Assaad Sakr 🇨🇦
504 posts


I in fact do not “trust the plan,” especially when the exact plan is never coherently articulated. The idea that we should reserve criticism of our elected leaders on the vague assumption that there must be some sort of “plan” that we mere mortals don’t understand is just embarrassing. How did “trusting the plan” work during COVID? How has it ever worked?
English

Some of us expressed great concern about the Iran War when it was first launched. We were shouted down and condemned as “panicans” and “blackpillers” and even Islamist sympathizers. But it’s pretty clear from how things have gone that our concerns were absolutely reasonable and legitimate. Maybe Trump will get us out of this thing soon and it still won’t spiral into a long and drawn out war. But even if that happens — and I’m not convinced it will — no thoughtful person can deny at this point that the spiral and long war scenario is very much a possibility. No reasonable person, at this stage, can say that our concerns were irrational. What looks irrational now — and always did — is the demand for blind allegiance and unthinking “trust” in our elected leaders, as though we are called to have faith in politicians like we have faith in God.
English

There are many false claims in this letter but let me address one specifically: that "Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation."
This is the same false claim that Democrats and some in the liberal media have been repeating over and over.
As President Trump has clearly and explicitly stated, he had strong and compelling evidence that Iran was going to attack the United States first.
This evidence was compiled from many sources and factors. President Trump would never make the decision to deploy military assets against a foreign adversary in a vacuum.
Iran is the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism.
The Iranian regime is evil. It proudly killed Americans, waged war against our country, and openly threatened us all the way up to the launch of Operation Epic Fury.
Iran was aggressively expanding their short-range ballistic missiles to combine with their naval assets to give themselves immunity – meaning they would have a degree of a capabilities that would give them immunity to hold us and the rest of the world hostage.
The regime aimed to use those ballistic missiles as a shield to continue achieving their ultimate goal – nuclear weapons.
The President, through his top negotiators, gave the regime every single possible opportunity to abandon this unacceptable course by permanently giving up their nuclear ambitions in exchange for sanctions relief, free nuclear fuel, and potential economic partnerships with our country.
But they would not say yes to peace because obtaining nuclear weapons was their fundamental goal.
President Trump ultimately made the determination that a joint attack with Israel would greatly reduce the risk to American lives that would come from a first strike by the terrorist Iranian regime and address this imminent threat to America’s national security interests.
All of this led to President Trump arriving at the determination that this military operation was necessary for U.S. national security, which is why he launched the massively successful Operation Epic Fury.
The Commander-in-Chief determines what does and does not constitute a threat, because he is the one constitutionally empowered to do so - and because the American people went to the ballot box and entrusted him and him alone to make such final judgments.
And finally, the absurd allegation that President Trump made this decision based on the influence of others, even foreign countries, is both insulting and laughable. President Trump has been remarkably consistent and has said for DECADES that Iran can NEVER possess a nuclear weapon.
As someone who actually witnesses President Trump’s decision-making process on a daily basis, I can attest to the fact that he is always looking to do what’s in the best interest of the United States of America — period.
America First.
Joe Kent@joekent16jan19
After much reflection, I have decided to resign from my position as Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, effective today. I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran. Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby. It has been an honor serving under @POTUS and @DNIGabbard and leading the professionals at NCTC. May God bless America.
English

@david_parker David, are ideas to evaluated based on their own merit, or based on who says them?
English
Assaad Sakr 🇨🇦 retweetledi

BREAKING: Free Speech Union of Canada launches Petition to Abolish Human Rights Tribunals in Canada 🇨🇦
Bold political action is necessary to begin to restore our fundamental freedoms, and politicians need to know they have citizen support.
If you are concerned about human rights tribunals and the erosion of free expression in Canada in the wake of the recent Barry Neufeld case, please SIGN HERE: fsucanada.ca/petition-to-ab…

English

The Human Rights Tribunal affirms that hateful statements or publications are not shielded from the Human Rights Code because they are part of public or political discourse, re: BCTF v. Neufeld. To read the full statement please visit: bchumanrights.ca/neufeld-decisi…




English

@MichaelSolberg @jkenney +1. And that was not always the case.
English

I find myself retweeting the chronic sanity and pragmatism of @jkenney seemingly every day. Anyone else? 🖐️🙋
English

Hello Nagwan,
1. Why are comments off on your post? Conversations are a cornerstone of democracies.
2. The UCP is correct in respecting the right of Albertans to voice their opinion. What's wrong with that?
3. Isn't shutting down a peaceful democratic movement totalitarian?
Nagwan Al-Guneid@NagwanYYC
Albertans are proud Canadians. The UCP is playing with the separatist fire. The premier needs to shut this down. Now. #ableg
English

@LilaGraceRose @JDVance @SLOTUS Congratulations! Interesting how the North American culture refers to the couple as pregnant. Possibly a more accurate description is that the mother is pregnant, and the couple is expecting.
English

@david_parker @PierrePoilievre David, there are proper ways of doing things.
English

@PierrePoilievre You are not very bright. Trump is trying to protect the arctic.
English

It is unacceptable for the U.S. to seize the territory of a sovereign country, including by threatening tariffs on other NATO countries.
Greenland is part of the Kingdom of Denmark and we support its territorial integrity.
Conservatives support NATO and Canada’s obligations as a NATO member.
Canada should strengthen the NATO alliance and rebuild our own forces in the Arctic to combat threats also coming from China and Russia and to protect our seas, skies and soil.
English

@peteremcc They're not alberta dollars, they're federal dollars.
English

Quebec is basically cheating the system.
They're using a loophole to transfer $5,000 per Albertan per year to Quebec.
And they've been allowed to get away with it for decades for the simple reason that there are more votes in Quebec than there are in Alberta.
Heather Exner-Pirot@ExnerPirot
🤯 “If Quebec raised power prices by just two cents per kilowatt hour, for example, it could lose over $4-billion in equalization.”
English

@truckdriverpleb @wyatt_claypool @OneBC_Caucus Instead of crossing the floor, why don't they just fire their leader?
English

@wyatt_claypool @OneBC_Caucus Conservative Party of BC MLA's should all cross the floor and join Dallas Brodie's party
Avoid a pointless leadership race. She is a real Conservative. Be courageous and follow her lead.
Rustad's career is cooked. Jump ship now and you'll be rewarded for your bravery
English

Billboard Chris is speaking in the BC legislature after being invited by @OneBC_Caucus.
The BC Conservative have banned their staff and MLAs from showing up.
Despite not being able to come to the event many have walked up to me and said they wished they could be there.

English

@GarvielStudio @Concern70732755 Actions do have consequences. As the aim is the betterment of society, they have to be sat down and have that lengthy, in-depth conversation. Hopefully they are enlightened, learn and change. If not, then consequences can follow as appropriate.
English

@SakrAssaad @Concern70732755 That’s the issue… they do not want to have the discussion. Gleefully celebrating an assassination is a blatant red flag that something is seriously wrong with such a person. Actions have consequences. Thoughts?
English










