We all died and we're in hell

@tally_dad @BrentScher Huh? You're insinuating that Brent is anti free speech because he's pointing out that Tucker likes Platner?

@BrentScher It's strange how many on the right are suddenly anti free speech lately. Personally, I like hearing from everyone. Good or bad, it shows people who you are.

My last hilarious breakout, Tucker Carlson has plans to meet up with Nazi tattoo guy Graham Platner. This came up right after he said he’s open to supporting Democrats.

@believethat_ant @PhiliDips_ @mattyglesias nuclear and Hydrogen are the only two that and feasibility replace fossil fuels.

@SO0PERSALAD @PhiliDips_ @mattyglesias Nuclear is very important to a clean energy future but to think that it is the one and only option is silly.

Occurs to me today that I don’t actually know what diesel is with any specificity. It’s, um, kind of like gasoline but also different? Trucks use it. And Europeans? Freight trains?

@UN_SPExperts @gkatr @UNSRVAW @adequatehousing @PaulaGaviriaB @profbensaul @UNSRdevelopment @MichaelFakhri @UN_WGDAWG @smullallylaw @AshwiniKP_ Abolish the UN

UN experts call on #Israel to immediately end all practices of sexual & gender-based violence against #Palestinians and hold perpetrators accountable - dismayed at the inaction of the international community that permits total impunity. ohchr.org/en/press-relea…

@PhiliDips_ @mattyglesias Solar isn't effective 24/7 lmao not even close. . If you're serious about clean energy it begins and ends with nuclear power

@SO0PERSALAD @mattyglesias You don't need to know the difference between gasoline and diesel to know that it's idiotic to build infrastructure around a liquid that has to be mined from deep in the Earth, rather than using the solar energy that the planet is bathed in 24/7.

Despite the hysteria, decisions on the Supreme Court these days are actually LESS political and more adherent to the Constitution than in the past; it's that the left celebrated the previous liberal justices' willingness to be less constitutional and more political.

@Ssaniya_ I was told it was over 4.2 Billion

More than 75,000 people DIED in Gaza.

@bonchieredstate He is awesome. Definitely the most competent politician we've seen in a very long time.

It took DeSantis two days to get this done. Dude is simply a legend.

@tally_dad @bonchieredstate Not taking any action has a procedure? Lmfao

@bonchieredstate Typically, when I read a post like this I assume it's because the OP is ignorant of the procedures involved, and procedures is usually what Trump violated. I was right again.

The idea that it’s lawful for a president to grant temporary protective status, but that it’s unlawful for another president to let it expire remains absolutely insane.

@AugustCohen4 @bonchieredstate If they have the power to grant it, they have the power to recind it. This is not difficult

@bonchieredstate It's insane if you believe Presidents have absolute authority, yes. As the British King reminded us last night in his address to Congress, they do not in our system (or his).

@ComicDaveSmith Why does anyone care? I do not understand this

We don’t need to build a new ballroom. It’s a stupid idea.

@damintoell Both are true

@LibertyCappy Nope

Is this accurate?

If you say that something is fake, a false flag, a setup, a hoax, a psyop, or staged before you have gathered any evidence and had a chance to analyze it, you’re radicalized, and that radicalization is impacting your ability to assess reality.

Hasan Piker goes off on a Vietnamese refugee who escaped communism: “Shut the fuck up you stupid fucking idiotic old lady. Suck my dick old lady. Fuck this south Vietnamese motherfucking. Psychotic fucking refugee!”

@WalshFreedom Stop being a coward and admit you think this is completely justified

1. Political violence is always wrong. 2. It’s wrong, but not at all surprising, that someone would try to commit an act of violence against this President. Donald Trump is a cruel, hateful, divisive person, with the world’s biggest microphone, who incites violence against people every single day. He lives off of hate & division. Every day, Trump lights a match and spreads hate. So it’s not surprising someone would try to commit violence against him. It’s wrong, but not surprising.

@FederalDiamonds @chamath Are they able to change the criteria at will? If so then obviously it will creep to larger portions of the population

A billionaire arguing against a billionaire tax. That's worth knowing before evaluating the argument. Some of what Chamath says is real. The compliance infrastructure (asset disclosure, valuation, audit mechanisms, penalty provisions) is in the bill and worth scrutiny. Legitimate concerns exist about how wealth gets valued and disputed. Then the technique starts. "The creators named it the Billionaire Tax so you would get into a froth." That's accurate: naming legislation to obscure its scope is a real tactic. But Chamath immediately does the same thing: "Everyone Tax," "steal from all of you," "shifty language." He names the opposition's framing manipulation while deploying his own. That's mirror accusation. "It applies to every California resident who currently has assets or ever will." The bill applies to individuals with net worth over $1 billion. That is not every California resident. The legitimate concerns deserve a straight argument. They didn't get one. Serious thought leaders don't seem to be as serious as they once were.

The Billionaire Tax is actually an Everyone Tax. The Billionaire Tax is a new tax proposal written by four professors who don't believe in the American dream. Some of them aren’t even American…go figure. Despite its name, it applies to every California resident who currently has assets or ever will. The creators named it the Billionaire Tax so you would get into a froth andwouldn't look closely at what it actually does to you. On page twenty-six, it explains how the government can convert to an Everyone Tax without voter approval. They can also adjust the tax to be a yearly tax, not just one time…again, without your approval. Here's how the tax would work: As a voter, you're being asked to approve a tax that would require you to: 1. list all your assets and the value of each, then submit them to the California Franchise Tax Board. 2. authorize the tax board to appraise your assets and confirm the value of each. 3. pay a penalty of up to forty percent of your tax bill if the board determines your reported value was too low in their opinion. 4. allow the tax board to subpoena your financial records from every one of your financial institutions for auditing. This Everyone Tax runs 34 pages of shifty language describing how the government plans to take your assets. Read the fine print and decide for yourself. If this were truly a billionaire tax, it would be 3 pages. It’s 34 pages so that it can create the mechanisms to steal from all of you.

@samstein "WH"

i think it's important to note that the correspondents dinner wouldn't be at a White House ballroom even if it were built. The dinner is not a White House event. It's a WHCA event. Also, Trump had never attended before (would he host a dinner he didn't attend).

@blu_noz_pitbull @FakeNam55099865 @wideofthepost And that category alone would be the biggest box on the chart if it was attempting to be accurate

@FakeNam55099865 @wideofthepost Shoplifting is a type of larceny.

Stealing is bad never applies to crypto, or private equity, or Israeli land theft, or wall street's mass evictions in the subprime crisis aftermath, or to resources plundered in illegal foreign wars, or to concepts like time and well being, with mass imprisonment and austerity.

@blu_noz_pitbull @wideofthepost This is such a BS chart lmao

@wideofthepost Wage theft is far more pervasive than all other theft combined - but msm isn't posting daily screeds about that, are they? Manipulate, not inform.