Shahram Sabzevari

@jmbprime Because they are as unhinged and compromised as their boss

President Trump is stating on live television that he is prepared to destroy Iran and as a result kill millions of people. Why aren't Vance and Rubio invoking the 25th amendment.

Over the weekend a large US military operation was launched inside Iran, close to where some believe the 60 percent enriched uranium is stored. The stated goal was to retrieve F-15 pilots who were shot down in the area. But nothing at all adds up. Did the CIA or Mossad or someone else convince the US President that he could snatch Iran's uranium like he snatched Maduro out of Venezuela? Whatever the case, the operation was a spectacular failure, with at least six US military aircraft shot down. Will we learn the truth about what happened? Watch @RonPaul & @DanielLMcAdams below:

The orange buffoon @realDonaldTrump is calling a nation with 6000 years of civilization animals because they handed him his ass. He achieved nothing of value in his war, committed war crimes, & gambled US army's reputation only because BiBi had him by his balls over Epstein files

The 25th Amendment exists for a reason. The President of the United States is a deranged lunatic, and a national security threat to our country and the rest of the world.

@Rep_Grijalva Then do something about it/him.

A sitting U.S. president is openly threatening to commit war crimes in broad daylight. Bombing civilian infrastructure is not “tough” - it’s illegal. We cannot tolerate or normalize this.

@RepMcGovern Only if you can do something about it

This would be a war crime. Trump is unhinged, unwell, and unfit to lead.

We have now reached a point where US politicians are causally tweeting about committing war crimes. And we wonder why the world is standing against the United States government 🤦🏻‍♂️

@Quadcarl They flew in three smaller plains it seems.

How did they get hundreds of troops out of Iran if they blew up the planes that got them there?

Doesn’t sound like “ordinary Iranians want us to bomb them” does it?

The irony is that the orange buffoon is called them "Animals".

The civilisation that invented algebra is currently doing battle with the one that invented the hamburger. This is all you need to know.

BREAKING: 'Fifteen Americans wounded' in Iran strike on Kuwait airbase 🔴 LIVE updates: aje.news/ukui10?update=…

While the world focuses on the destruction in Iran, we must not ignore what Israel is doing in Lebanon. 1,461 have been killed. 4,430 have been injured. 1.2 million have been displaced. Israel now occupies 14% of Lebanon. Enough is enough. No more US military aid to Israel.

I owe my career to Sharif University. And many more successful Iranians in Silicon Valley owe it to this university paid fully by Iranian people’s tax and oil money. Today the illegal terrorist Israeli regime bombed my university, after a week of bombing other major universities in Iran. Take away what you want from this, but as I always said Israel is a stain on humanity. One day, from river to the sea, Palestine will be free and so will the whole Middle East, and US as well.

@RepDexterOR Then do something about it/him.

Trump is openly threatening to commit blatant war crimes—putting our service members and national security at enormous risk. He is prioritizing paying for a senseless war over caring for working people. It is past time to impeach and/or invoke the 25th Amendment. Republicans must put country over blind loyalty to one man. cnn.com/2026/04/06/pol…

@RepAprilDelaney Then do something about it/him.

On Easter Sunday, the President's message was a promise of war crimes. No call for peace, no promise of hope—just profanity and a promise of war crimes. This unhinged behavior is rattling global markets, breaking trust and ties with our long time allies, and undermining our health and well being at home. Enough is enough, and our Congress must step in to stop this madness. thehill.com/homenews/admin…

BREAKING: Looks like the US launched a mission to steal Iran's uranium, lost a bunch of aircraft in the process and pretended the real mission was to rescue missing pilots to save face. This is so fucking embarrassing 😭😭😭

Callings schools and universities “talent pipelines” for the military is genocidal language

It’s not a war crime because “they’re animals,” is what Israel said to justify genocide in Gaza.

Iran’s legal position regarding the Strait of Hormuz rests on a firm and multi-layered foundation in international law that has been consistently articulated, formally recorded, and never relinquished. First, the applicable treaty framework does not support the imposition of the “transit passage” regime on Iran. The UNCLOS introduced transit passage as a novel legal construct, granting expansive rights—including overflight and submerged navigation—to foreign military assets. However, Iran never ratified UNCLOS and explicitly rejected this regime upon signature. Under general principles of treaty law, a state cannot be bound by provisions of a treaty it has not ratified, particularly where it has expressly objected to those provisions at the time of signature. This position is reinforced by the doctrine of the persistent objector. Even if one assumes, arguendo, that transit passage has evolved into customary international law, Iran has consistently and openly rejected its applicability. As such, it is not bound by that rule. Second, in the absence of a universally binding transit passage regime, the governing law reverts to earlier treaty law and customary principles, most notably the 1958 Geneva Convention on the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone. Both Iran and key user states such as the United States are not parties to UNCLOS, creating a legal vacuum in which reliance on earlier treaty regimes is not only appropriate but necessary. Under this framework, the right of passage through territorial seas is not unlimited. It is conditioned on innocent passage, a well-established rule allowing coastal states to regulate navigation to protect their security and public order. Crucially, innocent passage excludes activities that threaten the coastal state, including military operations, intelligence gathering, and acts connected to hostile conduct. Third, the geographic reality of the Strait of Hormuz strengthens Iran’s legal position. The navigable channels lie entirely within the overlapping territorial seas of Iran and Oman. This is not a high seas corridor but a maritime space subject to coastal sovereignty, albeit qualified by navigational rights. That sovereignty carries with it the right to adopt and enforce laws necessary to safeguard national security. Fourth, even under UNCLOS itself, the regime of non-suspendable innocent passage remains a legally recognized alternative in certain straits. This regime is more restrictive than transit passage and explicitly allows the coastal state to take necessary steps to prevent passage that is not innocent. Iran’s interpretation is therefore not a legal aberration, but a plausible reading grounded in existing law. Fifth, and most critically in the present context, the law of armed conflict and the UN Charter fundamentally alter the legal landscape. Following an unlawful use of force against it, Iran is entitled to invoke its inherent right of self-defense. In such circumstances, the legal characterization of passage cannot be divorced from the realities of hostilities. Vessels and aircraft associated with belligerent states—or facilitating military operations—cannot claim protected navigational rights while simultaneously contributing to acts of aggression. International law has never required a state to permit its own territorial sea to be used as a conduit for hostile operations. On the contrary, the right of self-defense permits proportionate measures to prevent such exploitation. Conditioning passage on neutrality and non-hostility is therefore not only lawful but necessary to uphold the integrity of that right. Finally, the conduct of other states further undermines any claim that Iran’s position is exceptional. The United States itself is not a party to UNCLOS yet selectively invokes its provisions as customary law when convenient.