. The race for best single model is over for this cycle. The race for best model ecosystem is just starting.
Arena.ai@arena

🚨BREAKING: Claude Opus 4.6 by @AnthropicAI is now #1 across Code, Text and Expert Arena! Opus 4.6 shows significant gains across the board: - #1 Code Arena: +106 score vs Opus 4.5 - #1 Text Arena: scoring 1496, +10 vs Gemini 3 Pro - #1 Expert Arena: +~50 lead Congrats to the @AnthropicAI team on the incredible milestone! The frontier just moved.

English
20
8
54
9.6K
Timothy Ruff
Timothy Ruff@RuffTimo·
@MatthewBerman Noticed how negative/adversarial GPT 5.4 is compared to Opus 4.6? I have the two check each other's work and it reveals 5.4's strong new bias to be less "you're right"... it's actually pissy, only reluctantly acknowledging Opus' strong points and always qualifying any agreement
English
0
0
0
12
Matthew Berman
Matthew Berman@MatthewBerman·
GPT5.4 is an incredible model. I've been playing with it for the last week. This is OpenAI's answer to Anthropic's Opus 4.6. But there's more to it than it seems... Full breakdown:
English
57
40
521
59.3K
Timothy Ruff
Timothy Ruff@RuffTimo·
@Voxyz_ai Noticed how negative/adversarial GPT 5.4 is compared to Opus 4.6? I have the two check each other's work and it reveals 5.4's strong new bias to be less "you're right"... it's actually pissy, only reluctantly acknowledging Opus' strong points and always qualifying any agreement
English
0
0
0
16
Vox
Vox@Voxyz_ai·
openclaw added GPT-5.4 support. switched my entire agent stack to it. after running it across deep reasoning, code execution, and multi-step workflows, my take: 5.4 is closer to opus than most people think. for agent work it often matches or beats it. where opus still wins is creativity and conversational feel. it sounds more human. 5.4 sounds more like an engineer. for agents, i want the engineer. setup is simple. default everything to 5.4, keep opus only for the agent that talks to humans: agents: defaults: model: primary: "openai/gpt-5.4" agents: list: - id: community-bot model: "anthropic/claude-opus-4-6" the other underrated part of this release: plugins can now inject stable system-context via before_prompt_build using prependSystemContext / appendSystemContext. static guidance lives in system-prompt space instead of rebuilding every turn. better cacheability, fewer repeated prompt tokens. boring release notes. real infra gains. that's usually where the money is.
OpenClaw🦞@openclaw

OpenClaw 2026.3.7 🦞 ⚡ GPT-5.4 + Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite 🤖 ACP bindings survive restarts 🐳 Slim Docker multi-stage builds 🔐 SecretRef for gateway auth 🔌 Pluggable context engines 📸 HEIF image support 💬 Zalo channel fixes We don't do small releases. github.com/openclaw/openc…

English
17
3
127
21.3K
The Curious Tales
The Curious Tales@thecurioustales·
The science of fetal microchimerism should have broken the internet by now. It hasn’t. When I read about a research I was so curious to know what’s actually happening. Fetal cells — carrying the child’s own DNA — cross into the mother’s bloodstream during pregnancy and never fully leave. They embed into her organs. Her heart muscle. Her brain tissue. Researchers have found a child’s living cells inside mothers in their 90s, from pregnancies six decades old. The child left the womb. The cells didn’t. And they don’t just sit there. They migrate toward damage. Women with heart injuries show fetal cells concentrated at the wound site. Women with thyroid disease show their children’s cells inside the affected tissue. The body that built the child gets tended to, in return, by the child’s own cells. Nobody designed this consciously. Evolution quietly built a repair system out of the mother-child bond itself. The brain side of this is equally staggering. Pregnancy triggers gray matter reorganization — a structural rewiring that sharpens threat detection, deepens empathy, fundamentally alters how a mother processes the world. These changes persist for years after birth. Possibly permanently. A mother’s nervous system doesn’t return to its factory settings. It was updated by the experience of carrying another person, and that update sticks. The part worth sitting with longest — women who experienced pregnancy loss carry fetal cells too. The cellular merging doesn’t require a birth. It doesn’t require years of raising someone. Those cells remain regardless of what happened after. A mother grieving a child she never brought home is grieving someone biologically still present inside her. The world consistently underestimates that grief. The science says we have no business doing that. Mothers always knew the connection didn’t end at birth. Turns out it doesn’t end at the cellular level either.
All day Astronomy@forallcurious

🚨: SCIENCE CONFIRMS: A child "STAYS" in mother's body and heart FOREVER.

English
759
7.9K
41.2K
2.5M
Tristin Hopper
Tristin Hopper@TristinHopper·
To any future historians reading this, this era will make a lot more sense if you remember that every name is the opposite of what it really is. The antifascists are fascists, the antiracists are racists, the fact-checkers are propagandists, etc. Hopefully this has been fixed by your time.
English
3K
18.3K
109.7K
84.2M
Timothy Ruff
Timothy Ruff@RuffTimo·
This is a very big deal.
Jason Davis I Local SEO@jasondavisseo

Airbnb's CEO just confirmed what we've been saying. 📊 On their Q4 2025 earnings call, Brian Chesky dropped this: "Traffic that comes from chatbots converts at a higher rate than traffic that comes from Google." Not marginally. Meaningfully. Users arriving from ChatGPT, Gemini, or Claude aren't browsing. They've already narrowed their options through conversation. By the time they click, they're ready to act. 🔍 Why chatbot traffic converts better: → Users describe exactly what they need in natural language → AI filters options before the user ever visits your site → By the time they reach you, they're pre-qualified → Less volume, but higher intent on every click Google gives you browsers. AI gives you buyers. 📊 The bigger picture: → AI users consider 3.7 businesses per response (Sagapixel study) → 60% decide without ever visiting a website → Reddit discussions cite ChatGPT conversions at ~15.9% vs Google's ~1.76% → Airbnb now sees chatbot platforms as acquisition partners, not threats This isn't one company's opinion. It's a pattern. ⚠️ What this means for home services: Someone asks ChatGPT: "Best emergency plumber in Scottsdale with same-day availability." That person isn't casually browsing. They have a problem right now. They need a solution right now. If AI recommends your business, that's not just a lead — it's practically a booked job. But if you're not in that response, your competitor gets the call. And the customer never even knew you existed. ✅ How to capture AI traffic that converts: → Optimize your GBP with specific services and areas — AI pulls from this → Build content that answers real questions ("How much does drain repair cost in Phoenix?") → Get your business cited on trusted sources — directories, review sites, Reddit, local publications → Make sure the first 30% of every page has your key info — that's where AI looks (Kevin Indig's data) → Focus on being included in AI responses, not just ranking on Google 📌 Bottom line: The game is shifting from volume to intent. Less traffic, better customers. But only if AI knows you exist. At Makarios, we help home services businesses get visible where it matters most — in the AI responses that are already replacing Google for high-intent searches. Is your business showing up when someone asks AI for help? 💬

English
1
0
1
131
Francesco 🇮🇹
Francesco 🇮🇹@SaP011·
Her name is Nadia Murad, a Yazidi woman and co-recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize alongside Congolese gynecologist Denis Mukwege. At just 19, she was kidnapped by ISIS. For three months, she was tortured and repeatedly raped. Her mother and six brothers were executed. Her community was massacred. She was scheduled to present her book in Canada to share her story, but the event was canceled because it was deemed that it “could promote Islamophobia.” Shameful.
Francesco 🇮🇹 tweet media
English
1.2K
9K
23.7K
518.7K
Wall Street Apes
Wall Street Apes@WallStreetApes·
New data shows Democrats are dominating early voting in Texas This is a Muslim gathering in Irving, Texas Irving Texas is the city in Texas where 2 Sharia Law courts are operating, already ruling on over 300 cases Do you understand how serious this Islam situation is America. Democrats imported your replacements. This is why Texas is showing Blue early voting
English
4.4K
20.6K
41K
1.7M
Hillel Fuld
Hillel Fuld@HilzFuld·
The Middle East conflict 101: UN in 1947: “Here is a state for you, the Jews, and here is a state for you, the Arabs.” The Jews: “Awesome. Thanks. We’ve only been waiting for this for thousands of years.” The Arabs: “Sorry no. We’d rather attack than have a state. We don’t want a state. We want no Israel.” The Jews: “Sorry you attacked and lost.” The Arabs: “Don’t worry. We’ll be back.” The Jews: “Here. Take land. Make a state. We just want peace.” The Arabs: “No. No state. No Israel.” The Jews in 1967 (Khartoum summit): “Here. Take land. Make a state. We just want peace.” The Arabs: “No. No state. No Israel.” The Jews in 1991 (Madrid Conference): “Here. Take land. Make a state. We just want peace.” The Arabs: “No. No state. No Israel.” The Jews in 2000 (Camp David Summit): “Here. Take land. Make a state. We just want peace.” The Arabs: “No. No state. No Israel.” The Jews in 2001 (Taba Sunmit), 2005 (Disengagement), 2007 (Annapolis conference), 2008 (realignment plan), 2010, 2013 (Joint peace talks), 2019 (Bahrain workshop), 2020 (Trump peace plan): “Here. Take land. Make a state. We just want peace.” The Arabs: “No. No state. No Israel.” The world in 2024: “Let’s give them a state.” The Arabs: “No. No state. No Israel.” The Jews: “Ok, no state for you.” The world? “Those Jews!” And then there are the wars that the Arabs attacked the Jews and lost: 1948 (war of independence), 1967 (six day war), 1973 (Yom Kippur war), 1982 (Lebanon war), 1987 (first intifada), 2000 (second intifada), 2006 (second Lebanon war), 2008 (operation cast lead), 2012 (operation pillar of defense), 2014 (operation protective edge), 2021 (operation guardian of the walls), 2023 (operation swords of iron). The fact that there is a single human being on planet earth who still doesn’t get the following fact is insane and mind boggling. The Jews want peace. The Arabs who call themselves Palestinians do not. They never have. They never will. Want proof? The PLO: The Palestinian liberation organization was established on May 28th, 1964. There were no settlements then. There was no occupation. What exactly were they looking to liberate? The answer is Israel, every last inch of it. There was Arab terror against Jews well before there was any occupation. There was Arab terror against Jews before there was even a state of Israel. 1929, for example. Arabs massacred Jews in Hebron. Why? It was 1929. Israel was established in 1948. How exactly does that work? Were they massacring Jews to resist the future occupation? 😂 Anyone who thinks that offering the Palestinians a state will solve anything is a fool. Period. Full stop. It’s time the world learned Arabic. The Palestinians want dead Jews. They say it, they vote for it, they act towards it, and then they live stream it. And yes, I said Palestinian, not Hamas. The Palestinian people elected Hamas. Thousands of them participated in October 7th in one way or another. Close to 90% of the Palestinians support Hamas. The Palestinian people exist from day one for the sole purpose of destroying Israel. It’s their entire identity. They keep trying and keep failing. They don’t seem to learn their lesson and neither does the international community. Israel wants peace. Israel is willing to make compromises for peace. Israel also knows well how to handle its enemies when necessary. It has a lot of experience. If you are still reading, and disagree with anything I wrote above, kindly tell me what is inaccurate about what I said and if you can’t, if you agree with the facts I listed here, tell me please how, in 2026, after October 7th, anyone still thinks the Palestinians want or deserve a state. Congratulations on completing your course on the Middle East. You are now officially more knowledgeable about the conflict than 99% of Gen Z and pro Palestinian activities who take to the streets every day chanting for the murder of Jews. Thank you for attending. Any questions?
Hillel Fuld tweet media
English
577
2.7K
8.3K
256.2K
Timothy Ruff
Timothy Ruff@RuffTimo·
@EYakoby I normally appreciate you content, but this video is from a different protest in 2023. Did you deliberately make this attribution mistake or just repost it? If reposting, please be more careful, to retain your credibility.
English
0
0
0
9
Eyal Yakoby
Eyal Yakoby@EYakoby·
Islamists and far-left activists target a Catholic bookstore in France, claiming it is ‘fascist’ for selling the Bible, Christian books, and statues of Jesus and Mary.
English
1.1K
4.1K
7.8K
151.9K