BitRoot

859 posts

BitRoot banner
BitRoot

BitRoot

@SamRatio

I’m an explorer and curious to learn. Im a late entrepreneur and lover of tech. my mission is to make a difference in the lives of others. 🔥

Sydney, New South Wales Katılım Ekim 2012
393 Takip Edilen97 Takipçiler
BitRoot
BitRoot@SamRatio·
@richimedhurst How are these deals meant to be successful when the region is unstable.
English
0
0
2
905
Richard Medhurst
Richard Medhurst@richimedhurst·
While everyone watched Iran, Washington quietly finalized Nord Stream’s replacement: Poseidon. 4 gas deals in 4 months 🇸🇾🇮🇱🇬🇷🇨🇾 $3 trillion dollars I spent weeks on these maps and this investigation to expose the US agenda in Iran and globally. richardmedhurst.substack.com/p/how-the-us-p…
Richard Medhurst tweet media
English
195
3.2K
5.7K
473.8K
BitRoot
BitRoot@SamRatio·
I build data centres and it is definetly a fragile system when you are energy dependent. Energy dependent means, government approved and protected infrastructure including grids, also, ensuring sufficient backing storage is available for a sustainable energy supply to site. None of the data centres built today can last more than a week without power from grid. And Iran showed the billion dollar investment in the GCC data center space was knocked out within the first 10 days. The issue here is that the AI bubble 🫧 is designed to fail so only a few can hold all the cards or few companies will be super successful and rich so the race has begun Similarly to tech bubble. The problems with Palantir are four things: 1. The assumptions that the entire world will be digital. 2. That the entire world will be politically stable. 3. that it relies on governement power to ensure a monopoly over the holy grail of AI models. Meaning heavily dependent on the US government to maintain relative power globally. 4. Full reliance on Government funding. Extending its service across the western world. This is a byproduct of security concerns. Under a unipolar system governments tend to be less interested in security when you are the only great power in the system. In a mulitpolarity the expectations will be on security competition against rivalry and likely palantir will be increasing in demand for surveillance domestically and covertly internationally. Under the guise of national security the US and the west will likely to become a nanny state hindering on th foundations of the western value that people romanticized about across the century. The tectonic shift in global order may be interpreted as looming possibilities in the west however the good news multipolarity will usher in great collaboration and prosperity to the global south which is rather important to consider when trying to understand the geopolitics of today.
English
0
0
0
9
BitRoot
BitRoot@SamRatio·
Congratulations Scott to you and your daughter and family. Marceline will be proud to have a grandfather with a heart of a lion and an eye of an eagle to protect her, give her courage and wisdom as you often do to many of us (old and young) and mind her way through life. we wish her a long life filled with health and happiness and also wish a speedy recovery to your daughter. God bless
English
1
0
4
118
Scott Ritter
Scott Ritter@RealScottRitter·
On Baby's, Bebo's and Babu's My daughter and her husband have blessed my wife and I with a lovely little Granddaughter. Now what? A ray of hope flickers in the sky A tiny star lights up way up high All across the land, dawns a brand new morn This comes to pass when a Child is born A silent wish sails the seven seas The winds of change whisper in the trees And the walls of doubt crumble, tossed and torn This comes to pass when a Child is born When a Child is Born, Fred Jay (sung by Johnny Mathis). Marceline Salome MacDowell—all of six pounds, ten ounces—came into this world at 10 am on April 22, 2026. Read more: scottritter.substack.com/p/on-babys-beb…
Scott Ritter tweet media
English
77
194
3.5K
40.6K
BitRoot
BitRoot@SamRatio·
@alon_mizrahi What happened to the flotillas that tried to break the siege whilst being attacked in international waters heading to Gaza which technically as an independent state you would think they will be up in arms about the int law violations.
English
0
0
3
31
BitRoot
BitRoot@SamRatio·
In a multipolar system’s higher security would be required to track and monitor activities under the guise of national security. Under a unipolar this was never necessary. The interesting question here is this: when the US became the only nation state to be classified as the only pole and with this tremendous power wealth and prestige, why did it give it away? What was the reason to create a world of insecurity uncertainty and fear, the Fukuyama thesis after the collapse of the Soviet Union was meant to usher in stability prosperity and peace arguing where we may enter a state of boredom. Obviously this didn’t unravel this way at all in fact you can argue the opposite. However one key take you can draw from his thesis is the security aspect of it. Because the unipolar was marked the beginning of new liberal system where wars will cease to exist, this meant that extreme surveillance to the micro level will never be necessary to the state. What this means that under a multipolar, and intense security competition between great powers, this will inevitably have an impact on the micro level with respect to surveillance, security, and intelligence (data) which are paramount for survival. The new world will create volatility insecurity and confusions for a while but as always people will vote with their feet. And when a lot of families sought refuge in Europeans and western countries we will certainly see and outflow of these families flocking back to their native countries settling back there where they feel safe again. This may be a good thing for some but also you can argue that this would be bad for a western population that is in decline. Did the boogeyman trap have something to say about our psyche and for this reason we gave up the prestige we had in order to continue chasing fighting and killing monsters we created to the point we pushed small powers to be great powers in order to play that game again?. or is it merely business interest alone and global elites playing a game of chess in order to preserve their own lineage of legacies but how long would that last for because those that attempted to do this in the past their blood don’t exist with us today. (I think it would be foolish to think that although the do have some influence but not enough to outsmart human nature).
English
0
0
0
51
Simon Dixon
Simon Dixon@SimonDixonTwitt·
@WatcherGuru The technical industrial complex came from the military industrial complex. Technology for killing people was always what drove and incentivised innovation. Defence was never the game. The police & survellance state is the main game today. Pre-crime is coming home.
English
7
23
196
4.5K
Watcher.Guru
Watcher.Guru@WatcherGuru·
JUST IN: Google $GOOGL signs classified AI deal with the Pentagon.
Watcher.Guru tweet mediaWatcher.Guru tweet media
English
311
549
5.3K
420.2K
BitRoot
BitRoot@SamRatio·
@baoshaoshan The west has shilled for the US crimes for decades. What do US citizens get from allies like Ixrael
English
0
0
0
4
BitRoot
BitRoot@SamRatio·
@EthanLevins2 How did they bring excavators and diggers inside Lebanon
English
1
0
1
290
Ethan Levins 🇺🇸
Ethan Levins 🇺🇸@EthanLevins2·
Israel destroying solar panels in Debil, Lebanon. This is a Christian village. Wow....
English
460
5.4K
13.7K
211K
BitRoot
BitRoot@SamRatio·
Thanks yanis. And if Iran acted as a democratic state, that state would have been another satellite state same as Greece. So the question I have for you, when are you going to admit whether you agree or not that the behaviour of the state of Iranian republic is merely driven by the ugly colonial forces you shaped your whole career on fighting against. But because of the weakening of the left in 80 and 90s and later the CIA project dismantling it in universities, it isn’t difficult to see a theocratic society to defend itself and protect its citizens independtly putting its body on the line and now we are seeing the fruits of it. Whether you agree or disagree with a theocratic system in Iran, when you are under ongoing threats survival is the only subject should be discussed and not get embroiled in philosophical debates about what should and shouldn’t. Should the left movement have won in Iran, (which most moderate in Iran are leftist), the hegemony of the west would have been more vile and destructive today.
English
0
0
0
148
Yanis Varoufakis
Yanis Varoufakis@yanisvaroufakis·
Είμαστε εδώ για τα 180 κορίτσια που σκότωσαν οι Αμερικανοί και οι Ισραηλινοί στην πόλη Μινάμπ την πρώτη μέρα του πολέμου. Είμαστε εδώ επειδή ο πρόεδρος των ΗΠΑ κήρυξε πολιτισμικό πόλεμο εναντίον ενός από τους αρχαιότερους πολιτισμούς της ανθρωπότητας. Είμαστε εδώ επειδή η Ευρώπη είναι ανύπαρκτη και δεν έχει καμία συμμετοχή σε μια ειρηνευτική προσπάθεια. Το αντίθετο, είναι συνένοχη στον πόλεμο που γίνεται αυτή τη στιγμή στο Ιράν. Είμαστε εδώ επειδή το ελληνικό κράτος έχει παραδοθεί, έχει δορυφοροποιηθεί πλήρως στο Ισραήλ και όχι μόνο στο ΝΑΤΟ και τις ΗΠΑ. Ο ελληνικός λαός, ο δικός μας λαός, συμπάσχει με τους Παλαιστίνιους, συμπάσχει με τους Σύριους, συμπάσχει με τους Λίβυους, συμπάσχει με όλους τους λαούς που ήταν θύματα της αμερικανο-ισραηλινής επιδρομής. mera25.gr/synantisi-g-va…
Ελληνικά
194
1.6K
5.2K
76.2K
BitRoot
BitRoot@SamRatio·
@Glenn_Diesen Why are these sanctions not used before. Running out of ideas.
English
0
0
0
9
Glenn Diesen
Glenn Diesen@Glenn_Diesen·
The EU "peace project": 21 sanctions packages, but no diplomacy...
Glenn Diesen tweet media
English
187
366
1.4K
29.1K
BitRoot
BitRoot@SamRatio·
@georgegalloway George can you please ask the elephant in the room question: why is this airport functioning?
English
0
1
2
197
BitRoot
BitRoot@SamRatio·
He is running out of ideas. No win in Iran no win Lebanon so he uses the same tactics using his house slaves in Lebanon via the media to show the world the world that a deal with Israel was always hindered by Hezbollah. But what they don’t tell you is that in Ben Morris book Israel was already meddling with Lebanese politicians since late 40s early 50s.
English
0
0
0
171
Sulaiman Ahmed
Sulaiman Ahmed@ShaykhSulaiman·
BREAKING: NETANYAHU: I had an excellent conversation with President Trump. He is pressuring Iran very hard economically and militarily. We have started a process to achieve a historic peace between Israel and Lebanon. It is clear to us that Hezbollah is trying to sabotage it.
English
48
78
395
46.4K
BitRoot
BitRoot@SamRatio·
That’s not new to Lebanon. History is changing and unfolding in front of our eyes and these long time political leaders”age is expiring and to quote malcom x the Lebanese politicians mainly the flange and current sunni Saudi backed politicians are mere “house slaves” and is expected for their behaviour to continue until the the chess board of west-Asia is changed in favour of Iran. It is inevitable and the political system in Lebanon will be broken before it gets rebuild again.
English
1
1
5
538
Ibrahim Majed
Ibrahim Majed@IbrahimMajed·
𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗜𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗦 𝗢𝗙 𝗟𝗘𝗕𝗔𝗡𝗢𝗡 Throughout history, I have never read or heard of a betrayal as profound as the one unfolding in Lebanon today. While Israel bombs the south, leveling villages and inflicting unspeakable suffering on civilians, a group within our own borders, led by the President, the Prime Minister, and the Lebanese Forces, a right wing christian group historically affiliated with Israel, has reached a bottomless depth of depravity. Under the hollow guise of "political pragmatism," they are whispering in the ear of the aggressor, encouraging the continued slaughter of their own countrymen who stand for the resistance. It is a disgrace beyond words to hold direct, face-to-face meetings with those spilling Lebanese blood while the smoke still rises from our homes. Shaking the hands of the executioner while the bodies of your citizens are still being pulled from the rubble is not "diplomacy"; it is the most intimate form of treachery. These people will be remembered as the ultimate traitors. Even the masters they serve, the Israelis and the Americans, view them with nothing but contempt. They are being used as temporary tools, and history will discard them as nothing more than treacherous lowlifes.
Ibrahim Majed tweet media
English
71
663
1.3K
23.3K
BitRoot
BitRoot@SamRatio·
@SimonDixonTwitt Only because I..rael cannot commit to a ceasefire and killing civilians. And the US and Europe can’t do anything about it.
English
2
0
8
1.1K
Simon Dixon
Simon Dixon@SimonDixonTwitt·
ECB chief Christine Lagarde warns of possible food rationing due to fertilizer disruptions “A third of fertilizers are shipped through the Strait of Hormuz... that is at risk.”
English
103
200
672
319.3K
BitRoot
BitRoot@SamRatio·
@DanielLDavis1 What if all these wars waged for the purpose of destabilizing and the destruction of a society. That’s all. As long as the US homeland is not impacted the cost is always by someone else dumb enough to buy it.
English
0
0
3
1.1K
Daniel Davis Deep Dive
Daniel Davis Deep Dive@DanielLDavis1·
President Trump today convened a “war cabinet” meeting in the White House to consider what happens next week when the current cease-fire expires next Wednesday morning. What he should conclude is that this “excursion“ was a dramatic mistake, and recognize that the objective of defeating Iran militarily is not possible with the troops we have allocated and the time we have available, and instead of proving that by trying to restart the war, he should admit the plan didn’t work, and seek to extricate the US as quickly as possible at the lowest possible cost. It is crucial to understand where we are at this point and how we got here: Prior to choosing to start this war w Iran, there was no threat to the United States, imminent or otherwise. They were not two weeks from a nuclear bomb, and they had made no move to build one. The Strait of Hormuz was open and free and unfettered, and about 19 million barrels of oil and all other commodities were flowing freely and without encumbrance, every day. All American troops in the region were alive and well. All of our bases were fully operational and unscathed. 24 MQ9 reaper drones were still in our possession, and 13 combat aircraft were still fully functional, and no planes had been shot out of the sky. The price of oil was a little over $60 a barrel, and every reason to think that it would remain stable at that price. Our regional allies we’re still whole and protected. Now none of those things are true now. The cost has been profound for a war that should never have been started, and it was clear to anyone willing to see the reality that we would end up in a place like this. And now, it is equally clear that to restart this war by choice, will only deepen all of the costs that we’ve already had imposed upon us, likely more death and destruction for America and its allies, and an even graver interruption of global oil supplies. And we still will not have control of the Strait, and will be facing a strategic and then military defeat at the hands of someone smaller and much weaker than us. The only way we could ever lose a war to Iran is if we started one. And now here we are staring defeating the face bc of that bad choice. The only question now, how much deeper with the cost be to America and our allies if we refuse to learn the previous lessons, and arrogantly go forth, trying to win again with the military. How many more Americans will have to die to prove what is already self evident?
Daniel Davis Deep Dive tweet media
English
275
715
2K
166.7K
Pepe Escobar
Pepe Escobar@RealPepeEscobar·
Out in the open - for everyone to see. The Gazaification of the planet, operated by a bunch of self-entitled techno-feudalists. No. Future. For you. x.com/PalantirTech/s…
Palantir@PalantirTech

Because we get asked a lot. The Technological Republic, in brief. 1. Silicon Valley owes a moral debt to the country that made its rise possible. The engineering elite of Silicon Valley has an affirmative obligation to participate in the defense of the nation. 2. We must rebel against the tyranny of the apps. Is the iPhone our greatest creative if not crowning achievement as a civilization? The object has changed our lives, but it may also now be limiting and constraining our sense of the possible. 3. Free email is not enough. The decadence of a culture or civilization, and indeed its ruling class, will be forgiven only if that culture is capable of delivering economic growth and security for the public. 4. The limits of soft power, of soaring rhetoric alone, have been exposed. The ability of free and democratic societies to prevail requires something more than moral appeal. It requires hard power, and hard power in this century will be built on software. 5. The question is not whether A.I. weapons will be built; it is who will build them and for what purpose. Our adversaries will not pause to indulge in theatrical debates about the merits of developing technologies with critical military and national security applications. They will proceed. 6. National service should be a universal duty. We should, as a society, seriously consider moving away from an all-volunteer force and only fight the next war if everyone shares in the risk and the cost. 7. If a U.S. Marine asks for a better rifle, we should build it; and the same goes for software. We should as a country be capable of continuing a debate about the appropriateness of military action abroad while remaining unflinching in our commitment to those we have asked to step into harm’s way. 8. Public servants need not be our priests. Any business that compensated its employees in the way that the federal government compensates public servants would struggle to survive. 9. We should show far more grace towards those who have subjected themselves to public life. The eradication of any space for forgiveness—a jettisoning of any tolerance for the complexities and contradictions of the human psyche—may leave us with a cast of characters at the helm we will grow to regret. 10. The psychologization of modern politics is leading us astray. Those who look to the political arena to nourish their soul and sense of self, who rely too heavily on their internal life finding expression in people they may never meet, will be left disappointed. 11. Our society has grown too eager to hasten, and is often gleeful at, the demise of its enemies. The vanquishing of an opponent is a moment to pause, not rejoice. 12. The atomic age is ending. One age of deterrence, the atomic age, is ending, and a new era of deterrence built on A.I. is set to begin. 13. No other country in the history of the world has advanced progressive values more than this one. The United States is far from perfect. But it is easy to forget how much more opportunity exists in this country for those who are not hereditary elites than in any other nation on the planet. 14. American power has made possible an extraordinarily long peace. Too many have forgotten or perhaps take for granted that nearly a century of some version of peace has prevailed in the world without a great power military conflict. At least three generations — billions of people and their children and now grandchildren — have never known a world war. 15. The postwar neutering of Germany and Japan must be undone. The defanging of Germany was an overcorrection for which Europe is now paying a heavy price. A similar and highly theatrical commitment to Japanese pacifism will, if maintained, also threaten to shift the balance of power in Asia. 16. We should applaud those who attempt to build where the market has failed to act. The culture almost snickers at Musk’s interest in grand narrative, as if billionaires ought to simply stay in their lane of enriching themselves . . . . Any curiosity or genuine interest in the value of what he has created is essentially dismissed, or perhaps lurks from beneath a thinly veiled scorn. 17. Silicon Valley must play a role in addressing violent crime. Many politicians across the United States have essentially shrugged when it comes to violent crime, abandoning any serious efforts to address the problem or take on any risk with their constituencies or donors in coming up with solutions and experiments in what should be a desperate bid to save lives. 18. The ruthless exposure of the private lives of public figures drives far too much talent away from government service. The public arena—and the shallow and petty assaults against those who dare to do something other than enrich themselves—has become so unforgiving that the republic is left with a significant roster of ineffectual, empty vessels whose ambition one would forgive if there were any genuine belief structure lurking within. 19. The caution in public life that we unwittingly encourage is corrosive. Those who say nothing wrong often say nothing much at all. 20. The pervasive intolerance of religious belief in certain circles must be resisted. The elite’s intolerance of religious belief is perhaps one of the most telling signs that its political project constitutes a less open intellectual movement than many within it would claim. 21. Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive. All cultures are now equal. Criticism and value judgments are forbidden. Yet this new dogma glosses over the fact that certain cultures and indeed subcultures . . . have produced wonders. Others have proven middling, and worse, regressive and harmful. 22. We must resist the shallow temptation of a vacant and hollow pluralism. We, in America and more broadly the West, have for the past half century resisted defining national cultures in the name of inclusivity. But inclusion into what? Excerpts from the #1 New York Times Bestseller The Technological Republic: Hard Power, Soft Belief, and the Future of the West, by Alexander C. Karp & Nicholas W. Zamiska techrepublicbook.com

English
63
1.3K
3.6K
90.5K
BitRoot
BitRoot@SamRatio·
@alon_mizrahi If you know how the end works then they also know how this ends. Then the serious question should be asked? What does th end look like. I’m struggling to know how a small country is still using its military bases and they’re still flying jets etc.
English
1
0
5
2K
Alon Mizrahi
Alon Mizrahi@alon_mizrahi·
The way I see it, the US and Israel are preparing the world's most obvious surprise attack against Iran, which I expect to happen in the coming week or two. It will be the widest and wildest operation conducted to destabilize and occupy Iran to date, combining a massive air campaign, assassinations, and a serious attempts to start a ground operation in Iran - potentially on Kharg Island or some other strategic point in the Persian Gulf. They may also try and do something big to take over the Strait. I wouldn't rule out a raid on the Iranian parliament, in an attempt to kidnap some leaders or potentially take over the building. Regional government buildings could also become targets for commando raids. I also wouldn't be surprised if the US and Israel used EMP bombs to try and blind Iran's military and shock and awe its population. It is not only the buildup of ground forces and the nonstop delivery of equipment into West Asia, it is a proper appreciation of Israel's control over the American system, which so many people still don't get. Israel is not done with Iran, and therefore the US is not done with Iran. The fake negotiations will most probably soon be over, or cut off abruptly for the new phase of the war to begin. Iran will face a major test - the biggest it ever faced. Once again, it will emerge victorious
English
493
2.8K
8.7K
465K