Sean

@Osemka8 If we hit .10 range I’m loading up a lot of CRV

[ $CRV ] Curve has lost the zone it needed to hold and 3D divs didn't materialise to anything. It's not a coin I'll be touching anytime soon. Probably going for the 1010 wick fill at least.

@bangerz You just answered your own question

Quitting Solana for XRP. Where should i start?

@great_martis Smart ones are accumulating the dips.

First they laughed. Then they mocked. Then they wept.

@Mishi_2210 9

Stop scrolling. Solve this first What number is it ?

@TedPillows Short it and show us your returns

$BTC bear flag and fakeout.... A tale as old as time.

I am not going to say anything $CRV

@Slopestylesnow Oh didn’t know he had an IG, I’m in his telegram accounts and they’re super informative and useful. I’m gonna have to check it out.

@Sean0destroy90 @Sean0destroy90 Win rate > RR via partials saves sanity fr. His IG astronomer_zero got the live breakdowns if you're deep in this vibe.

$BTC Account doubled in 1.5 months (5% risk per trade on average) ✅ Here's how I did it (secrets to trading philosophy revealed) Alright, just doubled my account from trading the range so far since start of Feb. And, to many of you, that should be to no surprise, because these trades are all built on the backbone of our macro range masterplan since the very day it started, of calling the bottom in live time (Feb 6), range high, and range low. That range is still holding more than 1 month later. And in alignment, we have simply continued to trade it so far without failure. Many of you have been able to replicate a large part of that success since I share (almost) all of my entries and exits live, telling you exactly when to get in, and when to get out. But regardless, even if you copied all my moves, doesn't necessarily mean you doubled your account. That's exactly why I often get asked how much I exactly make, because there is one parameter I don't often talk about, which is how much I risk per trade in exact sense. And while I don't like to reveal PnL numbers too often to not draw unwanted attention, I can share relative numbers since risk is related to just that, regardless of your size. After all, risk is personal, and should be treated that way. Besides, it's treated as too holy. There is way too much emphasis on having an exact defined risk, and misinterpreted as needing a stoploss in an exact location (market makers love to hunt you), so that you can plan your exact risk and know exactly how fast your account will grow and exactly when you can retire. In reality, trading is quite different, but it's a good kind of different. Because planning retirmenent like that, to any critical mind, is nothing but a pipe dream. So this all leads to revealing a part of my trading philosophy, to help you avoid such traps and continue your journey in the right direction and especially not the wrong direction. Keep in mind, my philosophy is personal, and is often considered an unpopular opinion. It certainly is not for everyone. But if you have been liking my trades, enjoy how they feel and the stress free aspect of it as well as the real (as real as it gets) results they bring, then you're welcome in advance for the sneak peek in my trading philosophy I'm sharing here. #1 Win rate is more important than RR Unpopular opinion number 1 indeed. Because only high RR's look flashy and clean on social media. Only 10 RR+'s seem as if the trader exactly knows what he's doing. And it's very effective for selectively sharing posts too. In reality though, going for 10RR+ trades means no partials at all before hitting 5RR say, which means your trade could run to 6RR, hit all your targets except your most ambitious ones, and still result in a loss. So, even while your edge is working well, you still probably eat many losses before seeing the winning effect of your edge. That gap is frustrating because it means you have to sometimes wait days/weeks (multiple losing trades) before seeing results, which is also detrimental if you want to test a new edge (which may not be an edge in the first place). Instead, partials earlier, reduces your RR, and increases win rate because you already eliminate. If your 6RR or 7RR still hits, then you still take home 3RR or so net, instead of -1RR. This allows for steadier growth, allows you to see pretty quickly if you are doing a good job, the very next 1 or two trades, allows you to steer and adjust quickly, and by principle of risk optimisation, also allows you to risk more, and so your account ends up growing faster. It also allows you to redeploy partials if price retraces locally, and it still keeps you winning even if your final target isn't hit. You have all seen how I pinpoint entries quite exact, but then sometimes we don't get final target, or get front run, but still walk home with the win. Finally, it also allows you to keep runners which increase drastically on big trending moves. Since, if you go for a 10RR+ trade, I assure you once you hit 10RR without having taken much partial, you are very tempted to close all (I mean congrats, you just hit a homerun). But if price runs further, you feel unexposed and so you feel the strongest emotion in trading: FOMO whereas if you keep runners, you still end up with a 50RR plus runner sometimes, getting an average return of 10RR anyways, whilst keeping your high win rate, the irony. Instead leaving runners always keeps you exposed, especially when executed well in alignment with your high timeframe idea. There are some more reasons, but let's keep this post not too lengthy and move on to the second unpopular opinion: #2 Fixed position sizing - variable risk, is better than fixed risk - variable position sizing. Another very unpopular opinion. "No defined risk, no trade", "no SL, no trade", "no invalidation, no trade". The single biggest misunderstanding by far, is that a stop loss is the same as an invalidation. It's not. So instead of telling your broker (crypto exchange) exactly where you force yourself to sell, either directly (with a stoploss order), or, indirectly. Indirectly as in: with a higher position size i.e. telling your broker your stoploss/liquidation is closer, or vice versa, lower position size, telling your broker your stoploss is further away, and yes, the AI is very good at finding your forced selling point nowadays. Instead, using a fixed position size (say always 2x of your account), leaves the broker completely in the unknown. On top, it also allows you to locally monitor on set intervals whether to get in or to get out. Sometimes, you get out beyond analytical invalidation, sometimes, before your analytical invalidation, on average usually around it. And because you use fixed position size, your invalidation width determines risk. Keep that consistent, and so will your risk be approximately. My results So I just laid out my philosophy. You know me, I don't leave it at that, we actually have been calling all these moves step by step, and they have led to these results. Closing 6 wins in a row, but in the graph, a steady increase due to partials and all other elements of my exact philosophy, mostly reaching my final target (about 6-8 RR away from entry/inval), with partials, ending mostly around 2-3RR on average after fees per trade. And with an SL width mostly 1-3.5% wide, and a fixed position size of 2x or 3x leverage (you already know), that results in a variable risk per trade ranging 3 - 8% approx. On average around 5% risk per trade give or take, and with 6 trades closed, 0 losses, 6 wins, that ends up in 1.12^6 = 1.97 x or about a double on the account. Say you have not been risking my amount and say go for 1x on account, then average risk using my method is less, say 2.5%, then you might have ended up with: 1.06^6 = 40% gain in 1.5 months, very good indeed. Even if you missed a trade entirely: 1.05^6 = 34%, still amongst the top 100 traders in the robins cup. Summary So my philosophy, assuming accurate analysis allows you to: ➡️Have way more winners ➡️Have way less losers ➡️Risk more ➡️Allow runners ➡️Stress out less for being front run on your target and still losing ➡️Stress out less about getting close to target 5 times before hitting it on the 6th ➡️Stress out less about micromanaging your trade because the market is volatile ➡️Etc, etc etc. There of course is more to it, but without a doubt, here is a big (the biggest) step on the path towards... the dream of profitable and stress free trading. Enjoy.

@Cobb_XRPL It’ll be negative a $1 soon

No offense but I’m not trusting this pump

@ScruFFuR Nothing wrong with buying dips 🤙🏻

I have slowly averaged up my $LINK price but I have more tokens. One day I’ll be right.

Bitcoin A significant move will begin between March 26th and April 3rd.

@unusual_whales This is where our tax money goes. Pathetic.

Trump: We may bomb Kharg Island a few more times for fun

@unusual_whales @grok was this what Trump really said?

@unusual_whales Gas prices are shit, we’re at war, and we’re in a government shutdown. America is respected is wild because we got a long ways to go for that.

Trump: Inflation is plummeting, incomes are rising, the economy is roaring back and America is respected again

@Sykodelic_ @greenytrades Just another random account that’ll disappear when things don’t go its way.

@greenytrades The irony of you saying this and sharing this chart, which is primed for a breakout… Is wild.

We will NEVER see another altcoin season. The data proves it. The macro proves it. Your favourite influencer is lying to you.

@BankXRP and fees between all transactions

Binance's post promotes an upgraded limited-time offer for up to 8% APR on RLUSD deposits via Simple Earn Flexible Products, with a personal limit of 10,000 RLUSD to attract users to the platform.

@ChainLinkGod On no a link fart passing in the wind

I didn’t even mention Ripple in this tweet and yet the $XRP army is having a meltdown over it Crypto companies “double dipping” by selling both equity and tokens is a pervasive systemic problem in our industry, not unique to one any firm It just so happens Ripple/XRP is the most prolific example of economic misalignment, so it’s the first example everyone thinks of

@BCBacker Buy and forget

I sympathize with those who are feeling overwhelmed with narratives & catalysts every time they log on. This is typical in these phases of markets. Bottoms are processes, we capitulated, lows could still be swept. But negative news is the norm in these phases. Keep your chin up.

@Waleedahmed234 Good call on AVAX 👍🏻

$AVAX

@Waleedahmed234 Got a long in at .23. 🤞🏻give me something good.

tik tik tik $CRV