Steve So

Naomi, you are really funny! Your attempts to justify these fabrications only further expose the lack of credibility in your story. A lie, no matter how cleverly acted or rationalized, is still a lie. Instead of masking dishonesty with excuses and concocting stories, why not confront the truth for once? Your quibbling is pointless. Hold tight, there’s no need to panic. Like I said, I’m not running X/Twitter as a business like you. I’m an investor, and I invested real money in FIRSTUVC to become a shareholder. I also have my R&D team, and we hold the design and patent ownership. QUESTION: Do you own the design and patent IP for the so-called ‘Nukit Torch,’ or is it just a label you’ve slapped on an existing product? Do you see the problem here? My advice to you is simple: stop showcasing your little DIY projects as if they’re groundbreaking innovations. You own nothing about the original design or any patent of the ‘Nukit Torch.’ Stop spreading misinformation and trying to justify it with baseless claims.

Ok Steve (everyone, Steve if the owner of @ERGO_HealthTech), post your documentation that shows the total UVC Optical Power of the Ergo X One- not just one measurement, at one angle- which is what Ewan measured to determine safety, not total power output. This was explained here in very simple English: x.com/NukitToBeSure/… This is what a complete spectral analysis with goniophotometric assay looks like: cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0552… This shows total power output- you would understand this, and have this data if you knew anything about the white-label OEM product you resell. (I've asked @TheOSLUVProject for my data unwatermarked and permission to post many times but they are too busy ripping off @VitalikButerin to do what they got their grant for or reciprocate for the massive amount of unpaid work I did for them) Here are the results of the GB/T 18801-2022 Air cleaner Appendix H Virus Removal Rate (Human Coronavirus HCoV-229E) test: cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0552… This proves the efficacy of the Torch kit in a hermetically sealed chamber. Now post your data Steve, show everyone how well your Ergo X One performs under GB/T 18801-2022. Oh right, you don't have it, because you know your product is ineffective as sold but lack the engineering knowledge to improve it. Not to worry Steve- in response to your concerns, I have submitted the Ergo X One both for pathogen testing and for goniophotometric analyses and will post the results on my websites when they are complete. I have stopped making the Torch, and they will be sold out within a month or two- had you the foresight of a newt, you could have smoothly stepped in to fill in the gap with a product that people thought might work. This was remarkably foolish on your part- you were about to have all my Torch customers. Instead, you decided to come at me, so I will ensure that everyone sees the hard data that you don't wish them to see. The Ergo X One will no longer be a viable product, and you don't have the ability to make something better the way I do. Here are the UL, CE and FCC, certs that you don't have, all posted on the sales page, the way you do not: cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0552… cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0552… cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0552… cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0552… cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0552… And we know you can't post an EPA facility certification: cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0872… ...because your lights are a @F222nm OEM product you had no role in engineering. I understand you have lost face and are feeling humiliated, but it was your choice to come at me- despite every time you have tried this, exactly the same thing happening. My advice would be to put your hurt feelings aside and think of the potential profits to be made if you very quietly go away and convince me to forget about you. I have nothing to lose defending a depreciated product of proven efficacy, you are desperately clinging to relevance in the market with a product that was never effective in the first place, that you have no supporting data on. It's lose/lose for you.

NukitTorch owners, you MUST know this! Read, understand, spread the word! It might be cheap money-wise, but @NukitToBeSure is playing games and using @EwanEadie reports to mislead everyone. NukitTorch has SUPER-LOW power. @SocialObGyne @mfpseth @fiothenerd @michael_hoerger #UL #FUV #FarUVC @IntlUVAssn

@bornofajackall @JonKHuff @NukitToBeSure @SocialObGyne @mfpseth @fiothenerd My intention is simply to unveil dishonesty and hypocrisy where it exists.

@SS002500SS @JonKHuff @NukitToBeSure @SocialObGyne @mfpseth @fiothenerd Yet you’ve failed to address the reasonable concerns with the way you represented your claims. Why’s that?

Thanks for pointing that out. Let me clarify: I don’t treat anyone as my competitor, and I’ve never opposed Far-UVC advocates; I would fully support them. However, before endorsing any product, it’s critical to verify the claims being made. While certifications like UL, CE, and FCC are listed on her website, the real question is whether these reports can be verified. My intention here isn’t to sell anything but to ensure transparency and accountability in this industry.

@SS002500SS @NukitToBeSure @SocialObGyne @mfpseth @fiothenerd Nukit has UL, CE, and FCC certification reports directly on their website which can be viewed by all. The fact your comparison has unknown listed shows that you did not research your competitors product and are not engaging in good faith.

I’ve never opposed any Far-UVC advocates - in fact, I fully support them and their efforts. I’ve never needed to step on anyone’s shoulders to stand out, and for the record, she’s not my competitor. If raising legitimate concerns makes me ‘incompetent’ or ‘disingenuous,’ then perhaps it’s time to reevaluate what accountability means in this industry.

@JonKHuff @SS002500SS @NukitToBeSure @SocialObGyne @mfpseth @fiothenerd As a competing far uv manufacturer, one has to wonder if he’s incompetent or disingenuous

@bornofajackall @NukitToBeSure @SocialObGyne @mfpseth @fiothenerd Of course, she’ll never show up with those unknown reports or UL certification claims - she knows exactly what she’s done. My post isn’t about selling anything; it’s about exposing the misleading information she’s relying on. Facts matter, and people deserve to know the truth.

@SS002500SS @NukitToBeSure @SocialObGyne @mfpseth @fiothenerd I’m just here for the inevitable nukit response 🍿🍿

Relax, my post has zero intention of selling anything. It’s purely to unveil misleading information for everyone’s benefit. If you’re comfortable trusting unverified claims and dismissing legitimate concerns, that’s your choice—but facts don’t lie, and neither should the products you rely on.

And sure enough, @NukitToBeSure already debunked this bullshit last month because she lives in the future. It's pretty disgusting to see Nukit's business competitors like Stevie be so quick to disguise their ads as legitimate "concerns" about safety. x.com/NukitToBeSure/…

Big red flag? The real red flag is blindly trusting a product without questioning its claims. Facts matter. If you’re okay with unknown reports and so-called certifications, that’s on you. But don’t dismiss legitimate concerns because they’re inconvenient for your narrative. I have zero intention of selling anything with this post; my goal is to unveil misleading information

@SS002500SS @NukitToBeSure @SocialObGyne @fiothenerd I already told you: what the screenshot claims to represent wasn't evaluating the Torch in the way it was manufactured to operate. It's inherently misleading AND ON PURPOSE SO YOU CAN SELL YOUR PRODUCT. Do you understand how that could be a big red flag for a potential customer?

@mfpseth @NukitToBeSure @SocialObGyne @fiothenerd Funny how calling out legitimate safety concerns is ‘slimeball behavior’ to you. Facts don’t change just because they’re inconvenient for your narrative. Maybe focus on the science instead of personal attacks, bro.

@SS002500SS @NukitToBeSure @SocialObGyne @fiothenerd For a guy who is hawking his own competing far-UVC light, claiming that your competition is scientifically & factually dangerous is pretty slimeball behavior! The Torches were sold as a set of 4, so even that means this screenshot is bullshit. Go tweet somewhere else, bro.

@ParentMishmash @NukitToBeSure @SocialObGyne @mfpseth @fiothenerd Please don't just focus on the unit price only, look at the real numbers. Numbers don't lie!

@SS002500SS @NukitToBeSure @SocialObGyne @mfpseth @fiothenerd @michael_hoerger Nukit Torches are sold as a set of 4 and specifically intended to be used as a complete set only, this comparison is misleading

Protect your beloved with the most advanced portable UV sterilizer - X ONE Give Her/Him a meaningful protective gift is better than a bouquet of roses. 20%OFF Promo Code: VDAY20 ergoht.com/xone #ValentinesDay #FUV #222nm #Love #ERGO222 #XONE

2022: The year we broke boundaries. X ONE launched as a game-changer. 2023: Still the smallest, Still the best. No competitor could match its size or performance. 2024: A leader without rival. ERGO222 X ONE continued to dominate, trusted by users worldwide. 2025: 3-years strong and still holding the crown. Until innovation takes another leap, ERGO222 X ONE remains unmatched. Small in size. Mighty in impact. #FUV #FarUVC #ERGO222 #XONE

Since 2022, #ERGO222 X ONE has been the world’s smallest yet most powerful portable Far-UVC sterilizer in its size. Trusted by #families, #travelers, and #Businesses worldwide, it delivers 99.9% pathogen protection in seconds - all while being safe for human use. Compact enough to fit in your pocket but mighty enough to safeguard your world. #Safety . #Protection . #Prevention

I strongly believe in the potential of Far-UVC technology to protect people from respiratory diseases, and I welcome companies @FarUVtech that bring innovative, effective solutions to the market. However, I cannot support or respect businesses like @NukitTobeSure that mislead customers under the guise of altruism while prioritizing profits over transparency and quality. Nukit Torch positions itself as a consumer-friendly, low-cost option, but its claims don’t hold up under scrutiny. The company has provided a misleading statement that they had a UL test report and were UL certified, BUT this was simply a test report from an unknown, unverifiable company - hardly the rigorous, third-party verification consumers expect for a product in this critical field. This lack of credible, transparent testing is a major RED FLAG and undermines trust in the product. Additionally, Nukit Torch’s minimal R&D investment and reliance on white-label components suggest that the company is cutting corners to maximize margins, not to help consumers. By pricing its product significantly lower than competitors, Nukit Torch creates the illusion of affordability while potentially compromising on quality and safety - something no responsible company should do in a field as critical as disinfection technology. What’s worse is the hypocrisy of framing itself as a selfless, mission-driven company. If Nukit Torch were truly committed to helping people, it would invest in rigorous testing, transparent reporting, and high-quality manufacturing - not rely on unverified claims and questionable cost structures. Instead, it appears to be profiting by misleading customers into thinking they’re getting a premium product at a bargain price, when in reality, they may be sacrificing reliability and efficacy. I hope to see more companies enter this space with genuine integrity, transparency, and a commitment to quality. But as long as Nukit Torch continues to mislead consumers with unverifiable claims and prioritize profits over people, it does a disservice not only to its customers but to the entire industry. #FUV #FARUVC

Folks are having math trouble, let me see if I can break this down. The Nukit Torch is four, 3w emitters for $345, or one 3w for $86 The Ergo222 is one, 3w emitter for $345 The Krypton-MVP is one, 5w? emitter for $599 Those other two manufacturers won’t release spectral data, but we can comfortably say the Nukit Torch is 1/4th the cost of any equivalent product. If you are manufacturing your own product- have to invest in tooling, packaging, support and warranty replacements- not OEM, not just distributing, you are looking at a 350% markup to cover all that. At 250% you’ll break even or maybe lose money most of the time. warriorforum.com/ecommerce-site… That means the Ergo222 probably costs about $86 to manufacture, the Krypton-MVP around $200. You can compare all three units and there is nothing magical going on with Nukit. The only way the math works is if Nukit is able to manufacture Far-UVC a bit more cheaply, but mostly just accepts much, much slimmer- margins. That’s the secret sauce- we earn less. The correct price point for the Torch kit, according to most industry formulas, is $599-799. Higher than that unit sales might drop off. This still makes it far, far cheaper than competitors (and third-party tested) and also does not devalue the product the way the current price point does. Every estimate I’ve been given predicted that I could double prices without halving sales- because the low price actually hurt sales and made the product look cheap. So, every Torch kit sold sells for $250 to $450 less than it should- if you doubt me, please show the above data to anyone who has e-commerce experience or has manufactured something in China and sold it online. They will tell you each Torch kit has been subsidized $250 to $450, there is no other explanation. There is no way my manufacturing costs are 1/4th to 1/3rd the cost of every other Chinese Far-UVC company using the exact same materials. I’m just profiting less- by $250 to $450 for each kit. I have sold about 5000 Torch kits in the past year and a half. Had I charged what I could have- $599-799, what I now realize I should have charged given how I’ve been treated, yes, I would have been very comfortable. But the way the math actually works- at $345, only a few dollars above my competitor's manufacturing costs, that’s barely a middle-class income. Any way you do the math, I could have easily- easily, pocketed high 6 to low 7 figures in the last year and a half if I’d charged even half of market rates. So I get why some of you think I must be well off- because in my position, you would have never tried to help anyone, would have profiteered off the sick, and would be doing quite well. But anyone who looks at my prices can do the math on the back of a napkin and see that the only plausible explanation is that I earn a very, very modest living. That's why walking away from this, or any given market, is so easy for me- I make more manufacturing virtually anything else, and without the abuse.

We have the testing report for the X ONE from Dr. Ewan Eddie, conducted in 2022. The reason we have not shared this report is that Dr. Eddie specified it was not intended for marketing purposes. We respect and uphold ethical business practices, and we recently obtained his permission to release it for clarification. This stands in contrast to individuals who exploit another person's credibility for their own gain. researchgate.net/publication/38…

It has come to my attention that @NukitToBeSure has been spreading misinformation about #XONE @ERGO_HealthTech I want to share the attached information, which shows that the X ONE offers exceptional value for your money, especially when compared to any of the low-priced options that come with uncertainty. Thank you all our esteemed customers for your ongoing support. By choosing our #originaldesigns, #patented & #awardwinning products, you have made a valuable investment in quality assurance. #ERGO222 #XONE #FARUVC

I genuinely hope that your 222 journey in exploring and advancing Far-UVC technology and indoor air quality is met with great success. These fields hold immense potential for improving public health and safety, and I believe that your contributions can make a significant impact. As you engage with others who share your passion, may you find valuable collaborations and insights that propel your efforts forward. Together, we can work towards creating healthier environments for everyone. Wishing you all the best on this important journey!

I embarked on the 222 journey of Far-UVC technology in 2020, and I sincerely wish you @UshioAmerica @UVMedico @FarUVSterilray @UVC_Far @FarUVtech @HealtheInc and everyone involved great success in this endeavor, enabling all to benefit and enhance their protection. #FarUVC #IAQ

@FarUVSterilray When lining up 150 units X ONE, it can effectively sanitize an area up to 150 meters away. Given these distinctions, I believe it is essential to consider whether this comparison is entirely fair. What do you think?

How many 3 watt Far-UV devices are needed to match the irradiance output of one GermBuster Sabre? Based on total irradiance output, you would need 50 3w devices. Only the power of Sterilray’s 222nm products can destroy airborne pathogens before they can infect others in a room.