Ryane SaaS

Sf here we comeeee

@spect3ral Heyoz

These ads are going crazy, avg 4.2x ROAS Built a free claude skill to prompt these 👇 These cartoon style ads work great because they get the idea across easily Earlier ads like these used to take an entire studio and atleast 4 weeks Now, they can be done in <30 mins pop Here's how: -Enable my claude skill -Tell it about your product -Brainstorm angles -Get the image, video and VO prompts -Generate and assemble in HeyOz That's it Comment "heyoz" and I'll share the guide

@jerrod_lew having so much fun building with this, is there any community I can speak to others using this?

HyperFrames is here and open sourced. This entire video was created with Claude Code, using HyperFrames to create your own graphics for video content. Check out the article from Bin!

@andreilunev fair, ive been playing around with hyperframes, would recommend, but doesn't seem like you need it

@RyaneSaaS no, ffmpeg. captions rendered directly onto the video during assembly

🌶️I have infinite creatives now. That's not a metaphor. I built a system that generates complete video ads from a single marketing angle. Not scripts. Not briefs. Actual finished videos. Voiceover, animation, captions, assembled and exported. One command. Minutes, not weeks. I studied a ton of ad creators. Figured out how they think about scenes, pacing, hooks, visual styles. What actually converts vs what just looks cool. Then I built something none of them have. A fully automated pipeline that goes from a marketing angle to a rendered .mp4 without touching a single tool manually. today alone - already 300+. That's just the beginning. I literally cannot stop printing creatives.

@TheMattBerman @firecrawl @virlomain breakout

this claude agent replaced my $12k mo creator strategist 😱 here's the system that nails UGC hooks/formats/concepts BEFORE you waste a dollar: step 1: read your site → @firecrawl pulls desires. objections. claims you can prove step 2: find the UGC breakouts → @virlomain pulls outliers in your niche. not top creators. not follower count → posts beating a creator's OWN baseline. 3x. 5x. 10x. → the WHY. the hook. the mechanic. the buyer tension step 3: mine the comments → every outlier. every reply. the part everyone skips. → objections buyers actually type. → phrases they actually use. free buyer research from the scroll. step 4: maps creator archetypes → figures out types of creator roles ie educator. skeptic. routine fixer. proof tester → names stay comps so you pitch creators & types that make sense step 5: builds the bangers → every concept tagged: breakout driver. buyer tension. creator delivery. test priority. → confidence scored step 6: rejects generic plays → the anti-positioning block. 5 plays we will NOT run, in writing. → no lifestyle montage. no day in the life. step 7: ships a SEXY brief → 3 best concepts. ranked on what to ship first.alongside or backlog. each with a decision window. → 8 sections. markdown + dark-mode HTML. all data backed. → open it. send it. crush it. input: your URL output: a UGC strategy, hooks, formats, creator types all based on DATA the old way: → creator strategist: $12K/mo → research analyst: $6K/mo = $18K mo of "send the ideas" this: $0 I packaged the entire system as the Creator Breakout Kit. 7 claude skills: - brand-snapshot (buyer psychology + claim truth via @firecrawl) - breakout-pattern-research (post-level outliers via @virlomain) - creator-archetype-mapper (roles, not rosters) - creator-concept-generator (slate w/ 4 framework labels + confidence) - creator-kit-formatter (MD + dark-terminal HTML brief) - sales-handoff (honest follow-up copy. no fake urgency.) - creator-breakout-kit (orchestrator. runs the full pipeline end to end.) also works with @openclaw, hermes or any agent framework. dont waste $ on unproven concepts. ship bangers. giving it away free. comment BREAKOUT + like + follow (must follow so i can DM)

@0xnocode @andreilunev me too - shall we compare? would want to get someone elses opinion

@andreilunev Did the same 👍

claude code down... i guess its time to go for a walk

AI UGC looks fAkE" These AI reaction hooks are crushing it for valentines. Whilst your AI UGC looks plastic. Because you're paying $89/mo to a tool that gives you zero onboarding, zero tutorials, zero support and when your output looks like garbage they ghost you. Ezra users are printing because we actually give a shit. We teach you the workflow. We show you how to brief AI properly. We answer when you're stuck. Half the price. Ten times the support. Make better AI UGC in 2026. Comment “EZRA” for a 15% discount code in your DM.

@Nate_Google_ Why lovable in particular to build the web pages? Does it do something others don’t or is it just your preferred tool?

this is cool but Figma is the wrong tool for ecom brands here's what nobody is talking about: you can use Claude + Lovable to build fully custom advertorials, listicles, and product pages for your Shopify store in under an hour. no developer. no designer. no $5,000 agency fee. and these aren't template garbage pages. these are high-converting landing pages that would cost you $3,000-$5,000 each from a CRO agency here's exactly how we're doing it: advertorials (the biggest money printer in ecom right now): step 1: take your best-performing ad hook — the one with the highest CTR and lowest CPA step 2: paste it into Claude and say "write a 1,500 word advertorial for [product] using this hook as the headline. format it like a health publication article. include 3 customer testimonials, 2 clinical references, a comparison table vs competitors, and a strong CTA to the product page" step 3: Claude writes the entire advertorial in 2 minutes. edit for accuracy and brand voice step 4: open Lovable and say "build this advertorial as a responsive landing page. clean editorial design. sticky CTA button. mobile-first. include the comparison table and testimonial sections" step 5: Lovable builds the full page in minutes. you get a live URL you can preview immediately step 6: connect it to your Shopify store. Lovable deploys to custom domains — point a subdomain like go.yourbrand.com to it, or use Shopify's custom page integration total time: under 60 minutes. total cost: $0 beyond your subscriptions we used to pay $3,000-$5,000 per advertorial from agencies. now we produce 5-10 per week listicle pages (the "best of" format that converts like crazy): same workflow. tell Claude to write a "top 5 [category] products in 2026" listicle with your brand as #1. include real competitors. include real specs. make it genuinely useful tell Lovable to build it as a clean comparison-style landing page with a specs table, star ratings, pros/cons for each product, and a "buy now" CTA on your product this format works insanely well for cold traffic from Google and YouTube ads because it gives people the research experience they were going to do anyway — except you control the narrative custom PDPs (for specific campaigns): your default Shopify product page is designed for everyone. but what if you could build a custom product page for every audience segment? one PDP for the "joint pain over 50" audience with testimonials from that demographic, clinical data relevant to their concerns, and messaging that speaks directly to them a different PDP for the "athlete recovery" audience with completely different proof points, imagery, and CTAs Claude writes the copy. Lovable builds the page. you now have 10 custom PDPs for 10 audience segments. each one converting 30-40% higher than your generic product page because the messaging actually matches the ad that brought them there the scaling loop: this is where it gets ridiculous week 1: build 3 advertorials with different hooks week 2: run paid traffic to all 3, see which converts best week 3: take the winning hook, tell Claude to write 5 variations of that advertorial (different angles, different proof points, different story structures) week 4: Lovable builds all 5 in a single afternoon week 5: test all 5, find the next winner, repeat you now have a landing page testing velocity that would require a 6-person team to match. except it's one person with Claude and Lovable the brands spending $5,000 per landing page and waiting 3 weeks for delivery are competing against brands producing 10-20 per week for basically free that's not a fair fight this is one of the biggest unfair advantages in ecom right now and almost nobody is using it yet

@tankots @WisprFlow Wispr flow

We offered 5 people a Porsche 911 GT3 RS if they could get @WisprFlow to make a mistake It's the fastest and most accurate AI voice dictation app that's 3x more accurate than ChatGPT, Claude, or Siri. Today, we’re finally launching on Android. Download now: play.google.com/store/apps/det… As a part of the launch, we’re giving away 6 months of Wispr Flow Pro for free. Like, retweet and comment ‘Wispr Flow’ to get it. Enjoy. — Written with Wispr Flow

Given how much time I spend on here I should definitely post more lol

@chddaniel @Remotion How much prompting was needed to make that video wit remotion?

YESS SHIPPED!!! @Remotion + Claude Code Opus 4.5 + app/website building You can now prompt Remotion to build videos straight into: • Your website • Or your SaaS app • Or your landing page • Or your iOS/Android app (soon 😉) This is just a quick example, but it can do some REALLY powerful stuff...

@pierreeliottlal This video is nuts

It’s crazy how one single video can change a business. What one video did for us: • 1M+ views across social media • Thousands of site visits • 500+ free trials started (with credit card) • 150+ paying customers • $15k+ in new MRR Content is not branding. Content is distribution. 🚀

@nicktheriot_ whats the toothbrush example?

The highest-converting ad flow for unaware audiences: 1. Call out what they're currently doing (toothbrush example) 2. Make them aware of the problem they don't know exists (micro-abrasions) 3. Twist the knife on the problem (bacteria breeding, smell, discoloration) 4. Introduce the cost of ignoring it ($200-$500 retainer replacement) 5. Introduce your solution (ultrasonic cleaner under $150) 6. Explain how it works (UVC light, sound waves, 5 minutes) 7. Paint the picture of their new life (crisp, clear, odor-free every morning) 8. Close with the offer (urgency or guarantee) This is how you take unaware → buyer in one ad.

@adamtaylorl is finding new angles tough? or do most brands not know that they need to be changing up the angles?

Most brands think their creative is fatiguing. It's not. Their angle is. Here's how to know the difference: Creative Fatigue = Your audience is tired of seeing THIS specific video Signs: → Hook rate drops → Frequency climbs above 3.5 → CPM stays flat but CTR falls What's happening: People have seen your creator's face too many times. The fix: Keep the message, change the container. – Swap the hook (first 3 seconds only) – New creator, same script – Different format (UGC → static, video → carousel) You're not changing what you say. Just who says it. Angle Fatigue = Your audience is tired of hearing THIS message Signs: → Brand new creatives with the same angle flop instantly → CPM starts climbing (Meta can't find fresh people for this pitch) → Both CTR and CVR decline together What's happening: The market has heard "reduces joint pain in 7 days" 47 times this month. The fix: Pivot the entire narrative. – New pain point (stiffness → inflammation) – New proof mechanism (clinical study → customer transformation) – New awareness stage (problem-unaware → solution-aware) Real example: A supplement brand's winning angle was "gut health is the root of bloating." Crushed for 8 weeks. Then died. They tried new creators. New visuals. New hooks. Nothing worked. Why? Everyone in their audience had already heard about gut health. We pivoted to: "Your probiotic is making bloating worse. Here's why." New angle. New enemy. New life. CPA dropped 40% in 30 days. Before you remake everything, ask: Is the message stale, or just the messenger?

@CESDigital_ do you have a solution for creative testing?

Real Example: Creative Testing. Teams used to spend 20+ hours/week on ad variants. By automating generation & testing, they reduced manual work by 60% in only 3 weeks.

80% of AI automation projects fail. Most companies waste 6-figures on "shiny" tools that never actually move the needle. Here’s why they crash—and the framework to ensure yours succeeds. 🧵

@makrammbenn @irabukht are you running meta ads for your clients?

@RyaneSaaS @irabukht Yes. Meta is already moving this way—AI-driven, context-aware offers are likely next. Higher conversions, but similar pressure on per-sale margins.

Google Ads just got smarter! AI now turns your chatbot chats into personalized deals. Discounts, bundles, free shipping—coming soon. Retailers like Petco & e.l.f. are already in #Google #ecommerce #AI #shoppingonline

@Nnoha_1 @odesanmijamal_ what tools do you use?

@odesanmijamal_ I make Ai video ads. x.com/nnoha_1/status…

MARKET is OPEN (aje awa o) What are you selling today? Let's help you reach your audience. 🙏 pls return the favor for whoever retweets for you. Ps: include your location.

@sometimesfrunny @The_AdProfessor This is a great analysis, I saw you're using AI to code. Have you tried using it to make ads?

AI Creative-Director says about your ad: This acts as a fascinating piece of creativity because it highlights the tension between visual cleverness and strategic integrity. If you were a junior creative presenting this to me in a review, here is the honest, creative-director-level feedback I would give you. The "Gut Reaction" Visually, it is incredibly satisfying. It takes the brand’s most distinct asset—the overlapping circles—and turns it into the message itself. It’s minimalist, "thumb-stopping," and requires zero translation. In a vacuum, it looks like a design award winner. However, from a brand strategy perspective, I would kill this ad immediately. Here is the breakdown of why this doesn't work for a multibillion-dollar brand like MasterCard. 1. It fundamentally misunderstands the "Priceless" campaign MasterCard’s "Priceless" campaign is one of the most successful in advertising history because it acknowledges a humble truth: Money is secondary. + The Classic Logic: There are things money can’t buy (Love, memories, time). For the tools you need to get there (tickets, dinner, travel), there’s MasterCard. + This Ad's Logic: It suggests that MasterCard sits at the intersection of "Money" and "Happiness." It implies that MasterCard buys Happiness. This reverses 25+ years of brand equity. The entire point of MasterCard’s positioning is that they handle the "stuff" (the commerce) so you can enjoy the "happiness" (which is free/priceless). By placing the brand in the intersection, you are claiming that the credit card is happiness, or that happiness is transactional. That is a cynical message that consumers usually reject. 2. The Venn Diagram logic is flawed Let’s look at the semantics of a Venn diagram: + Left Circle: Things money can buy. + Right Circle: Happiness. + The Intersection: Things money can buy THAT ARE Happiness. By labeling the intersection "MasterCard," you are effectively saying: "MasterCard is a thing money can buy that is happiness." Technically, MasterCard is the mechanism (the how), not the object (the what). A more accurate (but less sexy) diagram would place MasterCard strictly within the red circle ("Things money can buy"), thereby facilitating a path to the orange circle. 3. It creates a "Brand Ego" problem Great brands try to be the hero's guide, not the hero itself. + Nike: Doesn't say "Nike is greatness." It says "Just Do It" (You are the hero). + Apple: Doesn't say "Apple is creativity." It says "Think Different" (You are the creative). This ad makes MasterCard the hero. It says, "We are the sweet spot of your life." It feels arrogant. It lacks the emotional intelligence that made the original "Priceless" commercials make people cry. The Verdict: Don't Run It. It is a classic case of "Design over Idea." You let the shape of the logo dictate the strategy, rather than letting the strategy dictate the creative. How to fix it? If you are married to the Venn diagram concept using the logo, you have to change the labels to fit the brand promise. + Left Circle: "The Bill." + Right Circle: "The Memories." + Intersection: "Priceless." (Even then, you lose the MasterCard logo in the middle, but at least the message is on-brand.)

I created an ad for Mastercard on my coffee break. What company should I do next?