Satoshis Castle

216 posts

Satoshis Castle banner
Satoshis Castle

Satoshis Castle

@SatCastle21

fix the money, fix the world. #bitcoin

Germany Katılım Kasım 2021
188 Takip Edilen60 Takipçiler
Satoshis Castle
Satoshis Castle@SatCastle21·
@georgrestle Dass die Schere zwischen Arm und Reich auseinander geht, geht nicht anders in einem Fiatgeldsystem.
Deutsch
0
0
0
18
Georg Restle
Georg Restle@georgrestle·
Die Reaktionen auf unseren Film #ReichtumVerpflichtet zeigen, wie stark die Lobby der Superreichen und Hochvermögenden in diesem Land ist. Dabei ist die deutlich wachsende Schere zwischen arm und reich der größte gesellschaftliche Skandal im Land. Und nicht zu bestreiten.
Deutsch
450
409
2.3K
197.5K
marc friedrich
marc friedrich@marcfriedrich·
„Es ist eine schiere Katastrophe…. Wir sind auf dem Weg zum Entwicklungsland“
Deutsch
194
1.6K
5.2K
352.6K
Anabel Schunke
Anabel Schunke@ainyrockstar·
Berlin 5. Klasse Sexualkundeunterricht. Weiß ich jetzt nicht….
Anabel Schunke tweet mediaAnabel Schunke tweet mediaAnabel Schunke tweet media
Deutsch
458
321
2.7K
560.2K
Satoshis Castle retweetledi
Pavol Lupták
Pavol Lupták@wilderko·
This is brutal and desperate at the same time.
Pavol Lupták tweet media
English
18
106
449
17.9K
justlenasart
justlenasart@justlenasart·
Asking for a friend 👀 Which design do you find more appealing? #bitcoin A or B 👇🏾🙏🏽🧡
justlenasart tweet media
English
445
9
181
58.5K
Satoshis Castle retweetledi
Phoenix Wallet
Phoenix Wallet@PhoenixWallet·
💧🪣 Enlarge your bucket! It is now possible to request inbound liquidity in Phoenix. Available amount: 100k-10M sat, cost is 1% + mining fee The liquidity is guaranteed for a year. (available today on Phoenix Android, shortly on iOS)
Phoenix Wallet tweet media
English
53
93
452
130.6K
El Bademantel Ambassador
El Bademantel Ambassador@elbademantelamb·
Ist Thomas von @finanzfluss eine Art deutscher Nic Carter? Hat #Bitcoin verstanden (Videos belegen das), würde sich aber aufgrund seines Fiat Kanal ins eigene Fleisch schneiden? Was meint ihr?
Deutsch
36
3
177
24.3K
Satoshis Castle
Satoshis Castle@SatCastle21·
@PhoenixWallet „Remote“ approximately 50k sats. But I wonder why it is only so low because I „poured out“ an amount multiples higher than that and I thought I would then have that much „space in my bucket“ after that … do you know why this is not the case ?
English
1
0
0
44
Phoenix Wallet
Phoenix Wallet@PhoenixWallet·
@SatCastle21 No, see: #how-much-can-i-receive-with-my-existing-channels" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">phoenix.acinq.co/faq#how-much-c… What is the approximate capacity of your channel?
English
1
0
0
81
Satoshis Castle
Satoshis Castle@SatCastle21·
Seriously @PhoenixWallet , WHEN does an incoming payment require an on chain transaction and when not? Please explain it to me like I‘m 5
English
1
1
18
4.4K
Satoshis Castle
Satoshis Castle@SatCastle21·
@PhoenixWallet Thank you @PhoenixWallet 🙏 So is the „remote“ channel balance = inbound liquidity ? Why can I only receive 2% of my bucket via lightning although I poured out 50% of the bucket? I thought I could receive up to those 50% now via lightning ?
English
1
0
0
86
Phoenix Wallet
Phoenix Wallet@PhoenixWallet·
@SatCastle21 When you create an invoice, if you set the amount Phoenix will tell you if the payment won't fit in your existing channel (estimation). If you're afraid of paying an unexpected mining fee, just disable auto channel management.
English
1
0
1
172
Satoshis Castle
Satoshis Castle@SatCastle21·
@PhoenixWallet I poured some water out (50% of the bucket). But I am still hesitant to receive a Lightning payment now because my „remote“ balance is very very low compared to my „local“/„total“ balance (maybe 2% vs. 98%). Is the „remote“ balance what I can receive via LN without onchain fees?
English
1
0
0
201
Phoenix Wallet
Phoenix Wallet@PhoenixWallet·
@SatCastle21 Suppose that your wallet is a bucket, and your balance is the water in the bucket. Receiving = adding more water Spending = pouring water out Any time the bucket needs to be resized to allow for more water, that's an on-chain operation.
English
19
33
279
47.8K
Satoshis Castle
Satoshis Castle@SatCastle21·
I just realized 🤯 Bitcoin block subsidy per block in BTC equals % of total supply (21M) issued in that halving epoch. For example at the moment: 2020-2024 epoch: block subsidy is 6.25 BTC and 6.25% of total supply will have been issued (~1.3M BTC) at the end of this epoch
English
0
0
0
29
Satoshis Castle
Satoshis Castle@SatCastle21·
@sovereignorigin @PhoenixWallet The way I understood it now, you would keep that inbound liquidity, but you shouldn’t splice 100% out. Only 99% in order to avoid a channel close.
English
1
0
2
287
Sovereign Origin 🥕
Sovereign Origin 🥕@sovereignorigin·
@PhoenixWallet @SatCastle21 So, I receive a large onchain amount, it gets spliced in, I get large spending capacity. If I would splice it out again, do I keep inbound liquidity provisioning that would have been provided by the previously received funds, or is it lost?
English
1
0
0
440
arrakis
arrakis@arrakis9999·
@SatCastle21 @PhoenixWallet The non custodial lightning is not really for you. Except if you create a big channel / bucket and then poured most of it out if it. That would allow for a lot of cheap receiving until you have no more receiving capacity and then dump on chain into cold storage.
English
1
0
1
130