S'Moore
6K posts
Maybe @SpaceX can ask its engineers not to chant nationalist dogwhistles on the livestream please? 😒
English
S'Moore retweetledi
It is perfectly acceptable to chant "USA" when you work at a company in said USA and just launched a ginormous rocket
she builds their fires@ErinIshimoticha
Maybe @SpaceX can ask its engineers not to chant nationalist dogwhistles on the livestream please? 😒
English
@whothehellsjack Clearly never seen a P&L. Let's assume a reasonable 15% gross margin (not enough space for calculating COGS) you're looking at a 17.65% markup which means costs were $510 on the items you sold for $600. You GROSSED $90, took home $71, after costs, company probably took a net loss
English
No I work in retail where I can quite literally see how much money I’m making the company. I’ll do anywhere between $600 and $2000 in a 5hr shift while only making $71. It’s more radicalizing to see the dramatic extent at which your surplus labor is being extracted
Mago Berlino@MagoBerlino2
Siamo tutti di sinistra finché non iniziamo a lavorare
English
@JosieMarcellino Gun instructor for what? Clearly not concealed carry classes that teach about escalation. Engagement bait that lacks context. A punch can absolutely constitute a threat that leads to legal use of lethal force. Evidence matters, not hypotheticals.
English
Gun-owner and daughter of a gun instructor here.
You can’t legally shoot someone for punching you one time in the face. Especially after intentionally trying to incite violence.
FearBuck@FearedBuck
ChudTheBuilder shot a man who attacked him outside a courthouse in Clarksville & accidentally grazed himself in the process. Before it escalated, he asked the man if he was going to “chimp out” the man then walked up & sucker punched him. It is unclear if the man survived.
English
@caitiff52 @PewPewBTC @theblessedsalt Completely backwards logic as always. But considering how our conversation started, I suppose i cant expect much less.
English
@SamTFMoore @PewPewBTC @theblessedsalt LOL!
"Convincing people to try save everyone is potentially murder, but increasing the likelihood that people die puts no one in danger..!"
English
@forgotv @SteveOnSpeed How about a society that teaches people some personal accountability? A society of individuals who all can fish is much better than a society with a burden of individuals who need free fish.
English
@SteveOnSpeed Fuck no, a society who does not take care of the most in need is not a society worth living in.
Social decay would be devastating and swift.
English
If you could opt out of Social Security today, but you lose everything that you’ve paid in so far, would you do it? 
English
@caitiff52 @PewPewBTC @theblessedsalt The unethical choice is gaslighting people into stepping onto the train tracks. Every blue who convinces someone else to pick blue is a potential murderer. Unlike reds who put no one in danger, convincing someone to pick blue is akin to assisted suicide.
English
@SamTFMoore @PewPewBTC @theblessedsalt LOL!
"But my unethical choice doesn't stop anyone else from making the same unethical choice..!"
English
I think the Team Red people are just pretending not to get it at this point.
Matt Wallace Tech@MattWallaceTech
Here is the best explanation so far in regard to the red vs blue button. For those that are team blue button can yall explain why?
English
@moonsewage @MattWallaceTech Ok, so you are not smart enough to pick red. Fine. Your choice. But don't gaslight those of us intelligent enough to not get on the tracks thats its our fault you die. Not responsible for the stupidity of others. Natural selection at work i suppose.
English
@SamTFMoore @MattWallaceTech You assume 100% of people are smart enough to pick red, whilst simultaneously stating it to people who aren't. That's literally why you are making your case. Because they exist. So you are self-proving your own assumption entirely wrong. Have you heard of a thing called "denial"?
English
Here is the best explanation so far in regard to the red vs blue button. For those that are team blue button can yall explain why?
English
@hi1itsme1 @JustaDom666 @cognitiva6 @MattWallaceTech "If 50% leave, those who stay died" portrays that reds making their choice condemns the blues. It doesnt unless they are in danger from the start. Which they aren't. If 50% leave, the other 50% could have left. Not reds fault that blues chose danger.
English
@SamTFMoore @JustaDom666 @cognitiva6 @MattWallaceTech Are you stupid? My example is correct. It doesn’t say you are in danger from the start.
English
@moonsewage @MattWallaceTech Argument based completely off emotion. Abandons logic. I assume 100% of people are smart enough to pick red. It is the only reasonable option. Picking blue is dumb, not even arguable. It PUTS you in danger with the only way out being 50% of people also being stupid.
English
Moon Sewer@moonsewage
@TrixyTrixter @MattWallaceTech If 100% vote Red, nobody dies. Unfeasible and will never happen. Therefore, a red vote contributes to enabling a "people die" policy. If 50% vote Blue, nobody dies. Therefore, a blue vote contributes to enabling a "no one dies" policy. Red's vote to switch on, Blue's vote it off.
QME
@hi1itsme1 @JustaDom666 @cognitiva6 @MattWallaceTech Completely incorrect. Leaving vs staying implies we were all in danger from the start. We are not. Only by pushing blue are you or anyone else in harms way. Pushing red does nothing to anyone. Pushing blue puts yourself on danger.
English
@SamTFMoore @JustaDom666 @cognitiva6 @MattWallaceTech No it goes both ways if you frame it right. Like, everyone is safe, if 50% leave, the people who stayed die. You aren’t smart.
English
@moonsewage @MattWallaceTech Completely fundamental misunderstanding of the scenario. Reds do not in any way turn on the machine. Blues do. The machine is a representation of danger. No one starts in any danger. Safety is the default. The first blue press is the catalyst for danger. It turns on the machine.
English
@MattWallaceTech You're missing how the red guys pressed the red button on the side that turns the machine on. All the red guys needed to do was NOT turn it on, and ZERO people could ever be harmed by it, even accidentally. Instead they thought "any human up there deserves to die, so ON it goes".
English
@JustaDom666 @cognitiva6 @MattWallaceTech The issue is most blues have a fundamental misunderstanding of the question. There is NO reason to push blue. No one is in ANY danger. You are not on the train tracks, its not a limited seat life boat scenario, all you have to do is not jump in front of the train.
English
@cognitiva6 @MattWallaceTech I just wish they were either more honest, or less ignorant. I wouldn't mind them as much if that were the case.
English
@caitiff52 @PewPewBTC @theblessedsalt Why would I accept something that is factually false? The danger to the blues IS THEMSELVES. no one is forcing you into danger. Im not pushing you onto the tracks, im not taking up one of a finite number of safety seats. My picking red does not stop ANYONE from also picking red.
English
@SamTFMoore @PewPewBTC @theblessedsalt No. Everyone starts with a choice. Reds choose to save themselves at the expense of Blues. Blues choose to save everyone.
The danger to the blues is the result of the choices of the red. Your POV completely hinges on not accepting this.
English
@caitiff52 @PewPewBTC @theblessedsalt It is suicide. The default is no danger. Every individual starts safe. Your inability to understand that blue is the danger to itself is honestly astounding. You refuse to accept that blues need to take accountability for their unintelligent choice instead of blaming others.
English
@SamTFMoore @PewPewBTC @theblessedsalt "My choice impacts no one."
Naive take. You can't ignore that every red button pushed is one less blue button, reducing the likelihood of more than half pushing the blue button and saving everyone.
You want to believe "blue is suicide and has nothing to do with me" so bad.
English
@caitiff52 @PewPewBTC @theblessedsalt My choice impacts no one. You still have a flawed understanding of the question. You think everyone is on the tracks and reds selfishly leaving kills whoever is left. But in reality no one is on the tracks and pushing blue gets you on the tracks which is suicide unless 50% do it.
English
@SamTFMoore @PewPewBTC @theblessedsalt You're not responsible for their choices. But you cannot escape your choices having an impact on others, no matter how you feel about their choices.
That's just being naive and in denial.
English
@caitiff52 @PewPewBTC @theblessedsalt If blue pushers want to kill themselves, thats none of my business. I am NOT putting anyone else in danger. They have equal opportunity to make the same choice i do. Red button is not a bus with limited room, them choosing not to get on is THEM putting THEMSELVES in danger.
English
@SamTFMoore @PewPewBTC @theblessedsalt You don't know who is pushing what. But you do know pushing red increases the chances of blue pushers dying.
So is surviving by putting other people in danger something you would do? Many would say no and push blue. They put themselves in danger in order to not *be* the danger.
English
@caitiff52 @PewPewBTC @theblessedsalt No, it doesn't 😂 i am 0% responsible for anyone else's choice. Pushing red puts no one else intelligent enough to make the obvious choice in any danger. I wont be gaslit into making the dumb choice just to die with the other idiots.
English
@SamTFMoore @PewPewBTC @theblessedsalt Because red ALSO puts people pushing blue in danger. Not wanting to endanger other people to save your own life is not stupid.
Assuming other people's choices must be a certain way (your way) is ABSOLUTELY STUPID.
English
@caitiff52 @PewPewBTC @theblessedsalt IF RED PUSH IS START AND END IN NO DANGER THEN WHY IS ANYONE PUSHING BLUE!? REDS ASSUME NO IS THAT STUPID. I have tried to be as nice as possible, but I am genuinely about to start crashing out. So, please have a wonderful day, i cannot continue to speak with someone so low IQ.
English
@SamTFMoore @PewPewBTC @theblessedsalt No.
Push red, Start in no danger. Stay in no danger. But put all blue pushers in danger where they die if more people push red instead of blue.
No red pushers, no danger.
English
@caitiff52 @PewPewBTC @theblessedsalt No one pushes red, no one dies. Correct. No one pushes blue, no one dies. Also correct. Both outcomes where both sides have 100% of the votes = no deaths. So WHY would anyone push the side where they MIGHT die if people don't push it!? Blues represent 100% of their own danger.
English
@SamTFMoore @PewPewBTC @theblessedsalt Incorrect. Blues are in no danger until someone pushes red. The trigger for blues dying is too many red pushers.
No one pushes red, no one dies.
English