Amita Sachdeva, Advocate

41K posts

Amita Sachdeva, Advocate banner
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate

Amita Sachdeva, Advocate

@SachdevaAmita

Advocate-on-Record (AOR)-Supreme Court of India-MBA Finance-Will pursue legal action against anyone who insults Sanatan Dharma.

India Katılım Mayıs 2017
3.9K Takip Edilen30.8K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate@SachdevaAmita·
🚨 Today, I have officially filed a criminal complaint against @RanaAyyub for her repeated defamatory and provocative posts targeting Hindu deities, spreading anti-India sentiments, and maligning the Indian Army. Such behavior is unacceptable and hurts the sentiments of millions. Ms. Ayyub's posts show a disturbing pattern of disrespect toward Hindu beliefs and the institutions that protect our nation. I urge authorities to take strict action against such divisive content and hold her accountable. I sincerely hope the police will take firm action against her. 🇮🇳 #DefendDignity #StandForIndia #CyberCrimeComplaint #RespectFaith A special thank you to @Prinstaz for her invaluable assistance in providing the relevant details for this matter.
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate tweet mediaAmita Sachdeva, Advocate tweet mediaAmita Sachdeva, Advocate tweet media
English
656
6.5K
17.7K
408.6K
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate@SachdevaAmita·
🚨 BREAKING: Government of India Orders Immediate Takedown of Dhruv Rathee’s (@dhruv_rathee) Video. The Grievance Appellate Committee (GAC), Ministry of Electronics & IT, Government of India, has passed an Order dated 15 July 2026 (Appeal No. 8321/2026) directing YouTube to remove the video titled “Can Hindus Eat Beef? | Kerala Story 2 Exposed” within 24 hours of receiving the Order. Note: Although the order is dated 15.07.2026, it has been uploaded today (19 July 2026). Key points from the GAC Order: - The video contains deliberate and malicious statements insulting Bhagwan Shri Ram, Bhagwan Shri Krishna, and Sita Devi. - It falsely claims they consumed meat (including deer meat) and alcohol, using distorted references from scriptures. - Such content hurts the religious sentiments of crores of Hindus and is against societal harmony. - YouTube’s arguments on “free speech” were not accepted. Freedom of expression comes with reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2) of the Constitution. The order was issued after Hon'ble Delhi High Court’s direction on 3rd July 2026 to decide the appeal within 15 days. Important: This observation and finding by the GAC that the video hurts religious sentiments will also have a strong bearing on the decision of the Ld. Magistrate before whom our petition seeking registration of FIR against Dhruv Rathee is pending for hearing on 10.09.2026. Faith cannot be mocked under the garb of “content creation.” Justice is being delivered step by step. Jai Shri Ram 🙏 A special thanks to Sr. Adv. Makarand D. Adkar Ji (@AdkarMakarand) for his invaluable guidance and support, and to our legal team for their tireless efforts and unwavering commitment. @OpIndia @TheBharatPost @TimesNow @SanatanPrabhat @MeghUpdates
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate tweet mediaAmita Sachdeva, Advocate tweet mediaAmita Sachdeva, Advocate tweet media
English
0
1
1
75
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate retweetledi
Sushil Kumar
Sushil Kumar@SushilGsl·
thank God , someone has taken it up. how easily they say, sab but uthaya jayenge etc aur rahega naam Allah ka .. Why is not against all principles of secularism ? It not only hurts Hindu sentiment but by not opposing it, minds of children start accepting it as truth. Ban it
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate@SachdevaAmita

A complaint has been filed on behalf of Hindu Janajagruti Samiti (@HinduJagrutiOrg) & Supreme Court Advocates. Well said by Sr. Adv. Makarand D. Adkar Ji (@AdkarMakarand) that if you will say, "सब बुत उठवाए जाएंगे... बस नाम रहेगा अल्लाह का।" - यह हमें मंज़ूर नहीं @Ramesh_hjs

English
0
1
4
188
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate retweetledi
Kuldip Kaur (मोदी का परिवार)
That lady shud b bookd fr singing d song which is a hate speech agnst Hindus,inciting d destructn of Hindu temples& deities& imposition of Sharia Law.She is married 2Muslim,Muslim by practice The Court &Govt mst band dat song in India.Such persons shud go& live in islamic country
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate@SachdevaAmita

A complaint has been filed on behalf of Hindu Janajagruti Samiti (@HinduJagrutiOrg) & Supreme Court Advocates. Well said by Sr. Adv. Makarand D. Adkar Ji (@AdkarMakarand) that if you will say, "सब बुत उठवाए जाएंगे... बस नाम रहेगा अल्लाह का।" - यह हमें मंज़ूर नहीं @Ramesh_hjs

English
1
6
6
196
वेदऋचा
वेदऋचा@VedaRicha·
@SachdevaAmita Didi, I think she is Nandita Narain, a former professor at St. Stephen's College, Delhi University. You can google please
English
2
1
19
1.2K
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate retweetledi
#Bagri
#Bagri@Bagriml·
@SachdevaAmita Well done .. Keep spreading your wings so that others can’t take Hindus for granted in future
English
0
2
2
119
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate retweetledi
Srinagesh(Hindhu) 🇮🇳
@SachdevaAmita Thanks Sachdeva Ji and thanks to all who helped in filling FIR on these scoundrels. It has become a habit for these maroons every time they get on any stage. Hope Police and court takes strict action.🙏🙏🙏🙏
English
0
1
2
125
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate retweetledi
Mai bhi Modijee ka Parivar
Mai bhi Modijee ka Parivar@NitinJoviJuvi·
@SachdevaAmita Big thank you all of you 🙏🏽 you are doing such a commendable work Vijayi bhava, Narayan tum/hum sabke sath hai 🙏🏽 Jai Hind
English
0
1
4
179
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate retweetledi
Simran Sachdeva
Simran Sachdeva@Simran_0607·
@SachdevaAmita Great work by all of you. These cockroaches need to in their boundaries.
English
0
2
3
135
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate retweetledi
anju
anju@_anjusharma·
@SachdevaAmita Appreciate your efforts Amita ji. Great job done🙏🏻
English
0
1
3
122
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate retweetledi
Pramod Kumar Singh
Pramod Kumar Singh@SinghPramod2784·
@SachdevaAmita Well done, Amita ji, for taking the fight to these uncouth men. Insulting Prabhu Sri Ram & Maa Sita can't be tolerated.
English
0
3
9
198
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate retweetledi
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate@SachdevaAmita·
Today, 18 July 2026, we submitted a detailed complaint to the ACP, Parliament Street Police Station, seeking the registration of an FIR under the relevant provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The complaint raises serious concerns regarding the hate speech and anti-national statements made during the protest held at Jantar Mantar under the banner of the "Cockroach Janata Party @Cockroachisback. " Individuals who participated in or supported the protest, including Kunal Kamra (@kunalkamra88), Abhijit Dipke (@abhijeet_dipke), Prakash Raj (@prakashraaj), Syed Kaleem Rasool Ilyas (father of Umar Khalid, @UmarKhalidJNU), and others, made statements that went far beyond a students' movement and amounted to insults against Hindu Deities and narratives perceived as supportive of terrorist or Pakistani interests. The complaint requests that the competent authorities investigate these allegations and take appropriate action in accordance with law. Heartfelt gratitude to Hindu Janajagruti Samiti (@HinduJagrutiOrg) for taking this important initiative. Special thanks to Sr. Adv. Shri Makarand D. Adkar (@AdkarMakarand) for his invaluable guidance, support, and for accompanying us during the submission of the complaint. We now await appropriate action from the authorities (@DCPNewDelhi, @DelhiPolice) in accordance with law. @Ramesh_hjs @KS_HJS @narendrasurve2 @shriram_l #StopHateSpeech #HinduJanajagrutiSamiti #JusticeForHindus
Amita Sachdeva, Advocate tweet mediaAmita Sachdeva, Advocate tweet mediaAmita Sachdeva, Advocate tweet media
English
95
689
1.5K
21.9K