Science Integrity

524 posts

Science Integrity banner
Science Integrity

Science Integrity

@ScIntegrity

Inspired By the Work of Great Elisabeth Bik

Planet Earth Katılım Aralık 2020
64 Takip Edilen222 Takipçiler
Science Integrity
Science Integrity@ScIntegrity·
Update: Editor of IEEE Sensors who refused to retract the plagiarized paper & insisted correctness, permit authors to publish corrections with new references to help them. Checking linkedin of Editor found him friend of main author. Typical @SensorsCouncil @IEEEorg corruption.
Science Integrity tweet mediaScience Integrity tweet mediaScience Integrity tweet media
Science Integrity@ScIntegrity

Plagiarized paper prepared by #Papermill accepted in few weeks by collusion ring.Notified the editor more than 8 months ago &he still agree to publish it.Shame on @SensorsCouncil & @IEEEorg doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2… #AcademicChatter #AcademicTwitter #phdchat @OpenAcademics #PhDlife

English
1
0
0
0
Science Integrity retweetledi
Nïck Brown🌻
Nïck Brown🌻@sTeamTraen·
Left: Rodriguez et al., 2019, doi.org/10.3390/s19204… Right: Rodriguez, 2021, arxiv.org/abs/2101.04770 The most parsimonious explanation seems to be that the author has plagiarised his own lead-authored article using synonym software to get a preprint, with hilarious results.
Nïck Brown🌻 tweet mediaNïck Brown🌻 tweet media
English
2
5
16
0
Science Integrity
Science Integrity@ScIntegrity·
If u still publishing in #Elsevier,remember sharing ur own paper is restricted & use ur own paper in teaching only if library is subscribed to #Elsevier.Why do we do this to ourselves? #AcademicChatter #openaccess #AcademicTwitter #NoElsevier #PhDLife #profTwitter #ScienceTwitter
Chris Banks (she/her)@ChrisBanks

Brilliant summary by @SallyRumsey1 of the completely conflicting sharing advice provided by #Elsevier to researchers publishing in Elsevier journals. Also, authors can make *some* use of THEIR OWN WORK *if* their library has a subscription.

English
0
0
0
0
Nick Wise
Nick Wise@nickwizzo·
There are several entirely plagiarised conference papers by this author, but this is the first one with a paraphrased warning message from plagiarism detection software in the abstract. @IOPPublishing
Nick Wise tweet media
English
2
2
15
0
David F. Flanders
David F. Flanders@dfflanders·
@rschconsulting @OASPA Fantastic to see @OASPA asking questions about what a 'marketplace' could look like for researcher OA outputs! However, I would disagree that 'marketplaces' haven't been defined which embrace Academic values, see Ostrom et al.
English
4
0
1
0
Science Integrity
Science Integrity@ScIntegrity·
@WimThiery @ResearchGate Apologize in advance for the sarcastic comment. Researcher was caught infringing copyright of specific content Was it for a musical track,NO Was it for a software,NO It was for a paper that he wrote & a research he conducted,This is how publishing with for-profit publishers works
English
0
2
26
0
Wim Thiery
Wim Thiery@WimThiery·
Dear @ResearchGate, Thank you for your message and the threat to suspend my account. To avoid this from happening in the future, my group will never submit a paper to an #Elsevier journal again. #OpenScience Kind regards, Prof. Wim Thiery
Wim Thiery tweet media
English
21
108
607
0
Science Integrity
Science Integrity@ScIntegrity·
When u devote life & time to publish research then u end up receiving threatening emails if u shared it."For-profit" publishers are willing to suck the life out of you to flourish their business #AcademicChatter #AcademicTwitter #profTwitter #icanhazpdf #phdfriend #ScienceTwitter
Wim Thiery@WimThiery

Dear @ResearchGate, Thank you for your message and the threat to suspend my account. To avoid this from happening in the future, my group will never submit a paper to an #Elsevier journal again. #OpenScience Kind regards, Prof. Wim Thiery

English
0
1
4
0
Science Integrity retweetledi
Cara Manning
Cara Manning@carabonate·
Want to retain the right to distribute your author's accepted manuscript (AAM)? Step 1: Add the following text to the cover page or acknowledgements of your paper before submission to a journal: “A CC BY or equivalent licence is applied to the AAM arising from this submission.”
R⓪ss Mounce @[email protected]@rmounce

I see Elsevier are sending another wave of copyright infringement takedown requests to anyone 'daring' to share research they've written, on ResearchGate. Seems like a good time to remind people to try to RETAIN YOUR RIGHTS when submitting your work zenodo.org/record/4668132…

English
2
3
9
0
Science Integrity retweetledi
jean-claude Guédon
jean-claude Guédon@jcdrg·
The impact factor is indeed a toxic indicator. It has been successful because it structures a commercial market under the pretense of addressing the evaluation of research results. Without the IF, no journal market, and no journal treated as a commodity!!!
Iryna Kuchma@irynakuchma

Traditional publishing model is no longer fit for purpose - too slow & no guarantee of quality, feels like running electric cars on steam train tracks. Need to rethink: #OpenAccess publishing first, then open peer review, no medals before the race has run - @Terry364 #OSFAIR2021

English
0
16
29
0
Science Integrity
Science Integrity@ScIntegrity·
@rpotter_9 This is why, most of their co-authors/collaborators are from Chinese universities. This is the case of most universities in Australia. The Australian Research Integrity Committee is on extended leave (for years)
English
0
0
0
0
Science Integrity
Science Integrity@ScIntegrity·
@rpotter_9 The cybersecurity research department at Monash university is largely occupied by Chinese researchers, who have big research profiles built by Chinese #papermill industry & collusion rings to get hired & tenured smoothly, Most of their publications are ambiguous & unreproducible
English
1
0
0
0
Robert Potter
Robert Potter@rpotter_9·
Monash contacted me with an interview request for an upcoming documentary on surveillance and hacking. I got on a call with someone from their media team and was told that we could cover any subject but could not focus on China. @a-different-lens/2021/02/16/1383011/adl-age-of-surveillance" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">lens.monash.edu/@a-different-l…
Robert Potter tweet media
English
1
31
80
0
Science Integrity
Science Integrity@ScIntegrity·
@rmounce Who said Wiley paid twice, for friends, they implement "Pay for one logo, get another for free"
English
0
0
0
0
Science Integrity
Science Integrity@ScIntegrity·
@KlaasvanDijk5 @rmounce They are all playing their roles under different names and affiliations to protect the ecosystem of the legacy for-profit publishers, we just think they are neutral but the conflict of interests is obvious in their actions
English
1
0
1
0
Science Integrity retweetledi
Toby Steiner
Toby Steiner@cmplxtv_studies·
APCs ranging from 1,149 to 4,479 USD (+surcharge) 🤦‍♂️ "In my view this level of APC is excessive, which is why I call this Fool’s Gold Open Access."
English
0
2
1
0
Science Integrity
Science Integrity@ScIntegrity·
We need to reduce our dependency on legacy for-profit publishers like #Elsevier, to start saying "that is enough",to decline the big deal &to use this money to invest in ethical approaches to academic publishing #AcademicTwitter #profTwitter #icanhazpdf #phdfriend #ScienceTwitter
CORE@oacore

How might we reduce our #dependency on legacy publishers such as #Elsevier? Just like a cable TV subscription, it is significantly cheaper and convenient to buy everything, than it is to just buy what you really need. More about it: unlockingresearch-blog.lib.cam.ac.uk/?p=3012

English
0
1
2
0
Science Integrity retweetledi
Peter Byard Davis
Peter Byard Davis@PeterByardDavis·
So much wrong here: an ad, yet masquerading as tweet. Open Science/OA being outmanoeuvered by legacy publishers. Gold OA a gift: it requires high APCs, promotes "double dipping", and allows legacy publishers to appropriate OA mantle. Elsevier makes monopoly returns. @openscience
English
0
1
3
0
Science Integrity
Science Integrity@ScIntegrity·
Received honorarium after reviewing several grant proposals,most don't encourage funding,doing this for last 3 years with same funding agency. Is paying for peer-review compromise integrity?acceptance /rejection depends on work not reviewer #AcademicChatter #icanhazpdf #phdfriend
Science Integrity tweet media
English
0
2
1
0

Keşfet

@SensorsCouncil @IEEEorg @CyberInfinite @nickwizzo @IOPPublishing @dfflanders @rschconsulting @OASPA