Salt 💙 Writer|Email marketing| Ai Influencer

2.9K posts

Salt 💙 Writer|Email marketing| Ai Influencer banner
Salt 💙 Writer|Email marketing| Ai Influencer

Salt 💙 Writer|Email marketing| Ai Influencer

@Saltedebby

I help brands and startups with clear written content, email campaigns and AI workflow automation system

Imo, Nigeria Katılım Ekim 2020
72 Takip Edilen101 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Salt 💙 Writer|Email marketing| Ai Influencer
So this client reached out to me in the month of February and asks if I do academic research and writing and I said yes. She proceeded I told me that she needed help writing some academic work and I agreed to help. I would say it is approximately 4 months since I started
English
1
1
6
751
Dave
Dave@thesavvyghost·
@Stevenbogd Hiring as well, will comb thru comments
English
4
0
2
255
Steven Bogdanov
Steven Bogdanov@Stevenbogd·
HIRING a writer for my twitter content agency: $1k-$3k/mo. job scope: - ideate + write content for various niches - this includes longforms and articles - communicate with clients requirements: - fluent english - good work ethic & responsive - doesn't disappear randomly all the time - genuinely enjoys making this kind of content - prepared to commit for a minimum of 3 months ideally some experience, but training is included anyway. DM me the following: 1. why I should work with you 2. case studies/testimonials/portfolio 3. results you have generated for yourself or a brand (if any)
English
23
3
71
4.4K
Oracle of GOD!
Oracle of GOD!@Smith_pharez·
@Saltedebby @TheJohnOlonade You speak as though women have the power to place demands on those under the influence of spirits & sits under the doctrines of demons which they live by. Jesus came to save the sinful nature of man that gives birth to all these problems you've listed. JESUS died for ALL.
English
2
1
3
23
John Olonade Esq. 👨‍⚖️✒️
And this is why you don't need to be a feminist to advocate for the rights of men and women. Being a Christian is enough. Christianity is enough.📌 All other philosophies and ideals aimed at ensuring social justice are only an attempt at solving a problem that Christ already solved when he offered salvation to all.
Iyaloja of Fields 🙌🏽@bisolabadejo

What many people miss is that Christianity is not merely a religion one practices alongside other ideological identities. Christianity is a total worldview. It is a complete reorientation of reality through the Lordship of Christ. This is why the New Testament language of salvation is so expansive. We are not merely told to “attend” Christianity. We are said to be: born again (John 3:3), transferred into a Kingdom (Colossians 1:13), adopted into a family (Romans 8:15), made citizens of heaven (Philippians 3:20), transformed by the renewing of our minds (Romans 12:2), crucified and raised with Christ (Galatians 2:20). Christianity is not simply a belief system added onto an existing identity. It is the death and replacement of the old identity altogether. This is why phrases like: “Christian feminist,” “Christian nationalist,” “Christian liberal,” “Christian conservative,” can become problematic when the adjective begins to function as the interpretive lens through which Christianity itself is understood. Because Christianity was never designed to be a modifier. Christ is not an attachment to another worldview. Christ is THE worldview. The believer does not primarily derive meaning from ideology, tribe, politics, gender theory, class struggle, or culture. The believer derives meaning from union with Christ. Paul says in Galatians 2:20: “I have been crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me…” (KJV) Notice the violence of salvation language. Christianity is not self-improvement. It is death and resurrection. This is also why Scripture repeatedly presents the Kingdom of God as an all-encompassing reality: a Kingdom (Matthew 6:33), a new creation (2 Corinthians 5:17), a holy nation (1 Peter 2:9), a family (Ephesians 2:19), the mind of Christ (1 Corinthians 2:16). Even the word “Lord” is governmental language. To call Jesus “Lord” is to declare ultimate allegiance. This is where the C.S. Lewis idea becomes important. Lewis argued that Christianity is not merely a set of moral suggestions added onto life; it is the lens through which all of life is interpreted. Like light itself: You do not merely look at Christianity; you look through it and see everything else differently. So when someone says: “Jesus is a feminist,” the concern is not simply semantic. The concern is theological. Because Jesus is not best understood as a subset of a modern ideology. Rather, every ideology must bow before Christ and be examined through Him. Christianity certainly affirms truths that feminism identified: the dignity of women, the value of women, the protection of women from abuse, the spiritual equality of men and women before God. But Christianity also critiques every human ideology wherever it departs from God’s design. That is why the Christian’s highest identity is never ultimately: feminist, capitalist, socialist, traditionalist, progressive, nationalist, activist. The Christian’s highest identity is: “in Christ.” Colossians 3:11 says: “…Christ is all, and in all.” (KJV) Not Christ plus. Not Christ modified. Not Christ filtered through ideology. Christ is all.

English
8
29
114
6K
SimplyDera ◻
SimplyDera ◻@Simply_Dera1·
I want to empower 100 persons with the knowledge of AI art,animation and prompting. Type AI in the comments if you're interested.
English
206
10
167
12.2K
Salt 💙 Writer|Email marketing| Ai Influencer retweetledi
Iyaloja of Fields 🙌🏽
What many people miss is that Christianity is not merely a religion one practices alongside other ideological identities. Christianity is a total worldview. It is a complete reorientation of reality through the Lordship of Christ. This is why the New Testament language of salvation is so expansive. We are not merely told to “attend” Christianity. We are said to be: born again (John 3:3), transferred into a Kingdom (Colossians 1:13), adopted into a family (Romans 8:15), made citizens of heaven (Philippians 3:20), transformed by the renewing of our minds (Romans 12:2), crucified and raised with Christ (Galatians 2:20). Christianity is not simply a belief system added onto an existing identity. It is the death and replacement of the old identity altogether. This is why phrases like: “Christian feminist,” “Christian nationalist,” “Christian liberal,” “Christian conservative,” can become problematic when the adjective begins to function as the interpretive lens through which Christianity itself is understood. Because Christianity was never designed to be a modifier. Christ is not an attachment to another worldview. Christ is THE worldview. The believer does not primarily derive meaning from ideology, tribe, politics, gender theory, class struggle, or culture. The believer derives meaning from union with Christ. Paul says in Galatians 2:20: “I have been crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me…” (KJV) Notice the violence of salvation language. Christianity is not self-improvement. It is death and resurrection. This is also why Scripture repeatedly presents the Kingdom of God as an all-encompassing reality: a Kingdom (Matthew 6:33), a new creation (2 Corinthians 5:17), a holy nation (1 Peter 2:9), a family (Ephesians 2:19), the mind of Christ (1 Corinthians 2:16). Even the word “Lord” is governmental language. To call Jesus “Lord” is to declare ultimate allegiance. This is where the C.S. Lewis idea becomes important. Lewis argued that Christianity is not merely a set of moral suggestions added onto life; it is the lens through which all of life is interpreted. Like light itself: You do not merely look at Christianity; you look through it and see everything else differently. So when someone says: “Jesus is a feminist,” the concern is not simply semantic. The concern is theological. Because Jesus is not best understood as a subset of a modern ideology. Rather, every ideology must bow before Christ and be examined through Him. Christianity certainly affirms truths that feminism identified: the dignity of women, the value of women, the protection of women from abuse, the spiritual equality of men and women before God. But Christianity also critiques every human ideology wherever it departs from God’s design. That is why the Christian’s highest identity is never ultimately: feminist, capitalist, socialist, traditionalist, progressive, nationalist, activist. The Christian’s highest identity is: “in Christ.” Colossians 3:11 says: “…Christ is all, and in all.” (KJV) Not Christ plus. Not Christ modified. Not Christ filtered through ideology. Christ is all.
English
12
185
479
24.2K
Salt 💙 Writer|Email marketing| Ai Influencer retweetledi
Iyaloja of Fields 🙌🏽
There is also a conversation we need to have with Christian men. Because some of you speak about women with an underhanded disdain that is deeply un-Christlike, then hide behind “biblical order” to justify it. You cannot simply look at every Christian woman who resonates with feminism and dismiss her as rebellious. History has shown women have had reasons to fight. The Church is not entirely innocent in the abuse and silencing of women. We have sometimes weaponized Scripture instead of rightly dividing it. Some women did not become angry because they hate God. They became angry because people used God against them. There are women who have been talked down to, ignored, diminished, spiritually manipulated, and emotionally controlled in church spaces while men quoted “submission” at them like a threat. And when women begin to push back against that, you cannot automatically label them rebellious without enough humility to ask: “What exactly are they reacting to?” Because even in Scripture, God did not condemn women who challenged systems. The daughters of Zelophehad fought. They contended. They challenged a structure that disadvantaged them. And God said: “The daughters of Zelophehad speak right.” (Numbers 27:7) Not rebellious. Not dishonorable. Not with the spirit of Jezebel… Right. Some of you need to realize that being male does not automatically make your interpretation superior. Statements like: “Woman was created later, therefore she is lesser,” “Eve was deceived, therefore women are inferior,” “Men are naturally superior because Adam came first,” do not make you sound spiritually mature. They make you sound biblically unintelligent. Genesis 1 says: “Male and female created he them.” God did not create woman as an afterthought. He had both genders in mind from the beginning. And Genesis 2 is not about superiority. It is about order. Order does not mean value. Christ and the Church have order. The Father and the Son have order. Order is not inferiority. In fact, biblical leadership is not domination. Christ never used His position to belittle the Church, He died for her. So how did some Christian men become more arrogant than Christ? You brandish submission like a weapon. You speak about masculinity like it is superiority. You talk about women as though leadership means lordship. News flash, you are not a biblical male. You are carnally minded and we all know what that means. To lead in our Kingdom is to serve. Where is your service?! And if creation order is your argument for superiority, then goats should be greater than men because animals were created before Adam. The logic collapses immediately. The truth is many women are angry because they encountered distortion disguised as doctrine. Male ego preached as theology. Misogyny defended with proof texts. And instead of constantly rushing to call women rebellious, maybe Christian men need enough self-awareness to ask: “Have we represented Christ properly?” Because many women are not rejecting Christ. They are reacting to men who looked nothing like Him. Love and Light… with a sprinkle of Holy Ghost Fire.
English
121
1.4K
3K
197.9K
Salt 💙 Writer|Email marketing| Ai Influencer
@BrotherPossible She is a good example of a Christian feminist but we do not accept that some christian women can identify themself as a feminist. feminism is not the battle against the leadership of men in marriage, it is against the evil done to women and little children.
English
0
0
2
122
Brother Possible
Brother Possible@BrotherPossible·
Just know what you're doing and when women advocacy becomes hatred and antagonism against men because many of the things camped under "feminism" today is unchristian. A good example is Mrs. Ibukun Awosika.
English
4
4
9
10.6K
Salt 💙 Writer|Email marketing| Ai Influencer
God bless you
Iyaloja of Fields 🙌🏽@bisolabadejo

There is also a conversation we need to have with Christian men. Because some of you speak about women with an underhanded disdain that is deeply un-Christlike, then hide behind “biblical order” to justify it. You cannot simply look at every Christian woman who resonates with feminism and dismiss her as rebellious. History has shown women have had reasons to fight. The Church is not entirely innocent in the abuse and silencing of women. We have sometimes weaponized Scripture instead of rightly dividing it. Some women did not become angry because they hate God. They became angry because people used God against them. There are women who have been talked down to, ignored, diminished, spiritually manipulated, and emotionally controlled in church spaces while men quoted “submission” at them like a threat. And when women begin to push back against that, you cannot automatically label them rebellious without enough humility to ask: “What exactly are they reacting to?” Because even in Scripture, God did not condemn women who challenged systems. The daughters of Zelophehad fought. They contended. They challenged a structure that disadvantaged them. And God said: “The daughters of Zelophehad speak right.” (Numbers 27:7) Not rebellious. Not dishonorable. Not with the spirit of Jezebel… Right. Some of you need to realize that being male does not automatically make your interpretation superior. Statements like: “Woman was created later, therefore she is lesser,” “Eve was deceived, therefore women are inferior,” “Men are naturally superior because Adam came first,” do not make you sound spiritually mature. They make you sound biblically unintelligent. Genesis 1 says: “Male and female created he them.” God did not create woman as an afterthought. He had both genders in mind from the beginning. And Genesis 2 is not about superiority. It is about order. Order does not mean value. Christ and the Church have order. The Father and the Son have order. Order is not inferiority. In fact, biblical leadership is not domination. Christ never used His position to belittle the Church, He died for her. So how did some Christian men become more arrogant than Christ? You brandish submission like a weapon. You speak about masculinity like it is superiority. You talk about women as though leadership means lordship. News flash, you are not a biblical male. You are carnally minded and we all know what that means. To lead in our Kingdom is to serve. Where is your service?! And if creation order is your argument for superiority, then goats should be greater than men because animals were created before Adam. The logic collapses immediately. The truth is many women are angry because they encountered distortion disguised as doctrine. Male ego preached as theology. Misogyny defended with proof texts. And instead of constantly rushing to call women rebellious, maybe Christian men need enough self-awareness to ask: “Have we represented Christ properly?” Because many women are not rejecting Christ. They are reacting to men who looked nothing like Him. Love and Light… with a sprinkle of Holy Ghost Fire.

English
0
0
0
320
Salt 💙 Writer|Email marketing| Ai Influencer
@_FarouqOlami @yung_pheelz01 Some ran me a fake transfer of almost 300k last month in a phone store that I am working, because of it I was not paid last and i would have to pay the complete money, I don't even know if I would be paid salary again till the money is complete. I am just crying everyday
English
0
0
0
72
rrbauer
rrbauer@rrbauer·
@sunnkssdseraph I disagree. Giving women a voice to vote and hold office has arguably wrecked our nation. Women are empathetic, and that is good in a localized, family context. But it is toxic in a larger, governmental context. Look around you - do you think our nation is better since suffrage?
English
6
0
4
801
DEE ❤
DEE ❤@Olami_deeEbony·
I went to the salon today to make my hair, and the hairdresser asked one of her girls to help wash my hair. As she was washing it, I honestly struggled with her body odour but I just stayed calm till she finished. Afterwards, I quietly called her aside and asked, “Fine girl, what body spray do you use?” She said, “I don’t use body spray because I don’t like it.” I then politely told her that body spray is important because sometimes people may not realize when they have body odour. Omo before I knew it, this girl started raising her voice 😭 Saying I was insulting her and talking down on her. Her madam came over to ask what happened and she immediately told her I said she’s smelling. The madam too got upset and said I shouldn’t speak to her staff like that. I just carried my bag and left quietly without explaining myself. Whoever wants to smell should smell abeg 😭 I don’t care again.
English
227
334
3.9K
210.1K