Sam Altarac

4.7K posts

Sam Altarac banner
Sam Altarac

Sam Altarac

@SamAltarac

HS Math & Science teacher | Math & Science education consultant | CogSci | Here to learn.

Montréal, Québec Katılım Nisan 2012
1.4K Takip Edilen587 Takipçiler
Sam Altarac retweetledi
Dylan Wiliam
Dylan Wiliam@dylanwiliam·
If you teach anyone at all, and you don't know about @helenrey's CogSci book summaries, you are missing out. It's a wonderful resource summarizing the most important books on cognitive science: bit.ly/3Q7dEnG
English
4
125
515
39.7K
Sam Altarac retweetledi
Sam Altarac retweetledi
Robert Pondiscio
Robert Pondiscio@rpondiscio·
We're actually at the high-water mark of admitting this. Just substitute "Hirsch was right" any time someone says "knowledge-rich curriculum" (its advocates tend not to acknowledge or are ignorant of their debt to Hirsch). But the hurdles to effective implementation remain high.
Joshua D Phillips@JoshPhillipsPhD

I wish the educational system would just admit that E.D. Hirsch was right and then structure the curriculum accordingly.

English
3
20
96
5.3K
Sam Altarac retweetledi
Helen Reynolds MBE
Helen Reynolds MBE@helenrey·
This is a REMARKABLE book. The breadth and depth are breathtaking. To find out what has a good likelihood of working in your classroom and why that might be, this research-informed +nuanced book is for you! Thanks so much @hruizmartin! Summary here: itsalearningcurve.education/cogsci-book-su…
Helen Reynolds MBE tweet media
English
4
88
423
22.5K
Sam Altarac retweetledi
Brendan Lee
Brendan Lee@learnwithmrlee·
Ever had a student ace a test on Friday and forget everything by Monday? In this clip @KimberlyBerens5 explains exactly why that happens: we are measuring the wrong thing. Accuracy is a false ceiling. If we want learning to actually stick we need to focus on true fluency. Watch the clip to hear why fluency is the only functional measure of mastery and how it leads to retention, application and endurance. Catch our full chat on the latest episode of Knowledge for Teachers! 🎧👇 learnwithlee.net/s04e05-dr-kimb…
English
8
13
73
6.2K
Sam Altarac retweetledi
Robert Pondiscio
Robert Pondiscio@rpondiscio·
I'd never heard of Paolo Freire until ed school. I realized instantly he had nothing useful to say to me as a South Bronx teacher. It's a sin he still gets assigned, not because it indoctrinates teachers, but because it wastes their time.
Tom Bennett OBE@tombennett71

A classic from the vaults

English
13
14
147
28.6K
Sam Altarac retweetledi
Tom Bennett OBE
Tom Bennett OBE@tombennett71·
You cannot teach critical thinking. You can teach domain specific expertise, which enables you to think critically about that domain. Brilliant chess players do not make great military commanders. More problematically, people who think they have great critical thinking skills are often the ones who get hoodwinked by any fashionable idea, because they lack the domain expertise to interrogate nonsense.
James Melville 🚜@JamesMelville

“I think critical thinking should be a school subject. I've always encouraged my kids to question absolutely everything.” ~ @sequi_simon Completely agree. Critical thinking should be on the school curriculum. But governments hate critical thinkers.

English
99
126
841
81.2K
Sam Altarac retweetledi
beanie0597_2.0
beanie0597_2.0@0Beanie05923291·
“Our lack of a systematic, sequential, and shared curriculum induces low literacy and low wisdom. That poses a deep danger to civic competence and thus to democracy itself.”
Daniel Willingham@DTWillingham

New article from E. D. Hirsch and me on (1) the evidence for the importance of knowledge in reading; (2) why it’s taken so long for people to acknowledge the evidence; (3) what we predict if the role of knowledge is taken seriously. educationnext.org/rediscovering-…

English
0
3
21
1.1K
Sam Altarac retweetledi
Steven Pinker
Steven Pinker@sapinker·
It's not just phonics: Schools have failed to teach reading because they ignore 50+ years of findings in cognitive psychology that reading depends on general knowledge. ED Hirsch has been banging this drum for a long time but Ed Schools shut their ears because the whole idea was unromantic & had a vaguely right-wing aroma. Now he joins with Dan Willingham to make a strong case that kids can't read if they don't have the background knowledge that makes sense of the rarer vocabulary, allusions, and understandings that allow us to read between the lines - which all reading requires. educationnext.org/rediscovering-…
English
1
947
3.8K
225.6K
Sam Altarac retweetledi
Chase Young
Chase Young@ChaseJYoung1·
Struggling readers don’t catch up with easier books. In fact, they often fall further behind. Less complex text = • less vocabulary exposure • less syntax development • less knowledge building The gap doesn’t close. It widens. Better inputs → better readers.
English
10
27
127
5.2K
Sam Altarac retweetledi
Doug Lemov
Doug Lemov@Doug_Lemov·
Sadly this is what passes for science of learning in many us schools.
Dylan Wiliam@dylanwiliam

@Principal_Jon Students can't learn from teachers they don't like You only use 10% of your brain The cone (or pyramid, or triangle) of learning For more, take a look at "Instructional illusions" by Kirschner, Hendrick and Heal (I liked it so much I wrote a foreword for it).

English
10
9
135
30.8K
Sam Altarac retweetledi
Dylan Wiliam
Dylan Wiliam@dylanwiliam·
@C_Hendrick Also, the way that most people use the term "forgotten" refers to retrieval strength. What we are often unaware of is the way that things we learned long ago are still there, just waiting to be reactivated...
English
3
7
52
6.3K
Sam Altarac retweetledi
Daniel Buck, “Youngest Old Man in Ed Reform”
“Students don’t need synthetic phonics instruction. They need good books to discover their own love of reading.” “Students don’t need to memorize their math facts. They need authentic problems to discover the joy of math.” Same exact vibes. Same exact mistake.
Daniel Buck, “Youngest Old Man in Ed Reform” tweet media
English
38
54
458
17.3K
Sam Altarac
Sam Altarac@SamAltarac·
I don’t remember if it was @adamboxer1 or @Doug_Lemov, someone explained this as a form of “opting out” of class - they know if they wait long enough, the teacher will just give the answer and they won’t have to think too hard. @rastokke called it being “cognitive misers” - the brain wants to use the least effort at all times.
English
1
0
2
30
tetheredtoed
tetheredtoed@tetheredtoed1·
I was soooo skeptical of this and I tried it in earnest this week (granted small group) and damned if it didn’t work like @sharemath said. I knew they were so reliant on the teacher eventually giving them the answer and I knew they’d been taught it… so I wrote the problem in the steps silently and paused without filling in for them It’s such a proof point of CLT
English
2
0
8
358