Rust

226 posts

Rust

Rust

@Rust94360778051

Katılım Nisan 2023
83 Takip Edilen4 Takipçiler
Jynxzi
Jynxzi@jynxzi·
This one is for all the people that said I'd never be able to do it.
Jynxzi tweet media
English
403
965
44.7K
1.9M
Jordan lovett
Jordan lovett@Jordan6ulovett·
@TalkativeTri I wonder what happens when you have a unique or any that are corrupted and get the special corrupted stats
English
1
0
0
388
Rust
Rust@Rust94360778051·
@Hafi75863333 @NeverSinkDev shotgun lich needed removed. how are you gonna nerf that interaction without removing it
English
0
0
0
11
Hafi
Hafi@Hafi75863333·
@NeverSinkDev A shame about Shackles. It is an ongoing issue, instead of bringing down the power of combos not planned by them, they just delete it. Like with Shotgun Lich or Siege Cascade and Gathering Storm Frostwall targeting.
English
2
0
1
1.5K
NeverSink
NeverSink@NeverSinkDev·
After some thinking, I arrived at the conclusion that I dislike these changes: The following 2 architect orb outcomes were removed: - "The Shackles of the Wretched can no longer target freeze reflection" - The Vertex can no longer roll +2-4 to Level of All Skill Gems" I understand that these were REALLY powerful. Still a shame to see them go. These were an interesting aspirational endgame chase. I personally wish these would keep a fraction of their power. What do yo think?
NeverSink tweet media
English
39
2
168
37.6K
Rust
Rust@Rust94360778051·
@pathofexile god i hope facebreaker isnt 100div
English
0
0
1
180
Path of Exile
Path of Exile@pathofexile·
Harness the madness and become the Auspex yourself, or follow in the Red Wolf’s footsteps with the legendary, jaw-breaking… Facebreaker. Check them out in the video below.
English
172
180
2.6K
484.9K
Tri
Tri@TalkativeTri·
Here is the simplest take about paywalling Path of Exile 2 builds: Can you do it? Sure. Should you do it? NO. It will ostracize you in the eyes of the community immediately and it'll make it EXTREMELY difficult to ever build up your content, no matter how good it is. The PoE and now the PoE 2 community has a history of being community driven. All of the best tools are free, some are open source. Look at Filterblade, Path of Building, Exiled Exchange, poeNinja, and oh so many more projects. Then, look at all the builds and build-makers: free to access the content. I know it sounds a bit silly: but there is a camaraderie to it. You are SABOTAGING yourself if you do this and joining the ranks of some...less than savory people. Don't do it I would never buy a build or guide for PoE2, but I would watch ads/tip a creator with subs if I deemed their content deserved. Done it many times! How about you?
English
88
16
341
86.2K
IndieGone
IndieGone@IndieGoneLive·
@SlothmanR6 How much? or any link to a site where i can read about their Base resistance at t15 maps. Would appreciate it alot!
English
1
0
0
12
Rust
Rust@Rust94360778051·
@kiwijuicing one could almost say its a path... of exile? too
English
0
0
0
261
Kelly_GGG
Kelly_GGG@kiwijuicing·
Trying to find 🪧
Kelly_GGG tweet media
English
34
0
378
19.4K
LunarSoulX
LunarSoulX@cricket_Stats05·
I was in the shower last night and I felt something on the back of my neck and it was this chip- looking thing.😭 Anyone have any idea what this is?
LunarSoulX tweet mediaLunarSoulX tweet media
English
2.4K
731
33.5K
12.1M
Rust
Rust@Rust94360778051·
@DarthMicroT too strong. expect prenerf
English
0
0
0
37
Darth Microtransaction
Darth Microtransaction@DarthMicroT·
Full Detailed Flow Chart of my path of exile 2 0.5 build plans
Darth Microtransaction tweet media
English
27
7
356
40.8K
Rust
Rust@Rust94360778051·
@NeverSinkDev its legit, posted by Tsuna (or Suna idk), they're a level designer who lurks in crimson's stream sometimes
English
0
0
0
521
NeverSink
NeverSink@NeverSinkDev·
Probably good PSA for people preparing for new league. This image (apparently posted by a GGG member on discord) is coursing around. Generally speaking: Very good news. Anything that streamlines the campaign is good.
NeverSink tweet media
English
43
15
861
67.3K
Rust
Rust@Rust94360778051·
@HayzStreams @ermin_h you defenitely could, dont let people tell you otherwise
English
0
0
1
25
𝙃𝙖𝙮𝙯
𝙃𝙖𝙮𝙯@HayzStreams·
@ermin_h I suppose so. I feel like I could play it casually though, not sure why.
English
6
0
5
962
MP9
MP9@Shadow_Peek_·
@DarthMicroT Absolute insane amount of recycled content*, also no reworked atlas, just the same endless generated.
English
1
0
12
1.2K
Jungroan
Jungroan@Jungroan·
predictions for 0.5 1. party quant bonuses removed 2. item rarity removed 3. map system changed to poe 1 system 4. sprint replaced with higher base movement speed 5. trigger system reverted to poe 2 0.1 version 6. gem level scaling significantly nerfed 7. no more account hacks
English
20
2
163
39.8K
Lariatooo
Lariatooo@honesttoehold·
@pathofexile Bro .. I just want fuckin campaign skip or add some shit in similar to Helltides in D4 or Patrols from Marvel Heroes Omega. The only ARPG that makes me not want to level an alt character at all lmao. At least POE 1’s campaign don’t feel like a slog
English
16
0
32
6.1K
Rust
Rust@Rust94360778051·
@kiwijuicing @NeverSinkDev kelly what do you have to say for yourself in regards to the 'accidental' sword teasers
English
1
0
1
176
Rust
Rust@Rust94360778051·
@empyriangaming people say this then quit 2 weeks after launch
English
0
0
0
333
Empyrian
Empyrian@empyriangaming·
That’s a lot of PoE 2 content. Almost.. too much? Like sometimes I just wanna run some maps, not apply a delirium fart and follow the fog into an abyssal breach to apply a kalguuran emotion rune onto a ritualized exile boss (???). Hopefully that’s still an option :D Anyway there is definitely stuff to look forward to. Gonna watch q&a tomorrow and try to digest it all.
English
52
7
516
67.3K
Rust
Rust@Rust94360778051·
@11_Simii trzeba mieć naturalną predyspozycję do kopania dołów żeby mieć trudności z podstawową maturą
Polski
0
0
0
33
Simi
Simi@11_Simii·
Wkurwilxm się wczoraj i napisalxm maila do cke xdd
Simi tweet media
Polski
381
117
9.2K
1.1M
Rust
Rust@Rust94360778051·
@drewlevin correct me if im wrong but if we wanted to minimize the collective time that game quality is unavoidably bad at apex tiers, wouldnt a much earlier reset (which was called for for multiple patches) do exactly that?
English
0
0
0
168
Drew Levin
Drew Levin@drewlevin·
quoting to answer because I think more people will be interested in this we try to balance MMRs within and across teams. we're a week into fully truncating the long right tail of our MMR distribution. as people (like you) push that distribution to the right again, the system continues to try to make fair games with the people available. let's have Master 1 LP equal +1 as an arithmetic value in the following. your opgg shows you at +749 (GM 749 LP). let's say you have a team of you (+749) three people at +30 one slot open so right now this sums to 839 (this is oversimplifying for the sake of the conversation, we care about more factors than MMR, but let's focus on this for now and accept that we are not just doing addition and subtraction when matchmaking, we care about multiple factors). if there isn't anyone around you and the best options for the highest MMR player for the team on the other side are Agurin (+1477) or a +400 Master player (and then let's say there's plenty of +30 Master players), the matchmaker - again, oversimplifying, but close enough - has two options: 1. put someone on your team that is functionally -350 (d4 50 LP), or 2. put someone(s) on enemy team that are functionally -725 (this is the theoretical case for how you get emeralds in games with challengers) this is obviously non-ideal from a match quality perspective (and part of "match quality will be pretty rough after apex reset"), and I would expect that this kind of MMR range is not what you get on an insta-pop. as the ranks of high apex fill out, this problem will naturally subside, because the matchmaker will go from having very few people with larger disparities between them (you, Agurin, etc) to having more people in a tighter top-to-bottom MMR range in a given lobby, such that the disparity between e.g. you and Agurin could be smoothed by giving you more mid-master players rather than having to reach below Master 0 LP to even the numbers out trying to preemptively answer some frustrations/questions I can imagine you having: 1. "why not implement a cutoff at some point where you just don't accept Diamond or Emerald people into Master+ games at all?" plausible, but it's all a continuous distribution on the backend and there's an algorithm that governs "how quickly should the matchmaker look for a wider range of MMRs as wait times go up?" (because otherwise people would die waiting in queue for the perfectly matchmade game of 10 GM 749 LP players) 2. "the skill function of the right tail of the distribution is nonlinear, you can't just take an emerald 4 50 LP person and pair them with a GM 750 player to 'even out' the disparity vs two Master 0 LP players" sure, this is the argument for percentile-based matchmaking, although you still end up having to make assumptions about the shape of the very right tail of the distribution and there are fractal levels of nuance (role agency is a pretty simple example of how that nuance can mess things up - getting to have the GM 750 jungler + emerald 4 support on your team versus flipping those role assignments likely leads to different outcomes, but also carry junglers versus tank junglers, yadda yadda lots of stuff matters) hope this helps, sorry I wrote a mini blog post but I promise we're not just fucking around throwing darts over here
Naayil@NAAAYIL

just an honest question to my boys @drewlevin and @RiotPhroxzon if we "reset" everyones MMR to Master 0 LP how is it possible that I have a Emerald 1 Top Laner running down my game in Challenger LP range? clearly he can not possess a high MMR to be matched with me since the max MMR he could have is Master 0 LP right? and his last season rank PEAK was Diamond 4 aswell, his account is LVL 600+ too so it is safe to assume this is literally the guys main account and this is the peak of his all time performance if your answer to this is "because you (me) want low queue times so we have to give you these teammates" then I think the reset was redundant right? if the reset is not pointless and you double down on the claim that matchmaking is "fine" and that this is just normal "early split volatility" then please explain to me how this is okay in regards to competetive integrity or how this would be resolved in (for example) 5 months from now and just so you know, i am also aware that i climb and gain LP playing and winning against literal toddlers like this which basically makes my (and everyone elses) challenger rank, meaningless because we get it in a dishonest uncompetetive manner against LITERAL OBJECTIVE NOOBS AKA NOVICES AKA CASUALS below I will add a bunch of other screenshots where this has happened multiple times TODAY sometimes I won because of it, sometimes I lost either way, it is a joke and my challenger rank might aswell be purple, blue, golden, or bronze colored it makes no difference to me, try to convince me, why it does make a difference please much love from Austria

English
97
33
1.2K
271.2K
Rust
Rust@Rust94360778051·
@CARNDARAK CARN ADDED IN 0.5 LOGIN
English
0
0
0
14