Ryan Chow

Over the course of building Solv for the past 5+ years, i’ve seen plenty of narratives come and go. Most of the projects 5 years ago doesn’t even resemble the sectors we have today. Solv has also evolved since we started building it, but our fundamental approach never changed. We always built it with economic value in mind: -Solv addresses a problem on how Bitcoin can become more productive. -Solv generates significant contributions to the economic flywheels of the ecosystem it lives in. -Solv supports its self-sustainability through a positive cash-flow. Markets will always have cycles, but i’m confident that the systems we built and workflows we’ve implemented will endure. We’ll continue to expand the largest onchain BTC reserve, work to be done

solv protocol ate a $2.7m exploit in march, reimbursed every user from treasury within 48 hours, passed 5 security audits, and shipped institutional staking tools by april. mango socialized $114m onto users. drift is still negotiating $285m in recovery. balancer shut down entirely. solv trades at $6.6m FDV. the bitcoin yield infrastructure layer is going to be worth hundreds of billions and the protocol that just passed its stress test in public costs less than a miami penthouse.

I see the SEC’s new crypto taxonomy as more than a sentiment boost. I think it materially improves the operating backdrop for what Solv is building. What stands out to me is that the SEC is starting to distinguish more clearly between speculation, securities activity, and infrastructure. That distinction matters because, for a long time, much of crypto was forced to operate under broad legal ambiguity. In practice, that ambiguity became a tax on innovation, making integrations harder, raising diligence costs and causing institutions hesitant to engage. From my perspective, the most important part for Solv is the SEC’s treatment of wrapping. I think this goes directly to the heart of our thesis. If a wrapped representation of a non-security crypto asset is simply preserving ownership, redemption, and utility, then making Bitcoin usable onchain should not be viewed the same way as issuing a new security. That is a very important conceptual and fundamental shift. I have always believed that one of the biggest inefficiencies in crypto is that Bitcoin, the largest and most important digital asset, remains underutilized relative to its economic potential. At Solv, the problem we are solving is not how to reinvent Bitcoin, but how to make it functional as collateral, liquidity, and productive capital across DeFi, CeFi, and institutional onchain finance. To me, that is not financial engineering for its own sake. It is about unlocking the full potential from an asset that has historically been held passively. Regulation clarity most certainly leads to cleaner business models that are easier to understand and scale. For Solv, this means the wrapper layer becomes much simpler to explain, the collateral layer is easier to justify, and institutional conversations become significantly more straightforward. We can now focus our energy on the essential topics: backing, redemption, transparency, risk controls, and product integrity. Perhaps a second-order effect that is just as important as the legal interpretation itself is how regulatory clarity improves institutional readability. It lowers the friction for integrations and makes counterparties more comfortable evaluating wrapped BTC as usable, production-ready infrastructure rather than something structurally suspect. When that happens, every investment we have made in proof of reserves, cross-chain transport, and product design becomes significantly more valuable. Of course, I do not think this means everything is suddenly risk-free. The SEC is still clearly saying that context matters. I think that is an important reminder. The market will reward protocols that are disciplined about structure, transparency, and utility. In my view, that is actually constructive, because it favors teams building real infrastructure instead of relying on just narratives. So when I look at this release, I see it as validation of a core principle I have believed for a long time: making Bitcoin usable is not the same thing as turning it into a security. And if that principle is increasingly recognized, then I believe the path becomes much clearer for Solv to help build the next phase of Bitcoin Finance.

This incident is isolated and limited in scope. The protocol and user funds remain secure.

We keep calling this borrowing. But a 365-day BTC-backed loan is closer to private banking behavior: keep the asset, finance around it, and treat collateral like a core position. @xapobankapp 2025 Digital Wealth Report shows: - Bitcoin-backed borrowing shifting from short-term liquidity to long-term planning - 52% of BTC-backed loans issued at a 365-day term. - people like to retain BTC exposure, unlock liquidity, and treat BTC as productive collateral. That’s why I think BTCFi is inevitable. The market is moving from BTC as trade → BTC as collateral primitive. Once that shift happens, the moat is risk transparency + execution quality, not APY. linkedin.com/posts/solv-fou…

Saw the Business Times piece quoting my take on the BTC plunge—thanks for the feature! (link: businesstimes.com.sg/wealth/crypto-…) Honestly, it's a tough moment, but this is exactly the kind of macro induced shakeout I've seen before. BTC dropped hard from $126k peaks to test below $60k this week, wiping out a ton of paper gains. But zoom out: this isn't a failure of Bitcoin, it's a feature of where it is in its lifecycle. Right now, everything risk-sensitive is getting hit: Fed signaling higher-for-longer rates, geopolitical nerves driving flight to "safe" havens, equities and tech bleeding. When liquidity tightens like this, leverage gets unwound fast, that's the cascade we're feeling. Spot demand cools, ETF outflows pick up (rational in this fear phase), and yes, big holders like Strategy are staring at massive unrealized losses. But are they dumping? No. Tesla, Block, others holding steady. Institutions aren't bailing, they're weathering it. Bitcoin itself? Network is rock-solid. This dip is testing resolve, not the thesis. For me, it's a healthy correction in a young asset (only 17 years old!). We've built Solv through multiple winters. The platforms that come out stronger are the ones stress-tested right now~ decentralized, transparent, with real adoption. Plunge feels brutal today, but liquidity cycles back. Macro will stabilize (it always does), and when it does, capital flows to what has genuine edge: fixed supply, institutional treasuries, growing utility. Not calling the bottom (no one can), but I'm not panicking. This is the maturation phase...shifting from hype to real store-of-value status. Cycles come and go. Bitcoin endures. Stay steady, friends. 💜

wait, you can earn BTC yield with one click in Base app? interesting. x.com/SolvProtocol/s…

Here's an interesting validation of our BTC productivity thesis. Our investor @LaserDigital_ is launching a tokenized Bitcoin Yield Fund targeting diversified long exposure. There are 2 macro forces converging here: 1) Institutions viewing BTC as a portfolio diversifier amid uncertainty 2) Growing demand for yield beyond just hodling We are originally positioned to fill this gap, to bring institutional-grade BTC yields onchain. Our edge comes down to infrastructure, transparency, security. Its not sexy, but critical for institutions crossing into DeFi. This is why I’m increasingly confident that the “BTC-denominated yield stack” is going to consolidate around platforms that can do risk-adjusted yield at scale and secure, not just ship strategies. We'll become the default infra for productive Bitcoin. Solv will eat all BTC-denominated yields and will continue to expand the largest onchain BTC treasury.

gSolv ☀️ 久等久等🫡 📰 Jan 12 - Jan 18 Solv Highlights 📈 收益机会 🔸 BTC+, APY @ 2.61% ⬇️ 🔸 SolvBTC.BNB, APY @ 1.98% 🟰 🔸 SolvBTC.JUP, APY @ 7.95% ⬆️ 🔸 SolvBTC.DLP, APY @ 1.00% 🟰 💰 借贷市场 🔹 SolvBTC borrows @ 0.04% @VenusProtocol 🔹 SolvBTC - USD1 @ 4.39% @lista_dao 🔹 SolvBTC - BNB @ 2.87% @lista_dao 🔹 SolvBTC - U @ 0.08% @lista_dao 🔹 SolvBTC - WBTC @ 0.46% @MorphoLabs @ Ethereum ⚖️ 其他资讯 🟡 Solv x @HackenProof 50K USD 漏洞赏金计划上线！了解更多 x.com/HackenProof/st… 🟡 SolvBTC 池上线 @uncapfinance @Starknet，赚取 U 本位高达 25.25% 收益！ uncap.finance/earn?collatera…

I was wrong, Bitcoin doesn't need to beat gold. If you have watched CZ's debate with Peter Schiff at #BinanceBlockchainWeek in Dubai and you will see why. Everyone's asking the wrong question. It's not which one wins? It's what happens when the programmability of Bitcoin meets the stability narrative of gold? After an hour of watching them spar, the conclusion results in the same scarcity thesis, same decentralization story, same inflation hedge, just different market cycles. - Gold = crisis hedge, risk-off flight to safety - Bitcoin = asymmetric bet, risk-on digital scarcity But there's one asymmetry: Bitcoin is programmable money. And programmable money can do something gold never could, generate native yield without counterparty risk or leverage loops. This is what keeps me up all night, I am also thinking about the next 10, 20 years for Solv. The answer is RWAs. The tokenized RWA market did 5X last year. Standard Chartered says $2T by 2028 (excluding stablecoins). At Solv, we built SolvBTC.RWA Vault specifically for this moment. We are the largest onchain BTC treasury. Partnership with Binance and BNB Chain with one goal: let Bitcoin earn real yields from real-world assets. Users get actual exposure to tokenized treasuries, credit, commodities, things with cashflows and risk-adjusted returns that institutions actually understand. My thesis have been the same since 5 years ago when I decided to build Solv. Bitcoin becomes the base collateral layer for the next generation of stable, yield-bearing reserve assets. Again, we are NOT competing with gold. NOT replacing TradFi, but aims to ABSORB *both into a programmable layer.* Think about the second-order effects when BTC holders can earn 4-8% yields from investment-grade RWAs without giving up self-custody, you change the game for every fund, treasury on earth. DAOs holding treasuries. Family offices diversifying. Sovereigns exploring alternatives to USD exposure. This is the convergence trade the market isn't pricing in yet. We're NOT building Bitcoin or RWAs at Solv. We're building Bitcoin PLUS RWAs, and the infrastructure to make that work at institutional scale without compromising on decentralization or security. The debate in Dubai made it obvious. And the rails we're building right now will define how the next $10T moves onchain. This is just the beginning. Read our Manifesto 👇 x.com/i/status/20113…

@jocyiosg Jocy老板加油

我们三年前的决策决定了今天的市场，今天的决策将决定两三年后的走向。 加密行业正站在悬崖边缘。2021-2022年融资泡沫催生的项目如今集中发币，海量供应砸向需求枯竭的市场，而行业却依旧沉迷于低流通、高FDV的伪繁荣游戏。更糟的是，造成这一切的机制几乎没变——项目仍把发币当成必经流程而非有门槛的战略选择，当优质创业者持续流向AI等更健康赛道，留下的只会是"柠檬市场"。 这是交易所、持币者、项目方、VC四方皆输的死局：交易所以为低流通保护散户却收获暴跌币价，持币者要求内部人不超50%反而推高估值制造更大泡沫，项目方用低流通硬撑估值最终摧毁行业融资能力，VC按低流通标记持仓却在中长期失去融资渠道。市场两次自救尝试——Meme币的100%流通让98%参与者亏钱，MetaDAO的过度保护吓跑优秀创始人——都以失败告终。 未来12个月是最后一波供应冲击，也是决定"改变还是离开"的窗口期。核心参与者尤其是交易所和做市商必须做出抉择：停止用超长锁仓阻碍价格发现、停止逼迫每个项目发币、转向KPI驱动的合理释放机制。代币的独特博弈论机制——加速增长、构建社区护城河——是股权无法复制的，Polymarket和Hyperliquid已证明做对了能创造变革性价值。今天的决策将决定两三年后的市场走向，2026年，我们要构建怎样的未来？ 拯救即将沉沦的巨轮，需要每个人一起努力。

Excited to share my perspective on where Bitcoin’s financial infrastructure is heading tonight. A lot is changing, fast.

Looking forward to the sparks between RGB and the Lightning Network — this could unlock a whole new wave of Bitcoin-native use cases.

@catwychan Been busy building… but couldn’t stay quiet forever:)

@RyanChow_DeFi nice to see you boss

One of the most exciting trends: stablecoins borrowed against SolvBTC are becoming the foundation for more and more yield scenarios. BTC as collateral is just getting started.

My view on RWA: 1. RWA looping There are very few truly high-quality RWAs that can be looped. Superstate and sUSDe have cyclical yields (bull market product), and ultimately they are tokenized hedge funds, i.e. faux-RWA. Private credit looping has just blown up (Fasanara mF-ONE). Drawdowns are always a feature, not a bug. Thus there is always a limit to which it can be scaled. 2. Onchain T-bills repo: Not here yet but this can be a very, very large market. Banks & dealers cannot sell US Treasuries due to Basel III constraints, so they can only obtain cash/ liquidity via overnight borrowing. The overnight repo market is limited to HQLA, like US Treasuries, which the US government will strongly support. I believe this is what Aave is betting on. Even a slice of this market is still on the order of $billions, per day. Aave Horizon has already listed all tokenized T-bills out there, e.g. VanEck VBILL, Circle USYC, Centrifuge JTRSY. We have been exploring RWA yields for BTC holders for quite some time. Stay tuned.

RT @SolvProtocol: Celebrating 1000 BTC deposits in BTC+ and the Holidays 🎁 2025 was a year to celebrate for Solv, to give back to the Solv…

BNB Chain Lending Landscape 🔶 The recent @jup_lend and @kamino fight is interesting. Lending is the few onchain use cases with proven PMF. Borrow demand is almost the first metric for how “real” a chain’s users are. The pattern repeats itself: - Ethereum: @aave & @Morpho - BNB: @VenusProtocol & @lista_dao - Solana: Kamino & Juplend The competitive evolution is awfully similar: a long term dominator, and a challenger rapidly gaining market share: 🟦 Morpho (ETH): grew to 10% of Aave 🟨 Listadao (BNB): grew to 50% of Venus in 9 months 🟪 Juplend (SOL): grew to 40% of Kamino in 4 months How do challengers grow so fast? I can’t speak for eth or @solana, but solv was building alongside with Listadao lending since their day 1. 🔹 Borrow Side > Strong base collateral with active users: $SolvBTC for Listadao / $cbBTC for Morpho > A good yield bearing stablecoin: @ethena for Listadao / @maplefinance SyrupUSDC for Morpho > Institutional grade RWAs: @Securitize @BlackRock BUIDL, @vaneck_us VBILL, @FTI_Global Benji, @circle USYC [rails via @binance] 🔹 Supply Side > A good stablecoin partner: @worldlibertyfi $USD1 for Listadao / $USDC for Morpho > Strong ability to source native asset supply: BNB, ETH, SOL SolvBTC users are currently split on @BNBCHAIN: 💛 $270M on Listadao 💙 $200M on Venus core pool Interesting thing is — Listadao didn’t vampire attack our users from Venus (not all at least), instead: - It attracted @SolvProtocol users from other ecos onto BNB chain - It also creates net new user for solv as they offer competitive rates I see it as win, win, win. I’m excited to see: - Listadao launching Smart Lending - Venus teaming up with @0xfluid for Venus X - Aave already deployed on BNB with lots of idle assets — curious what @Marczeller @StaniKulechov will build with @binance A strong challenger → healthier competition → better rates → faster feature rollouts. Done right, the whole ecosystem grows and attracts users from outside 🔥

Solv’s Q3 Institutional Adoption: 🔹Zeta Group (NASDAQ: ZNB) has announced introducing SolvBTC into their balance sheet with $230m SolvBTC purchase. 🔹Jiuzi Holdings (NASDAQ: JZXN) announced a plan to allocate up to $1 billion in BTC from its corporate digital asset strategy into Solv’s BTC yield product. 🔹With @plumenetwork and @Securitize, we are expanding BTC yield compositions to include institutional grade RWAs. Compliance: Solv Protocol became MiCA compliant in Q3, with $SOLV listings on compliant exchanges @Bitpanda_global & @bitvavocom. SolvBTC Adoption $SolvBTC and xSolvBTC backed loans grew to ~$400m on @BNBCHAIN alone, powered by @lista_dao & @VenusProtocol and USD1 from @worldlibertyfi. Ecosystem Expansions Q3 have seen SolvBTC expanding to @Starknet, @CantonNetwork, @solana @monad (Q4 now, technically). Revenue Growth Annualised revenue has grown to $23m. Leading BTC yield offerings includes our flagship BTC+, @JupiterExchange vault and BNB vault (with airdrops from e.g. @Aster_DEX). Proud of the results. We keep solving in Q4.

The curators are going to get consolidated and most will be selected out after the dust settles. Vault receipt token masked as yield-bearing stablecoin as collateral to borrow and looping USDC/USDT era is gone.