SlopeSpecter

344 posts

SlopeSpecter

SlopeSpecter

@Slopestylesnow

Crypto whisperer decoding whale moves 🐋 | Mentoring traders to think like insiders 📊 👇 More insights https://t.co/sNTCspS7Tf

On_chain Katılım Eylül 2011
134 Takip Edilen61 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
SlopeSpecter
SlopeSpecter@Slopestylesnow·
@lookonchain Big ETF outflows hitting both BTC and ETH looks like institutions cashing out in this bearish stretch. BlackRock leading the move says a lot.
English
1
0
5
293
SlopeSpecter
SlopeSpecter@Slopestylesnow·
@ugwa_kingsley @ugwa_kingsley His analysis stays accurate, He explains market logic well on Instagram, His charts are always clear, track his signals on his IG
English
1
0
0
9
SlopeSpecter retweetledi
Astronomer
Astronomer@astronomer_zero·
$BTC longs The psychology of this trade Alright nice. 71k's liquidity tapped, pullback achieved, and our drawn path is following pretty nicely. Congrats if you set your trade risk free per hints I gave last post. Don't worry if you didn't, as I remind you that I didn't do it either for all reasons mentioned last post. Educationally, an invaluable discrepancy, now you get to see the difference and how to hold through a pullback with risk still open versus not. It's not as bad as holding underwater, but it's not as easy as price going your way or staying at level. And there is nothing you can do to stop it. But long term followers know, how routinely price pulls back on our identified low density liquidity tap, to only run higher after, just like how I expect target here too. Psychology is the hardest part.
Astronomer tweet media
Astronomer@astronomer_zero

$BTC longs We're up and running ✅Set my limits at 71.5k Alright, nice push up so far off the entry on the longs we took today. Market now backing up my claim of wanting to see shorts squeezed as they were just too crowded into the sub 69k lows and our area of confluence. Already seeing them exit now slowly but surely. As per plan, I'm slowly looking to TP these longs in alignment. So I've set my limits to take off more than half (60%) of the position at 71.5k. Notice that point is further than my typical first trim. That's simply because I'm looking to TP the trade aggressively, locking in the win after 1 target. So partialing before isn't really worth it. So that is indeed taking on a bit more initial risk. But position size on this one is smaller than usual, so it's all aligned. If you don't have that type of risk appetite, there's nothing stopping you to trim earlier of course. In the end, I'm not telling you what to do. I'm just sharing whenever I get and get out for your entertainment and education, showing you what it's like to go from analysis, to trade idea, to actually taking trades, making money in the process.

English
53
24
239
85.9K
SlopeSpecter
SlopeSpecter@Slopestylesnow·
@astronomer_zero Pullback after tap — expected. Hold through — hard. Psychology hardest — agreed. Ever journaled these psych moments to track improvement?
English
7
0
0
264
SlopeSpecter
SlopeSpecter@Slopestylesnow·
@tienzyee @tienzyee sure it's nice indeed his higher patient cycle, If this confluence logic and wait mindset vibes with you, his Instagram astronomer_zero has the nonstop live updates, reversal takes, POI setups, and same honest trader style def worth following for the full ride 🚀
English
0
0
0
32
Tee Zee
Tee Zee@tienzyee·
@astronomer_zero Astro, I had some thoughts around this, but after seeing your post I realised I am only right half and wrong half. I know what you're looking at now. Its forming nicely indeed!
English
11
0
3
487
SlopeSpecter retweetledi
Astronomer
Astronomer@astronomer_zero·
$BTC Long POI (midrange) not reached yet, still no longs. However, short POI might be coming up. Alright, nice move further down on $BTC since last post and overall from our 76k level. Now, we reached all the way down to just under 69k, with a small bounce forming off 68.8k so far. This entire move is based on my famous FOMC reversal theory combined with the 76k key level rejection level which we used as the point of our first breakout attempt long TP. That long was first breakout long attempt we punted upon closing above 73k and took towards 76k, one that worked out for a 2.3k move for us, but then ultimately halted and didn't break our 76k level, causing failure of follow through. After that sign of failure at 76k, we held off on longs ever since reaching 74.2k, exactly based upon our temporary bearish shift. I am still in that frame of mind of a temporary bearish shift, not looking to long yet, until we finally reach midrange again, or until at least this and half of next week has passed (closing in on the monthly close). It would be nice to ride it further down with a short, but on this level, 70.8k, shorting is not ideal. Especially since we are seeing a large amount of short aggression into the current local low of 68.8k. Funny to see because we reached below the 0.5 of the leg into the golden zone, silver pocket and, local POI on top of a high timeframe POI-top retest. A classic Astro-proof confluence of price elements, ideal for an internal bounce. On top, the sentiment of the idea of the FOMC reversal and general downtrend is becoming quite obvious, hence the appetite for shorts. Not putting any money on this bounce personally. But this is typically enough to indeed provide a bounce to fresh short POI's. So again, not one I am looking to long, but once finished, one I am looking to short. Would be nice if we reach close to 73k, because it would offer us a second chance to re-short given we fumbled our first one and that level is close to pick up that entry again. Not blindly shorting either, what I am looking for, is a move up that looks fast and strong (but isn't) and indeed induces a lot of longs at the same time causing local top behaviour. If all elements are present, that's a nice short for me towards new local lows and hopefully midrange. We will see. So far, it's been a nice time staying side lined on longs regardless, but having a short on top would make it even better. Not from here, but from higher indeed. That's my plan going forward, based on what I revealed here to be a fraction of the parts I revealed here, combining into my logic and system, explaining why I expect lower but am hopeful for a short entry. Enjoy.
Astronomer tweet media
Astronomer@astronomer_zero

$BTC Nice drop further. Below midrange, I get excited again. So just keep waiting while early longs get rinsed over and over again Alright! Nice slide further down the slope on bitcoin. Making our plan to just wait before longing again age neatly in the context of our FOMC reversal we have been talking about ever since reaching 74.2k. The lower it goes, the more satisfied we should be as it gets closer and closer to midrange. I had some questions when I do go long again. So that's the level I want to see at least as it stands, it sits at 66.5k. Any alternative would be a close above our key level of 76k we pointed out at the time, to go long as a backup in case we get front run completely. Don't think that is happening however. Every time I mentioned an FOMC reversal in my post history, and every time we see over excitement into both positions and the leadup into it, which we did see, we get a decent countertrend such as we are seeing now. I know you are all tired of me talking about the FOMC reversal, as if it's the only thing on the planet. But it's key in this instance, especially given how frothy the market was into our 76k key level as well as afterwards when getting closer to FOMC. Quite sad about the short we fumbled at 73.7k regarding execution. It even ended the win streak. A clear example of how analysis can be spot on but execution slipping can cost. I apologize for that one, would have been great to book another win. But my aim is always to keep you on track as soon as possible. Safe to say, completely holding off on longs ever since 74.2k (since the quoted post) despite my bullish bias, is as on track as it gets. So, still waiting my turn as the drop develops further, still don't think it is over yet. However, don't get it twisted thinking I am bearish. Because I am not. As I do look to get long again. Long stands for buying. And buying should only be done when you are bullish. This range eventually resolves to the upside even if it takes a while to break out and above our 76k key level. I'll be here to get you through that, until, we actually break out. But until then, it's just one of those times to be patient before we can time our long entry again.

English
35
27
283
63.4K
SlopeSpecter
SlopeSpecter@Slopestylesnow·
@astronomer_zero Short aggression into 68.8k low funny how sentiment flips obvious right at classic bounce setup. No money on bounce personally but expecting it for fresh short POI. Relatable wait how do you stay patient when the drop looks diff
English
7
0
3
244
SlopeSpecter retweetledi
Astronomer
Astronomer@astronomer_zero·
$BTC 6 weeks of ranging now✅ Alright it's Monday again, new week, new candle open. That means we hit 6 on our bullish range idea. Yes bullish, because the range will break up. In terms of when, I'm monitoring order flow here to see if we will. It would be nice to get paid on our long runners right here right now, and knowing that they likely never come back to entry, keeping us comfy and paying for a very long time. If not, then we simply have to sweat through one final long entry (I'm interested below midrange). But that's okay, it will be one that will work out again. Because this range is bullish, not bearish. And I think the majority is wrong.
Astronomer tweet media
Astronomer@astronomer_zero

$BTC We thank the bounce, and now we thank the range. It's 4 weeks old now ✅ You see a lot of people flip flopping, calling for lower when we are at range low, calling for higher when we are at range high. Just posting this to remind you that this is very normal inside ranges. And I will keep reminding you about my most important post: to indeed fade all of it, and just continue to expect a range. Which means, to make money on that, simply long range lows, and short range highs. If you are stuck on when and where to do that, as well as how to manage the trades, feel free to use my levels and live calls, if you want, I share my entries and exits all the time for a reason. Since the post of the very start of the range, it's 4 weeks old now. Which way will this range break? I have already expressed my opinion, I don't need to be any more clear than that. If you want another hint, simply count which type of trade I took most and where I hinted to leave the biggest runners towards. But other than that, it doesn't matter at the moment to make money. Just follow the rules of the market, don't bait into the engagement farming you see out there of people saying "I told you so, it's going up", or "I told you so, it's going down". You will hear either from the same person whichever way price goes. The truth is, you can't make money on that. No trades, no money, no point and all is just hopium of your bags going up or hopium of getting cheap entries (whichever camp people are). What's in front of us is a range, still forming. We trade it, and slowly continue to build positions for the breakout.

English
42
30
273
29K
SlopeSpecter
SlopeSpecter@Slopestylesnow·
@astronomer_zero “Sweat through one final long entry” real talk. Most would panic, you just accept it. How do you prepare mentally for that sweat phase?
English
3
0
0
17
Sean
Sean@Sean0destroy90·
@astronomer_zero You ever thought of doing videos? Making a Patreon? It would be cool to see your thoughts and chart analysis in action.
English
3
0
1
13
SlopeSpecter retweetledi
Astronomer
Astronomer@astronomer_zero·
$BTC Account doubled in 1.5 months (5% risk per trade on average) ✅ Here's how I did it (secrets to trading philosophy revealed) Alright, just doubled my account from trading the range so far since start of Feb. And, to many of you, that should be to no surprise, because these trades are all built on the backbone of our macro range masterplan since the very day it started, of calling the bottom in live time (Feb 6), range high, and range low. That range is still holding more than 1 month later. And in alignment, we have simply continued to trade it so far without failure. Many of you have been able to replicate a large part of that success since I share (almost) all of my entries and exits live, telling you exactly when to get in, and when to get out. But regardless, even if you copied all my moves, doesn't necessarily mean you doubled your account. That's exactly why I often get asked how much I exactly make, because there is one parameter I don't often talk about, which is how much I risk per trade in exact sense. And while I don't like to reveal PnL numbers too often to not draw unwanted attention, I can share relative numbers since risk is related to just that, regardless of your size. After all, risk is personal, and should be treated that way. Besides, it's treated as too holy. There is way too much emphasis on having an exact defined risk, and misinterpreted as needing a stoploss in an exact location (market makers love to hunt you), so that you can plan your exact risk and know exactly how fast your account will grow and exactly when you can retire. In reality, trading is quite different, but it's a good kind of different. Because planning retirmenent like that, to any critical mind, is nothing but a pipe dream. So this all leads to revealing a part of my trading philosophy, to help you avoid such traps and continue your journey in the right direction and especially not the wrong direction. Keep in mind, my philosophy is personal, and is often considered an unpopular opinion. It certainly is not for everyone. But if you have been liking my trades, enjoy how they feel and the stress free aspect of it as well as the real (as real as it gets) results they bring, then you're welcome in advance for the sneak peek in my trading philosophy I'm sharing here. #1 Win rate is more important than RR Unpopular opinion number 1 indeed. Because only high RR's look flashy and clean on social media. Only 10 RR+'s seem as if the trader exactly knows what he's doing. And it's very effective for selectively sharing posts too. In reality though, going for 10RR+ trades means no partials at all before hitting 5RR say, which means your trade could run to 6RR, hit all your targets except your most ambitious ones, and still result in a loss. So, even while your edge is working well, you still probably eat many losses before seeing the winning effect of your edge. That gap is frustrating because it means you have to sometimes wait days/weeks (multiple losing trades) before seeing results, which is also detrimental if you want to test a new edge (which may not be an edge in the first place). Instead, partials earlier, reduces your RR, and increases win rate because you already eliminate. If your 6RR or 7RR still hits, then you still take home 3RR or so net, instead of -1RR. This allows for steadier growth, allows you to see pretty quickly if you are doing a good job, the very next 1 or two trades, allows you to steer and adjust quickly, and by principle of risk optimisation, also allows you to risk more, and so your account ends up growing faster. It also allows you to redeploy partials if price retraces locally, and it still keeps you winning even if your final target isn't hit. You have all seen how I pinpoint entries quite exact, but then sometimes we don't get final target, or get front run, but still walk home with the win. Finally, it also allows you to keep runners which increase drastically on big trending moves. Since, if you go for a 10RR+ trade, I assure you once you hit 10RR without having taken much partial, you are very tempted to close all (I mean congrats, you just hit a homerun). But if price runs further, you feel unexposed and so you feel the strongest emotion in trading: FOMO whereas if you keep runners, you still end up with a 50RR plus runner sometimes, getting an average return of 10RR anyways, whilst keeping your high win rate, the irony. Instead leaving runners always keeps you exposed, especially when executed well in alignment with your high timeframe idea. There are some more reasons, but let's keep this post not too lengthy and move on to the second unpopular opinion: #2 Fixed position sizing - variable risk, is better than fixed risk - variable position sizing. Another very unpopular opinion. "No defined risk, no trade", "no SL, no trade", "no invalidation, no trade". The single biggest misunderstanding by far, is that a stop loss is the same as an invalidation. It's not. So instead of telling your broker (crypto exchange) exactly where you force yourself to sell, either directly (with a stoploss order), or, indirectly. Indirectly as in: with a higher position size i.e. telling your broker your stoploss/liquidation is closer, or vice versa, lower position size, telling your broker your stoploss is further away, and yes, the AI is very good at finding your forced selling point nowadays. Instead, using a fixed position size (say always 2x of your account), leaves the broker completely in the unknown. On top, it also allows you to locally monitor on set intervals whether to get in or to get out. Sometimes, you get out beyond analytical invalidation, sometimes, before your analytical invalidation, on average usually around it. And because you use fixed position size, your invalidation width determines risk. Keep that consistent, and so will your risk be approximately. My results So I just laid out my philosophy. You know me, I don't leave it at that, we actually have been calling all these moves step by step, and they have led to these results. Closing 6 wins in a row, but in the graph, a steady increase due to partials and all other elements of my exact philosophy, mostly reaching my final target (about 6-8 RR away from entry/inval), with partials, ending mostly around 2-3RR on average after fees per trade. And with an SL width mostly 1-3.5% wide, and a fixed position size of 2x or 3x leverage (you already know), that results in a variable risk per trade ranging 3 - 8% approx. On average around 5% risk per trade give or take, and with 6 trades closed, 0 losses, 6 wins, that ends up in 1.12^6 = 1.97 x or about a double on the account. Say you have not been risking my amount and say go for 1x on account, then average risk using my method is less, say 2.5%, then you might have ended up with: 1.06^6 = 40% gain in 1.5 months, very good indeed. Even if you missed a trade entirely: 1.05^6 = 34%, still amongst the top 100 traders in the robins cup. Summary So my philosophy, assuming accurate analysis allows you to: ➡️Have way more winners ➡️Have way less losers ➡️Risk more ➡️Allow runners ➡️Stress out less for being front run on your target and still losing ➡️Stress out less about getting close to target 5 times before hitting it on the 6th ➡️Stress out less about micromanaging your trade because the market is volatile ➡️Etc, etc etc. There of course is more to it, but without a doubt, here is a big (the biggest) step on the path towards... the dream of profitable and stress free trading. Enjoy.
Astronomer tweet media
Astronomer@astronomer_zero

$BTC shorts 70.3k reached ✅. That's key target. We just hit six wins in a row! 💰 Alright, the plan is ancient, but the move down is young. We shorted 73.4k and now rolled down $3100 down the slide so far, bringing price right to our key level of 70k and pushing the trade to 2.4 RR. You know the drill, I said, sub 50k is not coming, but it doesn't mean good shorts can't emerge. They can, exactly like this one. With an entry above 73k, our key level of 70k is perfect for a first TP, locking in the sixth win in a row, officially. From here, letting the trade run closer to the mid range. That's an ambitious goal and does require a break back inside. So do take partials and lock in the win here, as a reaction back up and a day of time is possible. Thanks for playing everyone. It's been a pleasure.

English
56
48
460
46.4K
SlopeSpecter
SlopeSpecter@Slopestylesnow·
@astronomer_zero Runners turning 2-3RR averages into big outliers (50RR+) – irony of high win rate enabling bigger rewards. Seen this in past cycles on big trends?
English
6
0
1
98
SlopeSpecter
SlopeSpecter@Slopestylesnow·
Dream big Start small
SlopeSpecter tweet media
English
0
0
0
2
SlopeSpecter
SlopeSpecter@Slopestylesnow·
@astronomer_zero Not selling all ETH for SOL but better buy than last top – balanced king. Confluence over conviction, love it. Alts run later, spec harder endgame.
English
1
0
0
51
SlopeSpecter retweetledi
Astronomer
Astronomer@astronomer_zero·
$SOLETH We called the top, so when's the bottom? And why do we care at all? What's the point of tracking $SOLETH in general? I'll explain. Because it goes just beyond "sell ETH into SOL now". Yes, when $SOLETH bottoms, it's better to hold $SOL over $ETH. But when neither rally hard in the future, or both run hard in the future, then it doesn't really matter which one you hold, if all you care about is USD gains anyways, so the $SOLETH value is less important. Are you really going to care if you made a 5x or a 6x? Instead, tracking the $SOLETH chart is more useful to as another heat metric forming confluence (or counter fluence) to identify the $BTC tops and bottoms. A top in $SOLETH means a top in speculative alt growth, which means $BTC likely slows and tops soon. Vice versa, a bottom in $SOLETH means a bottom and speculative alt growth follows (slow, first, this phase can last a while, then all at once). That's why $SOLETH bottomed after $BTC in 2022, topped before $BTC topped in 2025. Using more advanced terms, in the Astro community, we call this mmd (market maker divergence) and explains the correlations and topping patterns in a nutshell. So the macro top call on $SOLETH was very important. Not my most liked call at the time, many said $SOL to $1000 etc, but the market has spoken. So it meant cooling down and due to correlation with $BTC, bearish $SOL($ETH) means a non rallying $BTC for a while, which is the main importance of this chart (correlation goes both ways, cause and effect are irrelevant when comparing big markets). On the flip side, now that it likely bottomed (purple zone, macro golden zone, 4 year low coming up, reversal range into slow reversal local response levels), it means it adds confluence bitcoin indeed already bottomed, which is all I care about as of now. Does it mean to go hard in $SOL? Personally, not a bad idea either and I am interested again. But it doesn't mean to me to sell all $ETH for it. It just means, $BTC bottoms, alts are slowly building base liquidity again, but they likely run later with more speculative alts running harder towards the end as per usual, meaning $SOLETH goes up. This all happens after the $BTC bottom, so yes, it is useful. But because my analysis can and very sometimes be wrong, downside is bigger too on alts. So I wouldn't "go all in" just for the sake of this chart. In short It's confluence for a $BTC bottom, and it means buying $SOL now is a lot better than last time we called the top, IMO, even approaching a 4 year buy. (if you still believe in the long term future of it, if you don't assume it to bleed to zero, I am not in that camp). Still a few more months remaining to approach that 4 year low, but we are at major 4 yearly support, and a 4 year low doesn't have to be the low of the trend, it just has to be a major low close to the lows of that trend, something many misunderstand. That also explains why $BTC possible already bottomed, I know not many like to hear it. That's all for me on $SOLETH. Mostly a tool as confluence to project bitcoin bottoms (most important), and secondarily, to know what stage the alt market is in and position more speculative bets accordingly.
Astronomer tweet media
Astronomer@astronomer_zero

$SOLETH $SOLETH has topped IMO (sorry $SOL maxi's) Now before you unfollow me, I love $SOL, its ecosystem, held heavy bags myself for a long time and still hold some remainder ecosystem bags and I also think it continues to do "just fine". This is also not a top call on $SOL itself, but a top call on $SOLETH, which means, $SOL is likely to run less hard than $ETH. Quite important to try and nail since in crypto these differences can be large enough to feel pain if not on the right side of the trade or ecosystem. This call is a high timeframe call, and thus part of the series of high timeframe calls we made (such as the 21.5k $BTC bottom, the 1.2k $ETH bottom, the 55k $BTC bottom before up only, the call of the $BTC.D top at 61%). And with that said, I'm putting my money where my talk is, and I sold the rest of my $SOL for $ETH here, just now, for a few reasons. Why $SOLETH has topped, the analysis Very strong reasons in fact, due to some simple, yet powerful high timeframe asset rotation analysis. Asset rotations are not a new thing and not "crypto only". They exist in every market and used to be very prominent in the early days of commodity trading (and still are). In crypto, they work even better because there still is so much unaware and fresh capital present, new to investing in high volatility terrain, easy to take advantage of, especially in altcoins. And whales love to take advantage of that. The way it works is simple. Every time a large (top 10) asset breaks its old all time high, its highest competitor often gets rotated towards and thus receives relative strength. Why? Because that's when it hits news lines, that's when everyone on the sidelines starts buying, and the whales start rotating into other assets, you already know these things. But what's more important is that this is all backed very strongly by data, still to this day. And there is nowhere near enough talk about these types of trend shifts and capital rotations, instead everyone just keeps on bull posting $SOL and holding $SOL memes on chain. Another reason why I'm writing this post. So regarding the data, let's check the simplest and oldest capital rotation: $BTC to $ETH. When does capital rotate from $BTC to $ETH? When $BTC breaks ATH. Below I drew the line every time $BTC broke ATH on the $BTCETH chart. Keep in mind this is the $BTCETH chart not the $ETHBTC chart. So over the entire history, that already gives three significant data points. But there is more. Second chart shows the rotation behavior between $ETH and $ETC, another strong beta play, and so also another strong data point showing that whenever $ETH broke ATH, $ETC gains relative strength. Third one: $ADA and $ETH. Especially in the early days, $ADA was known/put forward to be the prime $ETH killer (so much for that). As a beta play on $ETH, the chart shows that when $ETH broke old ATH the $ETHADA chart put in a top for the cycle. On $ETHADA, you do see one thing: $ETH hasn't broken ATH yet, but $ADA already seemed to have started its run. That doesn't mean that is a bad data point. All it means is that $ETH putting in an ATH for a high probability $ADA beta play isn't a requirement. But IF it happens, it is a strong reversal signal. So since $SOL indeed broke ATH and $ETH is the clear $SOL beta this cycle, this leads to the conclusion that $SOLETH likely has topped, the moment it happened. Not my biggest bet as I sold most of my SOL bags from cycle lows already in the $200's already, but hereby I sold my remainders, and I certainly won't go heavy anymore on the SOL ecosystems this cycle. $SOL ecosys likely still does well, but there is more out there, maybe ETH runs, maybe some stranger plays such as XRP ecosys, who knows. But based on this analysis, if correct, it's clear what to do and I took my actions. Just sharing this for your entertainment. What are you going to do?

English
34
31
255
32.9K
SlopeSpecter
SlopeSpecter@Slopestylesnow·
@Rayo_TP @Rayo_TP Great reminder update overall. For more real-time signals, cycle plans, and specifics like the range bias/TPs, definitely check astronomer_zero's Instagram.
English
0
0
1
7
RAYO💲
RAYO💲@Rayo_TP·
@astronomer_zero I've been having clarity on $BTC after stumbling on your account Astro. We Green 📈🦅
English
7
0
2
265
SlopeSpecter retweetledi
Astronomer
Astronomer@astronomer_zero·
$BTC Continuing our plan (some reminders) Alright, we just hit our second major TP on our shorts taken from 73.4k. That gives us a sixth win in a row, locking it in with glory since it ran nice and far to date. "What about the next trade Astro? What are we doing next?" It's all still unchanged, but in markets and especially crypto where sentiment changes on a dime, you all heavily enjoy reminders so I'm more than happy to again give the full list of my stance, unchanged since the very day of the bottom (Feb 6th). And yes, it is a short list because my stance is simple, non convoluted, and 0 engagement farming focused, purely money making focused (the goal of why we spend our time watching these charts). ➡️ $BTC bottomed, and will form a range ➡️ To make money, we must trade that very range before the majority catches on to it. ➡️ Then comes future planning (what happens after the range is done?): Because I also believe $BTC bottomed, my focus whilst trading the range, is on upside, more aggressive on longs, holding runners on longs for longer. And less aggressive on shorts These points are in the process of fulfilling nicely so far: ➡️the range is 32 days old now ➡️We have made lots of money so far, as we have been trading it for 32 days. We traded it both long and short, ➡️and we focused more long than short (we took nearly twice as many longs as shorts this range so far). So now that we have twice as many runners on longs as on shorts left, is only natural. (See the short, the trades with a red SL are runners). In lockstep with our bias... indeed, we expect price to run up once this range resolves. So what to do next, Astro? Given we still have from 63.9 and 62.7, there is no rush in entering again here as we have enough exposure. However, if we still take out our 63k level, I am looking to add again, as well as TP'ing the remainder of our final short from 73.4k. In all other cases, if we break 73k, we send it, and get paid bigtime. Do you see how I am not too eager to act all too much in our case anymore, especially now that the range is becoming obvious as others are catching on? That's when overtrading often peaks and we reach into final compression before breakout. So let our bullish bias do the work, and most importantly remain focused on it (ignore the sub 50k callers, in my humble opinion). Focused on making money and planning for it. It's the only way to get a six win streak, and beyond. Welcome to my account.
Astronomer tweet media
Astronomer@astronomer_zero

$BTC shorts 65.7k, next TP reached to the tick. ✅ Alright, we finally reached our 65.7k level. Indeed, the level we waited for our next TP on the short. That leaves just some runners on the table if 63k still comes. And yes, with TP 2 in, I am planning to long again too as per plan. Slowly but surely. Full disclosure, I technically already entered a long myself at our level of 65.7k, but didn't have time to write a post. Don't worry. It's not a big trade. And you know my rule, no live entry, no trade count, so I won't discuss that long further and we continue to look together. Just see it as a message that I am looking to long and long only again now that most of our short is closed. Because 50k isn't coming. The majority is wrong in my humble opinion. Doesn't mean we couldn't make money with a short off 73.4k however. We totally did, scoring 6RR, all in live time. Enjoy the gains, my friends.

English
43
29
371
88.7K
SlopeSpecter
SlopeSpecter@Slopestylesnow·
@astronomer_zero If we take 63k, add on short remainder—balanced. Otherwise upside send. Asymmetry favors patience.
English
5
0
1
104
SlopeSpecter
SlopeSpecter@Slopestylesnow·
@Bitcoin_Teddy Great update countering bears. For more real-time signals, cycle insights,definitely check astronomer_zero 's Instagram.
English
0
0
0
2
Bitcoin Teddy
Bitcoin Teddy@Bitcoin_Teddy·
This is the best time to buy Bitcoin
Bitcoin Teddy tweet media
English
71
65
434
12.7K