SScriver

33.2K posts

SScriver

SScriver

@SScriver3

Katılım Şubat 2022
1.3K Takip Edilen378 Takipçiler
SScriver
SScriver@SScriver3·
Don't let the Carney Liberals fool you. Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre brought more votes to the Conservative Party in the last election in over 30 years. We stand with Pierre and Anna Poilievre, their family and the Conservative Party of Canada!
Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱@ryangerritsen

Lisa Raitt doesn’t flinch after saying “I have this vision in my head of Mark Carney as the Pied Piper, he's got the flute and he's whistling all these people across but in reality, don't forget, the Pied Piper, he attracted RATS" She’s not wrong.

English
0
0
0
19
SScriver
SScriver@SScriver3·
Don't let the Carney Liberals fool you. Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre brought more votes to the Conservative Party in the last election in over 30 years. We stand with Pierre and Anna Poilievre, their family and the Conservative Party of Canada!
SScriver tweet media
English
0
0
0
11
SScriver
SScriver@SScriver3·
@nationalpost • Toronto (University—Rosedale): CONSERVATIVE Don Hodgson • Toronto (Scarborough Southwest): CONSERVATIVE Diana Filipova • Quebec (Terrebonne): CONSERVATIVE Adrienne Charles
SScriver tweet media
English
0
0
0
6
SScriver
SScriver@SScriver3·
VOTE CONSERVATIVE With POLICIES TO MAKE CANADA THE FREEST,SAFEST, MOST PROSPEROUS COUNTRY EVER • Toronto (University—Rosedale): CONSERVATIVE Don Hodgson • Toronto (Scarborough Southwest): CONSERVATIVE Diana Filipova • Quebec (Terrebonne): CONSERVATIVE Adrienne Charles
SScriver tweet media
HoCStaffer@HoCStaffer

Hey @MarilynGladuSL, when are you stepping down for the by-election?

English
0
0
0
24
SScriver
SScriver@SScriver3·
VOTE CONSERVATIVE WHO HAVE THE POLICIES TO THRIVE AS THE FREEST,SAFEST, MOST PROSPEROUS! • Toronto (University—Rosedale): CONSERVATIVE Don Hodgson • Toronto (Scarborough Southwest): CONSERVATIVE Diana Filipova • Quebec (Terrebonne): CONSERVATIVE Adrienne Charles
SScriver tweet media
Josh Seanosky@JoshSeanosky

Mon take sur le 5e transfuge à Ottawa aujourd’hui, @MarilynGladuSL Primo, @MarkJCarney évite de retourner en élection même si tous les sondages le donnent largement vainqueur. Il n’a aucun intérêt à se soumettre au processus démocratique et devoir passer plusieurs semaines à aller à la rencontre du petit peuple. Aller chercher une majorité "propre", ça veut dire faire campagne, convaincre les électeurs, prendre un risque. Lui fait l’inverse. Il utilise le pouvoir pour se bâtir une majorité de façon détournée, en débauchant des députés élus sous d’autres bannières. Ce n’est pas illégal. Mais est-ce moral ? Est-ce légitime ? Secondo, Pierre Poilievre représente, à moyen terme, une menace réelle pour les Libéraux. Les résultats de la dernière élection parlent d’eux-mêmes. Les conservateurs ont obtenu leur meilleur score depuis Brian Mulroney. Ils n’ont pas gagné mais ils sont en position de le faire. Le scénario idéal pour les Libéraux, c’est 1) obtenir une majorité par la bande et 2) que @PierrePoilievre disparaisse, soit en quittant par lui-même ou en se faisant tasser de l’intérieur, notamment par les "Red Tories". Dans tous les cas, le citoyen lambda semble être la dernière des priorités dans leurs calculs. C’est leurs intérêts et leur portefeuille qui priment, avant tout. Comment ne pas être cynique après ça.

English
1
0
0
26
SScriver
SScriver@SScriver3·
VOTE CONSERVATIVE WHO HAVE THE POLICIES TO THRIVE AS THE FREEST,SAFEST, MOST PROSPEROUS! • Toronto (University—Rosedale): CONSERVATIVE Don Hodgson • Toronto (Scarborough Southwest): CONSERVATIVE Diana Filipova • Quebec (Terrebonne): CONSERVATIVE Adrienne Charles
SScriver tweet media
Sassygal@Sassygal1971

English
0
0
0
15
SScriver
SScriver@SScriver3·
VOTE CONSERVATIVE WHO HAVE THE POLICIES TO THRIVE AS THE FREEST,SAFEST, MOST PROSPEROUS! • Toronto (University—Rosedale): CONSERVATIVE Don Hodgson • Toronto (Scarborough Southwest): CONSERVATIVE Diana Filipova • Quebec (Terrebonne): CONSERVATIVE Adrienne Charles
SScriver tweet media
English
0
1
1
17
SScriver
SScriver@SScriver3·
Conservatives in our Party have the best leader and they are the real Team Canada! We, without a doubt have the strongest, wisest, most experienced Leader and BEST POLICIES ! OUR REAL CONSERVATIVES NEVER QUIT! WE GET STRONGER , MORE UNITED EVERY DAY!
SScriver tweet media
English
0
0
0
5
SScriver
SScriver@SScriver3·
VOTE CONSERVATIVE WHO HAVE THE POLICIES TO THRIVE AS THE FREEST,SAFEST, MOST PROSPEROUS! • Toronto (University—Rosedale): CONSERVATIVE Don Hodgson • Toronto (Scarborough Southwest): CONSERVATIVE Diana Filipova • Quebec (Terrebonne): CONSERVATIVE Adrienne Charles
SScriver tweet media
English
0
0
0
14
SScriver
SScriver@SScriver3·
@globeandmail VOTE CONSERVATIVE WHO HAVE THE POLICIES To MAKE US THE FREEST, SAFEST, MOST PROSPEROUS! • Toronto (University—Rosedale): CONSERVATIVE Don Hodgson • Toronto (Scarborough Southwest): CONSERVATIVE Diana Filipova • Quebec (Terrebonne): CONSERVATIVE Adrienne Charles
SScriver tweet media
English
0
0
1
1
SScriver
SScriver@SScriver3·
@MarcNixon24 VOTE CONSERVATIVE WHO HAVE THE POLICIES TO BE THE FREEST,SAFEST, MOST PROSPEROUS! • Toronto (University—Rosedale): CONSERVATIVE Don Hodgson • Toronto (Scarborough Southwest): CONSERVATIVE Diana Filipova • Quebec (Terrebonne): CONSERVATIVE Adrienne Charles
SScriver tweet media
English
0
0
0
1
Marc Nixon
Marc Nixon@MarcNixon24·
SHOCKING & DISTURBING Marilyn Gladu tried to be the Conservative Leader and Prime Minister of Canada under the conservative BANNER. She CLAIMED that democracy is IMPORTANT and fight for conservative VALUES. WTF has happened to CANADA 🇨🇦 💀
English
145
641
2.6K
41.7K
SScriver
SScriver@SScriver3·
Conservatives put your freedom, safety and prosperity FIRST and Foremost, in everything they do. They will work for you.. NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND! And only Conservatives have the policies to back up their promises!
SScriver@SScriver3

VOTE CONSERVATIVE THE PRESERVATION OF OUR FREEDOM, SAFETY & PROSPERITY IS CRUCIAL • Toronto (University—Rosedale): CONSERVATIVE Don Hodgson • Toronto (Scarborough Southwest): CONSERVATIVE Diana Filipova • Quebec (Terrebonne): CONSERVATIVE Adrienne Charles

English
0
0
0
2
SScriver
SScriver@SScriver3·
VOTE CONSERVATIVE WHO HAVE THE POLICIES TO THRIVE AS THE FREEST, SAFEST, MOST PROSPEROUS • Toronto (University—Rosedale): CONSERVATIVE Don Hodgson • Toronto (Scarborough Southwest): CONSERVATIVE Diana Filipova • Quebec (Terrebonne): CONSERVATIVE Adrienne Charles
SScriver tweet media
English
0
1
1
15
SScriver
SScriver@SScriver3·
VOTE CONSERVATIVE THE PRESERVATION OF OUR FREEDOM, SAFETY & PROSPERITY IS CRUCIAL • Toronto (University—Rosedale): CONSERVATIVE Don Hodgson • Toronto (Scarborough Southwest): CONSERVATIVE Diana Filipova • Quebec (Terrebonne): CONSERVATIVE Adrienne Charles
SScriver tweet media
English
0
0
1
18
SScriver retweetledi
Dean Allison
Dean Allison@DeanAllisonMP·
Gladu on January 11, 2026, “Really, the whole point of being an MP is to represent your constituents. So if they’re voting you in under one platform –for you to switch for whatever reasons, just seems to me to not be representing what you’re supposed to be there to represent. “We elected you under this banner, and if you don’t want to be under that banner, then we deserve a chance to have a redo.”
Dean Allison tweet media
English
34
691
1.9K
70.4K
SScriver
SScriver@SScriver3·
@saskatchewan_in It was not actually revealed hon, maybe falsely revealed, mainly it was planted, rumoured, lied about, anyway not true. And what is it they say.... a lie makes it around the world twice before the truth gets it's pants on. Anyway ... Love your articles. Thank you!
English
0
0
0
18
Melanie In Saskatchewan
Melanie In Saskatchewan@saskatchewan_in·
Cross the Floor. End Your Career. Dear Members of Parliament Allegedly Considering Crossing the Floor... Recently it was revealed that there are up to another ten MPs thinking about crossing the floor to @MarkJCarney's Liberals. If floor crossing is so principled, why are you afraid to ask the people who elected you first? There is a moment before a decision like this where everything slows down. Not publicly. Out there, it’s noise, talking points, strategic leaks, careful denials. “Rumours.” Up to ten of you, apparently. Unconfirmed. Unproven. And yet, specific enough that it feels less like speculation and more like a test balloon. But internally, it’s different. Quiet. Focused. Because before you act, you already know what this is, and more importantly, you know how it will be seen. Strip Away the Language... You were not elected as a free agent drifting between ideologies. You were elected under a banner, a platform, a set of commitments that voters used to make a decision. They did not vote for you in theory. They voted for you in context. Remove that context and you are not evolving. You are overriding. You are taking tens of thousands of votes and retroactively rewriting them without consent. You can call it pragmatism. You can call it stability. You can call it doing what’s necessary. Your constituents will not use any of those words. They will use one, maybe two… Betrayal. Traitor. The Voice You’re Trying Not to Hear... That hesitation you feel right now is not indecision. It’s recognition. Because somewhere beneath the strategy, beneath the conversations and the pressure, there is a very simple understanding pressing in on you. This crosses a line. You can rationalize it. You can bury it under language about national interest. You can tell yourself this is bigger than your riding. But if that were true, you wouldn’t be avoiding the one step that would make it legitimate. Asking them. The Question You Refuse to Put to Your Voters... If this is so defensible, so necessary, so clearly the right move, why won’t you ask your constituents first? Why not resign, sit as an independent, and run again under the banner you now claim reflects your beliefs? Is it because you already know the answer? Is it because the people who elected you would not follow you? Or is it because the idea of hearing “no” is so corrosive to your sense of self that you’d rather rewrite their vote than risk your ego? If this is leadership, why does it require this much avoidance to function? What You Think You’re Securing... You may believe this is a move toward relevance, toward influence, toward a longer career orbiting power. It isn’t. It is a branding decision. You will become known, permanently, as the one who crossed. The one who asked for trust and then treated it like something they stepped in and couldn’t scrape off their shoe fast enough. The one who decided that proximity to power mattered more than fidelity to the people who put you there. That reputation does not fade. It hardens. It follows you into nomination meetings where hands don’t go up. Into interviews where questions linger a second longer than they should. Into rooms where your name is met with a pause instead of support. And you’ll feel it. Not loudly. Quietly. Consistently. And Here Is the Part You’re Ignoring... Your new allies will never fully trust you. They will welcome you, yes. They will use your vote. They will count you, quote you, parade you as proof of momentum. But they will always know what you did. You crossed once. Which means you can cross again. So what exactly are you to them? A trusted colleague, or a convenient number that comes with an expiry date? Because you don’t become indispensable this way. You become temporary. Not a partner. A placeholder. What You Are Actually Participating In... Let’s remove the last layer of insulation. This is not about thoughtful realignment. It is not about evolving political identity. This is about manufacturing a majority that voters did not grant, using individual ambition as the mechanism to bypass collective consent. You are not stabilizing governance. You are short-circuiting it. If this is democracy, why does it need to be done around the voters instead of through them? There Is an Honest Path. You’re Avoiding It... If you truly believe your position has changed, there is a clean, defensible, democratic way to proceed. Resign. Sit as an independent. Run again under your new banner. Let your constituents decide whether they endorse your shift. Anything less is not courage. It is convenience, wearing a borrowed moral argument. The Ending You Haven’t Considered... You are likely telling yourself this will settle, that voters will move on, that memory is short and cycles reset. That this becomes a footnote. It won’t. Because this is not a policy disagreement. This is a character decision made in full view. And voters do not forget those. So ask yourself one final question before you take the step you are clearly being encouraged to take. And do it with a semblance os self respect for who you were when you were elected, instead of settling to be "that guy." If you cannot defend this decision directly to the people who elected you, what exactly are you defending it for? And when this moment is over, when the noise fades and the next election arrives, do you really believe they will forget what you showed them about who you are? Or are you betting your entire career that they won’t care enough to remember? Final Word... You knew what you were asking for when you ran. You knew what that vote meant, and you accepted it anyway. So don’t stand there now and pretend the rules changed or the stakes shifted. They didn’t. You did. And if you follow through on this, don’t dress it up as anything noble. It’s not complicated. It’s the same logic as an unfaithful spouse who thinks they’ve found something better and convinces themselves the original commitment no longer matters. You made a promise, and you’re breaking it because something else caught your eye. That’s not politics. That’s character. And once people see that clearly, they don’t forget it, they don’t forgive it, and they certainly don’t reward it. Melanie in Saskatchewan 👇🏻 open.substack.com/pub/melanieins… 👇🏻 buymeacoffee.com/melanieinsaska… #cdnpoli #ThinkTwice
Melanie In Saskatchewan tweet media
English
89
390
842
11.3K