RyanLee 🕯️🦇🔊
2.7K posts

RyanLee 🕯️🦇🔊
@RyanLeeCrypto
CKSG #4 | prev: @laevitas1 | Run it back turbo.








NEW: @Scallop_io SAYS "WE HAVE IDENTIFIED AN EXPLOIT AFFECTING A SIDE CONTRACT RELATED TO SCALLOP’S SSUI SPOOL REWARDS POOL, RESULTING IN A LOSS OF APPROXIMATELY 150K SUI... THE AFFECTED CONTRACT HAS BEEN FROZEN" - "SCALLOP WILL FULLY COVER 100% OF THE LOSS"



My Variational Points: Drop in points, likely due lower volume. Stats below, not including any ref points: - 79 points - $250k+ volume - OI $620k - OI/Vol 2.48 = 1 point per $3.16k volume Last week I earned 1 point per $4.83k volume. Delta-neutral, vari side was profitable. What I did this week - Avg hold time 12d - Volume: BTC - OI: SOL, HYPE, ETH, BTC - 3 trades Perhaps volume + OI combo is needed, too longer hold time, or are large caps being punished again. Value your points blumerce.xyz/airdrops

The Arbitrum Security Council has taken emergency action to freeze the 30,766 ETH being held in the address on Arbitrum One that is connected to the KelpDAO exploit. The Security Council acted with input from law enforcement as to the exploiter’s identity, and, at all times, weighed its commitment to the security and integrity of the Arbitrum community without impacting any Arbitrum users or applications. After significant technical diligence and deliberation, the Security Council identified and executed a technical approach to move funds to safety without affecting any other chain state or Arbitrum users. As of April 20 11:26pm ET the funds have been successfully transferred to an intermediary frozen wallet. They are no longer accessible to the address that originally held the funds, and can only be moved by further action by Arbitrum governance, which will be coordinated with relevant parties.


The beauty of trading on @variational_io platform 🤡🤡 You set a Stop Loss on $BASED at Quote Price of 0.1995 ...it gets triggered but Price was 5% away from my SL And it was also Filled at 6% lower price than my SL at 0.188 This is how Variational is earning...by tricking you with 0$ fees but scamming you spread and quoting prices than never existed This is not the first time it happened to me and for sure not the last! If I open a ticket in their discord they will come with a bul** that chart price has nothing to do with Oracle Price



I made 6 figures at 20 from @Lighter_xyz airdrop. Then lost about half of it. So I took a break. No trading. No charts. Just stepping away to rethink everything. Now I’m coming back but differently. Instead of trying to predict the market, I’m starting a deep dive into algo trading, specifically Market Making. Not as a trader. Not as a signal seller. But as a builder trying to understand how markets actually work. Over the next weeks, I’ll be: • Reading real MM / microstructure papers • Breaking them down into simple insights • Testing ideas with actual bots • Sharing what works (and what doesn’t) Because one thing became very clear: The edge isn’t intelligence. It’s: • execution • inventory control • latency • and structure Which also means: Your exchange is not just a tool it’s part of your strategy. That’s one of the reasons I’m experimenting with Lighter again. If you want to learn algo trading from scratch follow along.




For week 16 of the Omni points program, 150,000 points were distributed across 24,106 accounts.






Earlier today, a user attempted to buy AAVE using $50M USDT through the Aave interface. Given the unusually large size of the single order, the Aave interface, like most trading interfaces, warned the user about extraordinary slippage and required confirmation via a checkbox. The user confirmed the warning on their mobile device and proceeded with the swap, accepting the high slippage, which ultimately resulted in receiving only 324 AAVE in return. The transaction could not be moved forward without the user explicitly accepting the risk through the confirmation checkbox. The CoW Swap routers functioned as intended, and the integration followed standard industry practices. However, while the user was able to proceed with the swap, the final outcome was clearly far from optimal. Events like this do occur in DeFi, but the scale of this transaction was significantly larger than what is typically seen in the space. We sympathize with the user and will try to make a contact with the user and we will return $600K in fees collected from the transaction. The key takeaway is that while DeFi should remain open and permissionless, allowing users to perform transactions freely, there are additional guardrails the industry can build to better protect users. Our team will be investigating ways to improve these safeguards going forward.








