Trixter the Enthusiast

838 posts

Trixter the Enthusiast

Trixter the Enthusiast

@TrixyTrixter

Just an account for stuff.

Sweden Katılım Ocak 2017
208 Takip Edilen63 Takipçiler
Gary Koepnick
Gary Koepnick@garykoepnick·
The problem is they are using such an easy example that the process or concept they are trying to teach or test isn’t any easier. 10+7 isn’t easier to do in your head than 8+9 At least use multiple digit numbers. Or do multiplication for numbers like 98 and 23 or something like that where it makes sense
English
8
0
5
6.6K
Travis Akers 🇺🇸
Travis Akers 🇺🇸@travisakers·
This is stupid. Just add the damn numbers or memorize it. What are we even doing?
Travis Akers 🇺🇸 tweet media
English
267
13
253
1.7M
Gallomimia
Gallomimia@gallomimia·
@PacoBedejo @travisakers See, teaching kids extra ways to figure out a math problem is definitely the way! However, requiring everyone to get good grades using each method, instead of picking the one that suits their learning style is the most retarded thing we could possibly cram into schools.
English
1
0
1
114
CodeBcn
CodeBcn@code_bcn·
@OrwellNGoode funny how most people dont realize the problem is mainly if we consider everyone to include child and disabled people. If they will die, then blue is the obvious choice to save them. if they are not participating, then red is the obvious choice
English
1
0
0
114
Trixter the Enthusiast
Trixter the Enthusiast@TrixyTrixter·
@deqextwt @Dave41605737145 @OrwellNGoode Obligatory: Internet Polls cary no risk for choosing Blue, Noone gets killed if blue lose making the choice to press it have 0 opportunity cost. In an online Poll both Buttons are the same woth "Nothing happen" no mater the result. Its not evidence for if it happened in reality
English
0
0
0
3
Depex
Depex@deqextwt·
@Dave41605737145 @OrwellNGoode a) blue never lost b) so you want 50% of newborns to die? c) some people press blue anyway blue minimizes deaths
English
1
0
1
18
Brian Pillman
Brian Pillman@LCannon1995·
@TrixyTrixter @catmomo1498286 @TruckChudmore @reset_by_peer I literally gave a "beggar" the couple dollars I had in my pocket earlier today, dude. You can drop the egocentric bias, I do things differently than you. Meanwhile, again, you're only here because people pressed blue for the majority of human existence.
English
1
0
1
22
Trixter the Enthusiast
Trixter the Enthusiast@TrixyTrixter·
@Mattinthemix @Hntaigana @LordTankArt So Noone then. The blues choose suicide. A person Voting Red is never causes any Blue death, Blues failing to reach their goal causes their own death. If Red was responsible you would be able to point out the dead at the 51% where 49% are still up to vote.
English
1
0
0
16
Trixter the Enthusiast
Trixter the Enthusiast@TrixyTrixter·
@LardofSith @LordTankArt Exactly thats the thing. The wast majority of Reds do not see 50%+1 as realistic when its the one choice that requires one to put their life on the line. Polls pass it marginaly when Blue has no stakes, I do not believe every blue is honest in a Poll.
English
0
0
1
4
Lard
Lard@LardofSith·
@TrixyTrixter @LordTankArt Sure, but "way" in my post is doing some heavy lifting. If it were 99% I would almost certainly choose red
English
1
0
0
4
👑D.
👑D.@_D_dot_·
“We don’t live in a high trust society” >test society >high trust wins >test again >trust wins >test again >trust wins “Well obviously they’re all lying”
Rock Solid@ShitpostRock2

High trust society is when you put your life on the line and hope that some stranger 10,000km away chooses the same illogical retarded option as you The entire point is that most societies are NOT high trust and will vote for their own interest. Don't trust them with your life

English
255
973
19.6K
282.7K
Trixter the Enthusiast
Trixter the Enthusiast@TrixyTrixter·
@YoubeliveImhere @spiderking232 A poll is not evidence of reality. Pressing Blue in an online poll carries 0 risk. It is very easy to say "I do the selfless thing" when one does not have to ever suffer the potential concequeces. If Blue really was so dominant I would expect upwards to 90-100% Blue in Polls
English
1
0
0
3
No one you know
No one you know@YoubeliveImhere·
That is the thing. Many vote red out of fear of not believing blue will reach 50%..But the polls show that blue consistently wins. And it was 70 vs 30% before the tribes were formed online. In my mind, it means most went with the instinct and voted blue before reading the arguments and then changing their mind into a strict stance. And more red they saw, more convinced they became. I also think many would vote blue only if they were convinced blue would win. I also think many would vote red believing blue would win, but ensuring own survival "just in case". I think many red voted would be there because of people fearing "just in case" would extend beyond 50%. But it all hinges on how many you of your loved ones you believe would vote blue.
English
1
0
0
15
Trixter the Enthusiast
Trixter the Enthusiast@TrixyTrixter·
@moonsewage @Operator_AF32 @Gunhildr_pics "Comfortable margin" When there was never any risk it results in a marginal win for blue. Polls are not evidence of true results because preasing Blue in a poll has no risk. To grandstanding blue voters its entirely beneift no mater the result in the end.
English
2
0
0
15
Moon Sewer
Moon Sewer@moonsewage·
@TrixyTrixter @Operator_AF32 @Gunhildr_pics Except it isn't "most of the time". Why are red-voters so clueless about the historical results of these polls? They typically resolve blue, and by a comfortable margin. Blue voters understand that but red voters - self-proclaimed masters of human reasoning - are mystified by it.
English
1
0
0
20
Gunhildr
Gunhildr@Gunhildr_pics·
I find the red button Blue button discourse amazingly stupid. It's framed as a morality question, when it isn't. Pressing the blue button does not save anyone but cause the dilemma in the first place. There is no person who 'accidentally' pressed the blue button.
English
153
31
957
30.4K
Trixter the Enthusiast
Trixter the Enthusiast@TrixyTrixter·
@flipseider @0xPBIT Idk I can at least Maybe Buy 50%+1 when everyone votes for a random stranger. The original tho most definitely no chance blue actually wins.
English
1
0
0
4
Man_in_the_High_Keep
Man_in_the_High_Keep@flipseider·
@TrixyTrixter @0xPBIT If you are only concerned about your own self, then sure, voting blue mathematically increases your odds of living by an infinitessimal amout. But realistically, it just dooms someone else at no benefit to you. Because blue isn't getting to 50%+1, regardless of what you do.
English
1
0
1
22
Kevin
Kevin@Intrinsic29·
Despite several days of blue/red button discourse, I haven't seen a single decent argument for why anyone should believe blue would actually win in reality. It's all just personal attacks against red-choosers.
English
155
2
351
18.7K
Trixter the Enthusiast
Trixter the Enthusiast@TrixyTrixter·
@TheJamie @GazeWindward Everyone starts in team "Not Blue" If blue is not majority team "Not Red" Dies. The flood is always coming because not voting is still death, you choose assured safety(Red), Maybe safety(Blue), or Atempted death(Not voting)
English
0
0
0
18
Jamie
Jamie@TheJamie·
@TrixyTrixter @GazeWindward There is no “reality that the flood is always coming” until the red votes, that’s what was always true and that this graphic is articulating more clearly to the people who seem to struggle to get it.
English
1
0
1
13
Trixter the Enthusiast
Trixter the Enthusiast@TrixyTrixter·
@thescruffykit @EUhobgoblin @GazeWindward Yes if everyone press red everyone lives. In the original tho a minority blue means "Non Red" die. And before anyone places a vote they defacto have to be both "Non Red" and "Non Blue" so accurately the flood is coming from the start, you vote for garanted safety or maybe.
English
1
0
0
17