Dr. Suzana Camargo

@BenRothenberg She is awful!

This is the campiest thing I've ever seen on Tennis Channel (complimentary).

@TennisChannel NOBODY absolutely nobody wants to listen to her. She’s an awful person. Please hire someone who actually gives some depth on the women’s tour, not a mean girl meme. Respect female tennis players and fans of the @WTA.

You're going to want to listen to this edition Story Time with Danielle 🫢 #MiamiOpen

@TheTennisLetter @TennisChannel nobody wants to hear these awful stories by her and Coco, they are just mean. Please find some better women to hire as commentators. Look at how wonderful Andrea is. That’s what we want.

Danielle Collins says her dog pooped in front of a player's locker who she's not a fan of at the 2024 Miami Open “I’m not gonna mention the name of the player. I don't wanna throw anyone under the bus.. I'm working on trying to be my best self" 😭😭😭😭

spot-on, from @anneapplebaum Money quote: "Donald Trump does not think strategically. Nor does he think historically, geographically, or even rationally. He does not connect actions he takes on one day to events that occur weeks later. He does not think about how his behavior in one place will change the behavior of other people in other places." "He does not consider the wider implications of his decisions. He does not take responsibility when these decisions go wrong. Instead, he acts on whim and impulse, and when he changes his mind—when he feels new whims and new impulses—he simply lies about whatever he said or did before." theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/03/…

One of the most successful deceptions of our time was getting many Americans to fear diversity more than racism, equality more than misogyny, democracy more than fascism, immigrants more than authoritarians, the poor more than corrupt billionaires, and empathy more than cruelty.

For your consideration: Crowd funding for "The Sky is the Limit (NCAR--A documentary about a crown jewel of American science, the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and the peril it faces." kickstarter.com/projects/lucia…

NCAR is a cornerstone of weather prediction, Earth system science & scientific training. Any action that would render the organization less effective could have dire consequences. Read AGU's comment to NSF: thebridge.agu.org/2026/03/17/agu…

🎉A big shoutout to the student award winners from the 39th Conference on Climate Variability and Change, held at the @ametsoc 106th Annual Meeting! A huge thank you to our judges for your time and expertise. 🙏We also want to extend our gratitude to everyone who attended in CVC.

New online! Interactions of tropical cyclones with global energy and water cycles dlvr.it/TRXBgV

Glad to see UCAR/NCAR is fighting back on this. This whole episode feels like yet another impeachable abuse of power (this time to blackmail Colorado) that won't result in actual consequences because of our impotent legislature. But hopefully some of the damage can be stopped. nbcnews.com/science/scienc…

@Sarilec @TennisChannel Absolutely awful @TennisChannel! Why would you do that to us? We PAY for our subscriptions and don’t want this. Terrible decision to enforce this upon your viewers.

What the hell is this @TennisChannel ? I pay for the app to watch T2 broadcast on changeovers? With all the ‘we’ll be right back’ crap. Awful AWFUL experience

@TennisChannel Dear @TennisChannel: I pay a LOT for my subscription. I DON’T want you to decide for me when I have a double screen instead of the match I actually want to see! The experience yesterday was absolutely awful! Double screens should be an OPTION not enforced. Terrible changes.

More tennis paradise + exciting ATP Challenger events 🌴✨

@incredibleiga @SoCalScreener @TennisChannel Absolutely! Don’t force me to watch double screens if I don’t want to @TennisChannel! It should be a OPTION not something you force upon the viewers! Awful, terrible changes.

… i watched about 1/3 of iga’s match on split screen today because they kept showing doubles and/or desk talk during play. and there was no stadium stream to switch to. all this after upping prices and also nuking the archive of old matches!! i wish you the worst @TennisChannel

total side note but the way tennis channel keeps managing to make their product worse and worse is baffling… they’ve taken world feeds away in the app to force us into watching betting commercials which means…

She kept finding women in laboratory photographs from the 1800s. Then she read the published papers—and every single woman had vanished. Someone had erased them from history. Yale University, 1969. Margaret Rossiter was a graduate student studying the history of science. She was one of very few women in her program. Every Friday afternoon, students and faculty gathered for beers and informal conversation. One week, Margaret asked a simple question: "Were there ever any women scientists?" The faculty answered firmly: No. Someone mentioned Marie Curie. The group dismissed it—her husband Pierre really deserved the credit. Margaret didn't argue. But she also didn't believe them. So she started looking. She found a reference book called "American Men of Science"—essentially a Who's Who of scientific achievement. Despite the title, she was shocked to discover it contained entries about women. Botanists trained at Wellesley. Geologists from Vermont. There were names. There were credentials. There were careers. The professors had been wrong. But Margaret's discovery was just the beginning. Because as she dug deeper into archives across the country, she found something far more disturbing. Photograph after photograph showed women standing at laboratory benches, working with equipment, listed on research teams. But when she read the published papers, the award citations, the official histories—those same women had disappeared. Their names were missing. Their contributions erased. It wasn't random. It was systematic. Women who designed experiments watched male colleagues publish results without giving them credit. Women whose discoveries were assigned to supervisors. Women listed in acknowledgments instead of as authors. Women passed over for awards that went to male collaborators who contributed far less. Margaret realized she was witnessing a pattern that stretched across centuries. Women had always been present in science. The record had simply pushed them aside. She needed a name for what she was documenting. In the early 1990s, she found it in the work of Matilda Joslyn Gage—a 19th-century suffragist who had written about this exact phenomenon in 1870. In 1993, Margaret published a paper formally naming it: The Matilda Effect. The term captured something that had been hidden in plain sight for generations. Once you knew the term, you saw it everywhere. Her dissertation became a lifelong mission. For more than 30 years, Margaret researched and wrote her landmark three-volume series: Women Scientists in America. She examined letters, institutional policies, individual careers. She gathered undeniable evidence that women in science had been consistently under-credited and structurally excluded. Her work faced resistance. Many dismissed women's history as political rather than academic. Others insisted she was exaggerating. Margaret didn't argue emotionally. She presented data. Documented cases. Patterns repeated across decades and institutions. Eventually, the evidence became undeniable. Her research helped restore recognition to scientists who had been erased: Rosalind Franklin, whose X-ray work revealed DNA's structure—credit went to Watson and Crick. Lise Meitner, who explained nuclear fission—omitted from the Nobel Prize. Nettie Stevens, who discovered sex chromosomes—received little credit. Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin, who discovered stars are made of hydrogen—initially dismissed. And countless others whose names had nearly vanished. Margaret changed the narrative. Science was no longer just the story of solitary male geniuses. It became a story of collaboration that included women who had been written out. The Matilda Effect became standard terminology. Scholars used it to examine how credit is assigned, how authors are listed, who receives awards, who gets left out.

BREAKING: Senate Republicans just blocked my bill to fund TSA and FEMA... AGAIN. This isn't complicated: if Republicans won't agree to rein in ICE & CBP, they should AT MINIMUM work with us to fund TSA. But they won't.

ICYMI: Republicans BLOCKED my bill to fund TSA. Republicans are punishing travelers and forcing TSA agents to work without pay because they want to cut another blank check for ICE & Border Patrol. It's shameful.

🚨BREAKING: DHS agents are now illegally arresting U.S. citizens at airports… and trafficking them across state lines. A 28-year-old U.S. citizen, Sunny Naqvi, was detained by DHS, for 43 hours, after landing at O’Hare International Airport in Chicago. She wasn’t charged with a crime, and she wasn’t accused of doing anything illegal… Agents reportedly detained her over what they called a “curious travel history.” Even though Sunny was born in Illinois…they still disappeared her. After being held for about 30 hours inside the airport, agents secretly moved Sunny to an ICE detention facility in Broadview, Illinois. While this was happening, federal agents repeatedly told her family she was NOT in custody, even though her phone location showed she was inside the facility. Then it gets worse. According to witnesses, agents asked for Sunny’s phone number so they could “look for her phone.” Minutes later, the phone was opened, her messages were read, and the device was shut off, cutting off the family’s ability to track her. After that, agents transported the U.S. citizen across state lines, to another detention facility in Dodge County, Wisconsin. And then she was eventually released early Saturday morning… in a random state, alone. Her phone was dead, and she had no transportation. So, a U.S. citizen detained by the federal government had to hitchhike to a hotel, just to be able to reunite with her family. And this is what people need to understand… When federal agents can detain U.S. citizens without charges… lie to families about their custody, search personal phones, and secretly transport people across state lines… That puts every single American in danger. Because they can do it to anyone.

@lisa_talking Imagine if Iga or Coco have done that! The criticism would be endless, but as this was Mirra, it’s just entertaining… If it was Aryna, it would be part of her charm, as the diva of tennis.

*tennis is boring sport* tennis:

@RepNancyMace Names are not enough. Job roles, dates, & victim statements can be easily matched to House records to ID names. Survivors have NOT provided consent and were promised anonymity and protection when they gave statements. This carelessness is why victims don’t come forward. Fix it.

@MakeItWayne151 I wonder how his ex-wife's ring looked like... Maybe it was similar... He clearly has no taste. Nobody seems to know if the guy has actually divorced her yet or not. Divorce in Brazil typically takes a LONG time.

Im sorry but I think big rings like this are so uncreative, lazy and gaudy. Like you got all the money and you just got a this big ass boring boulder on your finger